约束归纳逻辑程序设计系统

提出了一种新的约束归纳逻辑程序设计方法，并初步实现了一个自顶向下的约束归纳逻辑程序原型系统。该系统能够导出不受变量个数限制的多种形式的线性约束，得出覆盖正例而排斥负例的含约束的Hom子句程序。     

归纳逻辑程序设计综述

归纳逻辑程序设计是由机器学习与逻辑程序设计交叉所形成的一个研究领域,是机器学习的前沿研究课题。该文首先从归纳逻辑程序设计的问题背景、类型划分和搜索程序子句三个方面介绍了归纳逻辑程序设计系统的概貌;然后结合实验室的相关研究工作,回顾了归纳逻辑程序设计研究的发展;之后介绍了归纳逻辑程序设计领域中需要深入研究的若干问题,并提出了新的解决思路;最后是总结,以引起读者对归纳逻辑程序设计领域研究的进一步关注。     

归纳逻辑程序设计方法综述

归纳逻辑程序设计是机器学习与逻辑程序设计交叉所形成的一个研究领域,克服了传统机器学习方法的两个主要限制：即知识表示的限制和背景知识利用的限制,成为机器学习的前沿研究课题。首先从归纳逻辑程序设计的产生背景、定义、应用领域及问题背景介绍了归纳逻辑程序设计系统的概貌,对归纳逻辑程序设计方法的研究现状进行了总结和分析,最后探讨了该领域的进一步的研究方向。     

一种集成学习模型MIIE

归纳逻辑程序设计,以下简称ILP,是将归纳学习的理论与逻辑程序设计的方法相结合的一种机     

并发约束程序设计语言COPS及其执行模型

约束程序设计尤其是约束逻辑程序设计与并发约束程序设计在AI程序设计领域占据着越来越重要的位置。传统逻辑程序设计的基“计算即为定理证明”的计算风格虽获得了简洁优美的操作语义特性,但也付出了执行效率低的代价,当应用系统规模增大时,其性能严重下降以致崩溃。针对传统逻辑程序设计的这种可伸缩性问题,设计了一个基于并发约束程序设计概念的说明性语言COPS,旨在从语言设计与执行模型两方面降低说明性程序的不确定性,提高搜索与运行效率。在语言设计方面,通过引入确定性语言成分,避免不确定计算用于确定性目标所浪费的系统开销;在执行模型方面,在目标的并发穿叉执行与数据驱动的并发同步机制的基础上,实现“优先执行确定目标”策略与“最少假定”策略,作为约束传播的延伸,最大幅度地剪枝搜索空间,降低搜索复杂性。COPS提供的知识表示、推理与并发机制使其成为构造agent程序的理想语言。论文给出COPS语言的语法规范与执行模型的操作语义描述。     

归纳逻辑程序设计中的优化问题研究

归纳逻辑程序设计的核心问题是如何从背景知识中优选谓词构造满足约束的归纳假设,按Ｏｃｃａｍ准则,满足约束的最精简归纳假设为优,但迄今归纳逻辑程序设计中精简归纳假设构造的计算复杂性尚未解决。     

一种可扩展型CLP系统的统一建模方法

约束推理是人工智能中主要组成部分之一,可以解决实际优化调度和规划过程中的约束求解问题。这里在解释了约束逻辑程序设计的原理和过程基础上,打破封闭式约束逻辑程序设计系统,从软件工程上采用统一建模语言,提出一种新的开放的可扩展型约束逻辑程序设计结构系统。为实现可扩展的约束推理搜索系统,引进UML建模语言中用例图、类图和协作图。在建模基础上详细说明了可扩展约束逻辑程序设计中数学模型,搜索引擎和搜索驱动三者间的关系以及它们内部的工作内容。最后在描述系统结构后,提出了可扩展的内容。根据扩展因素,外界为满足更多的需要可扩展本系统的约束过滤器。     

面向对象的约束逻辑程序设计

本文介绍了面向对象技术和约束逻辑程序设计方法在人工智能中应用的基本思想，通过二者的结合使现有逻辑程序设计在逻辑的清晰性和执行的高效性上都得以提高，这样就引入了一个新的研究方向：面向对象的约束逻辑程序设计     

基于约束逻辑程序设计的排课算法研究

课程安排问题是典型的组合优化和不确定调度问题。采用约束逻辑程序设计的研究方法,结合课程安排自身的特点,通过约束推理找到最优的课程安排结果。约束逻辑程序设计综合了人工智能中一致性算法和启发式搜索算法,采用约束推理方法,能非常好地处理各种冲突,并且能快速地排出合理的课程。     

一种自顶向下和自底向上相结合的ILP算法

归纳逻辑程序设计(ILP)是机器学习的一个重要分支,给定一个样例集和相关背景知识,ILP研究如何构建与其相一致的逻辑程序,这些逻辑程序由有限一阶子句组成。文章描述了一种综合当前一些ILP方法多方面优势的算法ICCR,ICCR溶合了以FOIL为代表的自顶向下搜索策略和以GOLEM为代表的自底向上搜索策略,并能根据需要发明新谓词、学习递归逻辑程序,对比实验表明,对相同的样例及背景知识,ICCR比FOIL和GOLEM能学到精度更高的目标逻辑程序。     

Cautious induction: An alternative to clause-at-a-time hypothesis construction in inductive logic programming

Hypotheses constructed by inductive logic programming (ILP) systems are finite sets of definite clauses. Top-down ILP systems usually adopt the following greedy clause-at-a-time strategy to construct such a hypothesis: start with the empty set of clauses and repeatedly add the clause that most improves the quality of the set. This paper formulates and analyses an alternative method for constructing hypotheses. The method, calledcautious induction, consists of a first stage, which finds a finite set of candidate clauses, and a second stage, which selects a finite subset of these clauses to form a hypothesis. By using a less greedy method in the second stage, cautious induction can find hypotheses of higher quality than can be found with a clause-at-a-time algorithm. We have implemented a top-down, cautious ILP system called CILS. This paper presents CILS and compares it to Progol, a top-down clause-at-a-time ILP system. The sizes of the search spaces confronted by the two systems are analysed and an experiment examines their performance on a series of mutagenesis learning problems. Simon Anthony, BEng.: Simon, perhaps better known as “Mr. Cautious” in Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) circles, completed a BEng in Information Engineering at the University of York in 1995. He remained at York as a research student in the Intelligent Systems Group. Concentrating on ILP, his research interests are Cautious Induction and developing number handling techniques using Constraint Logic Programming. Alan M. Frisch, Ph.D.: He is the Reader in Intelligent Systems at the University of York (UK), and he heads the Intelligent Systems Group in the Department of Computer Science. He was awarded a Ph. D. in Computer Science from the University of Rochester (USA) in 1986 and has held faculty positions at the University of Sussex (UK) and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (USA). For over 15 years Dr. Frisch has been conducting research on a wide range of topics in the area of automated reasoning, including knowledge retrieval, probabilistic inference, constraint solving, parsing as deduction, inductive logic programming and the integration of constraint solvers into automated deduction systems.     

Advantages of decision lists and implicit negatives in Inductive Logic Programming

This paper demonstrates the capabilities offoidl, an inductive logic programming (ILP) system whose distinguishing characteristics are the ability to produce first-order decision lists, the use of an output completeness assumption as a substitute for negative examples, and the use originally motivated by the problem of learning to generate the past tense of English verbs; however, this paper demonstrates its superior performance on two different sets of benchmark ILP problems. Tests on the finite element mesh design problem show thatfoidl’s decision lists enable it to produce generally more accurate results than a range of methods previously applied to this problem. Tests with a selection of list-processing problems from Bratko’s introductory Prolog text demonstrate that the combination of implicit negatives and intensionality allowfoidl to learn correct programs from far fewer examples thanfoil. This research was supported by a fellowship from AT&T awarded to the first author and by the National Science Foundation under grant IRI-9310819. Mary Elaine Califf: She is currently pursuing her doctorate in Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin where she is supported by a fellowship from AT&T. Her research interests include natural language understanding, particularly using machine learning methods to build practical natural language understanding systems such as information extraction systems, and inductive logic programming. Raymond Joseph Mooney: He is an Associate Professor of Computer Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin. He recerived his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1988. His current research interests include applying machine to natural language understanding, inductive logic programming, knowledge-base and theory refinement, learning for planning, and learning for recommender systems. He serves on the editorial boards of the journalNew Generation Computing, theMachine Learning journal, theJournal of Artificial Intelligence Research, and the journalApplied Intelligence.     

约束逻辑程序设计综述

一、引言 约束逻辑程序设计(Constraint Logic Program-ming．CLP)是基于人工智能(AI)中约束满足问题(Constraint Satisfaction Problem．CSP)模型的一种程序设计风范。CLP是逻辑程序设计(LP)的一种推广,是八十年代发展起来的一种新的逻辑程序设计方法。由于它继承了LP简单易懂的说明性描述方法并结合了CSP在求解问题时的效率,使它在解决很多AI问题(如组合问题、资源分配、事务安排等)时有不凡的表现。更由于AI领域中绝大多数问题可以用CLP来表示,所以这一方法已引起了人们的广泛注意,并在八十年代后期得以迅速发展。     

Complexity–Based Induction

A central problem in inductive logic programming is theory evaluation. Without some sort of preference criterion, any two theories that explain a set of examples are equally acceptable. This paper presents a scheme for evaluating alternative inductive theories based on an objective preference criterion. It strives to extract maximal redundancy from examples, transforming structure into randomness. A major strength of the method is its application to learning problems where negative examples of concepts are scarce or unavailable. A new measure called model complexity is introduced, and its use is illustrated and compared with a proof complexity measure on relational learning tasks. The complementarity of model and proof complexity parallels that of model and proof–theoretic semantics. Model complexity, where applicable, seems to be an appropriate measure for evaluating inductive logic theories.     

Attributed Variables in XSB

The attributed variable data type plays an important role in many extensions to the basic Logic Programming language. It provides a flexible mechanism to implement constraint solvers over different domains in a standard logic programming system. To combine the technique of constraint solving with tabling and build a tabled constraint logic programming system, special work has to be done to handle attributed variables when they are copied into and out of tables. In this paper, we describe the implementation of attributed variables in XSB — a tabled logic programming system.We first introduce the internal representation of attributed variables and the interface between the internal representation and the user defined high level unification handler. Then, as the primary focus of the paper, we describe how the tabling mechanism in XSB can be extended to efficiently handle attributed variables. To save attributed variables in tables, the structure of subgoal table and answer table is modified, and the tabling engine itself requires extension as well.     

L-wrappers: concepts,properties and construction

In this paper, we propose a novel class of wrappers (logic wrappers) inspired by the logic prog- ramming paradigm. The developed Logic wrappers (L-wrapper) have declarative semantics, and therefore: (i) their specification is decoupled from their implementation and (ii) they can be generated using inductive logic programming. We also define a convenient way for mapping L-wrappers to XSLT for efficient processing using available XSLT processing engines.