Efficient parallel algorithms forr-dominating set andp-center problems on trees

We develop efficient parallel algorithms for ther-dominating set and thep-center problems on trees. On a concurrent-read exclusive-write PRAM, our algorithm for ther-dominating set problem runs inO(logn log logn) time withn processors. The algorithm for thep-center problem runs inO(log² n log logn) time withn processors.     

A faster parallel algorithm for a matrix searching problem

We give an improved parallel algorithm for the problem of computing the tube minima of a totally monotonen ×n ×n matrix, an important matrix searching problem that was formalized by Aggarwal and Park and has many applications. Our algorithm runs inO(log logn) time withO(n²/log logn) processors in theCRCW-PRAM model, whereas the previous best ran inO((log logn)²) time withO(n²/(log logn)² processors, also in theCRCW-PRAM model. Thus we improve the speed without any deterioration in thetime ×processors product. Our improved bound immediately translates into improvedCRCW-PRAM bounds for the numerous applications of this problem, including string editing, construction of Huffmann codes and other coding trees, and many other combinatorial and geometric problems.This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research under Grants N00014-84-K-0502 and N00014-86-K-0689, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant AFOSR-90-0107, the National Science Foundation under Grant DCR-8451393, and the National Library of Medicine under Grant R01-LM05118. Part of the research was done while the author was at Princeton University, visiting the DIMACS center.     

Deterministic parallel list ranking

In this paper we describe a simple parallel algorithm for list ranking. The algorithm is deterministic and runs inO(logn) time on an EREW PRAM withn/logn processors. The algorithm matches the performance of the Cole-Vishkin [CV3] algorithm but is simple and has reasonable constant factors.R. J. Anderson was supported by an NSF Presidential Young Investigator award and G. L. Miller was supported by NSF Grant DCR-85114961.     

On Parallel Selection and Searching in Partial Orders: Sorted Matrices

Parallel algorithms for the problems of selection and searching on sorted matrices are formulated. The selection algorithm takesO(lognlog lognlog*n) time withO(n/lognlog*n) processors on an EREW PRAM. This algorithm can be generalized to solve the selection problem on a set of sorted matrices. The searching algorithm takesO(log logn) time withO(n/log logn) processors on a Common CRCW PRAM, which is optimal. We show that no algorithm using at mostnlog^cnprocessors,c≥ 1, can solve the matrix search problem in time faster than Ω(log logn) and that Ω(logn) steps are needed to solve this problem on any model that does not allow concurrent writes.     

A new scheme for the deterministic simulation of PRAMs in VLSI

A deterministic scheme for the simulation of (n, m)-PRAM computation is devised. Each PRAM step is simulated on a bounded degree network consisting of a mesh-of-trees (MT) of siden. The memory is subdivided inn modules, each local to a PRAM processor. The roots of the MT contain these processors and the memory modules, while the otherO(n ²) nodes have the mere capabilities of packet switchers and one-bit comparators. The simulation algorithm makes a crucial use of pipelining on the MT, and attains a time complexity ofO(log² n/log logn). The best previous time bound wasO(log² n) on a different interconnection network withn processors. While the previous simulation schemes use an intermediate MPC model, which is in turn simulated on a bounded degree network, our method performs the simulation directly with a simple algorithm.This work has been supported in part by Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione of Italy under a research grant.     

An optimal speed-up parallel algorithm for triangulating simplicial point sets in space

Previous research on developing parallel triangulation algorithms concentrated on triangulating planar point sets.O(log³ n) running time algorithms usingO(n) processors have been developed in Refs. 1 and 2. Atallah and Goodrich⁽³⁾ presented a data structure that can be viewed as a parallel analogue of the sequential plane-sweeping paradigm, which can be used to triangulate a planar point set inO(logn loglogn) time usingO(n) processors. Recently Merks⁽⁴⁾ described an algorithm for triangulating point sets which runs inO(logn) time usingO(n) processors, and is thus optimal. In this paper we develop a parallel algorithm for triangulating simplicial point sets in arbitrary dimensions based on the idea of the sequential algorithm presented in Ref. 5. The algorithm runs inO(log² n) time usingO(n/logn) processors. The algorithm hasO(n logn) as the product of the running time and the number of processors; i.e., an optimal speed-up.     

Efficient parallel recognition of some circular arc graphs, II

Based on Tucker's work, we present an accurate proof of the characterization of proper circular arc graphs and obtain the first efficient parallel algorithm which not only recognizes proper circular arc graphs but also constructs proper circular arc representations. The algorithm runs inO(log² n) time withO(n ³) processors on a Common CRCW PRAM. The sequential algorithm can be implemented to run inO(n ²) time and is optimal if the input graph is given as an adjacency matrix, so to speak. Portions of this paper appear in preliminary form in theProceedings of the 1989Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures [2], and theProceedings of the 1994International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation [5].     

A chained-matrices approach for parallel computation of continued fractions and its applications

A chained-matrices approach for parallel computing thenth convergent of continued fractions is presented. The resulting algorithm computes the entire prefix values of any continued fraction inO(logn) time on the EREW PRAM model or a network withO(n/logn) processors connected by the cube-connectedcycles, binary tree, perfect shuffle, or hypercube. It can be applied to approximate the transcendental numbers, such as ande, inO(logm) time by usingO(m/logm) processors for a result withm-digit precision. We also use it to costoptimally solve the second-order linear recurrence, the polynomial evaluation, the recurrence of vector norm, the general class of recurrence equation defined by Kogge and Stone (1973), and the generalmth order linear recurrence. It is easy to implement because there are only some matrix multiplications and a division operation involved.This work was supported in part by National Science Council of the Republic of China under Contract NSC 77-0408-E002-09.     

Optimal Computing the Chessboard Distance Transform on Parallel Processing Systems

Thedistance transform(DT) is an image computation tool which can be used to extract the information about the shape and the position of the foreground pixels relative to each other. It converts a binary image into a grey-level image, where each pixel has a value corresponding to the distance to the nearest foreground pixel. The time complexity for computing the distance transform is fully dependent on the different distance metrics. Especially, the more exact the distance transform is, the worse execution time reached will be. Nowadays, quite often thousands of images are processed in a limited time. It seems quite impossible for a sequential computer to do such a computation for the distance transform in real time. In order to provide efficient distance transform computation, it is considerably desirable to develop a parallel algorithm for this operation. In this paper, based on the diagonal propagation approach, we first provide anO(N²) time sequential algorithm to compute thechessboard distance transform(CDT) of anN×Nimage, which is a DT using the chessboard distance metrics. Based on the proposed sequential algorithm, the CDT of a 2D binary image array of sizeN×Ncan be computed inO(logN) time on the EREW PRAM model usingO(N²/logN) processors,O(log logN) time on the CRCW PRAM model usingO(N²/log logN) processors, andO(logN) time on the hypercube computer usingO(N²/logN) processors. Following the mapping as proposed by Lee and Horng, the algorithm for the medial axis transform is also efficiently derived. The medial axis transform of a 2D binary image array of sizeN×Ncan be computed inO(logN) time on the EREW PRAM model usingO(N²/logN) processors,O(log logN) time on the CRCW PRAM model usingO(N²/log logN) processors, andO(logN) time on the hypercube computer usingO(N²/logN) processors. The proposed parallel algorithms are composed of a set of prefix operations. In each prefix operation phase, only increase (add-one) operation and minimum operation are employed. So, the algorithms are especially efficient in practical applications.     

Parallel integer sorting and simulation amongst CRCW models

In this paper a general technique for reducing processors in simulation without any increase in time is described. This results in an O(√logn) time algorithm for simulating one step of PRIORITY on TOLERANT with processor-time product of O(n log logn); the same as that for simulating PRIORITY on ARBITRARY. This is used to obtain anO(logn/log logn + √logn (log logm ? log logn)) time algorithm for sortingn integers from the set {0,...,m ? 1},m ≧n, with a processor-time product ofO(n log logm log logn) on a TOLERANT CRCW PRAM. New upper and lower bounds for ordered chaining problem on an allocated COMMON CRCW model are also obtained. The algorithm for ordered chaining takesO(logn/log logn) time on an allocated PRAM of sizen. It is shown that this result is best possible (upto a constant multiplicative factor) by obtaining a lower bound of Ω(r logn/(logr + log logn)) for finding the first (leftmost one) live processor on an allocated-COMMON PRAM of sizen ofr-slow virtual processors (one processor simulatesr processors of allocated PRAM). As a result, for ordered chaining problem, “processor-time product” has to be at least Ω(n logn/log logn) for any poly-logarithmic time algorithm. Algorithm for ordered-chaining problem results in anO(logN/log logN) time algorithm for (stable) sorting ofn integers from the set {0,...,m ? 1} withn-processors on a COMMON CRCW PRAM; hereN = max(n, m). In particular if,m =n ^O(1), then sorting takes Θ(logn/log logn) time on both TOLERANT and COMMON CRCW PRAMs. Processor-time product for TOLERANT isO(n(log logn)²). Algorithm for COMMON usesn processors.     

Expected parallel time and sequential space complexity of graph and digraph problems

This paper determines upper bounds on the expected time complexity for a variety of parallel algorithms for undirected and directed random graph problems. For connectivity, biconnectivity, transitive closure, minimum spanning trees, and all pairs minimum cost paths, we prove the expected time to beO(log logn) for the CRCW PRAM (this parallel RAM machine allows resolution of write conflicts) andO(logn · log logn) for the CREW PRAM (which allows simultaneous reads but not simultaneous writes). We also show that the problem of graph isomorphism has expected parallel timeO(log logn) for the CRCW PRAM andO(logn) for the CREW PRAM. Most of these results follow because of upper bounds on the mean depth of a graph, derived in this paper, for more general graphs than was known before.For undirected connectivity especially, we present a new probabilistic algorithm which runs on a randomized input and has an expected running time ofO(log logn) on the CRCW PRAM, withO(n) expected number of processors only.Our results also improve known upper bounds on the expected space required for sequential graph algorithms. For example, we show that the problems of finding connected components, transitive closure, minimum spanning trees, and minimum cost paths have expected sequential spaceO(logn · log logn) on a deterministic Turing Machine. We use a simulation of the CRCW PRAM to get these expected sequential space bounds.This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant DCR-85-03251 and Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-80-C-0647.This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grants MCS-83-00630, DCR-8503497, by the Greek Ministry of Research and Technology, and by the ESPRIT Basic Research Actions Project ALCOM.     

Efficient parallel and sequential algorithms for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs

We present an efficient algorithm for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs. The best previously known algorithm for this problem takesO(n ^3/2) sequential time, orO(log⁴ n) parallel time withO(n³) processors. The sequential implementation of our algorithm takesO(n logn) time. The parallel implementation of our algorithm takesO(log³ n) time withO(n) processors on a PRAM.     

Parallel general prefix computations with geometric,algebraic, and other applications

We introduce a generic problem component that captures the most common, difficult kernel of many problems. This kernel involves general prefix computations (GPC). GPC's lower bound complexity of (n logn) time is established, and we give optimal solutions on the sequential model inO(n logn) time, on the CREW PRAM model inO(logn) time, on the BSR (broadcasting with selective reduction) model in constant time, and on mesh-connected computers inO(n) time, all withn processors, plus anO(log² n) time solution on the hypercube model. We show that GPC techniques can be applied to a wide variety of geometric (point set and tree) problems, including triangulation of point sets, two-set dominance counting, ECDF searching, finding two-and three-dimensional maximal points, the reconstruction of trees from their traversals, counting inversions in a permutation, and matching parentheses.work partially supported by NSF IRI/8709726work partially supported by NSERC.     

Efficient parallel and sequential algorithms for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs

We present an efficient algorithm for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs. The best previously known algorithm for this problem takesO(n ^3/2) sequential time, orO(log⁴ n) parallel time withO(n³) processors. The sequential implementation of our algorithm takesO(n logn) time. The parallel implementation of our algorithm takesO(log³ n) time withO(n) processors on a PRAM.

     

An optimal parallel algorithm for triangulating a set of points in the plane

This paper presents an optimal parallel algorithm for triangulating an arbitrary set ofn points in the plane. The algorithm runs inO(logn) time usingO(n) space andO(_n) processors on a Concurrent-Read, Exclusive-Write Parallel RAM model (CREW PRAM). The parallel lower bound on triangulation is (logn) time so the best possible linear speedup has been achieved. A parallel divide-and-conquer technique of subdividing a problem into subproblems is employed.     

Deterministic parallel list ranking

In this paper we describe a simple parallel algorithm for list ranking. The algorithm is deterministic and runs inO(logn) time on an EREW PRAM withn/logn processors. The algorithm matches the performance of the Cole-Vishkin [CV3] algorithm but is simple and has reasonable constant factors.     

Constructing the Voronoi diagram of a set of line segments in parallel

In this paper we give a parallel algorithm for constructing the Voronoi diagram of a polygonal scene, i.e., a set of line segments in the plane such that no two segments intersect except possibly at their endpoints. Our algorithm runs inO(log² n) time usingO(n) processors in the CREW PRAM model.The research of M. T. Goodrich was supported by NSF under Grants CCR-8810568 and CCR-9003299 and by NSF/DARPA under Grant CCR-8908092. C. K. Yap's research was supported in part by NSF Grants DCR-8401898 and CCR-9002819.     

Dynamic fractional cascading

The problem of searching for a key in many ordered lists arises frequently in computational geometry. Chazelle and Guibas recently introduced fractional cascading as a general technique for solving this type of problem. In this paper we show that fractional cascading also supports insertions into and deletions from the lists efficiently. More specifically, we show that a search for a key inn lists takes timeO(logN +n log logN) and an insertion or deletion takes timeO(log logN). HereN is the total size of all lists. If only insertions or deletions have to be supported theO(log logN) factor reduces toO(1). As an application we show that queries, insertions, and deletions into segment trees or range trees can be supported in timeO(logn log logn), whenn is the number of segments (points).This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Grants Me 620/6-1 and SFB 124, Teilprojekt B2. A preliminary version of this research was presented at the ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, Baltimore, 1985.     

An Efficient Parallel Strategy for ComputingK-Terminal Reliability and Finding Most Vital Edges in 2-Trees and Partial 2-Trees

In this paper, we first develop a parallel algorithm for computingK-terminal reliability, denoted byR(G_K), in 2-trees. Based on this result, we can also computeR(G_K) in partial 2-trees using a method that transforms, in parallel, a given partial 2-tree into a 2-tree. Finally, we solve the problem of finding most vital edges with respect toK-terminal reliability in partial 2-trees. Our algorithms takeO(log n) time withC(m, n) processors on a CRCW PRAM, whereC(m, n) is the number of processors required to find the connected components of a graph withmedges andnvertices in logarithmic time.     

Parallel algorithms for arrangements

We give the first efficient parallel algorithms for solving the arrangement problem. We give a deterministic algorithm for the CREW PRAM which runs in nearly optimal bounds ofO (logn log^* n) time andn ²/logn processors. We generalize this to obtain anO (logn log^* n)-time algorithm usingn ^d /logn processors for solving the problem ind dimensions. We also give a randomized algorithm for the EREW PRAM that constructs an arrangement ofn lines on-line, in which each insertion is done in optimalO (logn) time usingn/logn processors. Our algorithms develop new parallel data structures and new methods for traversing an arrangement.This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, under Grants CCR-8657562 and CCR-8858799, NSF/DARPA under Grant CCR-8907960, and Digital Equipment Corporation. A preliminary version of this paper appeared at the Second Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures [3].