Effect of experimental primers on hydrolytic stability of resin zirconia bonding

This study assessed the effect of experimental silane primers and two adhesive resin cements on resin zirconia adhesion strength. The surfaces of cut Y-TZP zirconia blocks (Lava? Frame), 16 mm × 16 mm × 4.5 mm, were pretreated twice. First, they were grit-blasted with Korox? alumina powder (110 μm) followed by silica-coating with Rocatec? Soft. Next, the blocks were randomly assigned into eighteen sub-groups (n = 6, N = 108) according to three primers (control ESPE Sil?, 1.0 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, and 1.0 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane + 0.5 vol.-% bis-12-(triethoxysilyl)ethane), two in dentistry used resin cement products (Multilink? Speed, and Multilink? N), and three storage conditions (24 h dry, 1 month immersed in distilled water, and 6 months immersed in distilled water at room temperature) used. Onto each pretreated zirconia block, four cylindrical resin composite cement stubs were prepared and light-cured. The surface roughness, contact angle, and adhesion (shear bond) strength (SBS) were measured, and statistically analyzed (ANOVA, the Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in surface roughness values of different primer-treated zirconia groups. After six months of water aging, the shear bond strength of the groups that employed 1.0 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (9.0 MPa ± 0.8 MPa), and the blend of 1 vol.-% 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane + 0.5 vol.-% bis-12-(triethoxysilyl)ethane (8.9 MPa ± 2.0 MPa) with Multilink? Speed resin composite cement were statistically insignificantly higher compared to using ESPE Sil? (8.7 MPa ± 1.8 MPa). The experimental primers may have potential to be used for long-term resin zirconia adhesion.     

Effect of different surface shapes formed by femtosecond laser on zirconia-resin cement shear bond strength

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface shapes formed by femtosecond (FS) laser on zirconia (Y-TZP)-resin cement shear bond strength (SBS). Background data: All ceramic restoration is used as an alternative to metal-ceramic restorations, due to its better aesthetics, strength, and toughness properties. However, bond strength of restoration to tooth and other materials is effective to long term success of the restoration, and to achieve it surface treatment is required on ceramic surface. Materials and methods: Forty square-shaped zirconia samples were prepared and assigned to four groups of 10. The details of the groups are as follows: Group A, square-shaped recessed surface; Group B, square-shaped projection surface; Group C, circular-shaped recessed surface; Group D, circular-shaped projection surface. The SBSs values were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD multiple comparisons tests. Results: The one-way ANOVA results on SBSs of the zirconia material bonded with resin cement revealed significant differences among the groups (p < 0.05). The Tukey HSD test results revealed that Group B and D had significantly higher SBS values than other groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between each other (p > 0.05). Additionally, Group A and C had significantly lower values than other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Different surface shapes formed by FS laser provided a significant increase in SBSs. The SBS values of projection surfaces of circular and square-shapes are greater than that of recessed surfaces of circular and square-shapes.     

Effect of different air-abrasion protocols on topography,surface wettability and adhesion of MDP monomer-based resin cement to zirconia

This study evaluated the effect of air-abrasion protocols on the topography, surface wettability and adhesion of resin cement to zirconia. Ceramic specimens (N?=?49; n?=?7) (15?mm × 2?mm) were randomly allocated to seven groups to be treated with: (1) Air-abrasion with 45?μm Al₂O₃ (A45), (2) 80?μm Al₂O₃ (A80), (3) 30?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (CoJet) (C30), (4) 30?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec Soft) (R30), (5) 110?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec Plus) (R110); (6) R110R30 (Rocatec) (R110R30) and (7) control, no conditioning (NC). Air-abrasion was performed using a chairside air-abrasion device (2.5?bar, 10?mm, 90?s). Contact angle measurements were performed using goniometry (n?=?5). MDP-based dual resin cement (Panavia F2.0) was bonded on four locations after air-abrasion protocols (n?=?20 per group). Half of the specimens were tested after 24?h and the other half after thermal cycling (×3000, 5–55?°C). Data were analyzed using 1-, 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05). Significantly lower contact angle values were observed for groups C30 (62.6?±?0.91), R30 (61.91?±?1.05) and R110R30 (61.54?±?1.02) compared to those of other groups (65.5?±?0.9–110.61?±?0.9) (p?<?0.05). In dry conditions, surface conditioning methods tested did not show significant effect on bond strength (MPa) (10.57?±?1.42–16.86?±?2.54) (p?=?0.238). After thermocycling, bond strength results decreased significantly (p?<?0.05) (12.6–51.2%). R110 (7.18?±?1.34) and A80 (4.92?±?1.53) showed significantly higher bond strength compared to other groups (2.13?±?0.73–4.16?±?1.34) (p?<?0.05). The best wettability and adhesion results with MDP-based resin cement to zirconia was achieved with A80 and R110 air-abrasion.     

Effect of mechanical and air-particle cleansing protocols of provisional cement on immediate dentin sealing layer and subsequent adhesion of resin composite cement

Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) could avoid contamination of dentin from impression material and provisional cement but prior to final cementation of indirect restorations, removal of the provisional cement may damage the IDS. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of mechanical and air-particle cleansing protocols of provisional cement on IDS layer and subsequent adhesion of resin composite cement. The cuspal dentin surfaces of human third molars (N = 21, n_quadrant = 84) were exposed by a low-speed diamond saw under water cooling and conditioned with an adhesive system based on the three-step etch and rinse technique (OptiBond FL). Provisional cement (Freegenol) was applied on each specimen. They were then randomly divided into six subgroups where the provisional cement was removed either by (1) air-borne particle abrasion with 50-μm Al₂O₃ particles at 2 bar (AL2), (2) air-borne particle abrasion with 50-μm Al₂O₃ particles at 3.5 bar (AL3.5), (3) air-borne particle abrasion with 30-μm SiO₂ particles at 2 bar (SL2), (4) air-borne particle abrasion with 30-μm SiO₂ particles at 3.5 bar (SL3.5), (5) prophylaxy paste (Cleanic) (PP) or (6) pumice-water slurry (PW) at 1500 rpm for 15 s. The dentin surface on each tooth was assigned to four quadrants and each quadrant received the cleansing methods in a clockwise sequence. The non-contaminated and non-cleansed teeth acted as the control (C). Two separate teeth, contaminated and cleansed according to six cleansing protocols, were allocated for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis (×2000). The dentin surfaces in each quadrant received resin composite luting cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) incrementally in a polyethylene mould (diameter: 1 mm²; height: 4 mm) and photopolymerized. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C until the testing procedures and then shear force was applied to the adhesive interface until failure occurred in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Microshear bond (μSBS) was calculated by dividing the maximum load (N) by the bonding surface area of the resin cement. Failure types were analysed using optical microscope and SEM. Data (MPa) were analysed using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Two-parameter Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (₀), values were calculated. Mean μSBS results (MPa) showed a significant difference between the experimental groups (p = 0.011) and were in a descending order as follows: C (8 ± 2.3)^a < AL2 (6.7 ± 2.4)^b < PP (6.9 ± 2)^b < PW (6.5 ± 2.1)^b < AL3.5 (5.8 ± 1.1)^b < SL2 (5.3 ± 1)^b < SL3.5 (5.2 ± 1)^b. Failure types were predominantly mixed failure type between the dentin and the adhesive resin which is a combination of adhesive and cohesive failures in the adhesive resin. Cohesive failure in the dentin was not observed in any of the groups. Weibull distribution presented lower shape (₀) for C (3.9), AL2 (3.2), PP (3.5) and PW (3.6). SEM analysis showed rough surfaces especially in the air-abraded groups whereas mechanical cleansing methods presented smoother surfaces and partially covered by particle remnants all of which occluded the dentin tubuli.     

Bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia after different surface treatments

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the bond strength of veneering feldspathic porcelain to zirconia. Methods: Fifty yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline specimens were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to various surface treatments. The groups were as follows: Group 1: control group with liner application and no further surface treatment; Group 2: air-particle abrasion with 110 μm of alumina (Al₂O₃) particles; Group 3: grinding with a diamond disk; Group 4: Nd:YAG laser irradiation (the laser and the energy parameters were 10 Hz, and 2 W and 200 mJ, and the pulse duration (short pulse) range was up to 180 μs); Group 5: selective infiltration etching (SIE). After surface treatments, a liner application was performed for all surfaces according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Veneering porcelain was applied on zirconia surfaces using a Teflon mold. Shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. The fractured surface morphologies were examined with scanning electron microscopy. The data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests (α = .05). Results: The Megapascal values of the bonding groups were as follows: G1 = 8.62 ± 1.12, G2 = 13.87 ± 5.08, G3 = 12.31 ± 3.35, G4 = 17.32 ± 6.16, and G5 = 16.17 ± 4.55. Statistically significant differences were observed between the control group and the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 4 had the highest bond strength while G1 showed the lowest bond strength. No significant differences were found between the Nd:YAG, grinding, sandblasting, and SIE groups. Conclusion: Surface treatments had different effects on the shear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to zirconia. Surface treatment techniques used in this study can be used on zirconia specimens prior to liner application to obtain an acceptable bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia. The effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation and SIE techniques on bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia should be evaluated with further studies.     

Effects of different particle deposition parameters on adhesion of resin cement to zirconium dioxide and phase transformation

This study evaluated the effect of air-abrasion parameters such as particle size, distance, and time on adhesion of resin cement to zirconium dioxide (Y-TZP) and t→m phase transformation. Y-TZP blocks (N = 80) (In-Ceram YZ, Vita) (4 mm^3?×?4 mm^3?×?3 mm³) were assigned into eight groups (n = 10): air-abrasion with 30 μm (CoJet Sand, S30) and 110 μm (Rocatec-Plus, S110) silica-coated alumina particles, applied for either for 10–20 s (T = time), from a distance of 10–20 mm (D = distance), composing the following groups: S₃₀T₁₀D₁₀, S₃₀T₁₀D₂₀, S₃₀T₂₀D₁₀, S₃₀T₂₀D₂₀, S₁₁₀T₁₀D₁₀, S₁₁₀T₁₀D₂₀, S₁₁₀T₂₀D₁₀, and S₁₁₀T₂₀D₂₀. Resin composite (RelyX ARC) was bonded to Y-TZP blocks in polyethylene molds. The specimens were aged (10,000 thermal cycles and water storage for 90 days) prior to shear bond test. Failure types were analyzed under stereomicroscope and SEM, and phase transformation was calculated. Data (MPa) were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Air-abrasion with 110 μm silica particles (10.96) presented significantly higher bond strength (p = 0.0149) compared to 30 μm (8.96). Time (p = 0.403) and distance (p = 0.179) parameters did not affect the results significantly. Air-abrasion with 110 μm particles (12.3) promoted higher bond strength than that of 30 μm (6.4) when applied for 10 s from a distance of 10 mm (Tukey’s). Failure types were predominantly adhesive. Phase transformation ranged between 30.3 and 35.9% for 30 μm particles and 23.8–43.7% for 110 μm particles. While the size of silica-coated alumina particles were more relevant parameter for resin cement adhesion to Y-TZP, time (up to 20 s) and distance (up to 20 mm) appear to be less pertinent.     

Influence of zirconia surface treatments on resin cement bonding and phase transformation

It evaluated the effects of different zirconia surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to Y-TZP (yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia) ceramics, as well as their phase-transformations. 75 blocks (5 mm × 5 mm × 4 mm) of Y-TZP were assigned into five groups (n = 15): (tribochemical silica coating - TBS) zirconia surface was abraded by silica coated alumina particles followed by silanization; (GLZ₁) zirconia surface received the application of a thin layer of low-fusing porcelain glaze, followed by hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching for 1 min; (GLZ₅) glaze application + HF etching by 5 min; (GLZ₁₀) glaze application + HF etching by 10 min; (GLZ₁₅) glaze application + HF etching by 15 min. After etching, all the specimens were washed, dried and silanized. Cylinders of composites (diameter: 3.25 mm; height: 3 mm) were cemented to the Y-TZP blocks using a resin cement. All the specimens were subjected to aging (10,000 thermal cycles and 90 days storage), tested under shear conditions, and finally analyzed by a stereomicroscope (failure analysis). In addition, we also performed topographical and phase transformation analyses of the treated zirconia surfaces. The TBS group presented the highest bond strength value (23.34 MPa). The glazed groups presented low bond values and high prevalences of pretest failures. X-ray diffraction analysis showed a phase transformation for the TBS group (13.14%); however, there was no clear phase change observed for the GLZ groups. From our results, we concluded that tribochemical silica coating is the main Y-TZP surface conditioning for resin bond improvements.     

Adhesion to zirconia as a function of primers/silane coupling agents,luting cement types,aging and test methods

This study evaluated the adhesion of resin cements to zirconia with different primers/silane coupling agents using two test methods with and without aging. Zirconia discs (Cercon) (N = 900, n = 15 per group) were ground finished to 2000 grit silicone carbide and randomly divided into seven groups: (a) C: No treatment (Control), (b) SG: Signum, (c) CL: Clearfil Ceramic Primer, (d) AP: Alloy Primer, (e) Monobond Plus, (f) ES-R: ESPE-Sil after Rocatec and (g) ES-C: ESPE-Sil after CoJet. Methacrylate (Variolink II-VL) and MDP based (Panavia F2.0-PN) dual-polymerized and self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem-RX) were adhered and polymerized accordingly. The specimens were further randomly divided into two groups to be tested after (a) 24-h dry storage at 37 °C and (b) thermocycling (×5000, 5–55 °C). Macroshear (MSB) and macrotensile bond tests (MTB) were conducted in an universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min) and failure types were analyzed after debonding. Data were analyzed using Univariate analysis and Tukey’s tests (α = 0.05). Two-parameter Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) were calculated. While primer/silane (p < 0.001), cement type (p < 0.001) and aging (p < 0.001) significantly affected the bond results, test method did not show significant difference (p = 0.237). In MSB test, Weilbul moduli were more favorable for MP-VL (4.2) and AP-PN (6) combinations and after aging for MP-VL (4.2) and AP-PN (5.66). In MTB test, after aging, Weilbul moduli were more favorable for AP-PN (5.41). Bond strength results mostly decreased with SG (24–92%) after aging. Cohesive failures in the cement were more frequent with PN (252) compared to VL (83).     

Could readily silanized silica particles substitute silica coating and silanization in conditioning zirconium dioxide for resin adhesion?

This study investigated the effect of particle types with different morphology and surface properties on the wettability and adhesion of resin cement to zirconia. Zirconia specimens (5 × 5 × 1 mm³) were wet polished. Specimens were randomly assigned to one of the following protocols (N = 36, n = 9 per group): Group CON: Control, no surface conditioning; Group AL: Chairside air-abrasion with aluminium trioxide (50 μm Al₂O₃) + silane; Group SIL: Chairside air-abrasion with alumina particles coated with silica (SIL) (30 μm SiO2, SilJet) + air-drying + silane; Group 4: Chairside air-abrasion with readily silanized silica particles (SILP) (30 μm SiO_2, SilJet Plus). Adhesive resin was applied and resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar) was bonded using polyethylene moulds and photo-polymerized and aged (thermocycling, 6.000 cycles, 5–55 °C). Shear bond test was performed using Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Pretest failures were considered 0 MPa. Contact angle measurements were performed (n = 2/group, sessile drop with water). Data (MPa) were analyzed (ANOVA, Tukey’s (α = 0.05). Two-parameter Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0), values were calculated. Contact angle measurements were in descending order as follows: SIL (74°)^c < CON (60°)^c < AL (51°)^b < SILP (40°)^a. Bond strength (MPa) with SIL (17.2 ± 4)^a and SILP (17.3 ± 1.9)^a demonstrated no significant difference (p > 0.05), being higher than AL (8.4 ± 1.5)^b and CON (0)^c (p < 0.05). Failure types were exclusively adhesive in all groups. Weibull distribution presented the highest shape (0) for SILP (10.8). SILP presented better wettability than AL. SILP provided similar bond strength to SIL. Readily silanized silica particles may substitute for conventional silica coating and silanization.     

Effect of different ceramic primers on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to zirconia

Purpose: This study evaluated and compared the effect of different ceramic primers on the shear bond strength of RMGIC to zirconia with and without air-particle abrasion. Material and Methods: 120 zirconia square specimens (5 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm) were fabricated. Half of the specimens were air-particle abraded (A) and the other half were left untreated (NA). Both groups were further divided into six subgroups (n = 10). Composite cylinders (2.9 mm × 3.0 mm) were fabricated and bonded to the zirconia samples with RMGIC (RelyX Plus) after different priming methods: no ceramic primer (group NS); Z-Prime (group ZP); Clearfil ceramic primer (group CP); cleaned with Ivoclean then Monobond plus (IV/MS); Monobond plus (group MS); and Rely X ceramic primer (group RX). Specimens were rinsed, stored in distilled water, and thermocycled (TC) for 10,000 cycles between 5 and 60 °C with a dwell time of 15s. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and the Tukey–Kramer method test (a = .05). Results: air-particle abrasion significantly affected bond strength of RMGIC to zirconia regardless of the primer used (p < 0.001 for all primers and the control). After TC, A-ZP (11.1 ± 0.6 MPa), A-CP (11.9 ± 0.6 MPa), and A-MS (11.9 ± 0.5 MPa) revealed the highest shear bond strength values, while NA-NS (2.9 ± 0.3 MPa) and NA-RX (4.7 ± 0.5 MPa) had the lowest. Failure modes were primarily adhesive. Conclusion: air-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide and application of MDP-based ceramic primers provide the highest bond strength of RMGIC to zirconia.     

Effects of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to zirconia

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cements to zirconia. Material and methods: Sintered zirconia specimens (n = 192) were divided into four different surface treatment groups: control (no treatment); airborne-particle abrasion; glaze layer and hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, and hot etching solution application. Then, each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 12), and three different resin cements were applied to the zirconia surfaces. The shear bond strength value of each specimen was measured after 5000 thermo cycles. The failure types were examined with a stereomicroscope and the effects of the surface treatments were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: The surface treatment and resin cement type significantly affected the bond strength results (p < 0.05). For all resin cements, the airborne-particle abrasion treatment increased the shear bond strength values (p < 0.05). The glaze layer & HF application increased shear bond strength values for all groups, except the Single Bond Universal-RelyX Unicem Aplicap group (p < 0.05). The surface roughness values of airborne-particle abraded specimens were similar to comparable values for specimens from the control group and the hot etching solution group (p > 0.05). The glaze layer & HF application group produced the highest surface roughness values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study recommend using the appropriate combination of surface treatment and adhesive/silane coupling agent to achieve durable zirconia-resin bonding.     

Effect of cyclic loading and resin cement type used for luting fiber posts on bond strength at different root levels of crown-restored human teeth

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFP) at different root levels when luted with conventional or self-adhesive cements in crown-restored human premolars subjected, or not, to cyclic mechanical loading.

Materials and Methods: Sixty lower premolar roots were endodontically treated and prepared for a GFP system. Half of the roots (n = 30) had their posts cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement, while the remaining roots followed a three-step conditioning method: acid etch, bonding agent, and a conventional resin cement. Metal crowns were luted onto the post-core preparations and the specimens were embedded to simulate the periodontium. Half of the specimens from each group (n = 15) were submitted to cyclic loading simulations (130 N; 2.0 Hz) and then sections were obtained from each root for the pushout BS test.

Results: Independently of the cyclic loading and the root level tested, the conventional resin cement provided significantly higher values of BS (p = 0.002). For either cement or either root level, cyclic loading caused a significant decrease in BS values (p = 0.023). The Tukey test indicated that, regardless of the resin cement used or the cyclic loading, BS was highest at the middle and cervical thirds of the root (p = 0.026), and their values did not differ between themselves.

Conclusions: When used for luting GFP, self-adhesive resin cement resulted in lower pushout BS than the conventional counterpart, with cyclic loading causing a decrease in BS of the GFP to dentin for both resin cements.     

Adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite using different surface conditioning methods

This study evaluated the adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite (IRC) using different surface conditioning methods. Cylindrical IRC specimens (N = 192) were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods (n = 8 per group): (a) Control group, (b) Hydrofluoric acid, (c) Tribochemical silica-coating, and (d) 50 μm Al₂O₃ air-abrasion. Specimen surfaces were finished using silicon carbide papers up to 600 grit under water irrigation, rinsed and dried. Direct composite blocks were bonded to IRC specimens using three conventional resin cements (Multilink, Panavia F2.0, and Resicem) and three self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX U100, Gcem, Speed Cem). Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Failure types were categorized as mixed, adhesive and cohesive. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Two-parameter Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) were calculated. The bond strength results (MPa) were significantly affected by the surface conditioning method (p < 0.0001) and cement type (p < 0.001). For Panavia F2.0, Resicem, air-abrasion with 50 μm Al₂O₃ significantly increased the results (22.6 ± 6.5, 26.2 ± 6.5, respectively) compared to other conditioning methods (13.6 ± 1.4–21.9 ± 3.1) but for Multilink, hydrofluoric acid etching (20.5 ± 3.5) showed significantly higher results (p < 0.01). For the self-adhesive resin cements, air-abrasion with 50 μm Al₂O₃ significantly increased the results compared to other conditioning methods, except for RelyX U100 (p < 0.05). After air-abrasion with Al₂O₃, Gcem, (11.64), RelyX U100 (9.05), and SpeedCem (8.29) presented higher Weilbul moduli. Exclusively cohesive failure in the IRC was observed with RelyX U100 and Speedcem after Al₂O₃ air-abrasion.     

Effects of different surface treatments of zirconia on the bond strength of self-adhesive resinous cement

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different zirconia surface treatments on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resinous cements (SARC).

Methods: Two hundred and eight cylindrical specimens were obtained from Y-TZP zirconia (half with diameter 3.2 mm and half with 4.8 mm). After sintering and polishing, specimens were divided into four groups (n = 26), according to surface treatment: Control (no treatment); Sandblasting (Al₂O₃ particles); Rocatec (Al₂O₃ particles, tribochemical silica coating and silane application); Laser (Nd: YAG laser: 20 Hz, 100 mJ, 0.2 J/cm²). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated after the surface treatments, and the groups were divided into two subgroups (n = 13), according to the SARC tested: RelyX U200 and Bifix SE. The 2.2-mm cylinders were bonded to 4.8-mm cylinders and stressed until failure under shear using a universal testing machine. Bond strength and Ra were analyzed using ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).

Results: Surface treatment was significant (p < 0.0001), but cement type (p = 0.73) was not. Related to roughness, significant differences were found for the treatment type (p < 0.0001), with laser being the treatment with higher Ra values.

Conclusions: Nd:YAG laser produced a rougher surface and a higher bond strength compared with sandblasting, silicatization, and control groups.     

Shear bond strengths of six different porcelain laminate veneer materials cemented to enamel with two different MDP-containing resin cements

Purpose: To compare the shear bond strengths of six different porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials cemented to enamel with two different MDP-containing resin cements. Materials and methods: Totally 120 disc specimens were fabricated with In-Ceram alumina (ICA), Turkom-Cera^TM (TCR), IPS Empress (IPS), IPS Empress-II (IPS2), Finesse (FNS), and Ceramco-3 (CER) ceramic systems (n = 20). Sixty specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Clearfil SA), and 60 specimens were cemented with self-etch resin cement (Panavia F2.0) to enamel. Thus, 120 PLV–enamel specimens were assigned to 12 experimental groups (ICA/Pv, ICA/Cf, TCR/Pv, TCR/Cf, IPS/Pv, IPS/Cf, IPS2/Pv, IPS2/Cf, CER/Pv, CER/Cf). Shear force was applied on PLV–enamel interfaces until failure. Obtained data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and t-tests. Results: Obtained shear bond strength values (SBSV) ranged as follows, respectively; TCR/Cf (7.70 MPa), FNS/Cf (7.57 MPa), TCR/Pv (6.91 MPa), ICA/Pv (5.05 MPa), CER/Pv (4.75 MPa), IPS2/Cf (4.66 MPa), FNS/Pv (4.43 MPa), IPS2/Pv (3.97 MPa), CER/Cf (3.82 MPa), IPS/Pv (3.62 MPa), ICA/Cf (3.59 MPa), IPS/Cf (3.11 MPa). Highest SBSV were obtained in TCR groups (7.70 MPa for TCR/Cf and 6.91 MPa for TCR/Pv) and lowest SBSV were obtained in IPS groups (3.11 MPa for IPS/Cf and 3.62 MPa for IPS/Pv) in both resin cements. No significant bond strength difference was found between two resin cements. Conclusions: TCR groups showed highest SBSV; lowest SBSV were obtained with both IPS PLVs. The resin cement type did not significantly affect the bond strength value of a ceramic type, except for the Finesse system.     

Bonding ability of self-adhesive resin-cements after dentin biomodification with hyaluronic acid

Purpose: The present study evaluated the influence of the hyaluronic acid (HA) on the bonding ability of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin regarding the bond strength. Eighty bovine incisors were ground flat to obtain a 2-mm thick slices which received conical preparations. The specimens were randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 15) according to the dentin pretreatment (1 – control: untreated dentin; 2 – application of HA) and the evaluation time (1 – control: immediate evaluation; 2 – hydrolytic degradation: 6 months of storage in water at 37 °C). Preparations received the application of a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200 or MaxCem Elite). Push-out bond strength test was conducted (0.5 mm/min). The bond strength data was submitted to two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). For U200, no significance was observed when comparing the immediate (24 h) and 6 months means for the control groups (unexposed specimens). Previous application of HA to dentin significantly reduced the bond strength of U200 to dentin in both evaluation times (p < 0.05). HA had no significant influence on the push-out bond strength means for the cement MAX in both evaluation times (p > 0.05). The type 1 failure mode (adhesive mode) occurred in 100% of the specimens, irrespective of the dentin treatment or evaluation times. Pretreatment of dentin with HA produces a material-dependent influence on the push-out bond strength. The bonding ability of RelyX U200 is negatively influenced by the pretreatment of dentin with HA, whereas the biomodification of dentin with this bioactive agent causes no impact for the cement MaxCem Elite.     

Analysis of structural,morphological alterations,wettability characteristics and adhesion to enamel after various surface conditioning methods

Minimal invasive dental reconstructions and orthodontic appliances are bonded to enamel without removing the enamel with rotating instruments but the top layer of enamel may be partially aprismatic and impair adhesion. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of mechanical surface conditioning methods for removing enamel on its structural, morphological alterations, wettability characteristics, and adhesion of resin-based cement to the conditioned surfaces. Maxillary human incisors (N = 40, n_quadrant = 160) were obtained and coronal sections were embedded in acrylic with their labial surfaces exposed. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups and the enamel surface of each tooth was divided into four quadrants. The surfaces were conditioned in a clockwise manner by one of the following methods: (1) Non-conditioned enamel acted as the control group (C); (2) Silicone-coated disk (Sof-Lex disc, Black, 3 M ESPE) (SD); (3) Diamond bur at slow speed (DB) and (4) Airborne particle abrasion (50 μm Al₂O₃, 2 bar, 5 s) (AA). Surface roughness was measured at each quadrant using a non-contact digital profilometer and contact angle measurements were performed using a goniometer. Enamel surfaces were then etched with 37% H₃PO₄ for 60 s and roughness and wettability measurements were repeated. The enamel surfaces in each quadrant received resin composite luting cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) incrementally in a polyethylene mold (diameter: 1 mm²; height: 4 mm) and photopolymerized. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C until the testing procedures and then shear force was applied to the adhesive interface until failure occurred in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Microshear bond (μSBS) was calculated by dividing the maximum load (N) by the bonding surface area of the resin cement. Representative enamel surfaces were analyzed under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) (x5000) to assess the surface morphology. Failure types were analyzed using optical microscope and SEM. Data (MPa) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey`s test for each parameter and Linear model for group comparisons (α = 0.05). Surface conditioning method significantly affected the adhesion results (p < 0.001), surface roughness (p = 0.017), and contact angle (p < 0.001). Interaction terms were significant (p > 0.05). AA (338 ± 182) created significantly higher surface roughness compared to SD (308 ± 180) and DB (242 ± 197) (p < 0.05). After etching with 37% H₃PO₄, DB (307 ± 223) resulted in significantly lower roughness than those of SD (385 ± 173) and AA (414 ± 193) (p < 0.05). AA (40 ± 11) delivered significantly lower contact angle compared to those of SD (61 ± 9) and DB (59 ± 10). After etching with 37% H₃PO₄, AA (42 ± 10) and DB (50 ± 10) presented the lowest contact angle (p < 0.05). Mean μSBS results (MPa) showed significant difference between the experimental groups (p = 0.011) and were in descending order as follows: DB (20 ± 8)^a?a b < C (12 ± 5)^b. Failure types were predominantly mixed failure type between the enamel and the resin cement with more than half of the resin remained on the enamel surface (32 to 33 out of 40) in all groups. Cohesive failure in the enamel was not observed in any of the groups. SEM analysis showed that AA group leaves abundant particles on the enamel surface and after DB and AA, etching could not remove the particles completely and expose the enamel prisms.     

Adhesion of cast metal alloy and lithium disilicate copings luted to different core build-up materials with self-adhesive resin cement

This study evaluated the shear bond strength of two coping materials (non-nickel chrome-based cast alloy and lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress) to four different core foundation materials (resin composite, cast metal alloy, lithium disilicate, and dentin), luted with adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem). Specimens (N = 56) were fabricated and divided into eight groups (n = 7 per group). Each coping material was luted with self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) to the core materials. Bond strength was measured in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD tests (alpha = 0.05). Both core (p = 0.000) and coping material type (p = 0.000) significantly affected the mean bond strength (MPa) values. Interaction terms were also significant (p = 0.001). The highest bond strength results were obtained when lithium disilicate was bonded to lithium disilicate (21.48) with the resin cement tested. Lithium disilicate in general presented the highest bond results when bonded to all core materials tested (16.55–21.38) except dentin (3.56). Both cast alloy (2.9) and lithium disilicate (3.56) presented the lowest bond results on dentin followed by cast-alloy-cast alloy combination (3.82).     

Bond Strength of Porcelain Bonded to Enamel and Dentin Surfaces Prepared with Different Surface Treatments

Although acid etching is routinely used to condition tooth surfaces, it increases the caries susceptibility of enamel and enhances enamel demineralization; thus the role of alternative surface treatments such as alumina air abrasion and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation for tooth conditioning is controversial. This study was undertaken to compare the effects of different conditioning methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement on enamel and dentin. Prepared permanent human dentin and enamel samples (N = 210) embedded in clear acrylic resin were conditioned by 37% phosphoric acid etching, 50-µm alumina air abrasion, Er:YAG laser irradiation (120 mJ, 10 Hz, medium short pulse mode), or their combinations. Porcelain laminates were cemented by using photopolymerizing luting composite. SBS was evaluated after thermal cycling (10,000 cycles, 5–55°C) and fracture types (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed) were observed by stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance and followed by Tamhane's test (p < 0.05). Enamel and dentin specimens showed significant differences in SBS (p < 0.000). Er:YAG laser etching presents successful alternatives to acid etching on dentin surfaces; it does not enhance adhesion of the resin cement on enamel surfaces.     

Thermal Activation of Mendable Epoxy through Inclusion of Microcapsules and Imidazole Complexes

Epoxy resin was encapsulated in poly(urea–formaldehyde) microcapsules using an in situ dispersion polymerization technique. The efficiency of Ni and Cu–imidazole complexes as latent hardeners was compared to that of 2-methylimidazole. Calorimetric studies revealed higher reactivity of the nickel complex toward oxirane functionalities. Both the complexes could effectively cure the epoxy released from within the microcapsules in the event of damage followed by thermal treatment. The curing could be effected at lower temperature (T_onset = 145°C) using [Ni(2-Me-ImidH)₄Cl]Cl as compared to [Cu(2-Me-ImidH)₄Cl]Cl (T_onset = 152°C). A healing efficiency of 100 ± 2% could be achieved at 30% microcapsule loading, irrespective of the type of metal complex used.