Transformation of calcium cyanamide and its inhibitory effect on urea nitrification in some tropical soils

Transformation of calcium cyanamide and its inhibitory effect on urea nitrification was studied in some tropical soils. Three soils, from Onne, Mokwa and Samaru, representing different agro-climatological zones of Nigeria were incubated with calcium cyanamide, urea or a mixture of both for eight weeks at 30 °C and at field capacity moisture content. The recovery of inorganic N (NH ₄ ⁺ plus NO ₂ ^- plus NO ₃ ^- )from calcium cyanamide varied from 64% to 87% in different soils. Most of the inorganic N accumulated was in NH ₄ ⁺ form. Nitrification of the accumulated NH ₄ ⁺ in all the soils was slow.Urea (75 mg N kg^–1 soil) was completely nitrified within a week in the Samaru and Mokwa soils whereas in the Onne soil the rate of nitrification was slow. Addition of CaCN₂ at the rate of 10 mg N kg^–1 soil generally delayed ammonification of urea and nitrification was severely inhibited in all the soils. Addition of CaCN₂ at the rate of 20 mg N kg^–1 soil further reduced the ammonification of urea and completely inhibited the nitrification. High recovery of inorganic N from calcium cyanamide and its effective reduction of nitrification of urea make it suitable source of N for plants in the tropics, provided it is managed to avoid phyto-toxicity.     

Improvement of the N fertilizer efficiency with dicyandiamide (dcd) in citrus trees

Nitrification inhibitors such a dicyandiamide (DCD) help to reduce leaching losses by retaining applied N in the ammoniacal form. Research objectives were to evaluate dicyandiamide added to ammonium sulphate-nitrate (ASN) as a nitrification inhibitor in cultivated soils (Xeropsamments) and its effect on N uptake by citrus (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). Under field conditions, fertilization of adult trees with ASN (600 g N tree^–1) either with or without DCD (2% DCD-N) was compared (ASN+DCD and ASN, respectively). The NH ₄ ⁺ -N concentrations in plots fertilized with ASN+DCD were significantly higher than ASN plot in the 0-15 cm layer during 5–105 day period. Nitrification started immediately after N application in both treatments (ASN and ASN+DCD). In all three soil layers analyzed, NO^– ₃-N concentrations were higher in the ASN plots than in the ASN+DCD during the first 20 days. This indicates that nitrification of NH⁺ ₄ from ASN was more rapid in the absence of DCD. On the other hand, fertilization with ASN+DCD kept higher levels of NO^– ₃-N in soils than ASN during the rest of experience period (40–160 days). Addition of DCD to ASN showed a higher N concentration in the spring-flush leaves with respect to the trees fertilized with ASN, during the growth cycle. These results suggest that the use of a nitrification inhibitor permitted a more efficient utilization of fertilizer N by citrus trees. The plants treated with DCD added to ASN showed a higher yield in number of units per tree and a better fruit colour index than those treated with ASN alone.     

A comparative study of urea hydrolysis rate and ammonia volatilization from urea and urea calcium nitrate

A comparing of urea hydrolysis and NH₃ volatilization from urea supergranules and urea calcium nitrate (UCN, a new fertilizer produced by Norsk Hydro A/S, Norway) was made on two different flooded soil types, a high-CEC clay loam (Ås) and an intermediate-CEC clay loam (Kinn).Nitrogen loss by ammonia volatilization was reduced from 17% by surface application of urea supergranules (USG) on flooded Ås soil to 3% and 6% by UCN briquettes at either the same urea or nitrogen concentration as USG. A significant reduction was even found with the surface application of prilled UCN, 12% and 18% N-loss for prilled UCN and urea, respectively. The floodwater pH and NH ₄ ⁺ content was lower with UCN than urea, which reduced the potential for ammonia volatilization.NH₃-loss (5%) was significantly less when USG was surface applied on Kinn soil, while NH₃-loss from UCN briquettes was independent of soil type. The reduction in NH₃-loss from USG on Kinn soil was due to a decrease in the pH and NH ₄ ⁺ content of the floodwater caused by a reduced rate of urea hydrolysis.The rate of urea hydrolysis was lower with UCN than USG in both soils, but the difference between UCN and USG was greater in the Ås soil than in the Kinn soil. Three days after deep placement (10 cm), 18% of UCN urea and 52% of USG urea were hydrolyzed in Ås soil, while only 12% UCN and 17% USG were hydrolyzed in the Kinn soil.The surface application of USG on flooded soil reduced the rate of urea hydrolysis as compared to deep placement. 30% and 17% of USG urea was hydrolyzed after four days on Ås and Kinn soil, respectively. During the first few days the rate of hydrolysis of UCN was more affected by the soil type than the application method. Four days after surface application 32% and 13% UCN urea was hydrolyzed on Ås and Kinn soil, respectively. The rate of urea hydrolysis exhibited a zero-order reaction when USG and UCN-briquettes were point placed in flooded soils.     

Effect of urea granule size on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea

Urea powder and granules of varying size (1 to 8 mm diameter) were surface applied to a ryegrass/white clover pasture. Evolution of NH₃ was measured using a continuous air flow enclosure method. At 30 kg N ha^–1, the percentage of urea-N lost as NH₃ from powder or granules of 1–2, 3–4, 5.6 and 8 mm diameter was 18, 17, 20, 22 and 32 respectively. As the particle size increased, the rate of urea hydrolysis decreased and delayed the time at which the maximum rate of volatilization occurred. Mineral-N and soil surface pH measurements confirmed that during the period of volatilization, urea moved less than 30 mm from the application point.For the powder and 3–4 mm granule treatments, when the application rate was increased from 30 to 300 kg N ha^–1, the percentage of urea-N volatilized increased, but at any particular rate there was no significant difference in percentage loss between the powder and 3–4 mm granules.     

Chemical interactions between soil N and alkaline-hydrolysing N fertilizers

Chemical interactions between soil N and alkaline-hydrolysing N fertilizers labelled with¹⁵N were studied in the laboratory using twelve-irradiated soils. Fertilizer was recovered in the soil organic N fraction via the process of NH₃ fixation. NH₃ fixation at day 7 varied from 1.8 to 4.6% of the N added as aqua ammonia at 1000 mg kg^–1 soil. The amount of NH₃ fixed increased with increasing rates of application of NH_3(aq) and urea. The rate of NH₃ fixation decreased with time, with more than 55% of the total NH₃ fixation in 28 days occurring in the first week following application of 2000 mg urea-N kg^–1 soil. Soil pH and NH₃ fixation varied in response to N source, and increased in the order of di-ammonium phosphate 3 fixation, resulting in the release of unlabelled ammonium (deamination) and a real added nitrogen interaction in all but two of the soils studied. The release of NH ₄ ⁺ initially increased up to a pH of 7.5, was inhibited between pH 8.5 and 9.0, but increased thereafter. The balance (N_bal) between NH₃ fixation and deamination was either positive or negative, depending on the pH of the fertilized soil, which was directly related to N source and concentration for a given soil.     

Large granules,nests or bands: Methods of increasing efficiency of fall-applied urea for small cereal grains in North America

In North America where the climate is cool enough only one crop is grown yearly, N fertilizers are sometimes applied in the previous fall rather than in the spring for fall- or spring-sown cereal grains. However, in areas where snow accumulates in winter, fall application of N fertilizers is generally inferior to spring application. Substantial nitrification takes place in winter and subsequent N loss occurs primarily in early spring by denitrification after the snow melt. Immobilization of N is also greater with fall- than spring-applied N fertilizers. Nitrogen is more efficiently retained in the soil as NH₄ and thus more effectively used by plants if formation of nitrite (NO₂) and NO₃ is reduced or prevented by inhibiting nitrification. The nitrification is reduced when urea is placed in bands, because of high pH, ammonia concentration and osmotic pressure in the soil. The rate of nitrification is further reduced when urea is placed in widely-spaced nests (a number of urea prills placed together at a point below the soil surface) or as large urea granules (LUG) by reducing contact between the nitrifying bacteria and the NH₄ released upon urea hydrolysis. A further reduction in nitrification from LUG can be obtained by addition of chemical nitrification inhibitors (such as dicyandiamide (DCD)) to LUG. The concentration of a chemical inhibitor required to suppress nitrification decreases with increasing granule size. The small soil-fertilizer interaction zone with placement of urea in nests or as LUG also reduces immobilization of fertilizer N, especially in soils amended with crop residues. The efficiency of fall-applied N is improved greatly by placing urea in nests or as LUG for small cereal grains. Yields of spring-sown barley from nests of urea or LUG applied in the fall are close to those obtained with spring-applied urea prills incorporated into the soil. Delaying urea application until close to freeze-up is also improved the efficiency of fall-applied N. This increased effectiveness of urea nests or LUG is due to slower nitrification, lower N loss over the winter by denitrification, and reduced immobilization of applied N. Fall application of LUG containing low rates of DCD slows nitrification, reduces over-winter N loss, and causes further improvement in yield and N uptake of winter wheat compared to urea as LUG alone in experiments in Ontario; in other experiments in Alberta there is no yield advantage from using a nitrification inhibitor with LUG for barley. Placement of LUG or nests of urea in soil is an agronomically sound practice for reducing N losses. This practice can eliminate or reduce the amount of nitrification inhibitor necessary to improve the efficiency of fall-applied urea where losses of mineral N are a problem. The optimum size of urea nest or LUG, and optimum combination of LUG and an efficient nitrification inhibitor need to be determined for different crops under different agroclimatic conditions. The soil (texture, CEC, N status), plant (winter or spring crop, crop geometry, crop growth duration and cultivar) and climatic (temperature, amount and distribution of precipitation) factors should be taken into account during field evaluation of LUG. There is a need to conduct region-specific basic research to understand mechanisms and magnitudes of N transformations and N losses in a given ecosystem. Prediction of nitrification from LUG or urea nests in various environments is needed. In nitrification inhibition studies with LUG and chemical nitrification inhibitors, measurements of nitrifier activity will be useful. Finally, there is need for development of applicators for mechanical placement of LUG or urea prills in widely-spaced nests in soil.     

Urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce emissions of CH4 and N2O in rice production

Strategies used to reduce emissions of N₂O and CH₄ in rice production normally include irrigation management and fertilization. To date, little information has been published on the measures that can simultaneously reduce both emissions. Effects of application of a urease inhibitor, hydroquinone (HQ), and a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD) together with urea (U) on N₂O and CH₄ emission from rice growing were studied in pot experiments. These fertilization treatments were carried out in the presence and absence of wheat straw, applied to the soil surface. Without wheat straw addition, in all treatments with inhibitor(s) the emission of N₂O and CH₄ was significantly reduced, as compared with the treatment whereby only urea was applied (control). Especially for the U+HQ+DCD treatment, the total emission of N₂O and CH₄ was about 1/3 and 1/2 of that in the control, respectively. In the presence of wheat straw, the total N₂O emission from the U+HQ+DCD treatment was about 1/2 of that from the control. The total CH₄ emission was less influenced. Wheat straw addition, however, induced a substantial increase in emissions of N₂O and CH₄. Hence, simultaneous application of organic materials with a high C/N ratio and N-fertilizer (e.g. urea) is not a suitable method to reduce the N₂O and CH₄ emission. Application of HQ+DCD together with urea seemed to improve the rice growth and to reduce both emissions. The NO₃ ^–-N content of the rice plants and denitrification of (NO₃ ^–+NO₂ ^–)-N might contribute to the N₂O emission from flooded rice fields.     

Ammonium transformation in paddy soils affected by the presence of nitrate

Coupled nitrification and denitrification is considered as one of the main pathways of nitrogen losses in paddy soils. The effect of NO₃ ^– on NH₄ ⁺ transformation was investigated by using the ¹⁵N technique. The paddy soils were collected from Wuxi (soil pH 5.84) and Yingtan (soil pH 5.02), China. The soils were added with either urea (18.57 mol urea-N enriched with 60 atom% ¹⁵N excess) plus 2.14 mol KNO₃-N (natural abundance) per gram soil (U+NO₃) or urea alone (U). The KNO₃ was added 6 days after urea addition. The incubation was carried out under flooded condition in either air or N₂ gas headspace at 25°C. The results showed that in air headspace, ¹⁵NH₄ ⁺ oxidization was so fast that about 10% and 8% of added ¹⁵N in the treatment U could be oxidized during the incubation period of 73 hours after KNO₃ addition in Wuxi and Yingtan soil, respectively. The addition of KNO₃ significantly inhibited ¹⁵NH₄ ⁺ oxidation (p<0.01) in air headspace, while it stimulated ¹⁵NH₄ ⁺ oxidation in N₂ gas headspace, although the oxidation was depressed by the N₂ gas headspace itself. Therefore, the accumulation of NO₃ ^– would inhibit further nitrification of NH₄ ⁺ at micro-aerobic sites in paddy soils, especially in paddy soils with a low denitrification rate. On the other hand, NO₃ ^– would lead to oxidation of NH₄ ⁺in anaerobic bulk soils.     

The effects of a nitrification inhibitor on leaching losses and recovery of mineralized nitrogen by a wheat crop after ploughing-in temporary leguminous pastures

The effect of a nitrification inhibitor on the accumulation of ammonium (NH ₄ ⁺ -N) and nitrate (NO ₃ ^- -N) in the profile was investigated in two field experiments in Canterbury, New Zealand after the ploughing of a 4-year old ryegrass/white clover pasture in early (March) and late autumn (May). Nitrate leaching over the winter, and yield and N uptake of a following wheat crop were also assessed.The accumulation of N in the soil profile by the start of winter was greater in the March fallow (76–140 kg N ha^–1) than in the May fallow treatment (36–49 kg N ha^–1). The nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) did not affect the extent of net N mineralization, but it inhibited nitrification when applied to pasture before ploughing, especially at its depth of incorporation (100–200 mm). Nitrification inhibition in spring was greater when DCD was applied in May rather than in March due to its reduced degradation over the winter.Cumulative nitrate leaching losses were substantial from the March fallow treatment in both years (about 100 kg N ha^–1). A delay in the cultivation of pasture and the application of DCD both reduced nitrate leaching losses. When leaching occurred early in the winter (in 1991), losses were less when pasture was cultivated in May (2 kg N ha^–1) than when DCD was applied to pasture cultivated in March (68 kg N ha^–1). When leaching occurred late in the winter (in 1992), similar losses were measured from pasture cultivated in May (49 kg N ha^–1) and from DCD-treated pasture cultivated in March (57 kg N ha^–1).Grain harvest yield and N uptake of the following spring wheat crop were generally unaffected by the size of the N leaching loss over the winter. This was due to the high N fertility of the soil after four years of a grazed leguminous pasture.     

A comparison of methods of estimating ammonia volatilization in the field

Accurate estimation of the potential for NH₃ volatilization from urea-based fertilizers is an important step in attaining optimum N-use efficiency from these fertilizers. Published estimates of NH₃ volatilization losses from urea vary widely. Much of this variability may be due to the method of estimation and the degree of influence of the method on NH₃ loss. This study compared two field methods of estimating NH₃ volatilization in the field; a microplot-forced draft method, and a micrometeorogical method. Loss of NH₃ was estimated in three experiments following urea solution application to bare soil, and in two experiments following urea-ammonium nitrate solution application to wheat stubble residue. Both methods were found to be sensitive to soil and climatic variables influencing NH₃ volatilization. Cumulative N loss from the bare soil experiments ranged from 7 to 8 kg N ha^–1 for the microplot method and from 5 to 20 kg N ha^–1 for the micrometeorological method. Cumulative loss from wheat stubble residue ranged from 2 to 2.2 kg N ha^–1 for the microplot method and from 15 to 33 kg N ha^–1 for the micrometerological method. Loss of NH₃ was especially influenced by soil or residue water content and the influence of water content on the rate of urea hydrolysis. Maximum rates of loss were generally observed near midday, when water content at the soil surface was just beginning to decline and the surface temperature was rapidly rising. The microplot method was found to have a greater potential for affecting the environment and thus influencing NH₃ loss measurements than the micrometeorological method. Windspeed and mixing at the soil surface was influenced by the presence of the microplot cylinder and lid, especially in the wheat residue experiments. It is likely that the micrometeorological method, with its minimal influence on the field environment, more accurately reflects actual levels of ammonia loss. The primary advantage of the microplotforced draft method is its ability to easily compare relative NH₃ losses from different treatments.Contribution No. 87-300-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph. D. Degree at Kansas State University. The research was supported in part by grants from Farmland Industries, Inc., and USDA-ARS.     

Effects of NH3 and urea on K distribution in root and rhizosphere of maize

The effects of NH₃ formed by urea hydrolysis on K distribution in maize roots and the rhizosphere were examined by electron probe x-ray microanalysis. Fresh weight of seedlings growing on calcareous soils was decreased by applying 200 ppm N as urea attributable to the inhibition of the development of root hairs and lateral roots. In the U-200 treatment, little K accumulated in the roots but K concentration in the rhizosphere soil increased. Such a pattern does not appear in roots receiving 200 ppm as ammonium sulfate or on calcareous soils with 100 ppm N as urea or with 200 ppm as urea in an acidic clay loam. The results indicate that K efflux is responsible for the growth depression and that K efflux from the high concentration of NH₃ formed when urea is hydrolysed rather than from the NH ₄ ⁺ ion. Applying K fertilizer with urea should alleviate the adverse effects of urea on plant growth on calcareous soils by improving K status of the plant and by the decrease in rhizosphere soil pH which considerably reduces NH₃ concentration. Management designed to limit pH increase during urea hydrolysis should both prevent NH₃ injury and reduced N losses.     

Fate of Fertilizer15N applied as urea and ammonium sulphate in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions

Laboratory incubation and greenhouse experiments were conducted to investigate the comparative effectiveness of urea and ammonium sulphate in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) using¹⁵N dilution techniques. Fertilizer treatments were control (no N), 600 mg N pot^–1 and 1200 mg N pot^–1 (12 kg oven dry soil) applied as aqueous solution of urea or ammonium sulphate. Fertilizer rates, under laboratory incubation study were similar to that under greenhouse conditions. A fertilizer¹⁵N balance sheet reveals that N recovery by plants was 28–39% with urea and 35–45% with ammonium sulphate. Total recovery of¹⁵N in soil-plant system was 77–82% in urea. The corresponding estimates for ammonium sulphate were 89–91%. Consequently the unaccounted fertilizer N was higher under urea (18–23%) as compared to that in ammonium sulphate (9–11%). The soil pH increased from 8.2 to 9.4 with urea whereas in ammonium sulphate treated soil pH decreased to 7.3 during 30 days after fertilizer application. The rate of NH₃ volatilization, measured under laboratory conditions, was higher with urea as compared to the same level of ammonium sulphate. The changes in pH of soil followed the identical trend both under laboratory and greenhouse conditions.     

Effect of urea management on yield and N use efficiency of lowland rice on an acid sulfate soil

Field experiments were conducted during 1988–1989 at two adjacent sites on an acid sulfate soil (Sulfic Tropaquept) in Thailand to determine the influence of urea fertilization practices on lowland rice yield and N use efficiency. Almost all the unhydrolyzed urea completely disappeared from the floodwater within 8 to 10 d following urea application. A maximum partial pressure of ammonia (pNH₃) value of 0.14 Pa and an elevation in floodwater pH to about 7.5 following urea application suggest that appreciable loss of NH₃ could occur from this soil if wind speeds were favorable. Grain yields and N uptake were significantly increased with applied N over the control and affected by urea fertilization practices (4.7–5.7 Mg ha^–1 in dry season and 3.0–4.1 Mg ha^–1 in wet season). In terms of both grain yield and N uptake, incorporation treatments of urea as well as urea broadcasting onto drained soil followed by flooding 2 d later were more effective than the treatments in which the same fertilizer was broadcast directly into the floodwater either shortly or 10 d after transplanting (DT). The¹⁵N balance studies conducted in the wet season showed that N losses could be reduced to 31% of applied N by broadcasting of urea onto drained soil and flooding 2 d later compared with 52% loss by broadcasting of urea into floodwater at 10 DT. Gaseous N loss via NH₃ volatilization was probably responsible for the poor efficiency of broadcast urea in this study.     

Effects of type and amount of applied nitrogen fertilizer on nitrous oxide fluxes from intensively managed grassland

Five field experiments and one greenhouse experiment were carried out to assess the effects of nitrogen (N) fertilizer type and the amount of applied N fertilizer on nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission from grassland. During cold and dry conditions in early spring, emission of N₂O from both ammonium (NH ₄ ⁺ ) and nitrate (NO ₃ ^– ) containing fertilizers applied to a clay soil were relatively small, i.e. less than 0.1% of the N applied. Emission of N₂O and total denitrification losses from NO ₃ ^– containing fertilizers were large after application to a poorly drained sand soil during a wet spring. A total of 5–12% and 8–14% of the applied N was lost as N₂O and via denitrification, respectively. Emissions of N₂O and total denitrification losses from NH ₄ ⁺ fertilizers and cattle slurry were less than 2% of the N applied. Addition of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) reduced N₂O fluxes from ammonium sulphate (AS). However, the effect of DCD to reduce total N₂O emission from AS was much smaller than the effect of using NH ₄ ⁺ fertilizer instead of NO ₃ ^– fertilizer, during wet conditions. The greenhouse study showed that a high groundwater level favors production of N₂O from NO ₃ ^– fertilizers but not from NH ₄ ⁺ fertilizers. Inereasing calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) application increased the emitted N₂O on grassland from 0.6% of the fertilizer application rate for a dressing of 50 kg N ha^–1 to 3.1% for a dressing of 300 kg N ha^–1. In another experiment, N₂O emission increased proportionally with increasing N rate. The results indicate that there is scope for reducing N₂O emission from grasslands by choosing the N fertilizer type depending on the soil moisture status. Avoiding excessive N application rates may also minimize N₂O emission from intensively managed grasslands.     

The effect of increasing application rate of granular calcium ammonium nitrate on net nitrification in a laboratory study of grassland soils

Soil incubation studies were undertaken in controlled environment cabinets at 15°C to investigate the effect of increasing application rates of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) on net nitrification in two grassland soils. Granular CAN was applied to the surface of freshly collected, moist soil, at a rate equivalent to 0, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1600µg NH ₄ ⁺ -N and NO ₃ ^- -N per gram of oven dry soil. In half the treatments finely ground CaCO₃ was incorporated into the moist soil to raise the starting pH. Changes in soil mineral N and pH were measured at weekly intervals up to six-weeks. The most probable number (MPN) technique was used to enumerate the NH ₄ ⁺ -N and NO ₂ ^- -N oxidizers at the beginning and end of the incubation.At low rates of CAN application there was considerable NH ₄ ⁺ -N oxidation to NO ₃ ^- -N during the incubation of both soils. Lime stimulated this N transformation. At high application rates (i.e. 800 and 1600 ppm) there was little change in NH ₄ ⁺ -N or NO ₃ ^- -N on either soil during the 6 week incubation, in the presence or absence of lime. The rate of NO ₃ ^- -N produced peaked at 5.6 and 3.8 mg NO ₃ ^- -N kg^–1 d^–1 on soil 1 and 2 respectively, in the presence of lime. Above a level of 400 ppm CAN (equivalent to 38 kg N ha^–1) the rate of NO ₃ ^- -N produced decreased. The higher rate of net nitrification in soil 1 compared with soil 2 was probably due to a higher number of nitrifying bacteria. Although high rates of CAN decreased the nitrifying activity of both soils there was little difference between treatments in the actual numbers of NH ₄ ⁺ -N and NO ₂ ^- -N oxidizers determined by the MPN technique.The results showed that the rate of granular CAN applied to the soil surface can influence the local activity of nitrifying bacteria and subsequent N transformations. At application rates of CAN generally used agriculturally for grass production, it is likely that net nitrification of the NH ₄ ⁺ -N in the fertilizer granule will be inhibited.     

Recent research on problems in the use of urea as a nitrogen fertilizer

Recent research on the NH₃ volatilization, NO ₂ ^- accumulation, and phytotoxicity problems encountered in the use of urea fertilizer is reviewed. This research has shown that the adverse effects of urea fertilizers on seed germination and seedling growth in soil are due to NH₃ produced through hydrolysis of urea by soil urease and can be eliminated by addition of a urease inhibitor to these fertilizers. It also has shown that the leaf burn commonly observed after foliar fertilization of soybean with urea results from accumulation of toxic amounts of urea in soybean leaves rather than formation of toxic amounts of NH3 through hydrolysis of urea by leaf urease. It further showed that this leaf burn is accordingly increased rather than decreased by addition of a urease inhibitor to the urea fertilizer applied. N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) is the most effective compound currently available for retarding hydrolysis of urea fertilizer in soil, decreasing NH3 volatilization and NO ₂ ^- accumulation in soils treated with urea, and eliminating the adverse effects of urea fertilizer on seed germination and seedling growth in soil. NBPT is a poor inhibitor of plant or microbial urease, but it decomposes quite rapidly in soil with formation of its oxon analog N-(n-butyl) phosphoric triamide, which is a potent inhibitor of urease activity. It is not as effective as phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) for retarding urea hydrolysis and ammonia volatilization in soils under waterlogged conditions, presumably because these conditions retard formation of its oxon analog. PPD is a potent inhibitor of urease activity but it decomposes quite rapidly in soils with formation of phenol, which is a relatively weak inhibitor of urease activity. Recent studies of the effects of pesticides on transformations of urea N in soil indicate that fungicides have greater potential than herbicides or insecticides for retarding hydrolysis of urea and nitrification of urea N in soil.     

Movement and transformations of fertigated nitrogen below trickle emitters and their effects on pH in the wetted soil volume

The movement and transformations of ammonium-, urea- and nitrate-N in the wetted volume of soil below the trickle emitter was studied in a field experiment following the fertigation of N as ammonium sulphate, urea and calcium nitrate. Effects on soil pH in the wetted volume were also investigated.During a fertigation cycle (emitter rate 2lh^–1) applied ammonium was concentrated in the surface 10 cm of soil immediately below the emitter and little lateral movement occurred. In contrast, because of their greater mobility in the soil, fertigated urea and nitrate were more evenly distributed down the soil profile below the emitter and had moved laterally in the profile to 15 cm radius from the emitter. The conversion of applied N to nitrate-N was more rapid when urea rather than ammonium-N was applied suggesting that the accumulation of large amounts of ammonium below the emitter in the ammonium sulphate treatment probably retarded nitrification.Following their conversion to nitrate-N, both fertigated ammonium sulphate and urea caused acidification in the wetted soil volume. Acidification was confined to the surface 20 cm of soil in the ammonium sulphate treatment, however because of its greater mobility, fertigation with urea (2lh^–1) resulted in acidification occurring down to a depth of 40 cm. Such subsoil acidity is likely to be very difficult to ameliorate. Increasing the trickle discharge rate from 2lh^–1 to 4lh^–1 reduced the downward movement of urea and encouraged its lateral spread in the surface soil. As a consequence, acidification was confined to the surface (0–20 cm) soil.     

Use of nitrification inhibitors (neem and DCD) to increase N efficiency in maize-wheat cropping system

A 2-year field experiment was conducted to study the effects of the nitrification inhibitors dicyandiamide (DCD) and neem cake on the efficiency of applied prilled urea nitrogen in a maize-wheat cropping system. Prilled urea (PU), neem cake coated urea (NCU) and DCD blended urea (DCDU) were applied to maize at two levels (60 and 120 Kg N ha^–1) and two methods (all preplant and split) of N application along with a no-nitrogen control and their relative residual effect was studied on succeeding wheat grown with three levels of N as PU.In 1990 maize responded well to N up to 60 kg N ha^–1; at this level PU increased maize yield by 1.03 t ha^–1, whereas NCU and DCDU increased maize yield by 1.55 and 1.18 t ha^–1 over the control, which was equivalent to an application of 127 and 94 kg N ha^–1 as PU, respectively. Furthermore, when the results were averaged over two years of study, residual N from the application of NCU and DCDU at 60 kg N ha^–1 left after maize cropping increased the grain yield of the succeeding wheat crop grown with 60 kg N ha^–1 as PU by 1.97 and 1.68 t ha^–1, respectively, over a no nitrogen control or 60 kg N ha^–1 as PU applied to the maize. This was equal to an application of 96 and 82 kg N ha^–1 as PU to wheat.Thus, neem cake increased the efficiency of urea N applied to maize and benefits were also seen in the succeeding wheat yield in the maize-wheat cropping system.     

In situ comparisons of ammonia volatilization from N fertilizers in Chinese loess soils

Ammonia volatilization loss from mineral N fertilizers was determined on a calcareous Chinese loess soil with a pH (CaCl₂) of 7.7. An original in situ method that required no electricity or laboratory analyses was used. By means of a bellows pump, ambient air was drawn through four conical cups placed onto the soil (total area 400 cm²) and subsequently through an NH₃-specific detector tube with direct colorimetric indication of the ammonia concentration (measuring range, 0.05–700 vol.-ppm NH₃). Duration of measurement was about 3 min. Following N fertilization to winter wheat in 1990 and to summer maize in 1991, the application methods surface broadcast, uniform incorporation into the 0–15-cm layer, and for maize, a point placement at 10 cm depth were investigated. Ammonium bicarbonate and urea were applied at rates of 100 and 200 kg N ha^–1. In the autumn of 1990, ammonia losses following NH₄HCO₃ application were more than twice as large as with urea, fertilizer incorporation reduced NH₃ losses 15-fold, and doubling the nitrogen application rate resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in the percentage of nitrogen loss. Cumulative ammonia fluxes were about 2 times higher in the summer of 1991. Comparing application methods in summer, losses were significantly (3 times) lower only with point placement. The above differences were all significant at the P<0.05 level. Due to the very low air exchange rate (0.9 volumes min^–1), actual volatilization rates were underestimated by this method. Though not yielding absolute amounts, the Dräger-Tube method proved very suitable for comparing relative differences in ammonia fluxes. The measurements clearly reflected the characteristic flux patterns for the different treatments and the effects of environmental factors on their time course.     

Ammonia loss from surface applied urea-acid products

Ammonia (NH₃) losses from soils occur only under alkaline conditions; therefore, adequate acidification could prevent NH₃ loss. In acid soils this alkaline condition will exist only as a micro-environment around the decomposing CO(NH₂)₂ granule. The objective of this experiment was to examine the degree of NH₃ loss reduction that occurs when acids are placed with surface applied CO(NH₂)₂. Phosphoric acid, H₂SO₄, HCl and HNO₃ were used with surface applied CO(NH₂)₂ in a laboratory experiment to examine resultant NH₃ loss under very extreme NH₃ loss conditions. Calcium and magnesium chloride salts were added to urea:phosphoric acid to compare the relative effectiveness of acid and Ca + Mg salts for control of NH₃ loss.Little depression of NH₃-N loss was found from CO(NH₂)₂ containing H₃PO₄ and H₂SO₄ when the sand contained free CaCO₃. However, when CO(NH₂)₂:H₃PO₄ (UP) mixtures were applied as 17-19-0 on neutral and acid sands, NH₃ losses were reduced. Molar ratios less than 1:1 (28-12-0, 35-7-0) resulted in NH₃ losses similar to those from CO(NH₂)₂ alone even in acid soils. The 110 g N m^–2 as 17-19-0 reduced relative NH₃-N loss and pH in acidified and neutral soils more effectively than 11 g N m^–2. Ammonia losses are determined by chemical reactions occurring under the individual CO(NH₂)₂ granules; therefore, the use of the high 110 g N m^–2 rates in this research. The 17-19-0 reduced soil pH and retarded the rate of CO(NH₂)₂ hydrolysis with consequent reduction in NH₃ loss. Ammonia loss was reduced only slightly at 11 g N m^–2 from 17-19-0 even in acid soils. Ammonia loss was reduced from 70 to 30% of applied N by applications of HNO₃ and HCl with the CO(NH₂)₂. The HNO₃ and HCl react with CaCO₃ in a calcareous soil to produce CaCl₂ and Ca(NO₃)₂ which are known to reduce NH₃ loss from surface applied CO(NH₂)₂. However, a dry product of HNO₃ · CO(NH₂)₂ is explosive and can not be used as a general fertilizer.Calcium chloride or MgCl₂ combined with CO(NH₂)₂:H₃PO₄ reduced NH₃ loss more at 110 g N m^–2 than at 11 g N m^–2. Calcium chloride reduced NH₃ loss more effectively than MgCl₂. The CaCl₂ and MgCl₂ salts were more effective than H₂SO₄ or H₃PO₄ in reducing NH₃ losses except when (e.g., 17-19-0) mixtures were added to neutral or acidic sands.Contribution from Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843.