Competitive randomized algorithms for nonuniform problems

Competitive analysis is concerned with comparing the performance of on-line algorithms with that of optimal off-line algorithms. In some cases randomization can lead to algorithms with improved performance ratios on worst-case sequences. In this paper we present new randomized on-line algorithms for snoopy caching and the spin-block problem. These algorithms achieve competitive ratios approachinge/(e–1) 1.58 against an oblivious adversary. These ratios are optimal and are a surprising improvement over the best possible ratio in the deterministic case, which is 2. We also consider the situation when the request sequences for these problems are generated according to an unknown probability distribution. In this case we show that deterministic algorithms that adapt to the observed request statistics also have competitive factors approachinge/(e–1). Finally, we obtain randomized algorithms for the 2-server problem on a class of isosceles triangles. These algorithms are optimal against an oblivious adversary and have competitive ratios that approache/(e–1). This compares with the ratio of 3/2 that can be achieved on an equilateral triangle.Supported in part by the Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (DIMACS), an NSF Science and Technology Center funded under NSF Contract STC-88-09648 and supported by the New Jersey Commission on Science and Technology.     

An Improved Randomized On-Line Algorithm for a Weighted Interval Selection Problem

Given a set of weighted intervals, the objective of the weighted interval selection problem (WISP) is to select a maximum-weight subset such that the selected intervals are pairwise disjoint. We consider on-line algorithms that process the intervals in order of non-decreasing left endpoints. Preemption is allowed, but rejections are irrevocable. This problem has natural applications in various scheduling problems. We study the class of monotone instances of WISP, i.e., we require that the order of right endpoints of the given intervals coincides with that of the left endpoints. This class includes the case where all intervals have the same length. For monotone instances of WISP, the best possible competitive ratio for deterministic on-line algorithms is known to be 1/4. It has long been an open question whether there exists a randomized algorithm with better competitive ratio. In this paper, we present a new randomized algorithm and prove that it achieves a better competitive ratio 1/3 for the special case of monotone WISP where the sequence of weights of the arriving intervals is non-decreasing. Thus we provide the first result towards a solution of the long-standing open question. Furthermore, we show that no randomized algorithm achieves a competitive ratio strictly larger than 4/5. This is the first non-trivial upper bound for randomized algorithms for monotone WISP.     

Preprocessing of Intractable Problems

Some computationally hard problems, e.g., deduction in logical knowledge bases– are such that part of an instance is known well before the rest of it, and remains the same for several subsequent instances of the problem. In these cases, it is useful to preprocess off-line this known part so as to simplify the remaining on-line problem. In this paper we investigate such a technique in the context of intractable, i.e., NP-hard, problems. Recent results in the literature show that not all NP-hard problems behave in the same way: for some of them preprocessing yields polynomial-time on-line simplified problems (we call them compilable), while for other ones their compilability implies some consequences that are considered unlikely. Our primary goal is to provide a sound methodology that can be used to either prove or disprove that a problem is compilable. To this end, we define new models of computation, complexity classes, and reductions. We find complete problems for such classes, “completeness” meaning they are “the less likely to be compilable.” We also investigate preprocessing that does not yield polynomial-time on-line algorithms, but generically “decreases” complexity. This leads us to define “hierarchies of compilability,” that are the analog of the polynomial hierarchy. A detailed comparison of our framework to the idea of “parameterized tractability” shows the differences between the two approaches.     

On the Influence of Lookahead in Competitive Paging Algorithms

We introduce a new model of lookahead for on-line paging algorithms and study several algorithms using this model. A paging algorithm is n-line with strong lookahead l if it sees the present request and a sequence of future requests that contains l pairwise distinct pages. We show that strong lookahead has practical as well as theoretical importance and improves the competitive factors of on-line paging algorithms. This is the first model of lookahead having such properties. In addition to lower bounds we present a number of deterministic and randomized on-line paging algorithms with strong lookahead which are optimal or nearly optimal. Received April 8, 1994; revised May 15, 1995.     

Randomized competitive algorithms for the list update problem

We prove upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of randomized algorithms for the list update problem of Sleator and Tarjan. We give a simple and elegant randomized algorithm that is more competitive than the best previous randomized algorithm due to Irani. Our algorithm uses randomness only during an initialization phase, and from then on runs completely deterministically. It is the first randomized competitive algorithm with this property to beat the deterministic lower bound. We generalize our approach to a model in which access costs are fixed but update costs are scaled by an arbitrary constantd. We prove lower bounds for deterministic list update algorithms and for randomized algorithms against oblivious and adaptive on-line adversaries. In particular, we show that for this problem adaptive on-line and adaptive off-line adversaries are equally powerful.A preliminary version of these results appeared in a joint paper with S. Irani in theProceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1991 [17].This research was partially supported by NSF Grants CCR-8808949 and CCR-8958528.This research was partially supported by NSF Grant CCR-9009753.This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant CCR-8658139, by DIMACS, a National Science Foundation Science and Technology center, Grant No. NSF-STC88-09648.     

A General Decomposition Theorem for the k-Server Problem

The first general decomposition theorem for the k-server problem is presented. Whereas all previous theorems are for the case of a finite metric with k+1 points, the theorem given here allows an arbitrary number of points in the underlying metric space. This theorem implies O(polylog(k))-competitive randomized algorithms for certain metric spaces consisting of a polylogarithmic number of widely separated subspaces and takes a first step toward a general O(polylog(k))-competitive algorithm. The only other cases for which polylogarithmic competitive randomized algorithms are known are the uniform metric space and the weighted cache metric space with two weights.     

On-Line Edge-Coloring with a Fixed Number of Colors

Abstract. We investigate a variant of on-line edge-coloring in which there is a fixed number of colors available and the aim is to color as many edges as possible. We prove upper and lower bounds on the performance of different classes of algorithms for the problem. Moreover, we determine the performance of two specific algorithms, First-Fit and Next-Fit . Specifically, algorithms that never reject edges that they are able to color are called fair algorithms. We consider the four combinations of fair/ not fair and deterministic/ randomized. We show that the competitive ratio of deterministic fair algorithms can vary only between approximately 0.4641 and 1/2, and that Next-Fit is worst possible among fair algorithms. Moreover, we show that no algorithm is better than 4/7-competitive. If the graphs are all k -colorable, any fair algorithm is at least 1/2-competitive. Again, this performance is matched by Next-Fit while the competitive ratio for First-Fit is shown to be k/(2k-1) , which is significantly better, as long as k is not too large.     

Barely Random Algorithms for Multiprocessor Scheduling

We consider randomized algorithms for on-line scheduling on identical machines. For two machines, a randomized algorithm achieving a competitive ratio of was found by Bartal et al. (1995). Seiden has presented a randomized algorithm which achieves competitive ratios of 1.55665, 1.65888, 1.73376, 1.78295, and 1.81681, for m=3,4,5,6,7, respectively (Seiden, 2000). A barely random algorithm is one which is a distribution over a constant number of deterministic strategies. The algorithms of Bartal et al. and Seiden are not barely random–in fact, these algorithms potentially make a random choice for each job scheduled. We present the first barely random on-line scheduling algorithms. In addition, our algorithms use less space and time than the previous algorithms, asymptotically.     

A new measure for the study of on-line algorithms

An accepted measure for the performance of an on-line algorithm is the competitive ratio introduced by Sleator and Tarjan. This measure is well motivated and has led to the development of a mathematical theory for on-line algorithms.We investigate the behavior of this measure with respect to memory needs and benefits of lookahead and find some counterintuitive features. We present lower bounds on the size of memory devoted to recording the past. It is also observed that the competitive ratio reflects no improvement in the performance of an on-line algorithm due to any (finite) amount of lookahead.We offer an alternative measure that exhibits a different and, in some respects, more intuitive behavior. In particular, we demonstrate the use of our new measure by analyzing the tradeoff between the amortized cost of on-line algorithms for the paging problem and the amount of lookahead available to them. We also derive on-line algorithms for theK-server problem on any bounded metric space, which, relative to the new measure, are optimal among all on-line algorithms (up to a factor of 2) and are within a factor of 2K from the optimal off-line performance.     

Continuous stochastic logic characterizes bisimulation of continuous-time Markov processes

In a recent paper Baier et al. [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 2000, p. 358] analyzed a new way of model-checking formulas of a logic for continuous-time processes—called continuous stochastic logic (henceforth CSL)—against continuous-time Markov chains—henceforth CTMCs. One of the important results of that paper was the proof that if two CTMCs were bisimilar then they would satisfy exactly the same formulas of CSL. This raises the converse question—does satisfaction of the same collection of CSL formulas imply bisimilarity? In other words, given two CTMCs which are known to satisfy exactly the same formulas of CSL does it have to be the case that they are bisimilar? We prove that the answer to the question just raised is “yes”. In fact we prove a significant extension, namely that a subset of CSL suffices even for systems where the state space may be a continuum. Along the way we prove a result to the effect that the set of Zeno paths has measure zero provided that the transition rates are bounded.