Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis

Existing methods for generating common weights in data envelopment analysis (DEA) are either very complicated or unable to produce a full ranking for decision making units (DMUs). This paper proposes a new methodology based on regression analysis to seek a common set of weights that are easy to estimate and can produce a full ranking for DMUs. The DEA efficiencies obtained with the most favorable weights to each DMU are treated as the target efficiencies of DMUs and are best fitted with the efficiencies determined by common weights. Two new nonlinear regression models are constructed to optimally estimate the common weights. Four numerical examples are examined using the developed new models to test their discrimination power and illustrate their potential applications in fully ranking DMUs. Comparisons with a similar compromise approach for generating common weights are also discussed.     

DEA nonradial efficiency based on vector properties

Classic data envelopment analysis (DEA) models determine the efficiency of productive units, called decision making units (DMUs). DEA uses as its methodology the equiproportional reduction of inputs or increase of outputs and the finding of a single target for each DMU. This target does not incorporate the preference of the decision maker. Later works propose obtaining alternative targets based on nonradial projections on the efficiency frontier that are obtained through nonproportional variations of inputs or outputs. However, the efficiencies are not calculated for these alternative targets. This impedes a comparison among the DMUs. Thus, diverse nonradial efficiency indexes have been proposed based on mathematical averages or weighted averages that do not consider the vectorial characteristics of the efficiency. In this work, we present a nonradial efficiency index based on the initial concept of efficiency associated with each alternative (nonradial) target obtained through a multiobjective model of an inefficient DMU.     

A new DEA approach to fully rank DMUs with an application to MBA programs

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be used to evaluate the efficiencies of decision‐making units (DMUs) in various areas like education, healthcare, and energy. Several DEA methods are proposed for this purpose; however, some of these methods cannot provide a full ranking and others often overlook some considerations that arise with special characteristics of DMUs. We propose a new DEA‐based approach to achieve a full ranking of DMUs. Our approach takes various issues into account such as the initial efficiency score of the DMU, the DMUs that should be removed from the set for it to become efficient (if any) and its effects on the efficiency scores of other DMUs. We demonstrate the shortcomings of several other DEA methods and discuss how our approach overcomes these. We apply our approach to evaluate 50 MBA programs from Financial Times 2018 rankings and compare the results with the evaluations of other methods. As opposed to some methods, our approach has the advantage of differentiating between all efficient DMUs as well as inefficient ones. In addition, the results demonstrate that we can achieve a consistent ranking that considers different aspects of the problem setting. The generated scores are also used to sort DMUs in classes of preference.     

Negative data in DEA: Recognizing congestion and specifying the least and the most congested decision making units

One of the important concepts of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is congestion. A decision making unit (DMU) has congestion if an increase (decrease) in one or more input(s) of the DMU leads to a decrease (increase) in one or more its output(s). The drawback of all existing congestion DEA approaches is that they are applicable only to technologies specified by non-negative data, whereas in the real world, it may exist negative data, too. Moreover, specifying the strongly and weakly most congested DMUs is a very important issue for decision makers, however, there is no study on specifying these DMUs in DEA. These two facts are motivations for creating this current study. Hence, in this research, we first introduce a DEA model to determine candidate DMUs for having congestion and then, a DEA approach is presented to detect congestion status of these DMUs. Likewise, we propose two integrated mixed integer programming (MIP)-DEA models to specify the strongly and weakly most congested DMUs. Note that the proposed approach permits the inputs and outputs that can take both negative and non-negative magnitudes. Also, a ranking DEA approach is introduced to rank the specified congested DMUs and identify the least congested DMU. Finally, a numerical example and an empirical application are presented to highlight the purpose of this research.     

A note on simulating weights restrictions in DEA: an improvement of Thanassoulis and Allen's method

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric technique for measuring and assessing the comparative efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs). Weights restrictions are often imposed on these assessments and create many problems in interpretations of results. This paper focuses on one of those and reviews unobserved DMUs method, introduced by Thanassoulis and Allen, to overcome this problem. This paper clarifies the method proposed by them for specifying full set of unobserved DMUs (FSUD) and reduced set of unobserved DMUs (RSUD) as two sets of unobserved DMUs, too. It is indicated that this method is not suitable for some cases and a simple approach is introduced to identify and eliminate redundant unobserved DMUs and specify a new RSUD convenient for all cases.     

Data Envelopment Analysis Based on Choquet Integral

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a widely used technique in decision making. The existing DEA models always assume that the inputs (or outputs) of decision‐making units (DMUs) are independent with each other. However, there exist positive or negative interactions between inputs (or outputs) of DMUs. To reflect such interactions, Choquet integral is applied to DEA. Self‐efficiency models based on Choquet integral are first established, which can obtain more efficiency values than the existing ones. Then, the idea is extended to the cross‐efficiency models, including the game cross‐efficiency models. The optimal analysis of DEA is further investigated based on regret theory. To estimate the ranking intervals of DMUs, several models are also established. It is founded that the models considering the interactions between inputs (or outputs) can obtain wider ranking intervals.     

A full ranking methodology in data envelopment analysis based on a set of dummy decision making units

In this paper, we propose a new methodology for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Our approach is a benchmarking method, seeks a common set of weights using a proposed linear programming model and is based on the TOPSIS approach in multiple attribute decision making (MADM). To this end, five artificial or dummy decision making units (DMUs) are defined, the ideal DMU (IDMU), the anti-ideal DMU (ADMU), the right ideal DMU (RIDMU), the left anti-ideal DMU (LADMU) and the average DMU (AVDMU). We form two comprehensive indexes for the AVDMU called the Left Relative Closeness (LRC) and the Right Relative Closeness (RRC) with respect to the RIDMU and LADMU. The LRC and RRC indexes will be used in the new proposed linear programming model to estimate the common set of weights, the new efficiency of DMUs and finally an overall ranking for all the DMUs. The change of the ratio between LRC and RRC indexes is capable to be provoked alternative rankings. One of the best advantages of this model is that we can make a rationale ranking which is demonstrated by the realized correlation analysis. Also, the new proposed efficiency score of the DMUs is close to the efficiency score of the DEA (CCR) methodology. Three numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applicability of the new approach and the effectiveness of the new approach in DEA ranking in comparison with other conventional ranking methods. Also, an "error" analysis proves the robustness of the proposed methodology.     

A modified slacks‐based ranking method handling negative data in data envelopment analysis

Performance ranking for a set of comparable decision‐making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs is an important and often‐discussed topic in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Conventional DEA models distinguish efficient units from inefficient ones but cannot further discriminate the efficient units, which all have a 100% efficiency score. Another weakness of these models is that they cannot handle negative inputs and/or outputs. In this paper, a new modified slacks‐based measure is proposed that works in the presence of negative data and provides quantitative data that helps decision makers obtain a full ranking of DMUs in situations where other methods fail. In addition, the new method has the properties of unit invariance and translation invariance, and it can give targets for inefficient DMUs to guide them to achieve full efficiency. Two numerical examples are analysed to demonstrate the usefulness of the new method.     

DEA efficiency analysis: A DEA approach with double frontiers

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring efficiency of peer decision-making units (DMUs). Conventional DEA evaluates the performance of each DMU using a set of most favourable weights. As a result, traditional DEA models can be considered methods for the analysis of the best relative efficiency or analysis of the optimistic efficiency. DEA efficient DMUs obtained from conventional DEA models create an efficient production frontier. Traditional DEA can be used to identify units with good performance in the most desirable scenarios. There is a similar approach that evaluates the performance indicators of each DMU using a set of most unfavourable weights. Accordingly, such models can be considered models for analysing the worst relative efficiency or pessimistic efficiency. This approach uses the inefficient production frontier for determining the worst relative efficiency that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs lying on the inefficient production frontier are referred to as DEA inefficient while those neither on the efficient frontier nor on the inefficient frontier are declared DEA inefficient. It can be argued that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously and any approach with only one of them would be biased. This paper proposed the integration of both efficiencies as an interval so that the overall performance score would belong to this interval. It was shown that efficiency interval provided more information than either of the two efficiencies, which was illustrated using two numerical examples.     

A new data envelopment analysis method for ranking decision making units: an application in industrial parks

Relative efficiency of decision‐making units (DMUs) is assessed by classical data envelopment analysis (DEA) models. DEA is a popular technique for efficiency evaluation. There might be a couple of efficient DMUs. Classical DEA models cannot fully rank efficient DMUs. In this paper, a novel technique for fully ranking all DMUs based on changing reference set using a single virtual inefficient DMU is proposed. To this end, the first concept of virtual DMU is defined as average of all inefficient DMUs. Virtual DMU is a proxy of all inefficient DMUs. This new method proposes a new ranking method that takes into account impact of efficient DMUs on virtual DMU and impact of efficient DMUs on influences of other efficient DMUs. A case study is given to show applicability of the proposed approach.     

A new DEA‐based method for fully ranking all decision‐making units

Abstract: Decision makers always lay great emphasis on performance evaluation upon a group of peer business units to pick out the best performer. Standard data envelopment analysis models can evaluate the relative efficiency of decision‐making units (DMUs) and distinguish efficient ones from inefficient ones. However, when there are more than one efficient DMU, it is impossible to rank all of them solely according to standard efficiency scores. In this paper, a new method for fully ranking all DMUs is proposed, which is based on the combination of each efficient DMU's influence on all the other DMUs and the standard efficiency scores. This method is effective in helping decision makers differentiate all units' performance thoroughly and select the best performer.     

Pareto–Koopmans efficiency in two‐stage network data envelopment analysis in the presence of undesirable intermediate products and nondiscretionary factors

Many studies have recently been conducted on the evaluation of system performance with a two‐stage network structure in data envelopment analysis (DEA) literature. One of the topics of interest to researchers has been the mitigation of undesirable products or nondiscretionary factors into their corresponding possible production set (PPS) and their impact on overall efficiency calculations. Determination of decision‐making units (DMUs) with Pareto–Koopmans efficiency status is decisive in identifying benchmark units. The calculated overall efficiency status is compromised when both undesirable products and nondiscretionary factors are present. This work utilizes an axiomatic approach. A novel PPS for a two‐stage network in presence of undesirable intermediate products and nondiscretionary exogenous inputs is introduced. Based on this PPS and by focusing on the principle of mathematical dominance, new models for evaluating overall and divisional efficiencies are presented. In addition, by proposing a two‐step network DEA approach, a necessary and sufficient condition for detection of DMUs with Pareto–Koopmans efficiency status is provided. And by introducing a two‐step algorithm, a novel technique for determining overall efficiency conditions is produced. Finally, the proposed technology is applied to a practical example, and outcomes are discussed.     

The voting analytic hierarchy process method for discriminating among efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis

Making optimal use of available resources has always been of interest to humankind, and different approaches have been used in an attempt to make maximum use of existing resources. Limitations of capital, manpower, energy, etc., have led managers to seek ways for optimally using such resources. In fact, being informed of the performance of the units under the supervision of a manager is the most important task with regard to making sensible decisions for managing them. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) suggests an appropriate method for evaluating the efficiency of homogeneous units with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. DEA models classify decision making units (DMUs) into efficient and inefficient ones. However, in most cases, managers and researchers are interested in ranking the units and selecting the best DMU. Various scientific models have been proposed by researchers for ranking DMUs. Each of these models has some weakness(es), which makes it difficult to select the appropriate ranking model. This paper presents a method for ranking efficient DMUs by the voting analytic hierarchy process (VAHP). The paper reviews some ranking models in DEA and discusses their strengths and weaknesses. Then, we provide the method for ranking efficient DMUs by VAHP. Finally we give an example to illustrate our approach and then the new method is employed to rank efficient units in a real world problem.     

A concept of fuzzy input mix-efficiency in fuzzy DEA and its application in banking sector

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming based non-parametric technique for evaluating the relative efficiency of homogeneous decision making units (DMUs) on the basis of multiple inputs and multiple outputs. There exist radial and non-radial models in DEA. Radial models only deal with proportional changes of inputs/outputs and neglect the input/output slacks. On the other hand, non-radial models directly deal with the input/output slacks. The slack-based measure (SBM) model is a non-radial model in which the SBM efficiency can be decomposed into radial, scale and mix-efficiency. The mix-efficiency is a measure to estimate how well the set of inputs are used (or outputs are produced) together. The conventional mix-efficiency measure requires crisp data which may not always be available in real world applications. In real world problems, data may be imprecise or fuzzy. In this paper, we propose (i) a concept of fuzzy input mix-efficiency and evaluate the fuzzy input mix-efficiency using α – cut approach, (ii) a fuzzy correlation coefficient method using expected value approach which calculates the expected intervals and expected values of fuzzy correlation coefficients between fuzzy inputs and fuzzy outputs, and (iii) a new method for ranking the DMUs on the basis of fuzzy input mix-efficiency. The proposed approaches are then applied to the State Bank of Patiala in the Punjab state of India with districts as the DMUs.     

一种考虑DMU间交叉竞争的博弈效率DEA评价方法

针对绩效评价过程中一般只考虑DMU与评价者之间的合作竞争而忽视DMU间的非合作竞争的博弈,引入交叉竞争的博弈理念,将评价问题界定为评价者与DMU间合作竞争与博弈、DMU间交叉竞争的博弈两大类;考虑到在交叉竞争的博弈情境下,DMU的指标值不再是固定不变,而是随之动态调整的特点,设计交叉竞争的博弈规则,并运用决策树法描述考虑交叉竞争博弈下的DEA评价与选择过程;变评价过程中效用值改变的途径由“基于权重的交换”转化为“基于交叉竞争博弈的指标值调整”,实施对DEA模型的改进,设计交叉竞争的博弈效率DEA评价方法,得出确定型、风险型和不确定型DEA方法的分类和交叉竞争的博弈效率评价过程;从经济学的博弈论和管理学的决策分析来解释DEA,实现更加直观的DMU评价过程和更符合客观实际的评价情景.最后通过算例验证所提出方法的可行性、有效性和保序性.     

Measurement of overall performances of decision-making units using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for evaluating relative efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs) which perform similar functions in a production system, consuming multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. The conventional form of DEA evaluates performances of DMUs only from the optimistic point of view. In other words, it chooses the most favorable weights for each DMU. There is another approach that measures efficiency of a DMU from the pessimistic point of view. This approach chooses the most unfavorable weights for evaluation of each DMU. In this paper, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval in order to measure the overall performance of a DMU. The proposed DEA models for evaluation of efficiencies are called bounded DEA models. The proposed approach will be compared using a numerical example. Another example regarding performance evaluation of 50 bank branches in Iranian cities will be presented to demonstrate the advantages, simplicity, and utility of this approach in real-life situations.     

Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with application to base realignment and closure (BRAC)

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) on the basis of multiple inputs and outputs. Conventional DEA models assume that inputs and outputs are measured by exact values on a ratio scale. However, the observed values of the input and output data in real-world problems are often vague or random. Indeed, decision makers (DMs) may encounter a hybrid uncertain environment where fuzziness and randomness coexist in a problem. Several researchers have proposed various fuzzy methods for dealing with the ambiguous and random data in DEA. In this paper, we propose three fuzzy DEA models with respect to probability-possibility, probability-necessity and probability-credibility constraints. In addition to addressing the possibility, necessity and credibility constraints in the DEA model we also consider the probability constraints. A case study for the base realignment and closure (BRAC) decision process at the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is presented to illustrate the features and the applicability of the proposed models.     

A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric approach for measuring the relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs). The centralized model has been widely used to examine the efficiencies of two-stage systems, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. Since there may exist some flexibility in decomposing the overall efficiency between the two stages when multiple optimal weights exist, we develop a Nash bargaining game model to obtain a fair efficiency decomposition for the two stages while keeping the overall efficiency unchanged under this circumstance. The minimal achievable efficiencies for the two stages are used as the breakdown point and the unique bargaining decomposition of the overall efficiency is obtained subsequently. The Nash bargaining game model is applied to evaluate the performance of 10 branches of China Construction Bank.     

Expansion of the cross-efficiency evaluation by using the equations forming the efficient frontier in DEA

In this paper, we propose an algorithm to calculate cross-efficiency scores which used the equations forming the efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis (DEA). In many standard DEA models, each decision-making unit (DMU) is evaluated by using the advantageous weight for itself. Then, many DMUs are evaluated as efficient, and those efficient DMUs are not ranked by the models. The cross-efficiency evaluation is a method to rank DMUs by using the advantageous weights for all DMUs. Previously, the cross-efficiency scores based on different ideas are calculated by solving multiple linear or nonlinear programming problems. However, it is often hard to solve such a nonlinear programming problem. Therefore, by analysing the efficient frontier, we construct an algorithm to calculate alternative cross-efficiency scores.     

Additive centralized and Stackelberg DEA models for two‐stage system with shared resources

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric programming method for evaluating the efficiency performance of decision making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. The classic DEA model cannot provide accurate efficiency measurement and inefficiency sources of DMUs with complex internal structure. The network DEA approach opens the “black box” of DMU by taking its internal operations into consideration. The complexities of DMU's internal structure involve not only the organization of substages, but also the inputs allocation and the operational relations among the individual stages. This paper proposes a set of additive DEA models to evaluate and decompose the efficiency of a two‐stage system with shared inputs and operating in cooperative and Stackelberg game situations. Under the assumptions of cooperative and noncooperative gaming, the proposed models are able to highlight the effects of strategic elements on the efficiency formation of DMUs by calculating the optimal proportion of the shared inputs allocated to each stage. The case of information technology in the banking industry at the firm level, as discussed by Wang, is revisited using the developed DEA approach.