Morphology and rheological behavior of maltene–polymer blends. I. Effect of partial hydrogenation of poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene‐block)‐type copolymers

Because of the importance of the maltene–polymer interaction for the better performance of polymer‐modified asphalts, this article reports the effects of the molecular characteristics of two commercial poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene‐block) (SBS) polymers and their partially hydrogenated derivatives [poly{styrene‐block[(butadiene)_1?x–(ethylene‐co‐butylene)_x]‐block‐styrene‐block} (SBEBS)] on the morphology and rheological behavior of maltene–polymer blends (MPBs) with polymer concentrations of 3 and 10% (w/w). Each SBEBS and its parent SBS had the same molecular weight and polystyrene block size, but they differed from each other in the composition of the elastomeric block, which exhibited the semicrystalline characteristics of SBEBS. Maltenes were obtained from Ac‐20 asphalt (Pemex, Salamanca, Mexico), and the blends were prepared by a hot‐mixing procedure. Fluorescence microscopy images indicated that all the blends were heterogeneous, with polymer‐rich and maltene‐rich phases. The rheological behavior of the blends was determined from oscillatory shear flow data. An analysis of the storage modulus, loss modulus, complex modulus, and phase angle as a function of the oscillatory frequency at various temperatures allowed us to conclude that the maltenes behaved as pseudohomogeneous viscoelastic materials that could dissipate stress without presenting structural changes; moreover, all the MPBs were more viscoelastic than the neat maltenes, and this depended on both the characteristics and amount of the polymer. The MPBs prepared with SBEBS were more viscoelastic and possessed higher elasticity than those prepared with SBS. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Influence of the extrusion process on the morphology and micromechanical behavior of polystyrene‐block‐(polystyrene‐co‐butadiene)‐block‐polystyrene star block copolymer/homopolystyrene blends

The influence of the extrusion process on the morphology and micromechanical behavior of an asymmetric polystyrene‐block‐(polystyrene‐co‐butadiene)‐block‐polystyrene (SBS) star block copolymer and its blends with general‐purpose homopolystyrene (hPS) was studied with films prepared with a single‐screw extruder. The techniques used were transmission electron microscopy and uniaxial tensile testing. Unlike the pure SBS block copolymer possessing a gyroid‐like morphology, whose deformation was found to be insensitive to the processing conditions, the mechanical properties of the blends strongly depended on the extrusion temperature as well as the apparent shear rate. The deformation micromechanism was primarily dictated by the blend morphology. The yielding and cavitation of the nanostructures were the principal deformation mechanism for the blends having a droplet‐like microphase‐separated morphology, whereas cavitation dominated for the blends containing macrophase‐separated layers of polystyrene. The mechanical properties of the blends were further examined with respect to the influence of the temperature and shear rate on the phase behavior of the blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Micro‐ and macrophase separation of thermosetting systems modified with epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐ block‐styrene linear triblock copolymers and their influence on final mechanical properties

BACKGROUND: The goal of this work was to establish the minimum degree of epoxidation needed to develop nanostructured epoxy systems by modification with poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene) (SBS) triblock copolymers epoxidized to several degrees, and also to investigate the effect of polystyrene (PS) content on the final morphologies. By using two SBS copolymers, the influence of the weight ratio of the two blocks on the generated morphologies and mechanical properties was also analysed. RESULTS: Nanostructured thermosets were effectively obtained through reaction‐induced microphase separation of PS blocks from the matrix. A minimum of 27 mol% of epoxidation, which corresponds to 4.8 wt% of epoxidized polybutadiene (PB) units in the overall mixture, was needed to ensure nanostructuring of final mixtures and thus their transparency. Hexagonally ordered nanostructures were achieved for PS contents of around 16–20 wt%, which agrees with our previous results for mixtures with other SBS copolymers with different ratios between blocks. The fracture toughness of the epoxy matrix was improved or at least retained with mixing. CONCLUSION: The degree of epoxidation of PB blocks needed to switch epoxy/SBS mixtures from a macrophase‐separated to a nanostructured state has been established. The generated morphologies in the epoxy systems are mainly dependent on the PS content in the mixture. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Singlet oxygen generation and adhesive loss in stimuli‐responsive,fullerene‐polymer blends,containing polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene rubber‐based adhesives

The adhesive properties, as measured by bulk tack and peel strength analysis, were found to decrease in polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene (SBS) and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene (SIS) PSA films containing common singlet oxygen generators, acridine, rose bengal, and C₆₀ fullerene, when irradiated with a tungsten halogen light in air. The addition of the singlet oxygen quencher, β‐carotene, to the C₆₀ fullerene samples was found to significantly deter the rate of adhesive loss in the fullerene‐SBS and ‐SIS PSA nanocomposites. The presence of oxygen was essential to the mechanism of adhesive loss and, in combination with the effects of singlet oxygen generators and a singlet oxygen scavenger, strongly supports a singlet‐oxygen mediated process. FTIR investigations of fullerene‐SBS and ‐SIS systems suggest the initial formation of peroxides which, upon further irradiation, lead to the generation of carbonyl‐containing compounds of a ketonic type after crosslinking. Rates of SBS and SIS C‐H abstraction were comparable and found to decrease when the high‐pressure, mercury xenon irradiation source was filtered to allow only light of λ > 390 nm. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Influence of the incorporation of fine calcium carbonate particles on the impact strength of polypropylene/polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene butene)‐block‐polystyrene blends

The Izod impact strength of two kinds of ternary composites was investigated. One consisted of polypropylene (PP), the triblock copolymer polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene butene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS), and calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) particles, and the other consisted of PP, carboxylated SEBS (C‐SEBS), and CaCO₃ particles. The mean size of the CaCO₃ particles was about 160 nm. According to scanning electron microscopy observations, the composite with SEBS showed a morphology in which SEBS domains and CaCO₃ particles were independently dispersed in the PP matrix. On the other hand, the composite with C‐SEBS showed a morphology in which CaCO₃ particles were encapsulated by C‐SEBS; that is, a core–shell structure was formed. The Izod impact strength of the composite with SEBS was higher than that of the composite with C‐SEBS and the PP/SEBS and PP/C‐SEBS binary blends. According to observations of the fractured surface, the stress‐whitened area was larger in the composite with SEBS than in the composite with C‐SEBS and the PP/SEBS and PP/C‐SEBS binary blends. The toughening mechanism of the composite, using nanometer‐sized CaCO₃ particles in combination with SEBS, was examined. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Cure kinetics and thermal stability of micro and nanostructured thermosetting blends of epoxy resin and epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene triblock copolymer systems

The compatibility of styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene (SBS) triblockcopolymer in epoxy resin is increased by the epoxidation of butadiene segment, using hydrogen peroxide in the presence of an in situ prepared catalyst in water/dichloroethane biphasic system. Highly epoxidized SBS (epoxy content SBS >26 mol%) give rise to nanostructured blends with epoxy resin. The cure kinetics of micro and nanostructured blends of epoxy resin [diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A; (DGEBA)]/amine curing agent [4,4′‐diaminodiphenylmethane (DDM)] with epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene (eSBS 47 mol%) triblock copolymer has been studied for the first time using differential scanning calorimetry under isothermal conditions to determine the reaction kinetic parameters such as kinetic constants and activation energy. The cure reaction rate is decreased with increasing the concentration of eSBS in the blends and also with the lowering of cure temperature. The compatibility of eSBS in epoxy resin is investigated in detailed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, optical and transmition electron microscopic analysis. The experimental data of the cure behavior for the systems, epoxy/DDM and epoxy/eSBS(47 mol%)/DDM show an autocatalytic behavior regardless of the presence of eSBS in agreement with Kamal's model. The thermal stability of cured resins is also evaluated using thermogravimetry in nitrogen atmosphere. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Blends of SBS triblock copolymer with poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polystyrene mixture

Blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) or styrene–ethylene/1‐butene–styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with a commercial mixture of polystyrene (PS) and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) were prepared in the melt at different temperatures according to the chemical kind of the copolymer. Although solution‐cast SBS/PPO and SBS/PS blends were already known in the literature, a general and systematic study of the miscibility of the PS/PPO blend with a styrene‐based triblock copolymer in the melt was still missing. The thermal and mechanical behavior of SBS/(PPO/PS) blends was investigated by means of DSC and dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DMTA). The results were then compared to analogous SEBS/(PPO/PS) blends, for which the presence of a saturated olefinic block allowed processing at higher temperatures (220°C instead of 180°C). All the blends were further characterized by SEM and TGA to tentatively relate the observed properties with the blends' morphology and degradation temperature. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2698–2705, 2003     

Property enhancement in polypropylene ternary blend nanocomposites via a novel poly(ethylene oxide)‐grafted polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene toughener–compatibilizer system

Synthesis and characterization of a novel toughener–compatibilizer for polypropylene (PP)–montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposites were conducted to provide enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blocks were synthetically grafted onto maleic anhydride‐grafted polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Special attention was paid to emphasize the effect of PEO‐grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐PEO) against SEBS‐g‐MA on morphology, static/dynamic mechanical properties and surface hydrophilicity of the resultant blends and nanocomposites. It was found that the silicate layers of neat MMT are well separated by PEO chains chemically bonded to nonpolar SEBS polymer without needing any organophilic modification of the clay as confirmed by X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy analyses. From scanning electron microscopy analyses, elastomeric domains interacting with MMT layers via PEO sites were found to be distributed in the PP matrix with higher number and smaller sizes than the corresponding blend. As a benefit of PEO grafting, SEBS‐g‐PEO‐containing nanocomposite exhibited not only higher toughness/impact strength but also increased creep recovery, as compared to corresponding SEBS‐g‐MA‐containing nanocomposite and neat PP. The damping parameter of the same nanocomposite was also found to be high in a broad range of temperatures as another advantage of the SEBS‐g‐PEO toughener–compatibilizer. The water contact angles of the blends and nanocomposites were found to be lower than that of neat hydrophobic PP which is desirable for finishing processes such as dyeing and coating. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Physicomechanical and dielectric properties of magnesium and barium ionomers based on sulfonated maleated styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene block copolymer

Ionomers, containing both carboxylate and sulfonate anions on the polymer backbone, based on metal cations like Mg⁺² and Ba⁺² were prepared by sulfonating maleated styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene block copolymer, hereafter referred to as m‐SEBS, followed by its neutralization by metal acetates. Infrared spectroscopic studies reveal that sulfonation reaction takes place in the para position of the benzene rings of polystyrene blocks and metal salts are formed on neutralization of the precursor acids. Dynamic mechanical thermal analyses show that sulfonation causes increase in T_g of the rubbery phase of m‐SEBS and decrease in tan δ at T_g of the hard phase, along with formation of a rubbery plateau. The changes become more pronounced on neutralization of the sulfonated maleated SEBS, and the effect is greater in the case of Ba salt. Dielectric thermal analyses (DETA) show that incorporation of ionic groups causes profound changes in the dielectric constant (ϵ′) of m‐SEBS. In addition to the low temperature glass–rubber transition, the plot of ϵ′ vs. temperature shows occurrence of a high‐temperature transition, also known as the ionic transition. Activation energy for the dielectric relaxation could be determined on the basis of frequency dependence of the ionic transition temperature. Two values of the activation energy for the dielectric relaxation refer to the presence of two types of ionic aggregates, namely multiplets and clusters. Incorporation of the ionic groups causes enhancement in stress–strain properties as well as retention of the properties at elevated temperatures (50° and 75°C), and the effect is more pronounced in the case of Ba ionomer. Although sulfonated ionomers show greater strength than the carboxylated ionomers, the sulfonated maleated ionomers show higher stress–strain properties in comparison to both sulfonated and carboxylated ionomers. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 816–825, 2000     

Compatibilizing Effect of SEBS for Electrical Properties of LDPE/PS Blends

Summary: In the previous study, we observed compatibilizing effects of low density polyethylene (LDPE)/polystyrene (PS) with polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS), a triblock copolymer. Blends consisting of 70 wt.‐% LDPE and 30 wt.‐% PS were prepared with a SEBS concentration of up to 10 wt.‐%. This study examined the electrical properties such as the electrical breakdown, water tree length, permittivity and tan δ in the blends. The possibility of using these blends as insulating material substitutes for LDPE was investigated. The electrical breakdown strength reached a maximum of 66.67 kV/mm, which is superior to 50.27 kV/mm of the LDPE used as electrical insulators for cables. In addition, the water tree length decreased with increasing SEBS concentration. The water tree lengths of the blends containing SEBS were shorter than that of the LDPE. The permittivity of the blends was 2.28–2.48 F/m, and decreased with increasing SEBS concentration with the exception of S‐0. Tan δ of the blends increased smoothly with increasing SEBS content.

Breakdown strength , water tree length, permittivity and tan δ of the LDPE/PS/SEBS blends and raw materials.     

Effects of the molecular structure of impact modifier and compatibilizer on the toughening of PBT/SBS/PS‐GMA blends

This work aims at studying the toughening process of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) through its blends with styrene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymers (SBS), in the presence of poly(styrene‐ran‐glicydil methacrylate) (PS‐GMA) as reactive compatibilizer. High values of impact strength were attained for PBT/SBS blends without the compatibilizer; however, this improvement is achieved for blends with SBS having similar viscosity compared to PBT, at high SBS content (40 wt %) and for blends prepared under specific processing conditions. The efficiency of the in situ compatibilization of PBT/SBS blends by PS‐GMA was found to be strongly dependent on the SBS and PS‐GMA molecular characteristics. Better compatibilizing results were observed through fine phase morphologies and lower ductile to brittle transition temperatures (DBTT) as the interfacial interaction and stability of the in situ formed compatibilizer are maximized, that is, when the miscibility between SBS and PS‐GMA and reaction degree between PBT and PS‐GMA are maximized. For the PBT/SBS/PS‐GMA blends under study, this was found when it is used the SBS with higher polystyrene content (38 wt %) and with longer PS blocks (M_w = 20,000 g mol^?1) and also the PS‐GMA with moderate GMA contents (4 wt %) and with molecular weight similar to the critical one for PS entanglements (M_c = 35,000 g mol^?1). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 5795–5807, 2006     

Tough polyamide 6/core–shell blends prepared via in situ anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam by reactive extrusion

In this study, the molten ε‐caprolactam (CL) solution of maleated styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polystyrene (PS) containing catalyst and activator were introduced into a twin screw extruder, and polyamide 6 (PA6)/SEBS/PS blends were successfully prepared via anionic polymerization of CL by reactive extrusion. The mechanical properties measurements indicated that both the elongation at break and notched Izod impact strength of PA6/SEBS/PS (85/10/5) blends were improved distinctly with slight loss of tensile and flexural strength as compared to that of pure PA6. The images of transmission electron microscopy showed that a core–shell structure with PS core and poly (ethene‐co‐1‐butene) (PEB) shell was formed within the PA6 matrix. Fourier transform infrared was used to investigate the formation mechanisms of the core–shell structure. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 53:2705–2710, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Synthesis of polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane via polysiloxane‐based macroinitiator in supercritical CO2

Polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS‐b‐PS‐b‐PDMS) was synthesized by the radical polymerization of styrene using a polydimethylsiloxane‐based macroazoinitiator (PDMS MAI) in supercritical CO₂. PDMS MAI was synthesized by reacting hydroxy‐terminated PDMS and 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoyl chloride) (ACPC) having a thermodegradable azo‐linkage at room temperature. The polymerization of styrene initiated by PDMS MAI was investigated in a batch system using supercritical CO₂ as the reaction medium. PDMS MAI was found to behave as a polyazoinitiator for radical block copolymerization of styrene, but not as a surfactant. The response surface methodology was used to design the experiments. The parameters used were pressure, temperature, PDMS MAI concentration and reaction time. These parameters were investigated at three levels (?1, 0 and 1). The dependent variable was taken as the polymerization yield of styrene. PDMS MAI and PDMS‐b‐PS‐b‐PDMS copolymers obtained were characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. The number‐ and weight‐average molecular weights of block copolymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and mechanical properties of clay/polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene triblock copolymer (SBS) intercalated nanocomposites using organoclay containing stearic acid

Organoclays containing various amounts of stearic acid (SA) were synthesized, and clay/polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene triblock copolymer (SBS) intercalated nanocomposites were prepared using organoclays containing SA by melt‐blending. Montmorillonite was the clay used, and both stearylamine and SA were used as surface modifiers. The amount of SA added was 0, 20, 50 and 100% of the cation‐exchange capacity (CEC). In this study, the effects of SA on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the clay/SBS nanocomposites were investigated. In clay/SBS with 100% CEC of SA, although no exfoliation of the clay occurred, the stacked clay layers were uniformly dispersed at the nanometer level (100–800 nm) without agglomeration. Clay/SBSs containing SA exhibited superior mechanical properties compared to clay/SBS without SA. It was found that SA effectively improved the clay dispersion in the SBS matrix and the mechanical properties of the clay/SBSs. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

In the melt,grafting of polycarbonate onto polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene‐grafted‐maleic anhydride: Reactive extrusion

The use of reactions between polycarbonate (PC) and polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene‐ grafted‐maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MAH) is a convenient way to create SEBS‐g‐PC. Grafting was realized by reactive extrusion at three temperatures using SnOct₂ or TBD catalysts. SEC analyses showed the apparition of a double distribution when the TBD was used. The mean residence time widely increased when this catalyst was used, and the rheological curves depicted a percolation effect of the SEBS nodules in the PC matrix. No explicit evolution was found with the use of SnOct₂. The thermal analyses showed the disappearance of the PC phase transition temperature. The Van Gurp‐Palmen plots confirmed the efficiency of the TBD catalyst and that 260°C was the optimal reactive extrusion temperature. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:2660–2668, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Flexible and flame‐retardant S‐SEB‐S triblock copolymer/PPE nano‐alloy

We observed that modified polyphenylene ether (PPE) was solubilized in thermoplastic styrenic elastomer (TPS) and that a two‐phase lacy structure formed on nanometer scales when the TPS composition was 67 wt % and modified PPE and polystyrene‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (S‐SEB‐S triblock copolymer) were blended. However, the molecular weight of the outer PS block segments M_outPS and the content of the outer PS block segments ?_outPS were <10,000 g/mol and 20 wt %, respectively. The resulting S‐SEB‐S/modified PPE nano‐alloy exhibited both flexibility and flame retardancy, unlike other materials, where a trade‐off exists between these two properties; that is, the flame retardancy was excellent when the phosphorus additive was present. This combination of properties might be attributed to the two‐phase nanometer‐scale structure consisting of flame‐retardant styrene/PPE domains and a continuous soft, lacy SEB matrix. The results for polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (S‐EB‐S triblock copolymer)/modified PPE blends were presented for comparison. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40446.     

Compatibilization effects of styrenic/rubber block copolymers in polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Compatibilizing effects of styrene/rubber block copolymers poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) (SBS), poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP), and two types of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS), which differ in their molecular weights on morphology and selected mechanical properties of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) 70/30 blend were investigated. Three different concentrations of styrene/rubber block copolymers were used (2.5, 5, and 10 wt %). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to examine the phase morphology of blends. The SEM analysis revealed that the size of the dispersed particles decreases as the content of the compatibilizer increases. Reduction of the dispersed particles sizes of blends compatibilized with SEP, SBS, and low‐molecular weight SEBS agrees well with the theoretical predictions based on interaction energy densities determined by the binary interaction model of Paul and Barlow. The SEM analysis confirmed improved interfacial adhesion between matrix and dispersed phase. The TEM micrographs showed that SBS, SEP, and low‐molecular weight SEBS enveloped and joined pure PS particles into complex dispersed aggregates. Bimodal particle size distribution was observed in the case of SEP and low‐molecular weight SEBS addition. Notched impact strength (a_k), elongation at yield (ε_y), and Young's modulus (E) were measured as a function of weight percent of different types of styrene/rubber block copolymers. The a_k and ε_y were improved whereas E gradually decreased with increasing amount of the compatibilizer. The a_k was improved significantly by the addition of SEP. It was found that the compatibilizing efficiency of block copolymer used is strongly dependent on the chemical structure of rubber block, molecular weight of block copolymer molecule, and its concentration. The SEP diblock copolymer proved to be a superior compatibilizer over SBS and SEBS triblock copolymers. Low‐molecular weight SEBS appeared to be a more efficient compatibilizer in PP/PS blend than high‐molecular weight SEBS. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 291–307, 1999     

Compatibilization of high‐impact polystyrene/high‐density polyethylene blends by styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene block copolymer

Compatibilization of polymer blends of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) blend by styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene (SEBS) was elucidated. Polymer blends containing many ratios of HIPS and HDPE with various concentrations of SEBS were prepared. The Izod impact strength and elongation at break of the blends increased with increases in SEBS content. They increased markedly when the HDPE content was higher than 50 wt %. Tensile strength of blends increased when the SEBS concentration was not higher than 5 pphr. Whenever the SEBS loading was higher than 5 pphr, the tensile strength decreased and a greater decrease was found in blends in which the HDPE concentration was more than 50 wt %. The log additivity rule model was applied to these blends, which showed that the blends containing the HIPS‐rich phase gave higher compatibility at the higher shear rates. Surprisingly, the blends containing the HDPE‐rich phase yielded greater compatibility at the lower shear rates. Morphology observations of the blends indicated better compatibility of the blends with increasing SEBS concentration. The relaxation time (T₂) values from the pulsed NMR measurements revealed that both polymer blends became more compatible when the SEBS concentration was increased. When integrating all the investigations of compatibility compared with the mechanical properties, it is possible to conclude that SEBS promotes a certain level of compatibilization for several ratios of HIPS/HDPE blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 742–755, 2004     

Domain structure and miscibility studies of blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymers (SBS) and styrene–glycidyl methacrylate statistical copolymers (PS‐GMA) using SAXS and DMTA

The domain structure and miscibility in the solid state of a series of blends of styrene‐butadiene‐styrene (SBS) block copolymers and styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate (PS‐GMA) statistical copolymers with varying molecular weights and compositions were studied using small angle X‐ray scattering and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. Depending on the molecular characteristics of each component, different types and degrees of solubilization of PS‐GMA in SBS were found which, in addition to the initially SBS phase morphology, lead to materials with multiphase domain morphologies with differences in size and structure. The degree of solubilization of PS‐GMA into the PS domains of SBS was found to be higher for blends containing PS‐GMA with lower molecular weight (M_w = 18 100 g mol^?1) and lower GMA content (1 wt%) and/or for SBS with higher PS content (39 wt%) and longer PS blocks (M_w = 19 600 g mol^?1). Localized solubilization of PS‐GMA in the middle of PS domains of SBS was found to be the most probable to occur for the systems under study, causing swelling of PS domains. However, uniform solubilization was also observed for SBS/PS‐GMA blends containing SBS with composition in the range of a morphological transition (PS block M_w = 19 600 g mol^?1 and 39 wt% of PS) causing a morphological transition in the SBS copolymer (cylinder to lamella). Copyright © 2006 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd     

Relationship between structure and properties in high‐performance PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends: The role of PPO and PS

This work aimed at studying the role of poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) and polystyrene (PS) in toughening polyamide‐6 (PA6)/styrene‐ethylene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) blends. The effects of weight ratio and content of PPO/PS on the morphology and mechanical behaviors of PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends were studied by scanning electron microscope and mechanical tests. Driving by the interfacial tension and the spreading coefficient, the “core–shell” particles formed by PPO/PS (core) and SEBS‐g‐MA (shell) played the key role in toughening the PA6 blends. As PS improved the distribution of the “core–shell” particles due to its low viscosity, and PPO guaranteed the entanglement density of the PPO/PS phase, the 3/1 weight ratio of PPO/PS supplied the blends optimal mechanical properties. Within certain range, the increased content of PPO/PS could supply more efficient toughening particles and bring better mechanical properties. Thus, by adjusting the weight ratio and content of PPO and PS, the PA6/SEBS‐g‐MA/(PPO/PS) blends with excellent impact strength, high tensile strength, and good heat deflection temperature were obtained. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45281.