Design and Properties of New Functional Water – Soluble Polymers of Citraconic Anhydride (CA) and Related Copolymers

Summary The binary and ternary copolymers are synthesized by free-radical initiated binary copolymerization of citraconic anhydride (CA) with acrylamide (AAm) and terpolymerization of acrylamide (AAm) – citraconic anhydride (CA) – vinyl acetate (VA) monomer system. Co- and terpolymerization were carried out in the presence of benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as an initiator at 70 °C in benzene under nitrogen atmosphere. Structure and monomer unit composition of the copolymers, obtained from a wide range of monomer feed were determined by elemental analysis. Structural peculiarities of synthesized PAAm, [poly (AAm-alt-CA)] and [poly(AAm-co-CA-co-VA)] were characterized by using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR), Uv–vis, ¹H-NMR, X-ray diffraction (XRD), elemental analysis, analytical methods (titration methods) and viscometric measurements.     

Interpolymer interactions and miscibility in poly(n‐butyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid)/poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethyl acrylamide) blends

The miscibility of poly(n‐butyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) containing 18 mol % methacrylic acid (BMAM‐18) and poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethyl acrylamide) containing 17 mol % N,N‐dimethyl acrylamide (SAD‐17) was investigated with viscometry, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The DSC analysis showed a single glass‐transition temperature for all the blends, indicating that these copolymers were miscible over the entire composition range. The glass‐transition temperatures of these blends were higher than those calculated with the additivity rule. This was characteristic of the presence of specific interactions. The interactions between BMAM‐18 and the tertiary amide of SAD‐17 were studied with FTIR spectroscopy, which revealed that hydrogen‐bonding interactions occurred between the hydroxyl groups of BMAM‐18 and the carbonyl amide of SAD‐17. A new band characterizing these interactions appeared around 1613 cm^?1. The quantitative results showed that the fraction of the associated amide increased with an increase in the amount of the acidic BMAM‐18 copolymer. Although BMAM‐18 and SAD‐17 led to homogeneous solutions in butan‐2‐one, as the concentration of N,N‐dimethyl acrylamide increased to 32 mol % [as within the poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethyl acrylamide) containing 32 mol % N,N‐dimethyl acrylamide], complexation occurred when this latter compound was mixed with BMAM‐18 in butan‐2‐one. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 2717–2724, 2006     

The phase behavior and thermal stability of blends of poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid)/poly(styrene‐co‐ 4‐vinylpyridine)

The hydrogen bonding and miscibility behaviors of poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) (PSMA20) containing 20% of methacrylic acid with copolymers of poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) (PS4VP) containing 5, 15, 30, 40, and 50%, respectively, of 4‐vinylpyridine were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). It was shown that all the blends have a single glass transition over the entire composition range. The obtained T_gs of PSMA20/PS4VP blends containing an excess amount of PS4VP, above 15% of 4VP in the copolymer, were found to be significantly higher than those observed for each individual component of the mixture, indicating that these blends are able to form interpolymer complexes. The FTIR study reveals presence of intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interaction between vinylpyridine nitrogen atom and the hydroxyl of MMA group and intensifies when the amount of 4VP is increased in PS4VP copolymers. A new band characterizing these interactions at 1724 cm⁻¹ was observed. In addition, the quantitative FTIR study carried out for PSMA20/PS4VP blends was also performed for the methacrylic acid and 4‐vinylpyridine functional groups. The TGA study confirmed that the thermal stability of these blends was clearly improved. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Ionomeric blends of poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomer: Miscibility,crystallization, and melting behavior

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomer (SMAI) blends were studied by the dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This study has demonstrated that the presence of ion–dipole interactions enhances the miscibility of otherwise immiscible polymers in the PEO and high molecular weight poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA). The effect of ion–dipole interactions on enhancing miscibility is confirmed by the presence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of the PEO component. The equilibrium melting temperature of PEO in the blends are obtained using Hoffman‐Weeks plots. The interaction energy density, β, is calculated from these data using the Nishi‐Wang equation. The results suggest that PEO and SMAI blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1–7, 2000     

Melt‐state miscibility of poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) and linear polyethylene

On purpose to examine the effect of branch length on the miscibility of polyolefin blends, miscibility behavior of linear polyethylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) blend was studied and compared to that of linear polyethylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐butene) blend. Miscibility of the blend was determined by observing the morphology quenched from the melt, and by using the relation between interaction parameter and copolymer composition. When the weight composition and molecular weight was the same, poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) was slightly more miscible with linear polyethylene than poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐butene) was. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Swelling behavior and diffusion studies of high‐water‐retaining acrylamide/potassium methacrylate hydrogels

Poly(acrylamide‐co‐potassium methacrylate) hydrogels were prepared by free‐radical simultaneous polymerization with aqueous solutions of acrylamide (AAm) and potassium methacrylate (KMA) with a redox initiator. The copolymerization was performed with eight different compositions of KMA at a fixed concentration of oil‐soluble crosslinkers, including 1,4‐butanediol diacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA). For every composition of AAm/KMA copolymer, the percentage swelling, swelling equilibrium, and diffusion characteristics were investigated. The copolymers were further studied for deswelling properties. The power law relationships of the hydrogels were evaluated for variation in terms of saline concentration. The AAm/KMA copolymers were confirmed by IR spectroscopy. Thermal studies of hydrogels were performed with differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. EGDMA was found to be a better crosslinker for obtaining higher swelling and deswelling properties for the AAm/KMA hydrogels. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 1153–1164, 2005     

Blends containing amphiphilic polymers. V. Compatibilization of N‐alkylitaconamic acid‐co‐styrene copolymers with interacting polymers

The phase behavior of blends containing N‐alkylitaconamic acid‐co‐styrene copolymers (NAIA‐co‐S) with poly(N‐vinyl‐2‐pyrrolidone) (PVP) of two different weight average molecular weights (M _w ), poly(2‐vinylpyridine) (P2VPy) and poly(4‐vinylpyridine) (P4VPy), was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Copolymers containing 80% S are miscible with PVP₁₀, PVP₂₄, and P4VPy over the whole range of composition. In the case of blends with P2VPy, miscibility is observed only for the first three members of the series, i.e., NEIA‐co‐S, NPIA‐co‐S, and NBIA‐co‐S. For copolymers containing hexyl to dodecyl moieties, phase separation is observed in blends with P2VPy. Copolymers containing 50% S are miscible over the whole range of composition irrespective of the homopolymer and the length of the side chain of the itaconamic moiety of the copolymer. This behavior is interpreted in terms of steric hindrance, in the sense that the copolymers with long side chains are not able to interact with the nitrogen of P2VPy because of the position in the aromatic ring. The interactions between copolymers and homopolymers are discussed in terms of specific interactions like hydrogen bonds between the itaconamic moiety and the different functional groups of the homopolymers, together with the hydrophobic interaction, which cannot be disregarded. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 2512–2519, 2006     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Miscibility of dextran and poly(ethylene glycol) in dilute aqueous solutions. II. Effect of temperature and composition

The miscibility of dextran (Dx) with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) was investigated in dilute aqueous solutions by viscometry. Homopolymers of Dx and PEG and their blends with Dx/PEG ratios of 10/90, 25/75, 50/50, 75/25, and 90/10 were studied at 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45°C in bidistilled and deionized water. Starting with the classical Huggins equation, the results of the viscosity behavior of each parent polymer and their blends were interpreted in terms of miscibility parameters, Δk, Δb, α, β, ΔB, and μ. On the basis of the sign convention involved in these criteria, miscibility between Dx and PEG was found to increase with the weight fraction of PEG in the blend composition and temperature. The fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis is also used to investigate the miscibility of the polymer pairs. The existence of specific interactions between Dx and PEG was demonstrated by FTIR spectroscopy. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4587–4594, 2006     

Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of block copolymers via redox polymerization

Polymerization and copolymerization of vinyl monomers such as acrylamide, acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, and acrylic acid with a redox system of Ce(IV) and organic reducing agents containing hydroxy groups were studied. The reducing compounds were poly(ethylene glycol)s, halogen‐containing polyols, and depolymerization products of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol)s‐b‐polyacrylonitrile, poly(ethylene glycol)s‐b‐poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐vinyl acetate), poly(ethylene glycol)s‐b‐polyacrylamide, poly(ethylene glycol)s‐b‐poly(acrylamide‐co‐vinyl acetate), poly(1‐chloromethyl ethylene glycol)‐bpoly(acrylonitrile‐co‐vinyl acetate), and bis[poly(ethylene glycol terephthalate)]‐b‐poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐vinyl acetate) were produced. The yield of acrylamide polymerization and the molecular weight of the copolymer increased considerably if about 4% vinyl acetate was added into the acrylamide monomer. However, the molecular weight of the copolymer was decreased when 4% vinyl acetate was added into the acrylonitrile monomer. Physical properties such as solubility, water absorption, resistance to UV light, and viscosities of the copolymers were studied and their possible uses are discussed. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 1385–1395, 1999     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/ poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

Blending polypropylene (PP) with biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) can be a nice alternative to minimize the disposal problem of PP and the intrinsic brittleness that restricts PHB applications. However, to achieve acceptable engineering properties, the blend needs to be compatibilized because of the immiscibility between PP and PHB. In this work, PP/PHB blends were prepared with different types of copolymers as possible compatibilizers: poly(propylene‐g‐maleic anhydride) (PP–MAH), poly (ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate) [P(E–MA)], poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–GMA)], and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–MA–GMA)]. The effect of each copolymer on the morphology and mechanical properties of the blends was investigated. The results show that the compatibilizers efficiency decreased in this order: P(E–MA–GMA) > P(E–MA) > P(E–GMA) > PP–MAH; we explained this by taking into consideration the affinity degree of the compatibilizers with the PP matrix, the compatibilizers properties, and their ability to provide physical and/or reactive compatibilization with PHB. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Novel blends of alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers and styrenic copolymers

Summary Alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers (P-CO) were melt-blended with polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN), and with poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA). P-CO forms homogeneously miscible blends with SAN containing 25 wt% AN at the investigated blend compositions. The transparent blends have single, intermediate glass transition temperatures that fit the Fox equation. The elastic properties of P-CO at room temperature disappear upon blending with SAN because the T _g is driven above RT. Polystyrene and SMA are not miscible with P-CO and form heterogeneous blends with two glass transitions. This demonstrates that both the polarity of the styrenic copolymer and the nature of the comonomer govern its phase behavior. Received: 14 January 1999/Revised version: 19 April 1999/Accepted: 19 April 1999     

Synthesis of poly[(2‐oxo‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4‐yl)methyl vinyl ether‐co‐N‐phenylmaleimide] and its miscibility in blends with styrene‐acrylonitrile or poly(vinyl chloride)

The aim of the study was to investigate the synthesis of a copolymer bearing cyclic carbonate and its miscibility with styrene/acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN) or poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC). (2‐Oxo‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4‐yl)methyl vinyl ether (OVE) as a monomer was synthesized from glycidyl vinyl ether and CO₂ using quaternary ammonium chloride salts as catalysts. The highest reaction rate was observed when tetraoctylammonium chloride (TOAC) was used as a catalyst. Even at the atmospheric pressure of CO₂, the yield of OVE using TOAC was above 80% after 6 h of reaction at 80°C. The copolymer of OVE and N‐phenylmaleimide (NPM) was prepared by radical copolymerization and was characterized by FTIR and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopies and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The monomer reactivity ratios were given as r₁ (OVE) = 0.53–0.57 and r₂ (NPM) = 2.23–2.24 in the copolymerization of OVE and NPM. The films of poly(OVE‐co‐NPM)/SAN and poly(OVE‐co‐NPM)/PVC blends were cast from N‐dimethylformamide. An optical clarity test and DSC analysis showed that poly(OVE‐co‐NPM)/SAN and poly(OVE‐co‐NPM)/PVC blends were both miscible over the whole composition range. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1809–1815, 2000     

Interpolymer‐specific interactions and miscibility in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylic acid)/poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) blends

The miscibility or complexation of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylic acid) containing 27 mol % of acrylic acid (SAA‐27) and poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) containing 17 or 32 mol % of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide (SAD‐17, SAD‐32) or poly(N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) were investigated by different techniques. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis showed that a single glass‐transition temperature was observed for all the mixtures prepared from tetrahydrofuran (THF) or butan‐2‐one. This is an evidence of their miscibility or complexation over the entire composition range. As the content of the basic constituent increases as within SAA‐27/SAD‐32 and SAA‐27/PDMA, higher number of specific interpolymer interactins occurred and led to the formation of interpolymer complexes in butan‐2‐one. The qualitative Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy study carried out for SAA‐27/SAD‐17 blends revealed that hydrogen bonding occurred between the hydroxyl groups of SAA‐27 and the carbonyl amide of SAD‐17. Quantitative analysis carried out in the 160–210°C temperature range for the SAA‐27 copolymer and its blends of different ratios using the Painter–Coleman association model led to the estimation of the equilibrium constants K₂, K_A and the enthalpies of hydrogen bond formation. These blends are miscible even at 180°C as confirmed from the negative values of the total free energy of mixing ΔG_M over the entire blend composition. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1011–1024, 2007     

High molecular weight hydrophilic functional copolymers by free‐radical copolymerization of acrylamide and of N‐acryloylmorpholine with N‐acryloxysuccinimide: Application to the synthesis of a graft copolymer

Free‐radical solution copolymerization of acrylamide (AAm) and of a disubstituted acrylamide derivative, N‐acryloylmorpholine (NAM), with N‐acryloxysuccinimide (NAS) was investigated with the aim to obtain a copolymer of at least 100,000 g mol^?1. Different polymerization conditions likely to increase the molecular weight were studied such as monomer and initiator concentrations, temperature, and nature of the solvent. The molecular weights were determined by SEC using a light‐scattering detector. The grafting of end‐functionalized polysaccharide chains onto such high molecular weight poly(NAM‐co‐NAS) was performed and a graft copolymer bearing a high number of saccharidic branches was obtained. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 1808–1816, 2003     

Changes in the interfacial properties of PC/SAN blends with compatibilizer

Block copolymers of polycarbonate‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PC‐b‐PMMA) and tetramethyl poly(carbonate)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (TMPC‐b‐PMMA) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymer. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fiber retraction (IFR) technique and an asymmetric double cantilever beam fracture test. The average diameter of dispersed particles and interfacial tension of the PC/SAN blends were reduced by adding compatibilizer to the PC/SAN blends. Fracture toughness of the blends was also improved by enhancing interfacial adhesion with compatibilizer. TMPC‐b‐PMMA copolymer was more effective than PC‐b‐PMMA copolymer as a compatibilizer for the PC/SAN blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2649–2656, 2003     

Phase behavior of ternary blends containing dimethylpolycarbonate,tetramethylpolycarbonate and poly[styrene‐co‐(methyl methacrylate)] copolymers (or polystyrene)

The miscibility and phase behavior of ternary blends containing dimethylpolycarbonate (DMPC), tetramethylpolycarbonate (TMPC) and poly[styrene‐co‐(methyl methacrylate)] copolymer (SMMA) have been explored. Ternary blends containing polystyrene (PS) instead of SMMA were also examined. Blends of DMPC with SMMA copolymers (or PS) did not form miscible blends regardless of methyl methacrylate (MMA) content in copolymers. However, DMPC blends with SMMA (or PS) blends become miscible by adding TMPC. The miscible region of ternary blends is compared with the previously determined miscibility region of binary blends having the same chemical components and compositions. The region where the ternary blends are miscible is much narrower than that of binary blends. Based on lattice fluid theory, the observed phase behavior of ternary blends was analyzed. Even though the term representing the Gibbs free energy change of mixing for certain ternary blends had a negative value, blends were immiscible. It was revealed that a negative value of the Gibbs free energy change of mixing was not a sufficient condition for miscible ternary blends because of the asymmetry in the binary interactions involved in ternary blends. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of blending on the molecular dynamics of highly interacting binary polymer blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly[styrene‐co‐(maleic anhydride)]

The molecular dynamics and miscibility of highly interacting binary polymer blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly[styrene‐co‐(maleic anhydride)] random copolymer with 8 wt% maleic anhydride content (SMA) were investigated as a function of composition over a wide range of frequency (10^?2–10⁶ Hz) at different constant temperatures (30–160 °C). Only one common glass relaxation process (α‐process) was detected for all measured blends, and its dynamics and broadness were found to be composition dependent. The existence of only one common α‐relaxation process located at a temperature range between those of the pure polymer components indicated the miscibility of the two polymer components over the entire range of composition. The miscibility was also confirmed by measuring the glass transition temperatures of the blends, T_g, using differential scanning calorimetry. The composition dependence of T_g of the blends showed a positive deviation from the linear mixing rule and well described by the Gordon–Taylor–Kwei equation. The relaxation spectrum of the blends was resolved into α‐ and β‐relaxation processes using the Havriliake–Negami (HN) equation and ionic conductivity. The dielectric relaxation parameters obtained from HN analysis, such as broadness of relaxation processes, maximum frequency, f_max, and dielectric strength, Δ? (for the α‐ and β‐relaxation processes), were found to be blend composition dependent. The kinetics of the α‐relaxation process of the blends were well described by the Meander model, while an Arrhenius‐type equation was used to evaluate the molecular dynamics of the β‐relaxation process. Blending of PMMA and SMA was found to have a considerable effect on the kinetics and broadness of the β‐relaxation process of PMMA, indicating that the strong interaction and miscibility between the two polymer components could effectively change the local environment of each component in the blend. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis,crystallinity and degradation properties of biodegradable poly[(sebacic anhydride)‐co‐caprolactone] triblock copolymers

BACKGROUND: A series of novel biodegradable poly[(sebacic anhydride)‐co‐caprolactone] (PSA‐co‐PCL) triblock copolymers were prepared by melt condensation of acylated PSA and monofunctional hydroxyl‐terminated PCL prepolymers. These copolymers could be used as novel drug delivery carriers with expected good drug permeability due to the PCL component. The degradation rate and mode can be modulated by varying the ratio of monomers in the copolymer. RESULTS: The homopolymers and copolymers were characterized using ¹H NMR, gel permeation chromatography and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). ¹H NMR confirmed the formation of triblock copolymers that comprise a middle PSA block and two side PCL blocks. DSC revealed that the melting temperature and degree of crystallinity for both sebacic anhydride (SA) and caprolactone (CL) components are strongly composition dependent, implying the hindrance effect of the two components on the crystallinity. In vitro degradation experiments showed that the mass loss is significantly accelerated for samples in base buffer solution and more rapid for the copolymers with a higher SA content. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that for SA‐rich copolymer, PSA(80 wt%)‐co‐PCL, surface erosion dominated the degradation mode of the sample. In contrast, for CL‐rich copolymer, PSA(20 wt%)‐co‐PCL, a micropore structure developed at a degradation time of 155 h along the edges of the sample, owing to the hydrolysis of SA. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the rate and mode of degradation of these copolymers can be tuned by varying the composition of the copolymers. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry