N-Prolog and equivalence of logic programs

The aim of this work is to develop a declarative semantics for N-Prolog with negation as failure. N-Prolog is an extension of Prolog proposed by Gabbay and Reyle (1984, 1985), which allows for occurrences of nested implications in both goals and clauses. Our starting point is an operational semantics of the language defined by means of top-down derivation trees. Negation as finite failure can be naturally introduced in this context. A goal-G may be inferred from a database if every top-down derivation of G from the database finitely fails, i.e., contains a failure node at finite height.Our purpose is to give a logical interpretation of the underlying operational semantics. In the present work (Part 1) we take into consideration only the basic problems of determining such an interpretation, so that our analysis will concentrate on the propositional case. Nevertheless we give an intuitive account of how to extend our results to a first order language. A full treatment of N-Prolog with quantifiers will be deferred to the second part of this work.Our main contribution to the logical understanding of N-Prolog is the development of a notion of modal completion for programs, or databases. N-Prolog deductions turn out to be sound and complete with respect to such completions. More exactly, we introduce a natural modal three-valued logic PK and we prove that a goal is derivable from a propositional program if and only if it is implied by the completion of the program in the logic PK. This result holds for arbitrary programs. We assume no syntactic restriction, such as stratification (Apt et al. 1988; Bonner and McCarty 1990). In particular, we allow for arbitrary recursion through negation.Our semantical analysis heavily relies on a notion of intensional equivalence for programs and goals. This notion is naturally induced by the operational semantics, and is preserved under substitution of equivalent subexpressions. Basing on this substitution property we develop a theory of normal forms of programs and goals. Every program can be effectively transformed into an equivalent program in normal form. From the simple and uniform structure of programs in normal form one may directly define the completion.     

PRL: A probabilistic relational language

In this paper, we describe the syntax and semantics for a probabilistic relational language (PRL). PRL is a recasting of recent work in Probabilistic Relational Models (PRMs) into a logic programming framework. We show how to represent varying degrees of complexity in the semantics including attribute uncertainty, structural uncertainty and identity uncertainty. Our approach is similar in spirit to the work in Bayesian Logic Programs (BLPs), and Logical Bayesian Networks (LBNs). However, surprisingly, there are still some important differences in the resulting formalism; for example, we introduce a general notion of aggregates based on the PRM approaches. One of our contributions is that we show how to support richer forms of structural uncertainty in a probabilistic logical language than have been previously described. Our goal in this work is to present a unifying framework that supports all of the types of relational uncertainty yet is based on logic programming formalisms. We also believe that it facilitates understanding the relationship between the frame-based approaches and alternate logic programming approaches, and allows greater transfer of ideas between them. Editors: Hendrik Blockeel, David Jensen and Stefan Kramer An erratum to this article is available at .     

Learning probabilistic logic models from probabilistic examples

We revisit an application developed originally using abductive Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) for modeling inhibition in metabolic networks. The example data was derived from studies of the effects of toxins on rats using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) time-trace analysis of their biofluids together with background knowledge representing a subset of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). We now apply two Probabilistic ILP (PILP) approaches—abductive Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs) and PRogramming In Statistical modeling (PRISM) to the application. Both approaches support abductive learning and probability predictions. Abductive SLPs are a PILP framework that provides possible worlds semantics to SLPs through abduction. Instead of learning logic models from non-probabilistic examples as done in ILP, the PILP approach applied in this paper is based on a general technique for introducing probability labels within a standard scientific experimental setting involving control and treated data. Our results demonstrate that the PILP approach provides a way of learning probabilistic logic models from probabilistic examples, and the PILP models learned from probabilistic examples lead to a significant decrease in error accompanied by improved insight from the learned results compared with the PILP models learned from non-probabilistic examples.     

ALLPAD: approximate learning of logic programs with annotated disjunctions

Logic Programs with Annotated Disjunctions (LPADs) provide a simple and elegant framework for representing probabilistic knowledge in logic programming. In this paper we consider the problem of learning ground LPADs starting from a set of interpretations annotated with their probability. We present the system ALLPAD for solving this problem. ALLPAD modifies the previous system LLPAD in order to tackle real world learning problems more effectively. This is achieved by looking for an approximate solution rather than a perfect one. A number of experiments have been performed on real and artificial data for evaluating ALLPAD, showing the feasibility of the approach. Editors: Stephen Muggleton, Ramon Otero, Simon Colton.     

Well-founded semantics and stratification for ordered logic programs

This paper present an extension of traditional logic programming, called ordered logic (OL) programming, to support classical negation as well as constructs from the object-oriented paradigm. In particular, such an extension allows to cope with the notions of object, multiple inheritance and non-monotonic reasoning. The contribution of the work is mainly twofold. First, a rich wellfounded semantics for ordered logic programs is defined. Second, an efficient method for the well-founded model computation of a meaningful class of ordered logic programs, called stratified programs, is provided.     

Dualities between alternative semantics for logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning

The Gelfond-Lifschitz operator associated with a logic program (and likewise the operator associated with default theories by Reiter) exhibits oscillating behavior. In the case of logic programs, there is always at least one finite, nonempty collection of Herbrand interpretations around which the Gelfond-Lifschitz operator bounces around. The same phenomenon occurs with default logic when Reiter's operator is considered. Based on this, a stable class semantics and extension class semantics has been proposed. The main advantage of this semantics was that it was defined for all logic programs (and default theories), and that this definition was modelled using the standard operators existing in the literature such as Reiter's operator. In this paper our primary aim is to prove that there is a very interestingduality between stable class theory and the well-founded semantics for logic programming. In the stable class semantics, classes that were minimal with respect to Smyth's power-domain ordering were selected. We show that the well-founded semantics precisely corresponds to a class that is minimal w.r.t. Hoare's power domain ordering: the well-known dual of Smyth's ordering. Besides this elegant duality, this immediately suggests how to define a well-founded semantics for default logic in such a way that the dualities that hold for logic programming continue to hold for default theories. We show how the same technique may be applied to strong autoepistemic logic: the logic of strong expansions proposed by Marek and Truszczynski.     

Strong equivalence of logic programs under the infinite-valued semantics

We consider the notion of strong equivalence [V. Lifschitz, D. Pearce, A. Valverde, Strongly equivalent logic programs, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2 (4) (2001) 526-541] of normal propositional logic programs under the infinite-valued semantics [P. Rondogiannis, W.W. Wadge, Minimum model semantics for logic programs with negation-as-failure, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 6 (2) (2005) 441-467] (which is a purely model-theoretic semantics that is compatible with the well-founded one). We demonstrate that two such programs are strongly equivalent under the infinite-valued semantics if and only if they are logically equivalent in the corresponding infinite-valued logic. In particular, we show that strong equivalence of normal propositional logic programs is decidable, and more specifically coNP-complete. Our results have a direct implication for the well-founded semantics since, as we demonstrate, if two programs are strongly equivalent under the infinite-valued semantics, then they are also strongly equivalent under the well-founded semantics.     

A new generic scheme for functional logic programming with constraints

In this paper we propose a new generic scheme CFLP풟, intended as a logical and semantic framework for lazy Constraint Functional Logic Programming over a parametrically given constraint domain 풟. As in the case of the well known CLP풟 scheme for Constraint Logic Programming, 풟 is assumed to provide domain specific data values and constraints. CFLP풟 programs are presented as sets of constrained rewrite rules that define the behavior of possibly higher order and/or non-deterministic lazy functions over 풟. As a main novelty w.r.t. previous related work, we present a Constraint Rewriting Logic CRWL풟 which provides a declarative semantics for CFLP풟 programs. This logic relies on a new formalization of constraint domains and program interpretations, which allows a flexible combination of domain specific data values and user defined data constructors, as well as a functional view of constraints. This research has been partially supported by the Spanish National Projects MELODIAS (TIC2002-01167), MERIT-FORMS (TIN2005-09207-C03-03) and PROMESAS-CAM (S-0505/TIC/0407).     

On computing logic programs

In this paper we present and compare some classical problem-solving methods for computing the stable models of logic programs with negation. Using a graph theoretic representation of logic programs and their stable models, we discuss and compare linear programming, propositional satisfiability, constraint satisfaction, and graph methods.     

A linear programming approach to reasoning about probabilities

We continue our study, initiated in [9], of the following computational problem proposed by Nilsson: Several clauses (Boolean functions of several variables) are given, and for each clause the probability that the clause is true is specified. We are asked whether these probabilities are consistent. They are if there is a probability distribution on the truth assignments such that the probability of each clause is the measure of its satisfying set of assignments. Since this is a generalization of the satisfiability problem of predicate calculus, it is immediately NP-hard. In [9] we showed certain restricted cases of the problem to be NP-complete, and used the Ellipsoid Algorithm to show that a certain special case is in P. In this paper we use the Simplex method, column generation techniques, and variable-depth local search to derive an effective heuristic for the general problem. Experiments show that our heuristic performs successfully on instances with many dozens of variables and clauses. We also prove several interesting complexity results that answer open questions in [9] and motivate our approach.     

Compressing probabilistic Prolog programs

ProbLog is a recently introduced probabilistic extension of Prolog (De Raedt, et al. in Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp. 2468–2473, 2007). A ProbLog program defines a distribution over logic programs by specifying for each clause the probability that it belongs to a randomly sampled program, and these probabilities are mutually independent. The semantics of ProbLog is then defined by the success probability of a query in a randomly sampled program. This paper introduces the theory compression task for ProbLog, which consists of selecting that subset of clauses of a given ProbLog program that maximizes the likelihood w.r.t. a set of positive and negative examples. Experiments in the context of discovering links in real biological networks demonstrate the practical applicability of the approach. Editors: Stephen Muggleton, Ramon Otero, Simon Colton.     

Displacement logic for anaphora

The displacement calculus of Morrill, Valentín and Fadda (2011) [25] aspires to replace the calculus of Lambek (1958) [13] as the foundation of categorial grammar by accommodating intercalation as well as concatenation while remaining free of structural rules and enjoying Cut-elimination and its good corollaries. Jäger (2005) [11] proposes a type logical treatment of anaphora with syntactic duplication using limited contraction. Morrill and Valentín (2010) [24] apply (modal) displacement calculus to anaphora with lexical duplication and propose extension with a negation as failure in conjunction with additives to capture binding conditions. In this paper we present an account of anaphora developing characteristics and employing machinery from both of these proposals.     

S-semantics for logic programming: A retrospective look

The paper provides an overview of the s-semantic approach to the semantics of logic programs which had been developed about twenty years ago. The aim of such an approach was that of providing a suitable base for program analysis by means of a semantics which really captures the operational behavior of logic programs, and thus offers useful notions of observable program equivalences. The semantics is given in terms of extended interpretations, which are more expressive than Herbrand interpretations, extends the standard Herbrand semantics, and can be obtained as a result of both top-down and bottom-up constructions. The approach has been applied to several extensions of positive logic programs and used to develop semantic-based techniques for program analysis, verification and transformation.