Distributed vibration power absorption of the human hand-arm system in different postures coupled with vibrating handle and power tools

This study presents vibration power absorption (VPA) of different hand-arm substructures in the bent-arm and extended arm postures excited by broadband random and power tool vibrations. VPAs are estimated using biomechanical models of the hand-arm system derived from both the driving-point mechanical impedance and distributed vibration transmissibility. VPAs due to the vibrations of selected hand-held power tools are also estimated. The results show that distributed VPAs of the arms are greater below 25 Hz than those of the hand (fingers and palm) for both postures, while the hand VPAs are greater above 100 Hz, although the values are smaller than those below 25 Hz. The power absorbed during the extended arm posture is about 2.5 times greater than the power absorbed with the bent-arm posture for similar hand forces and vibration magnitude. Similar trends are observed in distributed VPAs due to broadband random as well as typical tool excitations, while the VPA due to tool vibration revealed peaks near the operating frequencies of the power tools and their harmonics. Furthermore, the percentage of power absorbed in different hand-arm substructures was dependent on the operating speed of the power tools, the higher the operating speed the higher the power absorbed in the hand and vice versa. The results showed relatively lower VPA values in the fingers and palm in the 60–160 Hz range than those obtained for the arms in the 5–16 Hz range. The study revealed the need for different frequency weightings for assessment of potential injury risk of different hand-arm substructures.Relevance to industryOperators of hand-held power tools are exposed to hand-transmitted vibration and the associated potential injuries. This study showed that the extended arm posture should be avoided when operating hand-held power tools because large vibration power is absorbed in the human hand-arm system, which may cause hand-arm injury.     

Vibrations transmitted from human hands to upper arm,shoulder, back,neck, and head

Some powered hand tools can generate significant vibration at frequencies below 25 Hz. It is not clear whether such vibration can be effectively transmitted to the upper arm, shoulder, neck, and head and cause adverse effects in these substructures. The objective of this study is to investigate the vibration transmission from the human hands to these substructures. Eight human subjects participated in the experiment, which was conducted on a 1-D vibration test system. Unlike many vibration transmission studies, both the right and left hand-arm systems were simultaneously exposed to the vibration to simulate a working posture in the experiment. A laser vibrometer and three accelerometers were used to measure the vibration transmitted to the substructures. The apparent mass at the palm of each hand was also measured to help in understanding the transmitted vibration and biodynamic response. This study found that the upper arm resonance frequency was 7–12 Hz, the shoulder resonance was 7–9 Hz, and the back and neck resonances were 6–7 Hz. The responses were affected by the hand-arm posture, applied hand force, and vibration magnitude. The transmissibility measured on the upper arm had a trend similar to that of the apparent mass measured at the palm in their major resonant frequency ranges. The implications of the results are discussed.Relevance to industryMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) of the shoulder and neck are important issues among many workers. Many of these workers use heavy-duty powered hand tools. The combined mechanical loads and vibration exposures are among the major factors contributing to the development of MSDs. The vibration characteristics of the body segments examined in this study can be used to help understand MSDs and to help develop more effective intervention methods.     

An examination of the vibration transmissibility of the hand-arm system in three orthogonal directions

The objective of this study is to enhance the understanding of the vibration transmission in the hand-arm system in three orthogonal directions (X, Y, and Z). For the first time, the transmitted vibrations distributed on the entire hand-arm system exposed in the three orthogonal directions via a 3-D vibration test system were measured using a 3-D laser vibrometer. Seven adult male subjects participated in the experiment. This study confirms that the vibration transmissibility generally decreased with the increase in distance from the hand and it varied with the vibration direction. Specifically, to the upper arm and shoulder, only moderate vibration transmission was measured in the test frequency range (16 to 500 Hz), and virtually no transmission was measured in the frequency range higher than 50 Hz. The resonance vibration on the forearm was primarily in the range of 16–30 Hz with the peak amplitude of approximately 1.5 times of the input vibration amplitude. The major resonance on the dorsal surfaces of the hand and wrist occurred at around 30–40 Hz and, in the Y direction, with peak amplitude of more than 2.5 times of the input amplitude. At higher than 50 Hz, vibration transmission was effectively limited to the hand and fingers. A major finger resonance was observed at around 100 Hz in the X and Y directions and around 200 Hz in the Z direction. In the fingers, the resonance magnitude in the Z direction was generally the lowest, and the resonance magnitude in the Y direction was generally the highest with the resonance amplitude of 3 times the input vibration, which was similar to the transmissibility at the wrist and hand dorsum. The implications of the results are discussed.Relevance to industryProlonged, intensive exposure to hand-transmitted vibration could result in hand-arm vibration syndrome. While the syndrome's precise mechanisms remain unclear, the characterization of the vibration transmissibility of the system in the three orthogonal dimensions performed in this study can help understand the syndrome and help develop improved frequency weightings for assessing the risk of the exposure for developing various components of the syndrome.     

The relationships between hand coupling force and vibration biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system

This study conducted two series of experiments to investigate the relationships between hand coupling force and biodynamic responses of the hand–arm system. In the first experiment, the vibration transmissibility on the system was measured as a continuous function of grip force while the hand was subjected to discrete sinusoidal excitations. In the second experiment, the biodynamic responses of the system subjected to a broadband random vibration were measured under five levels of grip forces and a combination of grip and push forces. This study found that the transmissibility at each given frequency increased with the increase in the grip force before reaching a maximum level. The transmissibility then tended to plateau or decrease when the grip force was further increased. This threshold force increased with an increase in the vibration frequency. These relationships remained the same for both types of vibrations. The implications of the experimental results are discussed.

Practitioner Summary: Shocks and vibrations transmitted to the hand–arm system may cause injuries and disorders of the system. How to take hand coupling force into account in the risk assessment of vibration exposure remains an important issue for further studies. This study is designed and conducted to help resolve this issue.     

An analytical investigation of an energy flow divider to attenuate hand-transmitted vibration

A five-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) bio-mechanical model of the hand-arm system is developed to study the vibration transmissibility characteristics of the human hand-arm. The model parameters are identified from the characteristics of vibration transmitted to the hand, forearm and upper arm, measured in the 10–200 Hz frequency range under a constant 25.0 N grip force. A concept of an energy flow divider is proposed to reduce the flow of vibration energy into the hand. The coupled hand-arm-divider is modeled as a six-DOF dynamical system and the response characteristics are evaluated for handle excitations caused by a palm-grip orbital sander. The response characteristics of the coupled hand-arm-divider model are compared to those of the hand-arm model to demonstrate the potential performance benefits of the proposed energy flow divider. The hand-transmitted vibration is further assessed using the overall weighted acceleration response, and it is concluded that the proposed energy flow divider can reduce the magnitude of hand-transmitted vibration considerably.     

The effects of vibration-reducing gloves on finger vibration

Vibration-reducing (VR) gloves have been used to reduce the hand-transmitted vibration exposures from machines and powered hand tools but their effectiveness remains unclear, especially for finger protection. The objectives of this study are to determine whether VR gloves can attenuate the vibration transmitted to the fingers and to enhance the understanding of the mechanisms of how these gloves work. Seven adult male subjects participated in the experiment. The fixed factors evaluated include hand force (four levels), glove condition (gel-filled, air bladder, no gloves), and location of the finger vibration measurement. A 3-D laser vibrometer was used to measure the vibrations on the fingers with and without wearing a glove on a 3-D hand-arm vibration test system. This study finds that the effect of VR gloves on the finger vibration depends on not only the gloves but also their influence on the distribution of the finger contact stiffness and the grip effort. As a result, the gloves increase the vibration in the fingertip area but marginally reduce the vibration in the proximal area at some frequencies below 100 Hz. On average, the gloves reduce the vibration of the entire fingers by less than 3% at frequencies below 80 Hz but increase at frequencies from 80 to 400 Hz. At higher frequencies, the gel-filled glove is more effective at reducing the finger vibration than the air bladder-filled glove. The implications of these findings are discussed.     

Feasibility analysis of low-cost flexible resistive sensors for measurements of driving point mechanical impedance of the hand-arm system

This study explored the feasibility of the flexible resistive (FlexiForce) force sensors for measurement of the hand-arm biodynamic response. Two FlexiForce sensors were installed on an instrumented handle to measure the palm-handle and finger–handle interface dynamic forces. The measurements were performed with six subjects grasping a 38 mm diameter instrumented handle with nine different combinations of grip (10, 30 and 50 N) and push (25, 50 and 75 N) forces and two levels of broad-band random vibration (1.5 and 3.0 m/s² weighted rms acceleration) in the 4–1000 Hz frequency range. The data acquired from the instrumented handle was analyzed to determine the palm and finger impedance responses, which served as the reference values to evaluate feasibility of the FlexiForce sensors. The comparisons revealed very similar trends, while the impedance magnitude responses obtained from the FlexiForce sensors were substantially lower in the entire frequency range than the reference values, except at very low frequencies. A correction function was subsequently developed and applied to the FlexiForce measured data, which resulted in similar hand-arm impedance response trends compared to the reference values. It was concluded that the low-cost FlexiForce sensors could be applied for measurements of biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system in real tool handles in the field. Due to the physiological risks associated with prolonged exposure to tool vibration the applicability of a low-cost biodynamic response measurement system can be used as a preventative measure for such risks.Relevance to industryThe measurement of hand–handle interface forces is vital for assessing the hand-transmitted vibration exposure and the biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system to vibration. The low cost and flexible sensors, proposed in the study, could be conveniently applied to the curved surfaces of real power tool handles in the field. The most significant benefit of the sensors lies with its negligible mass and thereby the instrumented handle inertia-induced errors in the biodynamic responses can be eliminated.     

Vibration-reducing gloves: transmissibility at the palm of the hand in three orthogonal directions

Vibration-reducing (VR) gloves are commonly used as a means to help control exposures to hand-transmitted vibrations generated by powered hand tools. The objective of this study was to characterise the vibration transmissibility spectra and frequency-weighted vibration transmissibility of VR gloves at the palm of the hand in three orthogonal directions. Seven adult males participated in the evaluation of seven glove models using a three-dimensional hand–arm vibration test system. Three levels of hand coupling force were applied in the experiment. This study found that, in general, VR gloves are most effective at reducing vibrations transmitted to the palm along the forearm direction. Gloves that are found to be superior at reducing vibrations in the forearm direction may not be more effective in the other directions when compared with other VR gloves. This casts doubts on the validity of the standardised glove screening test.

Practitioner Summary: This study used human subjects to measure three-dimensional vibration transmissibility of vibration-reducing gloves at the palm and identified their vibration attenuation characteristics. This study found the gloves to be most effective at reducing vibrations along the forearm direction. These gloves did not effectively attenuate vibration along the handle axial direction.     

Development of a new frequency weighting filter for the assessment of grinder exposure to wrist-transmitted vibration

The risk assessment of hand tool workers exposed to hand-arm vibrations is still problematic. It is based, accordingly to ISO 5349, on a frequency-weighted measurement recorded at the handle of the tool. Unfortunately, the frequency-weighted filter recommended by ISO 5349 does not take into account any amplification of the hand-arm system and underestimates the global rms acceleration transmitted to the hand. In this study, the vibration transmitted from the tool handle to the worker's wrist is investigated in an industrial environment for seven commercial grinders, two subjects and three push forces. The results are compared with the ISO-5349 and ACGIH threshold limit values, and a new frequency weighting filter is proposed, by which the amplification close to the natural frequencies of the hand-arm system can be considered in the evaluation of the vibration transmitted to the wrist from vibration measurements at the tool handle in a grinding operation.     

Transmission of vibration through glove materials: effects of contact force

This study investigated effects of applied force on the apparent mass of the hand, the dynamic stiffness of glove materials and the transmission of vibration through gloves to the hand. For 10 subjects, 3 glove materials and 3 contact forces, apparent masses and glove transmissibilities were measured at the palm and at a finger at frequencies in the range 5–300 Hz. The dynamic stiffnesses of the materials were also measured. With increasing force, the dynamic stiffnesses of the materials increased, the apparent mass at the palm increased at frequencies greater than the resonance and the apparent mass at the finger increased at low frequencies. The effects of force on transmissibilities therefore differed between materials and depended on vibration frequency, but changes in apparent mass and dynamic stiffness had predictable effects on material transmissibility. Depending on the glove material, the transmission of vibration through a glove can be increased or decreased when increasing the applied force.

Practitioner summary: Increasing the contact force (i.e. push force or grip force) can increase or decrease the transmission of vibration through a glove. The vibration transmissibilities of gloves should be assessed with a range of contact forces to understand their likely influence on the exposure of the hand and fingers to vibration.     

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: biodynamic responses to sinusoidal and random vibration

The dependence of biodynamic responses of the seated human body on the frequency, magnitude and waveform of vertical vibration has been studied in 20 males and 20 females. With sinusoidal vibration (13 frequencies from 1 to 16 Hz) at five magnitudes (0.1–1.6 ms^? 2 r.m.s.) and with random vibration (1–16 Hz) at the same magnitudes, the apparent mass of the body was similar with random and sinusoidal vibration of the same overall magnitude. With increasing magnitude of vibration, the stiffness and damping of a model fitted to the apparent mass reduced and the resonance frequency decreased (from 6.5 to 4.5 Hz). Male and female subjects had similar apparent mass (after adjusting for subject weight) and a similar principal resonance frequency with both random and sinusoidal vibration. The change in biodynamic response with increasing vibration magnitude depends on the frequency of the vibration excitation, but is similar with sinusoidal and random excitation.     

Transmission of vibration through gloves: effects of material thickness

It might be assumed that increasing the thickness of a glove would reduce the vibration transmitted to the hand. Three material samples from an anti-vibration glove were stacked to produce three thicknesses: 6.4, 12.8 and 19.2 mm. The dynamic stiffnesses of all three thicknesses, the apparent mass at the palm and the finger and the transmission of vibration to the palm and finger were measured. At frequencies from 20 to 350 Hz, the material reduced vibration at the palm but increased vibration at the finger. Increased thickness reduced vibration at the palm but increased vibration at the finger. The measured transmissibilities could be predicted from the material dynamic stiffness and the apparent mass of the palm and finger. Reducing the dynamic stiffness of glove material may increase or decrease the transmission of vibration, depending on the material, the frequency of vibration and the location of measurement (palm or finger).

Practitioner Summary: Transmission of vibration through gloves depends on the dynamic response of the hand and the dynamic stiffness of glove material, which depends on material thickness. Measuring the transmission of vibration through gloves to the palm of the hand gives a misleading indication of the transmission of vibration to the fingers.     

Tool-specific performance of vibration-reducing gloves for attenuating palm-transmitted vibrations in three orthogonal directions

Vibration-reducing (VR) gloves have been increasingly used to help reduce vibration exposure, but it remains unclear how effective these gloves are. The purpose of this study was to estimate tool-specific performances of VR gloves for reducing the vibrations transmitted to the palm of the hand in three orthogonal directions (3-D) in an attempt to assess glove effectiveness and aid in the appropriate selection of these gloves. Four typical VR gloves were considered in this study, two of which can be classified as anti-vibration (AV) gloves according to the current AV glove test standard. The average transmissibility spectrum of each glove in each direction was synthesized based on spectra measured in this study and other spectra collected from reported studies. More than seventy vibration spectra of various tools or machines were considered in the estimations, which were also measured in this study or collected from reported studies. The glove performance assessments were based on the percent reduction of frequency-weighted acceleration as is required in the current standard for assessing the risk of vibration exposures. The estimated tool-specific vibration reductions of the gloves indicate that the VR gloves could slightly reduce (<5%) or marginally amplify (<10%) the vibrations generated from low-frequency (<25 Hz) tools or those vibrating primarily along the axis of the tool handle. With other tools, the VR gloves could reduce palm-transmitted vibrations in the range of 5%–58%, primarily depending on the specific tool and its vibration spectra in the three directions. The two AV gloves were not more effective than the other gloves with some of the tools considered in this study. The implications of the results are discussed.Relevance to industryHand-transmitted vibration exposure may cause hand-arm vibration syndrome. Vibration-reducing gloves are considered as an alternative approach to reduce the vibration exposure. This study provides useful information on the effectiveness of the gloves when used with many tools for reducing the vibration transmitted to the palm in three directions. The results can aid in the appropriate selection and use of these gloves.     

A new methodology for measuring the vibration transmission from handle to finger whilst gripping

The transmission of vibration from hand-held tools via work gloves and into the operators' hands can be affected by several factors such as glove material properties, tool vibration conditions, grip force, and temperature. The primary aim of this study is to develop a new methodology to measure and evaluate vibration transmissibility for a human finger in contact with different materials, whilst measuring and controlling the grip force. The study presented here used a new bespoke lab-based apparatus for assessing vibration transmissibility that includes a generic handle instrumented for vibration and grip force measurements. The handle is freely suspended and can be excited at a range of real-world vibration conditions whilst being gripped by a human subject. The study conducted a frequency response function (FRF) of the handle using an instrumented hammer to ensure that the handle system was resonance free at the important frequency range for glove research, as outlined in ISO 10819: 1996: 2013, and also investigated how glove material properties and design affect the tool vibration transmission into the index finger (Almagirby et al. 2015). The FRF results obtained at each of six positions shows that the dynamic system of the handle has three resonance frequencies in the low frequency range (2, 11 and 17 Hz) and indicated that no resonances were displayed up to a frequency of about 550 Hz. No significant vibration attenuation was shown at frequencies lower than 150 Hz. The two materials cut from the gloves that were labelled as anti-vibration gloves (AV) indicated resonance at frequencies of 150 and 160 Hz. However, the non-glove material that did not meet the requirements for AV gloves showed resonance at 250 Hz. The attenuation for the three materials was found at frequencies of 315 Hz and 400 Hz. The level and position of the true resonance frequencies were found to vary between samples and individual subjects.     

Influence of coupling forces on the mechanical impedance of the hand-arm system during rotational vibration excitation around the xh-axis

The research presented in this paper focuses on the determination of the rotational mechanical impedance of the human hand-arm system under rotational vibration excitation, applied via the knob-shaped handle. During the development of power tools, the interaction between the power tool and the hand-arm system must be simulated. This requires accurate models of the hand-arm system's biodynamics. The current state of research provides such models for translational vibrations, but are limited when also considering rotational vibrations. To enable the development of such models, the study investigates the biodynamics of the hand-arm system for rotational vibration excitation. Therefore, the rotational impedance of 21 subjects was measured in a study. In the study, a knob-shaped measuring handle, whereby the subjects applied different combinations of gripping and push forces to the handle, vibrated the hand-arm system of the subjects rotationally. The results show that a higher gripping force results in a higher magnitude of rotational mechanical impedance, while the push force does not seem to influence the rotational impedance. The missing influence of the push force on the rotational impedance may be caused by the alignment between hand position, force direction, and excitation axis. The findings of this study extend the overall knowledge of rotational mechanical impedance for simulating the hand-arm system in power tool development. In regards to the rotational vibration exposure when performing sanding tasks, the results suggest that a frictional connection between the hand and the power tool handle reduces the vibration exposure of the hand-arm system.     

Validity and inter-observer reliability of subjective hand-arm vibration assessments

Exposure to mechanical vibrations at work (e.g., due to handling powered tools) is a potential occupational risk as it may cause upper extremity complaints. However, reliable and valid assessment methods for vibration exposure at work are lacking. Measuring hand-arm vibration objectively is often difficult and expensive, while often used information provided by manufacturers lacks detail. Therefore, a subjective hand-arm vibration assessment method was tested on validity and inter-observer reliability.     

Hand-arm and whole-body vibrations induced in cross motorcycle and bicycle drivers

Generally, and particularly at sports, the human body is constantly exposed to physical requests and to tests in many different situations. Although the practice of sports is considered a healthy act, there are limits and, when these limits are reached, the benefits of sport can turn into problems. Thus, the biodynamic response method is increasingly being used to study the human injuries induced by external vibrations. Moreover, the European Directive 2002/44/EC on the minimum health and safety requirements, regarding worker exposure to risks from physical agents (e.g. vibration), limit the exposure to vibrations. The aim of this study is to analyze the exposure level of cross motorcycle and of cycling drivers to hand-arm vibration (HAV) and to whole-body vibration (WBV). For this research, vibration levels of a common 200 cc cross motorcycle were experimentally measured and the maximum driving time that could be safely used in a stone road was established. Moreover, bicycle vibration measurements were performed using two different bicycles: a road cycling bike; a bike for track cycling. The road bike was evaluated at three road scenarios: asphalt; paved; and stone road pavement. The track bike was evaluated in track cycling and rollers. In the case of cycling the results indicate that impacts and transient vibrations lead to a higher musculoskeletal request particularly in what concerns shoulders, arms, wrists, knees and spine.     

Biodynamic response analysis of semi-supine human under varying vertical excitations

The biodynamic responses of semi-supine humans exposed to varying vertical vibration magnitudes (0.125–1.0 m/s² r.m.s.) are studied employing a multi-body modeling approach. The model comprises five rigid segments: the head, upper torso, lower torso, thigh, and leg. The viscoelastic property of tissues at joints and body-support interface are incorporated using the Kelvin-Voigt model. The dynamic model parameters identified through optimization are employed to capture the transmissibility responses of different body segments at varying vibration magnitudes. The Monte-Carlo simulation is performed to ascertain the effect of uncertainty of the model parameter and body mass on the biodynamic responses at different vibration magnitudes. The calibrated model accurately predicts the decrease in the primary resonance frequency with the increase in vibration magnitude. This nonlinearity is also apparent in vertical transmissibility responses of all the body segments. The effect of uncertainty of model parameters and body mass on the transmissibility responses is prominent near resonance frequency, while their effect on the apparent mass response is consistent across the entire frequency spectrum. The Monte-Carlo simulation illustrates higher dispersion in the transmissibility responses of the head and thorax at 1.0 m/s² r.m.s. compared to at 0.125 m/s² r.m.s. Therefore effective restraint systems are required at the head and thorax to counter the impact of high vibration magnitudes experienced during spaceflight.     

Determination of reference values of apparent mass responses of seated occupants of different body masses under vertical vibration with and without a back support

The biodynamic response of human body seated without a back support and exposed to vertical whole-body vibration have been standardized in ISO 5982 and DIN 45676 in terms of driving-point mechanical impedance and apparent mass. A comparison of ranges defined in two standards, however, reveal considerable differences in both the magnitude and phase. Greater differences are more evident for the three body mass groups, which suggests the lack of adequate reference values of biodynamic responses of seated human subjects of different body masses. In this experimental study, the biodynamic responses of seated humans within three different body mass ranges are characterized under different magnitudes of vibration and three different sitting postures in an attempt to define reference values of apparent mass for applications in mechanical-equivalent model development and anthropodynamic manikin design. Laboratory measurements were performed with adult male subjects of total body mass in the vicinity of 55, 75 and 98 kg (nine subjects for each mass group) seated with and without an inclined back support and exposed to three different magnitudes of white-noise vertical vibration (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² unweighted rms acceleration) in the frequency range between 0.5 and 20 Hz. The measured data were analyzed to derive the mean magnitude and phase responses for the three body masses, posture and excitation conditions. The mean magnitude responses of subjects within three mass groups were compared with idealized ranges defined in ISO 5982 and mean values described in DIN 45676 for no back support condition. The results revealed significant differences between the mean measured and standardized magnitudes, suggesting that the current standardized values do not describe the biodynamic responses of seated occupant of different masses even for the back not supported condition. The mean measured responses revealed most important effect of body mass, irrespective of the sitting posture. The reference values of apparent mass responses of seated body subject to vertical whole-body vibration are thus defined for three mass groups and different back support conditions that may be considered applicable for ranges of excitations considered. The responses of the body seated without a back support, also revealed notable influences of excitation magnitude, particularly on the primary peak frequencies.     

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration

Frequency weightings for predicting vibration discomfort assume the same frequency-dependence at all magnitudes of vibration, whereas biodynamic studies show that the frequency-dependence of the human body depends on the magnitude of vibration. This study investigated how the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort depends on the acceleration and the force at the subject–seat interface. Using magnitude estimation, 20 males and 20 females judged their discomfort caused by sinusoidal vertical acceleration at 13 frequencies (1–16 Hz) at magnitudes from 0.1 to 4.0 ms^? 2 r.m.s. The frequency-dependence of their equivalent comfort contours depended on the magnitude of vibration, but was less dependent on the magnitude of dynamic force than the magnitude of acceleration, consistent with the biodynamic non-linearity of the body causing some of the magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours. There were significant associations between the biodynamic responses and subjective responses at all frequencies in the range 1–16 Hz.

Practitioner Summary: Vertical seat vibration causes discomfort in many forms of transport. This study provides the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort over a range of vibration magnitudes and shows how the frequency weightings in the current standards can be improved.