Defibrillator therapy 1997. Prerequisites--results--prospects

BACKGROUND: The first human cardioverter defibrillator implant was performed in 1980. Since then, significant technological improvement has been performed and today, ICDs with multiple diagnostic and therapeutic features are available. We report on 541 patients who underwent ICD implantation between January 1984 and March 1997. Epicardial ICD implant was performed in 209 patients (39%) and 332 patients (61%) received transvenous ICDs. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 2% (13 patients), significantly more frequent after epicardial (12/209 patients, 6%) than after transvenous implantation (1/332 patients) (p < 0.01). During a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 23 months, 104 patients died (20%), 15 of them (3%) suddenly. 8407 arrhythmic episodes were observed and terminated by antitachycardia pacing in 6655 (79%). Infections occurred in 13 patients (2%), electrode complications in 43 patients (8%) and inappropriate shocks in 84 patients (16%). CONCLUSION: The ICD is an effective approach to treat patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias leading to a low incidence of sudden death. Today, there is a low operative risk and modern ICDs have multiple diagnostic and therapeutic features that allow individual ICD therapy.     

Sudden cardiac death and the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in pediatric patients. The Pediatric Electrophysiology Society

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has emerged as the primary therapeutic option for survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Investigation of the clinical efficacy of these devices has primarily assessed outcome in adults with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this cooperative, international study was to evaluate the impact of ICDs on the pediatric population of SCD survivors, based on an analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of young patients who underwent ICD implantation following an episode of life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or resuscitation from SCD. METHODS AND RESULTS: An initial data base, established by contacting the manufacturers of the various commercially and investigationally available devices, identified 177 patients who were less than 20 years of age at the time of initial implantation of an ICD. With this data base as a reference, detailed responses were subsequently obtained from physicians involved in the care of 125 (71%) of these patients. The patients ranged in age from 1.9 to 19.9 years (mean, 14.5 +/- 4 years) and weighted 9.7-117 kg (mean, 44.6 +/- 14 kg). Of the 125 patients, 76% were survivors of SCD, 10% had drug refractory ventricular tachycardia, and 10% had syncope with heart disease and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The most common types of associated cardiovascular disease were hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies (54%), primary electrical diseases (26%), and congenital heart defects (18%). Ventricular function was abnormal in 46% of the patients. During a mean follow-up of 31 +/- 23 months, at least one ICD discharge occurred in 85 of the 125 (68%) patients. Seventy-three patients (59%) received at least one appropriate ICD discharge, and 25 patients (20%) had one or more spurious or indeterminate discharges. Duration of follow-up > 24 months (p = 0.001) and inducibility of a sustained ventricular arrhythmia (p = 0.05) were correlated with appropriate ICD discharges. There were nine deaths during the study period: five sudden, two due to recurrent ventricular arrhythmias, and two related to congestive heart failure. Abnormal ventricular function (p = 0.002) and prior ICD discharge (p = 0.01) were univariate correlates of patient mortality; by multivariate logistic regression, abnormal ventricular function was the only significant correlate of death (p = 0.005). By actuarial analysis, the estimated overall post-ICD implant survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 95%, 93%, and 85%, respectively. The corresponding sudden death-free survival rates were 97%, 95%, and 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients resuscitated from SCD appear to remain at risk for recurrence of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias. During a mean follow-up of 31 months, the ICD provided an effective therapy for such arrhythmias in the majority of patients in this study. Following ICD implant, impaired ventricular function was the primary factor correlated with mortality. The patterns of ICD discharge observed in young patients and, thus, inferred risk of recurrent life threatening arrhythmias are similar to those of adult survivors of SCD. Thus, the use of ICDs in pediatric patients, with implant selection criteria similar to adults, appears valid.     

Potential benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with and without heart failure

BACKGROUND: Whether patients with heart failure derive a benefit from therapy with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class had an impact on the potential benefit from ICD therapy as assessed from data stored in the memory of ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1996, 603 patients (77% men; 59% with coronary artery disease and 16% with dilated cardiomyopathy; age, 57+/-13 years; ejection fraction, 44+/-18%) were treated with an ICD with extended memory function (storage of electrograms and/or RR intervals from treated episodes) in combination with endocardial lead systems. The stages of heart failure (NYHA functional class I through III) at implantation were correlated with overall mortality and the recurrence of fast ventricular tachyarrhythmias (>240 bpm) during follow-up. The potential benefit of the device was estimated as the difference between overall mortality and the hypothetical death rate had the device not been implanted. The latter was based on the recurrence of fast and, without termination by the devices, presumably fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In the overall group, a significant difference between hypothetical death rate and overall mortality was observed (13.9%, 23.5%, and 26.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively) that suggested a benefit from ICD implantation. In patients in NYHA class I, the estimated benefit, which increased over time, was 15.2%, 29.2%, and 35.6% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. In patients in NYHA class II or III, the estimated benefit increased until the third year (21.8% and 21.9%, respectively) and then remained constant until the fifth year (22.9% and 23.8%, respectively). Even those patients in NYHA class III with a history of decompensated heart failure benefited from ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of stored ECG data suggests that in patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, ICD therapy may lead to a prolongation of life in NYHA classes I through III. The initial benefit is greatest in patients in NYHA class II and class III, but the estimated benefit might persist longest for patients in NYHA class I.     

Comparison of three cardioverter defibrillator implantation techniques: initial results with transvenous pectoral implantation

A total of 121 patients underwent epicardial (n = 32), transvenous abdominal (n = 30), and transvenous pectoral (n = 59) ICD implants. Perioperative complications were defined as those occurring within 30 days after surgery. Hospital costs were calculated with $750 per day as a fixed charge. Duration of surgery was the time between the first skin incision and the last skin suture. Severe perioperative complications that were life-threatening or required surgical intervention occurred in the epicardial (6%) and transvenous (10%) abdominal groups, but not in the pectoral group. Perioperative mortality occurred only in the epicardial abdominal group, predominantly in patients with concomitant surgery (18%), and in 5% of patients without concomitant surgery. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter for transvenous pectoral implantation (58 +/- 15 min, P < 0.05) compared to transvenous abdominal implantation (115 +/- 38 min). Epicardial abdominal ICD implantation had the longest procedure time (154 +/- 31 min). The postimplant hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for pectoral implantation (5 +/- 3 days, P < 0.05) compared to transvenous (13 +/- 5) and epicardial (19 +/- 5) abdominal implantation. Total hospitalization costs significantly decreased in the pectoral implantation group ($4,068 +/- $2,099 for the pectoral group vs $14,887 +/- $4,415 and $9,975 +/- $3,657 for the epicardial and the transvenous abdominal group, respectively, P < 0.05). These initial results demonstrate the advantage of transvenous pectoral ICD implantation in terms of perioperative complications, procedure time, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs.     

Bronchodilator response to salbutamol after chronic dosing with salmeterol or placebo

OBJECTIVES: We report the occurrence of cardiac events during long-term follow-up in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. BACKGROUND: The identification of patients at high risk for sudden death and the prevention of recurrence of sudden death in HCM represents a difficult problem. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the occurrence of cardiac events during follow-up of 13 patients with HCM who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) because of aborted sudden death (n = 10) or sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 3) (group I). Findings were compared with those in 215 patients with an ICD and other structural heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (group II). RESULTS: After a mean (+/-SD) follow-up period of 26+/-18 months, 2 of 13 patients in group I received appropriate shocks. The calculated cumulative incidence of shocks was 21% in group I and 66% in group II after 40 months (p < 0.05). We observed a low incidence of recurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation during follow-up in patients with HCM. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ventricular tachyarrhythmias may not always be the primary mechanism of syncope and sudden death in patients with HCM. The ICD seems to have a less important impact on prognosis in patients with HCM than in patients with other etiologies of aborted sudden death.     

Non-pharmacologic prevention of sudden cardiac death

Non-pharmacologic therapy has revolutionized the management of arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Of particular importance is the introduction of radiofrequent catheter ablation (RFCA) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). RFCA is effective and useful in the treatment and prevention of SCD, especially in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias related to dual or accessory atrioventricular pathways. There are some limitations in using this method in the prevention of SCD in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. RFCA is very successful, particularly in the treatment of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia in patients without structural heart disease. RFCA can be used as a palliative treatment of incessant or frequent VT before and after ICD implantation. Antibradycardia pacing decreases SCD not only by the removal of serious bradyarrhythmias but also by prevention of the occurrence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced by bradyarrhythmia. Antitachycardia pacing is used in the prevention of SCD only as a part of ICD device. Implantation of an antitachycardia pacemaker as an isolated permanent treatment of tachycardias is currently almost not used. This method was replaced by RFCA in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and by ICD in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. ICD is a very perspective non-pharmacologic approach to SCD prevention, particularly as transvenous leads were introduced and device construction was simplified. ICD is indicated especially in patients with spontaneous sustained hemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and when antiarrhythmic drug treatment, RFCA or antitachycardia surgery are ineffective, intolerated, contraindicated or cannot be performed. ICD as the treatment of first choice instead of antiarrhythmic drugs as well as prophylactic ICD implantation in asymptomatic patients at high risk is a subject of discussion. ICD decreases the incidence of SCD significantly. However, the decrease in overall mortality was not verified. Antitachycardia surgery is less frequently used after RFCA, and ICD have been introduced. At present, this therapy is reserved only for the cases of failure of RFCA or the impossibility to use RFCA and ICD. Surgical therapy can be combined also with concommitant surgical correction of associated structural heart disease. Sympathectomy is used in prevention of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD in patients with congenital long Q-T syndrome. Selective left cardiac sympathetic denervation significantly reduces the risk of SCD in these patients but does not remove it completely. Heart transplantation is the last alternative of non-pharmacologic prevention of SCD. It is indicated in cases when all pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches have been exhausted. Heart transplantation is the only effective modality for the improvement of long-term prognosis in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and advanced chronic heart failure.     

Right ventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead implantation through a persistent left superior vena cava

A 60-year-old woman required implantation of an ICD because of a hypotensive ventricular tachycardia refractory to four different antiarrhythmic drugs. Preoperative diagnostics revealed a persistent left SVC as the only major venous return from the upper part of the body to the heart. Under local anesthesia, a tripolar lead was advanced through the left SVC into the right ventricular apex. Following successful testing, an active can ICD device was implanted, which is functioning well during a follow-up period of 9 months.     

Can amiodarone pulmonary toxicity be predicted in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation?

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation is rapidly becoming accepted as primary therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Many patients undergoing ICD implantation are on concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs to decrease shock frequency, slow tachycardia rate, and suppress supraventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic agent that is also frequently used in the treatment of patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Ten to forty percent of patients undergoing ICD implantation will also be taking amiodarone. It has been reported to cause pulmonary toxicity in about 5% of patients per year. Acute amiodarone toxicity presenting as adult respiratory distress syndrome has been reported much less frequently. Although perioperative morbidity due to amiodarone has been described, the risk, predictability, and consequences of acute pulmonary toxicity from amiodarone in patients undergoing ICD implantation have not been previously described. We reviewed the records of 99 consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation at our institution from October 1987 to April 1992. Thirty-nine patients were taking 480 +/- 230 mg of amiodarone (median 400 mg, lower 20th percentile 400 mg, upper 80th percentile 800 mg) for 291 +/- 554 days prior to ICD implantation. Ten patients taking amiodarone developed acute pulmonary toxicity clinically manifesting as diffuse pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography and adult respiratory distress syndrome with hypoxia (arterial pO2 < 60 mmHg) without evidence of pneumonia or elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCW < or = 15 mmHg). Of the 60 patients not taking amiodarone none developed adult respiratory distress syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Predictors of arrhythmic death and cardiac arrest in the ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electromagnetic Monitoring

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if the presenting ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest) predicted the type of arrhythmia recurrence in patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the previously reported Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, there were 486 patients who were randomized to antiarrhythmic drug testing guided by electrophysiological study or by ambulatory ECG monitoring. Use of a defibrillator (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, ICD) without stored electrograms among 81 patients precluded determination of the type of arrhythmia recurrence; thus these patients were censored at the time of ICD implantation. Of the 486 patients, 381 presented with ventricular tachycardia and 105 with cardiac arrest. Over a 6-year follow-up period, 285 of the 486 patients had an arrhythmia recurrence; of these, 97 had an arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest as a first recurrence. In the current analysis, all 129 arrhythmic deaths/cardiac arrests that occurred any time during follow-up were evaluated as end points. CONCLUSIONS: Although univariate analysis suggested that there was an association between the presenting arrhythmia and outcome, multivariate analysis failed to substantiate the predictive value of the presenting arrhythmia. Left ventricular ejection fraction was the single most important predictor of arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest. This information may be an important factor in deciding whether to advise ICD therapy.     

Short-term and long-term outcome of left heart function after cardioverter defibrillator implantation

The usefulness and problems of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were examined in patients with reduced heart function. Of 36 patients who received ICD for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), VT and/or VF was associated with underlying heart disease in 26 patients, and VF without underlying heart disease in 10. Of the former 26 patients, 13 with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 30% were assigned to group A, 13 with LVEF of greater than 30% to group B, and the other 10 with idiopathic VF to group C. Intraoperative death, cardiac death due to heart failure, sudden death, functional status of the ICD, exacerbation of heart failure symptoms and complications were compared between the three groups. There were no intraoperative deaths in any of the groups. During the median follow-up period of 36 +/- 22 months, there was only one sudden death in group A. There were no significant differences between the three groups. There were five cardiac deaths in group A, but none in groups B or C. The cardiac death-free rates 12, 24, and 36 months after implantation in group A were 83%, 60% and 50%, respectively. These values significantly differed from those in groups B and C (p < 0.05). The number of patients who received defibrillation therapy was higher in group A (p < 0.05). Defibrillation therapy was administered earlier in group A than in groups B and C (p < 0.05). The incidence of exacerbation of heart failure after implantation was 69%, 23% and 0% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. In group A, defibrillation therapy was administered in all patients with exacerbation of heart failure. The administration of defibrillation therapy significantly differed from that in patients without exacerbation of heart failure (p < 0.05). Exacerbation of heart failure during the postoperative acute stage occurred in both patients in group A in whom an epicardial lead system was used, but not in the four patients in group B or five in group C (p < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of other complications between the three groups. In group A, patients with reduced heart function, ICD greatly decreased the risk of sudden death. However, heart failure mortality remained high. Therefore, ICD may have limitations for improved prognosis. In group A patients, defibrillation therapy was administered in all patients with exacerbation of heart failure or death due to heart failure. In patients with reduced heart function, treatment for heart failure and prophylaxis of VT and/or VF should be administered.     

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator utilization among device recipients presenting exclusively with syncope or near-syncope

INTRODUCTION: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are occasionally used in presumed high-risk patients with electrocardiographically undocumented syncope, although the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in this population is not well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 33 consecutive patients receiving an ICD (67% nonthoracotomy and 70% tiered therapy) after electrophysiologic testing for unmonitored "syncope" (n = 29) or "near-syncope" (n = 4). Atherosclerotic heart disease was present in 24 (73%); mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 0.39 +/- 0.15; and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) was inducible in 18 (55%). Over a median follow-up of 17 months (range 4 to 61), 12 patients (36%) received > or = 1 appropriate ICD discharge triggered by SMVT (cycle length 230 to 375 msec) in 10 and ventricular flutter or fibrillation in 2--without concomitant antiarrhythmic medication in 8 of 12 cases. Inducible SMVT and LVEF < or = 0.35 were statistically significant, independent predictors of an appropriate ICD discharge (P < 0.02 and P < 0.03, respectively). Estimated 1-year cumulative survival free of appropriate discharge was 34% versus 87%, respectively, in patients with versus without inducible SMVT (P < 0.02), and 18% versus 56%, respectively, in patients with LVEF < or = 0.35 versus LVEF > 0.35 (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: In this highly select, multicenter population of ICD recipients with electrocardiographically undocumented syncope, a substantial incidence of appropriate device discharges was observed, particularly in patients with inducible SMVT and LVEF < or = 0.35. These findings support the notion that, in patients with LV dysfunction and inducible SMVT, ventricular tachyarrhythmias are likely to account for episodes of syncope or near-syncope.     

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death

Patients with known symptomatic VT or VF are at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Various therapeutic choices can be used to reduce the incidence of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death. These include beta-blockers, class I and III antiarrhythmic agents, VT focal ablations, and ICD therapy. The overall incidence of sudden cardiac death in ICD recipients is less than 2% per year, a rate of survival not achieved with any of the available antiarrhythmic agents. VT surgical therapy can produce comparable survival results, but the minimal operative mortality is higher than that with ICD therapy. In patients with noninducible VT/VF or inducible polymorphic VT, and in those refractory to or intolerant of antiarrhythmic agents and poor left ventricular function, ICD therapy may be the only realistic option.     

Characteristics related to STD/HIV in men working in Mexico City bars where female prostitution takes place

Today, we are facing an exponential increase in implantation of cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). The intraoperative and follow-up results are reported in 105 patients (pts) with ventricular tachyarrythmias who underwent ICD implantation in the catheterization laboratory. Fifty-seven pts (54%) hat their first ICD implant (G 1), whereas 46 pts (44%) underwent pulse generator replacement or electrode revision (2 pts, 2%) (G 2). In all pts, ICD implant or pulse generator replacement was performed under general anesthesia from the beginning. In 57/58 pts (98%) in G 1, ICD implantation was possible with a mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) of 13 +/- 8 joules. One patient hat a DFT of > 25 joules and ICD implantation was not achieved. This patient underwent epicardial lead implantation 1 day later. One patient in G 1 had a vessel rupture (v. subclavia) intraoperatively. During a mean follow-up of 5 +/- 2 (< 1-13) months, three pts (3%) died from congestive heart failure, 2, 4 and 6 months after device implantation. An infection occurred in 1 patient in G 2, 3 months after generator replacement. Our data show that in the majority of patients ICD implantation in the cath-lab is possible, safe, and the complication rate is low. Therefore, ICD implantation in the cath-lab can generally be recommended.     

Late complications in patients with pectoral defibrillator implants with transvenous defibrillator lead systems: high incidence of insulation breakdown

As the majority of ICDs with transvenous leads are now implanted in the pectoral region, complications associated with the technique are being identified. To determine the incidence of lead complications in patients with transvenous defibrillator leads and ICDs implanted in the pectoral region, 132 unselected consecutive patients with transvenous defibrillator leads had ICDs implanted in the pectoral region. Three lead systems were used: (1) lead system 1 (45 patients) consisted of a transvenous pacing sensing lead and a superior vena cava coil with a submuscular patch used for defibrillation; (2) lead system 2 (36 patients) utilized a CPI Endotak lead system; and (3) lead system 3 (51 patients) utilized a Medtronic Transvene lead system. Patients were followed for 3-54 months (cumulative 2,269, mean 18 months). The average duration of follow-up with the three systems was 32, 12 and 11 months, respectively. At 30 months follow-up, all three lead systems had a low incidence of complications. However, there was a 13% overall incidence (45% actuarial incidence) of erosion of the insulation of the pacing sensing lead of system 1 at 50 months of follow-up. All lead complications were seen in patients with ICDs whose weights were > 195 g and volumes > 115 cc. The erosion was probably a consequence of the pressure by the large ICD against the lead in the pectoral pocket. Follow-up with lead systems 2 and 3 is relatively short (average 12 months) but no lead erosions were seen. Pectoral implantation of ICDs with long transvenous leads and large generators is associated with a moderate risk of late complications in the form of insulation breaks caused by pressure of the generator against the leads. The use of less redundant leads coupled with smaller ICDs will probably eliminate this complication.     

Complications associated with pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: comparison of subcutaneous and submuscular approaches. Worldwide Jewel Investigators

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare complications in a large cohort of patients undergoing pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with a subcutaneous or submuscular approach. BACKGROUND: Pectoral placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) pulse generators is now routine because of downsizing of these devices. subcutaneous implantation has been advocated by some because it is a simple surgical procedure comparable to pacemaker insertion. Others have favored submuscular insertion to avoid wound complications. These surgical approaches have not been compared previously. METHODS: The subjects for this study were 1,000 consecutive patients receiving a Medtronic Jewel ICD at 93 centers worldwide. Cumulative follow-up for all patients was 633.7 patient-years, with 64.9% of patients followed up for > or = 6 months. The complications evaluated were erosion, pocket hematoma, seroma, wound infection, dehiscence, device migration, lead fracture and dislodgment. RESULTS: Subcutaneous implantation was performed in 604 patients and submuscular implantation in the remaining 396. The median procedural times were shorter for subcutaneous implantation (p = 0.014). In addition, the cumulative percentage of patients free from erosion was greater for subcutaneous implantations (p = 0.03, 100% vs. 99.1% at 6 months). However, lead dislodgment was more common with subcutaneous implantations (p = 0.019, 2.3% vs. 0.5% at 6 months) and occurred primarily during the first month postoperatively. Overall, there were no significant differences in cumulative freedom from complications between groups (4.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.1836). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous pectoral implantation of this ICD can be performed safely and has a low complication rate. This approach requires a simple surgical procedure and, compared with the submuscular approach, is associated with shorter procedure times and comparable overall complication rates. However, early follow-up is important in view of the increased lead dislodgment rate.     

Clinical significance of sleep apnea disorders after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with cardiac disease and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia

The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of sleep related breathing disorders (SRBD) in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and to evaluate prospectively the possible influence of SRBD on arrhythmia recurrence and circadian arrhythmia variation as well as on cardiac mortality during long-term follow-up. Forty consecutive ICD recipients with cardiac disease and a documented history of spontaneous, life-threatening, ventricular tachyarrhythmias underwent full-night polysomnography and were followed for 2 years. In 16 of 40 patients (40%), SRBD were diagnosed (Apnea/Hypopnea Index (AHI) > 10); in 9 of these 16 patients (56%) central sleep apneas (CSA) occurred (in 8 of these 9 patients in combination with Cheyne-Stokes respiration). Seven of the 16 patients with SRBD (44%) revealed obstructive sleep apneas (OSA). AHI was 32 +/- 15 (12-60) in patients with CSA and 32 +/- 27 (11-86) in patients with OSA. Patients with and without SRBD were comparable concerning left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA classification, cardiac disease, ICD indication, and concomitant medication. ICD registered ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 10 of 24 patients (42%) without SRBD, in 4 of 9 patients (44%) with CSA, and in 3 of 7 patients (44%) with OSA. The numbers and circadian variation of episodes registered during follow-up in patients without SRBD, with OSA or CSA were comparable (14 +/- 25, median 4 vs 15 +/- 15, median 7 vs 4 +/- 5, median 2.5). The 2-year cardiac mortality was highest in patients with CSA (4/9 (44%) vs. 0/7 patients (0%) with OSA vs 3/24 patients (12.5%) without SRBD. Thus, the prevalence of SRBD in patients with chronic heart failure and a history of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias is high (40%) and the occurrence of CSA seems to be predictive for cardiac mortality in these patients. An influence of moderate SRBD on arrhythmia recurrence and circadian variation of spontaneous sustained tachyarrhythmic events could not be demonstrated.     

Hepatoblastoma in a dog

BACKGROUND: In neonates and infants epicardial stimulation may be preferred to endocardial stimulation because of growth-associated lead problems and the risk of vascular complications associated with transvenous electrodes. This study analyzes the feasibility of atrioventricular implantation of a new epicardial lead using the video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) technique in an animal model. METHODS: Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads were implanted in seven young white pigs. In five animals bipolar atrial and ventricular pacing leads (n = 10) were inserted and fixed by the VATS technique, while two animals served as controls and underwent implantation through anterolateral thoracotomy. Surgical feasibility, pacing, and sensing thresholds of the leads as well as hemodynamic parameters during pacing were studied. Histological changes beneath the electrodes were evaluated 1 week after the implantation. RESULTS: All animals survived the pacemaker lead implantation. One animal which underwent thoracotomy died because of irreversible ventricular fibrillation induced by rapid ventricular pacing. One animal in the VATS group exhibited intraoperative herniation of the heart through the pericardial window. All animals with left-sided VATS implantations demonstrated good individual pacing and sensing threshold values. The mean cardiac output was 1.6 times higher during AAI-mode pacing as compared to VVI-mode pacing at a heart rate of 140/min. One animal died postoperatively due to respiratory failure. No displacements of the pacemaker leads were observed in the survivors. CONCLUSION: While VATS-guided implantation of epicardial, atrial, and ventricular leads is feasible, technical improvements of the system are mandatory for safe clinical application.     

Cost effectiveness of inpatient initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias

This study assessed the cost effectiveness of inpatient antiarrhythmic therapy initiation for supraventricular tachycardias using a metaanalysis of proarrhythmic risk and a decision analysis that compared inpatient to outpatient therapy initiation. A MEDLINE search of trials of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias was performed, and episodes of cardiac arrest, sudden or unexplained death, syncope, and sustained or unstable ventricular arrhythmias were recorded. A weighted average event rate, by sample size, was calculated and applied to a clinical decision model of therapy initiation in which patients were either hospitalized for 72 hours or treated as outpatients. Fifty-seven drug trials involving 2,822 patients met study criteria. Based on a 72-hour weighted average event rate of 0.63% (95% confidence interval, 0.2% to 1.2%), inpatient therapy initiation cost $19,231 per year of life saved for a 60-year-old patient with a normal life expectancy. Hospitalization remained cost effective when event rates and life expectancies were varied to model hypothetical clinical scenarios. For example, cost-effectiveness ratios for a 40-year-old without structural heart disease and a 60-year-old with structural heart disease were $37,510 and $33,310, respectively, per year of life saved. Thus, a 72-hour hospitalization for antiarrhythmic therapy initiation is cost effective for most patients with supraventricular tachycardias.     

Favorable results of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients older than 70 years

BACKGROUND: The clinical results of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in the elderly have received limited documentation. As the longevity of the U.S. population has increased, so has the need for ICD implantation in the elderly. We evaluated the efficacy and outcome of ICD implantation in elderly patients (>70 years) compared with younger patients. METHODS: The case records of all consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation at our institution between 1986 and 1994 were reviewed. Of a total of 238 patients, 78 patients were 70 years of age or older and 160 patients were younger than 70 years of age. RESULTS: The mean age of the younger group was 58 years and that of the elderly group was 74 years. There were no statistical differences in the presence of coronary artery disease, left ventricular systolic function, the inducibility of arrhythmias, or the history of sudden cardiac death. The hospital morbidity rate was similar in both groups (6.9% in the younger group and 7.7% in the elderly group; p = not significant). The operative mortality rate was 1.9% for the younger group and 1.3% for the elderly group (p = not significant). At a mean follow-up of 33 +/- 26 months, Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated similar survival rates, with 93%, 82%, and 65% of the patients alive at 1, 3, and 6 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was equally effective in the treatment of patients older than 70 years as in younger patients. No differences in theoretic survival or morbidity were observed.