Structural dependence of crystallization in glasses along the nepheline (NaAlSiO4) ‐ eucryptite (LiAlSiO4) join

Lithium and sodium aluminosilicates are important glass‐forming systems for commercial glass‐ceramics, as well as being important model systems for ion transport in battery studies. In addition, uncontrolled crystallization of LiAlSiO₄ (eucryptite) in high‐Li₂O compositions, analogous to the more well‐known problem of NaAlSiO₄ (nepheline) crystallization, can cause concerns for long‐term chemical durability in nuclear waste glasses. To study the relationships between glass structure and crystallization, nine glasses were synthesized in the Li_xNa_1‐xAlSiO₄ series, from x = 0 to x = 1. Raman spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Li‐7, Na‐23, Al‐27, Si‐29), and X‐ray diffraction were used to study the quenched and heat‐treated glasses. It was found that different LiAlSiO₄ and NaAlSiO₄ crystal phases crystallize from the glass depending on the Li/Na ratio. Raman and NMR spectra of quenched glasses suggest similar structures regardless of alkali substitution. Li‐7 and Na‐23 NMR spectra of the glass‐ceramics near the endmember compositions show evidence of several differentiable sites distinct from known Li_xNa_1‐xAlSiO₄ crystalline phases, suggesting that these measurements can reveal subtle chemical environment differences in mixed‐alkali systems, similar to what has been observed for zeolites.     

Understanding the structural origin of crystalline phase transformations in nepheline (NaAlSiO4)‐based glass‐ceramics

Nepheline (Na₆K₂Al₈Si₈O₃₂) is a rock‐forming tectosilicate mineral which is by far the most abundant of the feldspathoids. The crystallization in nepheline‐based glass‐ceramics proceeds through several polymorphic transformations — mainly orthorhombic, hexagonal, cubic — depending on their thermochemistry. However, the fundamental science governing these transformations is poorly understood. In this article, an attempt has been made to elucidate the structural drivers controlling these polymorphic transformations in nepheline‐based glass‐ceramics. Accordingly, two different sets of glasses (meta‐aluminous and per‐alkaline) have been designed in the system Na₂O–CaO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ in the crystallization field of nepheline and synthesized by the melt‐quench technique. The detailed structural analysis of glasses has been performed by ²⁹Si, ²⁷Al, and ²³Na magic‐angle spinning — nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR), and multiple‐quantum MAS NMR spectroscopy, while the crystalline phase transformations in these glasses have been studied under isothermal and non‐isothermal conditions using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and MQMAS NMR. Results indicate that the sequence of polymorphic phase transformations in these glass‐ceramics is dictated by the compositional chemistry of the parent glasses and the local environments of different species in the glass structure; for example, the sodium environment in glasses became highly ordered with decreasing Na₂O/CaO ratio, thus favoring the formation of hexagonal nepheline, while the cubic polymorph was the stable phase in SiO₂–poor glass‐ceramics with (Na₂O+CaO)/Al₂O₃ > 1. The structural origins of these crystalline phase transformations have been discussed in the paper.     

Thermodynamic assessment of the pseudoternary Na2O–Al2O3–SiO2 system

Vitrified high‐level radioactive waste that contains high concentrations of Na₂O and Al₂O₃, such as the waste stored at the Hanford site, can cause nepheline to precipitate in the glass upon cooling in the canisters. Nepheline formation removes oxides such as Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ from the host glass, which can reduce its chemical durability. Uncertainty in the extent of precipitated nepheline necessitates operating at an enhanced waste loading margin, which increases operational costs by extending the vitrification mission as well as increasing waste storage requirements. A thermodynamic evaluation of the Na₂O–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ system that forms nepheline was conducted by utilizing the compound energy formalism and ionic liquid model to represent the solid solution and liquid phases, respectively. These were optimized with experimental data and used to extrapolate phase boundaries into regions of temperature and composition where measurements are unavailable. The intent is to import the determined Gibbs energies into a phase field model to more accurately predict nepheline phase formation and morphology evolution in waste glasses to allow for the design of formulations with maximum loading.     

Limitations of the Augis and Bennett Method for Kinetic Analysis of the Crystallization of Glasses and Conditions for Correct Use

The equation proposed by Augis and Bennett for determining the kinetic exponent of the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami (JMA) model is thoroughly analyzed; a new expression, calculated accurately with no assumptions introduced, is proposed. This new method of calculation has been extended to the different kinetic models more commonly used in the literature for describing solid-state reactions. However, determining the JMA exponent from the Augis and Bennett method can lead to an incorrect interpretation of the reaction mechanism unless an additional, independent test is used. A testing method for verifying the applicability of the Augis and Bennett method is proposed. The kinetic analysis of the crystallization of Ge_0.3Sb_1.4S_2.7 has been used for checking this method.     

Bulk Crystallization of Glasses Belonging to the Calcia—Zirconia—Silica System by Microwave Energy

This paper reports results that show the effect of microwave absorption on the bulk crystallization of two glasses in the CaO—ZrO₂—SiO₂ system. The glass samples were devitrified using either microwave or conventional heating, to compare the results obtained from the two different techniques. Remarkably different crystallization paths were observed, depending mostly on the composition of the glass. This observation was especially true when microwave heating was used, where the dielectric losses observed in silicate glasses are related to the ZrO₂ content. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed on the powdered samples, to determine the crystalline phases present. The microstructure and microanalysis results of these glass-ceramic compositions are presented and are related to the different ZrO₂ contents.     

Kinetic Model for Crystallization in White Ceramic Glazes

Theoretical equations have been developed for crystal growth rate in layers of small frit (glass) particles during firing. Throughout the process, the crystalline and the glassy phases have different compositions; therefore, the system can be considered a pseudo-two-component system consisting of a crystallizable component (structural unit) and a noncrystallizable mixture of several components. The concentration of the crystallizable component decreases in the residual glassy phase during the crystal growth process, on integrating at the surfaces of crystals having the same composition. Throughout the crystal growth process, a concentration gradient of the crystallizable component is therefore produced in the glassy phase, which results in mass transport by diffusion of this component from the bulk residual glassy phase to the surfaces of the crystals. Equations have been derived assuming that the diffusion step of the crystallizable component through the residual glassy phase is the overall crystal growth process rate-controlling step.     

Effect of Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser Irradiation on Crystallization in Li2O–Al2O3–SiO2 Glass

A 355-nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser, produced by a harmonic generator, was used for the nucleation process in photosensitive glass containing Ag⁺ and Ce³⁺ ions. The pulse width and frequency of the laser were 8 ns and 10 Hz, respectively. Heat treatment was conducted at 570°C for 1 h, following laser irradiation, to produce crystalline growth, after which a LiAlSi₃O₈ crystal phase appeared in the laser-irradiated Li₂O–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ glass. The present study compares the effect of laser-induced nucleation on glass crystallization with that of spontaneous nucleation by heat treatment.     

Nucleation and Crystallization of New Glasses from Fly Ash Originating from Thermal Power Plants

The nucleation and crystallization kinetics of new glasses obtained by melting mixtures of a Spanish carbon fly ash with glass cullet and dolomite slag at 1500°C has been evaluated by a calculation method. These glasses, whose microstructure was examined by TEM carbon replica, were susceptible to controlled crystallization in the 800°–1100°C range. The resulting glass-ceramics developed acicular and branched wollastonite crystals or a network of dendritic pyroxene mixed with anorthite feldspar (SEM and EDX analysis). The time–temperature–transformation curves (processing of the XRD data) showed the crystallization kinetics and the critical cooling rate to be in the 12°–42°C/min range.     

Effect of P2O5 on the Nonisothermal Sinter‐Crystallization Process of a Lithium Aluminum Silicate Glass

Dense (~98.5%), lithium aluminum silicate glass‐ceramics were obtained via the sinter‐crystallization of glass particle compacts at relatively low temperatures, that is, 790–875°C. The effect of P₂O₅ on the glass‐ceramics' sinter‐crystallization behavior was evaluated. We found that P₂O₅ does not modify the surface crystallization mechanism but instead delays the crystallization kinetics, which facilitates viscous flow sintering. Our glass‐ceramics had virgilite (Li_xAl_xSi_3‐xO₆; 0.5 < x < 1), a crystal size <1 μm, and a linear thermal expansion coefficient of 2.1 × 10^?6°C^?1 in the temperature range 40–500°C. The overall heat treatment to obtain these GCs was quite short, at ~25 min.     

Dissolution and Separation of Ruthenium in Borosilicate Glass

The behavior of ruthenium oxide (RuO₂) in aluminoborosilicate glass used for the stabilization of nuclear waste was investigated. It was found that 0.025 mass% RuO₂ dissolved as Ru⁴⁺ in the glass at 1400°C, which caused the glass to turn yellow. When the RuO₂ amount was 0.05 mass%, needle-shaped crystals formed in the glass during slow cooling. If the added amount exceeded 0.1 mass% and the cooling rate was slow, it separated rapidly and the glass became pale after cooling. No dissolution of ruthenium was detectable after melting at 1200°C.     

Crystallization Behavior of Novel Silicon Boron Oxycarbide Glasses

Homogeneous silicon boron oxycarbide (Si-B-O-C) glasses based on SiO _x C_{4– x} and BO _y C_{3– y} mixed environments were obtained by pyrolysis under inert atmosphere of sol–gel-derived precursors. Their high-temperature structural evolution from 1000° to 1500°C was followed using XRD, ²⁹Si and ¹¹B MAS NMR, and chemical analysis and compared with the behavior of the parent boron-free Si-O-C glasses. The XRD study revealed that, for the Si-O-C and the Si-B-O-C systems, high-temperature annealing led to the crystallization of nanosized β-SiC into an amorphous SiO₂-based matrix. NMR analysis suggested that the β-SiC crystallization occurred with a consumption of the mixed silicon and boron oxycarbide units. Finally, by comparing the behavior of the Si-O-C and Si-B-O-C glasses, it was shown that the presence of boron increased the crystallization kinetics of β-SiC.     

Crystallization of LiNbO3 and NaNbO3 in niobiosilicate glass–ceramics

Although glass–ceramics have been widely explored for their thermal stability and mechanical properties, they also offer unique symmetry-dependent properties such as piezoelectricity and pyroelectricity through controlled crystallization of a polar phase. This work examines crystallization of LiNbO₃ in a 35SiO₂–30Nb₂O₅–35Li₂O mol% composition and crystallization of LiNbO₃ and NaNbO₃ in a 35SiO₂–30Nb₂O₅–25Li₂O–10Na₂O mol% composition. Crystallization kinetics are examined using the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov (JMAK) theory where the Avrami exponent, n, is calculated to be 1.0–1.5. Microscopical analysis shows dendritic morphology, which when combined with the JMAK analysis, suggests diffusion-controlled one-dimensional growth. Adding Na₂O to the glass composition increases the inter-diffusivity of ions which causes LiNbO₃ to crystallize faster and lowers the activation energy of transformation from 1054 ± 217 kJ/mol in the ternary composition to 882 ± 212 kJ/mol. Time-temperature-transformation diagrams are presented which show that the temperature for maximum rate of transformation for LiNbO₃ is ∼650°C and for NaNbO₃ is ∼715°C.     

Compositional dependence of crystallization in Ge–Sb–Se glasses relevant to optical fiber making

For fiber‐optic mid‐infrared bio‐ and chemical‐sensing, Ge–Sb–Se glass optical fibers are more attractive than Ge–As–Se because of: (i) lowered toxicity and (ii) lower phonon energy and hence transmission to longer wavelengths, with potential to reach the spectral “fingerprint region” for molecular sensing. There is little previous work on Ge–Sb–Se fibers. Here, fibers are fabricated from two glass compositions in the Ge_xSb₁₀Se_90?x atomic (at.) % series. Both glass compositions are of similar mean‐coordination‐number, lying in the overconstrained region, yet of different chemical composition: stoichiometric Ge₂₅Sb₁₀Se₆₅ at. % and non‐stoichiometric Ge₂₀Sb₁₀Se₇₀ at. %. Thermal analysis on bulk glasses has previously shown that the former exhibited the maximum glass stability of the series. However, during fiber‐drawing of Ge₂₅Sb₁₀Se₆₅ at. %, the preform tip is found to undergo surface‐devitrification to monoclinic GeSe₂ alone, the primary phase, no matter if the preform is an annealed, as‐melted rod or annealed, extruded rod. The heating rate of the preform‐tip to the fiber‐drawing temperature is estimated to be up to ~100°C/min to ~490°C. Lower heating rates of 10°C/min using thermal analysis, in contrast, encourage crystallization of both Sb₂Se₃ and GeSe₂. The non‐stoichiometric: Ge₂₀Sb₁₀Se₇₀ at. % composition drew successfully to low optical loss fiber, no matter whether the preform was an annealed, as‐melted rod or annealed, extruded rod.