Blackboard relations in the μLog coordination model

This paper describescoordination relations, that are relations that induce the presence or absence of data on some dataspaces from the presence or absence of other data on other dataspaces. To that end we build upon previous work on the μLog model and show that the coordination relations can be easily incorporated in it. This is achieved, on the one hand, by means of novel auxiliary operations, not classically used in Linda-like languages, and, on the other hand, by a translation technique reducing the extended μLog model to the core model augmented with the auxiliary operations. Among the most significant ones are multiple read and get operations on a blackboard, readall and getall operations, and tests for the absence of data on blackboards. Although simple, the form of coordination relations we propose is quite powerful as evidenced by a few examples including relations coming from the object-oriented paradigm such as inheritance relations. Jean-Marie Jacquet, Ph.D.: He is Professor at the Institute of Informatics at the University of Namur, Belgium, and, at an honorary title, Research Associate of the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research. He obtained a Master in Mathematics from the University of Liège in 1982, a Master in Computer Science from the University of Namur in 1984 and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Namur in 1989. His research interest are in Programming Languages and Coordination models. He has served as a reviewer and program committee member of several conferences. Koen de Bosschere, Ph.D.: He holds the degree of master of Science in Engineering of the Ghent University, and a Ph.D. from the same University. He is currently research associate with the Fund for Scientific Research — Flanders and senior lecturer at the Ghent University, where he teaches courses on computer architecture, operating systems and declarative programming languages. His research interests are coordination in parallel logic programming, computer architecture and systems software.     

Aggregation and negation-as-failure

Set-grouping and aggregation are powerful operations of practical interest in database query languages. An aggregate operation is a function that maps a set to some value, e.g., the maximum or minimum in the set, the cardinality of this set, the summation of all its members, etc. Since aggregate operations are typically non-monotonic in nature, recursive programs making use of aggregate operations must be suitably restricted in order that they have a well-defined meaning. In a recent paper we showed that partial-order clauses provide a well-structured means of formulating aggregate operations with recursion. In this paper, we consider the problem of expressing partial-order programs via negation-as-failure (NF), a well-known non-monotonic operation in logic programming. We show a natural translation of partial-order programs to normal logic programs: Anycost-monotonic partial-order programsP is translated to astratified normal program such that the declarative semantics ofP is defined as the stratified semantics of the translated program. The ability to effect such a translation is significant because the resulting normal programs do not make any explicit use of theaggregation capability, yet they are concise and intuitive. The success of this translation is due to the fact that the translated program is a stratified normal program. That would not be the case for other more general classes of programs thancost-monotonic partial-order programs. We therefore develop in stages a refined translation scheme that does not require the translated programs to be stratified, but requires the use of a suitable semantics. The class of normal programs originating from this refined translation scheme is itself interesting: Every program in this class has a clear intended total model, although these programs are in general neither stratified nor call-consistent, and do not have a stable model. The partial model given by the well-founded semantics is consistent with the intended total model and the extended well founded semantics,WFS ⁺, defines the intended model. Since there is a well-defined and efficient operational semantics for partial-order programs^{14, 15, 21)} we conclude that the gap between expression of a problem and computing its solution can be reduced with the right level of notation. Mauricio J. Osorio G., Ph.D.: He is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Systems Engineering, University of the Americas, Puebla, Mexico. He is the Head of the Laboratory of Theoretical Computer Science of the Center of Research (CENTIA), Puebla, Mexico. His research is currently funded by CENTIA and CONACYT (Ref. #C065-E9605). He is interested in Applications of Logic to Computer Science, with special emphasis on Logic Programming. He received his B.Sc. in Computer Science from the Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, his M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from CINVESTAV in Mexico, and his Ph.D. from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1995. Bharat Jayaraman, Ph.D.: He is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the State University of New York at Buffalo. He obtained his bachelors degree in Electronics from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras in 1975, and his Ph.D. from the University of Utah in 1981. His research interests are in Programming Languages and Declarative Modeling of Complex Systems. He has published over 50 research papers. He has served on the program committees of several conferences in the area of Programming Languages, and he is presently on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Functional and Logic Programming.     

A program specialiser for meta-level compositions of logic programs

Metal-level compositions of object logic programs are naturally implemented by means of meta-programming techniques. Metainterpreters defining program compositions however suffer from a computational overhead that is due partly to the interpretation layer present in all meta-programs, and partly to the specific interpretation layer needed to deal with program compositions. We show that meta-interpreters implementing compositions of object programs can be fruitfully specialised w.r.t. meta-level queries of the form Demo (E, G), where E denotes a program expression and G denotes a (partially instantiated) object level query. More precisely, we describe the design and implementation of declarative program specialiser that suitably transforms such meta-interpreters so as to sensibly reduce — if not to completely remove — the overhead due to the handling of program compositions. In many cases the specialiser succeeds in eliminating also the overhead due to meta-interpretation. Antonio Brogi, Ph.D.: He is currently assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Pisa, Italy. He received his Laurea Degree in Computer Science (1987) and his Ph. D. in Computer Science (1993) from the University of Pisa. His research interests include programming language design and semantics, logic programming, deductive databases, and software coordination. Simone Contiero: He is currently a Ph. D. student at the Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa (Italy). He received his Laurea Degree in Computer Science from the University of Pisa in 1994. His research interests are in high-level programming languages, metaprogramming and logic-based coordination of software.     

Temporal disjunctive logic programming

In this paper we introduce the logic programming languageDisjunctive Chronolog which combines the programming paradigms of temporal and disjunctive logic programming. Disjunctive Chronolog is capable of expressing dynamic behaviour as well as uncertainty, two notions that are very common in a variety of real systems. We present the minimal temporal model semantics and the fixpoint semantics for the new programming language and demonstrate their equivalence. We also show how proof procedures developed for disjunctive logic programs can be easily extended to apply to Disjunctive Chronolog programs. Manolis Gergatsoulis, Ph.D.: He received his B.Sc. in Physics in 1983, the M.Sc. and the Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science in 1986 and 1995 respectively all from the University of Athens, Greece. Since 1996 he is a Research Associate in the Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, NCSR ‘Demokritos’, Athens. His research interests include logic and temporal programming, program transformations and synthesis, as well as theory of programming languages. Panagiotis Rondogiannis, Ph.D.: He received his B.Sc. from the Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Greece, in 1989, and his M.Sc. and Ph.D. from the Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Canada, in 1991 and 1994 respectively. From 1995 to 1996 he served in the Greek army. From 1996 to 1997 he was a visiting professor in the Department of Computer Science, University of Ioannina, Greece, and since 1997 he is a Lecturer in the same Department. In January 2000 he was elected Assistant Professor in the Department of Informatics at the University of Athens. His research interests include functional, logic and temporal programming, as well as theory of programming languages. Themis Panayiotopoulos, Ph.D.: He received his Diploma on Electrical Engineering from the Department of Electrical Engineering, National Technical Univesity of Athens, in 1984, and his Ph.D. on Artificial Intelligence from the above mentioned department in 1989. From 1991 to 1994 he was a visiting professor at the Department of Mathematics, University of the Aegean, Samos, Greece and a Research Associate at the Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications of “Democritos” National Research Center. Since 1995 he is an Assistant Prof. at the Department of Computer Science, University of Piraeus. His research interests include temporal programming, logic programming, expert systems and intelligent agent architectures.     

Inductive logic programming for relational knowledge discovery

Inductive logic programming (ILP) is concerned with the induction of logic programs from examples and background knowledge. In ILP, the shift of attention from program synthesis to knowledge discovery resulted in advanced techniques that are practically applicable for discovering knowledge in relational databases. This paper gives a brief introduction to ILP, presents selected ILP techniques for relational knowledge discovery and reviews selected ILP applications. Nada Lavrač, Ph.D.: She is a senior research associate at the Department of Intelligent Systems, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia (since 1978) and a visiting professor at the Klagenfurt University, Austria (since 1987). Her main research interest is in machine learning, in particular inductive logic programming and intelligent data analysis in medicine. She received a BSc in Technical Mathematics and MSc in Computer Science from Ljubljana University, and a PhD in Technical Sciences from Maribor University, Slovenia. She is coauthor of KARDIO: A Study in Deep and Qualitative Knowledge for Expert Systems, The MIT Press 1989, and Inductive Logic Programming: Techniques and Applications, Ellis Horwood 1994, and coeditor of Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology, Kluwer 1997. She was the coordinator of the European Scientific Network in Inductive Logic Programming ILPNET (1993–1996) and program cochair of the 8th European Machine Learning Conference ECML’95, and 7th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming ILP’97. Sašo Džeroski, Ph.D.: He is a research associate at the Department of Intelligent Systems, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia (since 1989). He has held visiting researcher positions at the Turing Institute, Glasgow (UK), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), German National Research Center for Computer Science (GMD), Sankt Augustin (Germany) and the Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion (Greece). His research interest is in machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases, in particular inductive logic programming and its applications and knowledge discovery in environmental databases. He is co-author of Inductive Logic Programming: Techniques and Applications, Ellis Horwood 1994. He is the scientific coordinator of ILPnet2, The Network of Excellence in Inductive Logic Programming. He was program co-chair of the 7th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming ILP’97 and will be program co-chair of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning ICML’99. Masayuki Numao, Ph.D.: He is an associate professor at the Department of Computer Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology. He received a bachelor of engineering in electrical and electronics engineering in 1982 and his Ph.D. in computer science in 1987 from Tokyo Institute of Technology. He was a visiting scholar at CSLI, Stanford University from 1989 to 1990. His research interests include Artificial Intelligence, Global Intelligence and Machine Learning. Numao is a member of Information Processing Society of Japan, Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Japanese Cognitive Science Society, Japan Society for Software Science and Technology and AAAI.     

A unifying approach to goal-directed evaluation

Goal-directed evaluation, as embodied in Icon and Snobol, is built on the notions of backtracking and of generating successive results, and therefore it has always been something of a challenge to specify and implement. In this article, we address this challenge using computational monads and partial evaluation. We consider a subset of Icon and we specify it with a monadic semantics and a list monad. We then consider a spectrum of monads that also fit the bill, and we relate them to each other. For example, we derive a continuation monad as a Church encoding of the list monad. The resulting semantics coincides with Gudeman’s continuation semantics of Icon. We then compile Icon programs by specializing their interpreter (i.e., by using the first Futamura projection), using type-directed partial evaluation. Through various back ends, including a run-time code generator, we generate ML code, C code, and OCaml byte code. Binding-time analysis and partial evaluation of the continuation-based interpreter automatically give rise to C programs that coincide with the result of Proebsting’s optimized compiler. Basic Research in Computer Science (www.brics. dk), funded by the Danish National Research Foundation. Olivier Danvy, Ph.D., Habilitation: He is an Associate Professor at the Department of Computer Science at the University of Aarhus, in Denmark. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in 1986 and his Habilitation in 1993 from the Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), France. His research interests are in Programming Languages in general and in Partial Evaluation and Continuations in particular. He has published over 75 refereed research papers and edited several proceedings. He has both served on and chaired program committees of scientific meetings in the area of Programming Languages. He is presently chairing the PEPM steering committee at ACM SIGPLAN and serving as external reviewer in computer science for the Danish Universities, as board member in the BRICS PhD School, and as co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation (http://www.wkap.nl/journals/hosc). Bernd Grobauer, M.Sc.: He is a Ph.D. student at the BRICS International Ph.D. school, University of Aarhus, Denmark, and will graduate in the summer of 2001. He obtained his Masters degree from the Munich University of Technology (TUM), Germany. His research interests are in formal methods (especially theorem proving) and programming languages (semantics of programming languages, program analysis, program transformation, types). He serves as editorial assistant for the journal Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation and as chairman of the BRICS Juniorklubben. Morten Rhiger, M.Sc.: He is a Ph.D. student at the BRICS International Ph.D. school, University of Aarhus, Denmark, and will graduate in the summer of 2001. He obtained his Masters degree from the University of Aarhus in 1998. His research interests are in the semantics and implementation of programming languages.     

A Prolog simulator for deterministic P systems with active membranes

In this paper we propose a new way to represent P systems with active membranes based on Logic Programming techniques. This representation allows us to express the set of rules and the configuration of the P system in each step of the evolution as literals of an appropriate language of first order logic. We provide a Prolog program to simulate, the evolution of these P systems and present some auxiliary tools to simulate the evolution of a P system with active membranes using 2-division which solves the SAT problem following the techniques presented in Reference.¹⁰ Andrés Cordón-Franco: He is a member of the Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Sevilla (Spain). He is also a member of the research group on Natural Computing of the University of Seville. His research interest includes Mathematical Logic, Logic in Computer Science, and Membrane Computing, both from a theoretical and from a practical (software implementation) point of view. Miguel A. Gutiérrez-Naranjo: He is an assistant professor in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Department at University of Sevilla, Spain. He is also a member of the Research Group on Natural Computing of the University of Seville. His research interest includes Machine Learning, Logic Programming and Membrane Computing, both from a theoretical and a practical point of view. Mario J. Pérez-Jiménez, Ph.D.: He is professor of Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence at University of Seville, where he is the head of the Group of Research on Natural Computing, He has published 8 books of Mathematics and Computation, and more than 90 scientific articles in prestigious scientific journals. He is member of European Molecular Computing Consortium. Fernando Sancho-Caparrini: He is a member of the Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Sevilla (Spain). He is also a member of the research group on Natural Computing of the University of Seville. His research interest includes Complex Systems, DNA Computing, Logic in Computer Science, and Membrane Computing, both from a theoretical and from a practical point of view.     

Cautious induction: An alternative to clause-at-a-time hypothesis construction in inductive logic programming

Hypotheses constructed by inductive logic programming (ILP) systems are finite sets of definite clauses. Top-down ILP systems usually adopt the following greedy clause-at-a-time strategy to construct such a hypothesis: start with the empty set of clauses and repeatedly add the clause that most improves the quality of the set. This paper formulates and analyses an alternative method for constructing hypotheses. The method, calledcautious induction, consists of a first stage, which finds a finite set of candidate clauses, and a second stage, which selects a finite subset of these clauses to form a hypothesis. By using a less greedy method in the second stage, cautious induction can find hypotheses of higher quality than can be found with a clause-at-a-time algorithm. We have implemented a top-down, cautious ILP system called CILS. This paper presents CILS and compares it to Progol, a top-down clause-at-a-time ILP system. The sizes of the search spaces confronted by the two systems are analysed and an experiment examines their performance on a series of mutagenesis learning problems. Simon Anthony, BEng.: Simon, perhaps better known as “Mr. Cautious” in Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) circles, completed a BEng in Information Engineering at the University of York in 1995. He remained at York as a research student in the Intelligent Systems Group. Concentrating on ILP, his research interests are Cautious Induction and developing number handling techniques using Constraint Logic Programming. Alan M. Frisch, Ph.D.: He is the Reader in Intelligent Systems at the University of York (UK), and he heads the Intelligent Systems Group in the Department of Computer Science. He was awarded a Ph. D. in Computer Science from the University of Rochester (USA) in 1986 and has held faculty positions at the University of Sussex (UK) and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (USA). For over 15 years Dr. Frisch has been conducting research on a wide range of topics in the area of automated reasoning, including knowledge retrieval, probabilistic inference, constraint solving, parsing as deduction, inductive logic programming and the integration of constraint solvers into automated deduction systems.     

A portable approach to dynamic optimization in run-time specialization

This paper proposes arun-time bytecode specialization (BCS) technique that analyzes programs and generates specialized programs at run-time in an intermediate language. By using an intermediate language for code generation, a back-end system canoptimize the specialized programs after specialization. The system uses Java virtual machine language (JVML) as the intermediate language, which allows the system to easily achieve practicalportability and to use existing sophisticated just-in-time (JIT) compilers as its back-end. The binding-time analysis algorithm is based on a type system, and covers a non-object-oriented subset of JVML. The specializer generates programs on a per-instruction basis, and can performmethod inlining at run-time. Our performance measurements show that a non-trivial application program specialized at run-time by BCS runs approximately 3–4 times faster than the unspecialized one. Despite the large overhead of JIT compilation of specialized code, we observed that the overall performance of the application can be improved. This paper is an extended version of “A Portable Approach to Generating Optimized Specialized Code”, inProceedings of Second Symposium on Programs as Data Objects (PADO-II), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2053, pp. 138–154, Aarhus, Denmark, May 2001.²³) Hidehiko Masuhara, D.Sc.: He is an Assistant Professor at Department of Graphics and Computer Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo. He received his B.S., M.S. and D.Sc. degrees from Department of Information Science, University of Tokyo in 1992, 1994, and 1999, respectively. His research interests are in programming languages, especially in mechanisms to support flexible and efficient computation such as dynamic optimization and reflection. He received the best-paper award from Information Processing Society of Japan in 1996. Akinori Yonezawa, Ph.D.: He is a Professor of computer science at Department of Computer Science, University of Tokyo. He received Ph.D. in Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1977. His current major research interests are in the areas of concurrent/parallel computation models, programming languages, object-oriented computing, and distributed computing. He is the designer of an object-oriented concurrent language ABCL/1 and the editor of several books and served as an associate editor of ACM Transaction of Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS). Since 1998, he has been an ACM Fellow.