Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMA) (designated iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) primarily in chloroform to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PVP. The aPMMA/PVP and sPMMA/PVP blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films showed composition-dependent glass-transition temperatures (T_g). The glass-transition temperatures of the aPMMA/PVP blends are equal to or lower than weight average and can be qualitatively described by the Gordon–Taylor equation. The glass-transition temperatures of the other miscible blends (i.e., sPMMA/PVP blends) are mostly higher than weight average and can be approximately fitted by the simplified Kwei equation. The iPMMA/PVP blends were found to be immiscible or partially miscible based on the observation of two glass-transition temperatures. The immiscibility is probably attributable to a stronger interaction among isotactic MMA segments because its ordination and molecular packing contribute to form a rigid domain. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 3190–3197, 2001     

Tacticity effects on the miscibility behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide-b-dimethylsiloxane-b-ethylene oxide) blends

The miscibility of a triblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(dimethylsiloxane)-poly(ethylene oxide) with syndiotactic and isotactic poly(methylmethacrylate) wasstudied. Although isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was miscible with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) in the pure state, it was immiscible with the PEO end blocks in the copolymer. In comparison, the syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (sPMMA) was miscible with the PEO blocks as indicated by melting point depression, decrease in crystallinity, and slower rate of spherulite growth of PEO. When blends of the triblock copolymer were cooled to low temperatures, the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) middle block which resided in the interlamellar region of PEO spherulites also crystallized; the development of PDMS crystals was clearly suppressed at high sPMMA contents.On leave from Union Chemical Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002     

Polymer blends of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene) (abbreviated as PHS) containing 15 mol % of hydroxystyrene separately in 2‐butanone to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. The three polymer blends were found to be miscible, because all the prepared films were transparent and there was a single glass transition temperature (T_g) for each composition of the polymers. T_g elevation (above the additivity rule) is observed in all the three PMMA/PHS blends mainly because of hydrogen bonding. If less effective hydrogen bonding based on the FTIR evidence is assumed to infer less exothermic mixing, sPMMA may not be miscible with PHS over a broader range of conditions as iPMMA and aPMMA. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 431–440, 1999     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Miscibility of mixed stereoregular PMMA/PVCN monolayers at the air/water interface

The mixed monolayer behavior of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(vinyl cinnamate) (PVCN) was investigated from the measurements of surface pressure–area per molecule (π–A) isotherms at three different temperatures of 25 ± 1, 32.5 ± 1, and 40 ± 1°C. The miscibility and nonideality of the mixed monolayers were examined by calculating the excess area as a function of composition. Positive and negative deviations from ideality were observed. Negative deviations were observed mostly in syndiotactic PMMA (sPMMA) and PVCN blends suggesting the existence of favorable interactions. However, positive deviations in most isotactic PMMA (iPMMA) and PVCN blends indicated that the existence of unfavorable interactions. Atactic PMMA and PVCN blends demonstrated intermediate deviation behavior to sPMMA and iPMMA blends. On the basis of the results of π–A isotherms, the monolayer miscibility between PMMA and PVCN was in the majority not in agreement with the studies on the same blends in the bulk state. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Miscibility studies of binary and ternary mixtures of tactic poly(methyl methacrylates) with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (i, a, and s PMMAs) were mixed with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used mainly to study the miscibility of these blends. iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with Saran F based on the transparency and a single glass transition temperature (T_g) of the films. However, sPMMA was immiscible with Saran F because of the observation of two T_gs and opacity in most compositions of the blend. aPMMA is known to be miscible with sPMMA. Therefore aPMMA is both miscible with Saran F and sPMMA but Saran F and sPMMA are immiscible. Preliminary results of the effect of adding of aPMMA to immiscible sPMMA and Saran F mixtures were also reported. First, binary mixtures of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs were also prepared and confirmed to be miscible. Elevation of T_g of the aPMMA/sPMMA blend above weight average was observed probably due to stereocomplexation occurred between aPMMA and sPMMA. Then ternary blends of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs and Saran F in the weight ratios of about 3/1/4, 2/2/4, and 1/3/4 were also measured calorimetrically. A single T_g was observed for these three compositions different from two T_gs detected in the sPMMA/Saran F (50.0/50.0, i.e., 4/4) blend. Obviously, the composition of Saran was fixed in the ternary blends. When the other half of the blends was changing from pure sPMMA to sPMMA and aPMMA mixture, the blends became miscible because of the addition of aPMMA. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1313–1321, 2000     

Casting solvent effect on crystallization behavior and morphology of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate)

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends were prepared by casting from either chloroform or benzene solvents. After casting from solvents, all samples used in this study were preheated to 100°C and held for 10 min. Then, the solvent effect on the crystallization behavior and thermodynamic properties were studied by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Also, the morphology of spherulite of casting film was studied by polarized optical microscope. From the DSC and polarizing optical microscopy (POM) results, it was found that PEO/PMMA was miscible in the molten state no matter which casting solvent was used. However, the crystallization of PEO in the chloroform‐cast blend was more easily suppressed than it was in the benzene‐cast blend. Relatively, the chloroform‐cast blend showed the greater melting‐point depressing of PEO crystals. Also, the spherulite of chloroform‐cast film showed a coarser birefringence. It was supposed that the chloroform‐cast blend had more homogeneous morphology. It is fair to say that polymer blends, cast from solvent, are not necessarily in equilibrium. However, the benzene‐cast blends still were not in equilibrium even after preheating at 100°C for 10 min. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1627–1636, 2000     

Effects of molten poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) on crystalline morphology in stereocomplex of poly(L-lactic acid) with poly(D-lactic acid)

Effects of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) on crystalline morphology of stereocomplexing capacity of poly(L- and D-lactic acid) (PLLA and PDLA) were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarizing-light optical microscopy (POM), atomic-force microscopy (AFM) and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD). When crystallized at high T_c (130 °C or above), morphology transition of stereocomplexed PLA (sc-PLA) occurs from original well-rounded Maltese-cross spherulites to dendritic form in blends of high PHB contents (50 wt.% or higher), where PHB acts as an amorphous species. Microscopy characterizations show that morphology of sc-PLA in PHB/sc-PLA blends crystallized at T_c = 170 °C no longer retain original complexed Maltese-cross well-rounded spherulites; instead, the spherulites are disintegrated and restructured into two types of dendrites: (1) edge-on feather-like dendrites (early growth) and (2) flat-on wedge-like crystal plates (later growth) by growing along different directions and exhibiting different optical brightness. The concentration and/or distribution of amorphous PHB at the crystal growth front, corresponding to variation of the slopes of spherulitic growth rates, is a factor resulting in alteration and restructuring of the sc-PLA spherulites in the blends. Despite of spherulite disintegration, WAXD result shows that these two PHB-induced dendrites still retain the original unit cells of complexes, and thus these two new dendrites are sc-PLA.     

Solvent effects on the miscibility of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(bisphenol a carbonate) blends

Blends of atactic or syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (designated as aPMMA or sPMMA) and poly(bisphenol A carbonate) (PC) were prepared from solution casting. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and chloroform were used as solvent. Experimental results indicated that the as‐cast blends from THF were quite different from the chloroform‐cast ones. After film preparation, THF‐cast blends did not show any visible phase separation. However, chloroform‐cast blends formed a phase‐separated structure. The as‐cast PC from either solvent was not completely amorphous, and had a melting point at 239–242°C, indicating a certain degree of crystallinity. In contrast, the quenched samples of aPMMA/PC blends prepared from the two solvents behaved virtually the same. They both showed aPMMA dissolves better in PC, but PC solubility in aPMMA is very little. Using sPMMA instead of aPMMA to blend with PC, different results were obtained. The quenched sPMMA/PC blends cast from THF showed only one T_g. However, immiscibility (i.e., two T_gs) was found in the same blend system when cast from chloroform. THF was believed to cause the observation of single T_g due to the following kinetic reason. sPMMA and PC were still trapped together even after THF removal in a homogeneous, but nonequilibrium state below the glass transition. Therefore, the quenched sPMMA/PC blends were not truly thermodynamically miscible. From the results of aPMMA or sPMMA with PC, increasing syndiotacticity seemed to improve the miscibility between PMMA and PC. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2842–2850, 2001     

The crystalline morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methylmethacrylate) blends

Poly(vinylidene fluoride), PVF₂, as well as blends of PVF₂ with poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA, develop a variety of crystalline morphologies at low undercoolings. Both the α and γ crystal forms grow from the melt and the former undergoes a solid-solid phase transition to the latter, though its morphology remains unaltered. Three melting temperatures which decrease with increasing PMMA content are observed. Hoffman-Weeks analysis shows the equilibrium melting points of the blends to be depressed. Using these equilibrium values, the thermodynamic interaction energy density is calculated to go from ?5.40 × 10⁶ to ?2.96 × 10⁷ j/m³ as the blend composition goes from 40.1 volume percent to pure PVF₂. The band periodicity in the α form spherulites increases with crystallization temperature and PMMA content and it appears to be from a lamellar reorientation process with an apparent activation energy of 322 cal/mole. Electron diffraction patterns taken along the radial direction in a given spherulite reveal lamellar twisting which causes the banded appearance. Light scattering results suggest that the lamellar are formed into rod-like structures on a local scale but that on a larger scale they develop a disoriented spherulitic morphology.     

Spherulite morphology and crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends

The spherulite morphology and crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(ether imide) (PEI) blends were investigated with optical microscopy (OM), small-angle light scattering (SALS), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Thermal analysis showed that PTT and PEI were miscible in the melt over the entire composition range. The addition of PEI depressed the overall crystallization rate of PTT and affected the texture of spherulites but did not alter the mechanism of crystal growth. When a 50/50 blend was melt-crystallized at 180 °C, the highly birefringent spherulite appeared at the early stage of crystallization (t < 20 min). After longer times, the spherulite of a second form was developed, which exhibited lower birefringence. The SALS results suggested that the observed birefringence change along the radial direction of the spherulite was mainly due to an increase in the orientation fluctuation of the growing crystals as the radius of spherulite increased. The lamellar morphological parameters were evaluated by a one-dimensional correlation function analysis. The amorphous layer thickness showed little dependence on the PEI concentration, indicating that the noncrystallizable PEI component resided primarily in the interfibrillar regions of the growing spherulites.     

Biodegradable polymer blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(DL-lactide)-co-poly(ethylene glycol)

The melting and crystallization behavior and phase morphology of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(DL-lactide)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) (PELA) blends were studied by DSC, SEM, and polarizing optical microscopy. The melting temperatures of PHB in the blends showed a slight shift, and the melting enthalpy of the blends decreased linearly with the increase of PELA content. The glass transition temperatures of PHB/PELA (60/40), (40/60), and (20/80) blends were found at about 30°C, close to that of the pure PELA component, during DSC heating runs for the original samples and samples after cooling from the melt at a rate of 20°C/min. After a DSC cooling run at a rate of 100°C/min, the blends showed glass transitions in the range of 10–30°C. Uniform distribution of two phases in the blends was observed by SEM. The crystallization of PHB in the blends from both the melt and the glassy state was affected by the PELA component. When crystallized from the melt during the DSC nonisothermal crystallization run at a rate of 20°C/min, the temperatures of crystallization decreased with the increase of PELA content. Compared with pure PHB, the cold crystallization peaks of PHB in the blends shifted to higher temperatures. Well-defined spherulites of PHB were found in both pure PHB and the blends with PHB content of 80 or 60%. The growth of spherulites of PHB in the blends was affected significantly by 60% PELA content. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65: 1849–1856, 1997     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Crystallization behavior and hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) ternary blends

Ternary blends composed of matrix polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with different proportions of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) blends were prepared by melt mixing. The miscibility, crystallization behavior, mechanical properties and hydrophilicity of the ternary blends have been investigated. The high compatibility of PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends is induced by strong interactions between the carbonyl groups of the PMMA/PVP blend and the CF₂ or CH₂ group of PVDF. According to the Fourier transform infrared and wide‐angle X‐ray difffraction analyses, the introduction of PMMA does not change the crystalline state (i.e. α phase) of PVDF. By contrast, the addition of PVP in the blends favors the transformation of the crystalline state of PVDF from non‐polar α to polar β phase. Moreover, the crystallinity of the PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends also decreases compared with neat PVDF. Through mechanical analysis, the elongation at break of the blends significantly increases to more than six times that of neat PVDF. This confirms that the addition of the PMMA/PVP blend enhances the toughness of PVDF. Besides, the hydrophilicity of PVDF is remarkably improved by blending with PMMA/PVP; in particular when the content of PVP reaches 30 wt%, the water contact angle displays its lowest value which decreased from 91.4° to 51.0°. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Immiscibility–miscibility phase transitions in blends of poly(L‐lactide) with poly(methyl methacrylate)

BACKGROUND: The nature of phase transitions and apparently irreversible phase homogenization upon heating in blends of biodegradable poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were proven using differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The complex phase behaviour in this blend system is puzzling and is a matter of debate; this study attempts to clarify the true nature of the phase behaviour. RESULTS: A PMMA/PLLA blend is immiscible at ambient temperature but can become miscible upon heating to higher temperatures with an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) at 230 °C. The blends, upon rapid quenching from the UCST, can be frozen into a quasi‐miscible state. In this state, the interaction strength was determined to be χ₁₂ = ? 0.15 to ? 0.19, indicating relatively weak interactions between the PLLA ester and PMMA acrylic carbonyl groups. CONCLUSION: The absence of chemical exchange reactions above the UCST and phase reversibility back to the original phase separation morphology, assisted by solvent re‐dissolution, in the heat‐homogenized PLLA/PMMA blend was shown. Verification of UCST behaviour, phase diagrams and solvent‐assisted phase reversibility were experimentally demonstrated in PMMA/PLLA blends. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization behavior of partially crosslinked poly(β‐hydroxyalkonates)/poly(butylene succinate) blends

Partially crosslinked poly(β‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐β‐hydroxyvalerate)/poly(butylene succinate) (PHBV/PBS) and poly(β‐hydroxybutyrate)/poly(butylene succinate) (PHB/PBS) blends were prepared by melt compounding with dicumyl peroxide. The effect of partial crosslinking on crystallization of the PHBV/PBS and PHB/PBS blends was investigated systematically. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed that the overall crystallization rates of both PHBV and PBS in their blends were enhanced considerably by the partial crosslinking. Similar results were also detected in the PHB/PBS blends. The polarized optical microscope observation displayed that the nuclei density of PHBV was increased while the spherulitic morphology did not change much. Conversely, the PBS spherulites turned into cloud‐like morphology after the partial crosslinking which is a result of the decrease in spherulite size, the reduction in interspherulite distance and the interconnection of fine PBS domains. Wide angle X‐ray diffraction patterns confirmed the enhancement in crystallization of the PHBV/PBS blends after the partial crosslinking without modification on crystalline forms of the PHBV and PBS components. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 41020.     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Influence of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the compatibility with poly(vinyl phenol)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. Isotactic PMMA was found to be more miscible with PVPh than atactic or syndiotactic PMMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 1773–1780, 1997     

Poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends as novel form‐stable phase‐change materials for thermal energy storage

In this study, we focused on the preparation and characterization of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends as novel form‐stable phase‐change materials (PCMs) for latent‐heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) applications. In the blends, PEG acted as a PCM when PMMA was operated as supporting material. We subjected the prepared blends at different mass fractions of PEG (50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% w/w) to leakage tests by heating the blends over the melting temperature of the PCM to determine the maximum encapsulation ratio without leakage. The prepared 70/30 w/w % PEG/PMMA blend as a form‐stable PCM was characterized with optical microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The thermal properties of the form‐stable PCM were measured with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). DSC analysis indicated that the form‐stable PEG/PMMA blend melted at 58.07°C and crystallized at 39.28°C and that it had latent heats of 121.24 and 108.36 J/g for melting and crystallization, respectively. These thermal properties give the PCMs potential LHTES purposes, such as for solar space heating and ventilating applications in buildings. Accelerated thermal cycling tests also showed that the form‐stable PEG/PMMA blend as PCMs had good thermal reliability and chemical stability. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010