Inferring negative information from disjunctive databases

We propose criteria that any rule for inferring negative information from disjunctive databases should satisfy, and examine existing rules from this viewpoint. We then present a new inference rule, the ‘disjunctive database rule’ (DDR), and compare it to the existing rules with respect to the criteria. In particular, the DDR is equivalent to the CWA for definite databases, it infers no more negative information than the GCWA, and it interprets disjunction inclusively rather than exclusively. We generalize the DDR to a class of layered databases, describe an implementation of the DDR, ‘negation as positive failure’, and study its soundness and completeness properties.     

An Extension to GCWA and Query Evaluation for Disjunctive Deductive Databases

We present a simple and intuitive extension GCWA^G of the generalized closed world assumption (GCWA) from positive disjunctive deductive databases to general disjunctive deductive databases (with default negation). This semantics is defined in terms of unfounded sets and possesses an argumentation-theoretic characterization. We also provide a top-down procedure for GCWA^G, which is sound and complete with respect to GCWA^G. We investigate two query evaluation methods for GCWA^G: database partition, and database splitting. The basic idea of these methods is to divide the original deductive database into several smaller sub-databases and the query evaluation in the original database is transformed into the problem of query evaluation in smaller or simplified components. We prove that these two methods of query evaluation are all sound with respect to GCWA^G.     

Closed world assumption for disjunctive reasoning

In this paper,the relationship between argumentation and closed world reasoning for disjunctive information is studied.In particular,the authors propose a simple and intuitive generalization of the closed world assumption(CWA) for general disjunctive deductive databases(with default negation).This semantics,called DCWA,allows a natural argumentation-based interpretation and can be used to represent reasoning for disjunctive information.We compare DCWA with GCWA and prove that DCWA extends Minker‘s GCWA to the class of disjunctive databases with defacult negation.Also we compare our semantics with some related approaches.In addition,the computational complexity of DCWA is investigated.     

析取封闭世界假设的一种过程语义

析取信息的表示是一个重要的研究问题.DCWA(析取封闭假设)为一般演绎数据库提供了一种谨慎语义,并且扩充了标准的良基语义.同时DCWA支持争论推理,为广义封闭世界假设提供了一种逼近.基于此,提出了DCWA的过程语义,并证明了它的可靠性和完备性.     

View updates in stratified disjunctive databases

The view update problem is considered in the context of deductive databases where the update of an intensional predicate is accomplished by modifying appropriately the underlying relations in the extensional database. Two classes of disjunctive databases are considered. The first class contains those disjunctive databases which allow only definite rules in the intensional database and disjunctive facts in the extensional database. The second class contains stratified disjunctive databases so that in addition to the first class, negation is allowed in the bodies of the rules, but the database must be stratified. Algorithms are given both for the insertion of an intensional predicate into and the deletion of an intensional predicate from the database. The algorithms use SLD resolution and the concept of minimal models of the extensional database. The algorithms are proved to be correct and best according to the criterion of causing minimal change to the database, where we give first priority to minimizing deletions.Research supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers IRI-8916059, IRI-8921591, IRI-9200898, and IRI-9210220.     

A logical framework for querying and repairing inconsistent databases

In this paper, we address the problem of managing inconsistent databases, i.e., databases violating integrity constraints. We propose a general logic framework for computing repairs and consistent answers over inconsistent databases. A repair for a possibly inconsistent database is a minimal set of insert and delete operations which makes the database consistent, whereas a consistent answer is a set of tuples derived from the database, satisfying all integrity constraints. In our framework, different types of rules defining general integrity constraints, repair constraints (i.e., rules defining conditions on the insertion or deletion of atoms), and prioritized constraints (i.e., rules defining priorities among updates and repairs) are considered. We propose a technique based on the rewriting of constraints into (prioritized) extended disjunctive rules with two different forms of negation (negation as failure and classical negation). The disjunctive program can be used for two different purposes: to compute "repairs" for the database and produce consistent answers, i.e., a maximal set of atoms which do not violate the constraints. We show that our technique is sound, complete (each preferred stable model defines a repair and each repair is derived from a preferred stable model), and more general than techniques previously proposed.     

Model theoretic approach to view updates in deductive databases

The view update problem for deductive databases has been defined as the problem of accomplishing the update of an intensional predicate by modifying appropriately the extensional database. A previous paper by Grant, Horty, Lobo, and Minker developed algorithms for the insertion and the deletion of an intensional predicate in certain important classes of stratified disjunctive deductive databases. This paper introduces a model theoretic approach which encompasses a wide class of Herbrand semantics, including the perfect model and stable model semantics, for disjunctive databases including negation. This generalizes the earlier results: now the intensional database may contain disjunctive and denial rules, and the database may be required to satisfy integrity constraints. As in the previous paper, the algorithms are proved to be correct and best according to the criterion of causing minimal change to the database, where the first priority is to minimize deletions.     

Answering Queries Addressed to Several Databases According to a Majority Merging Approach

The general context of this work is the problem of merging data provided by several sources which can be contradictory. Focusing on the case when the information sources do not contain any disjunction, this paper first defines a propositional modal logic for reasoning with data obtained by merging several information sources according to a majority approach. Then it defines a theorem prover to automatically deduce these merged data. Finally, it shows how to use this prover to implement a query evaluator which answers queries addressed to several databases. This evaluator is such that the answer to a query is the one that could be computed by a classical evaluator if the query was addressed to the merged databases. The databases we consider are made of an extensional part, i.e. a set of positive or negative ground literals, and an intensional part i.e. a set of first order function-free clauses. A restriction is imposed to these databases in order to avoid disjunctive data.     

Weak Generalized Closed World Assumption

Explicit representation of negative information in logic programs is not feasible in many applications such as deductive databases and artificial intelligence. Defining default rules which allow implicit inference of negated facts from positive information encoded in a logic program has been an attractive alternative to the explicit representation approach. There is, however, a difficulty associated with implicit default rules. Default rules such as the CWA and the GCWA, which closely model logical negation, are in general computationally intractable. This has led to the development of weaker definitions of negation such as the Negation-As-Failure (NF) and the Support-For-Negation (SN) rules which are computationally simpler. These are sound implementations of the CWA and the GCWA, respectively. In this paper, we define an alternative rule of negation based upon the fixpoint definition of the GCWA. This rule, called the Weak Generalized Closed World Assumption (WGCWA), is a weaker definition of the GCWA that allows us to implement a sound negation rule, called the Negation-As-Finite-Failure (NAFF), similar to the NF-rule and less cumbersome than the SN-rule. We present three definitions of the NAFF. Two declarative definitions similar to those for the NF-rule and one procedural definition based on SLI-resolution.     

Computing Only Minimal Answers in Disjunctive Deductive Databases

A method is presented for computing minimal answers of the form in disjunctive deductive databases under the disjunctive stable model semantics. Such answers are constructed by repeatedly extending partial answers. Our method is complete (in that every minimal answer can be computed) and does not admit redundancy (in the sense that every partial answer generated can be extended to a minimal answer), thus no non-minimal answer is generated. The method does not (necessarily) require the computation of models of the database in their entirety. A partitioning of the database into extensional and intensional components is employed in order to overcome the problems caused by the possible non-existence of disjunctive stable models, and a form of compilation is presented as a means of simplifying and improving the efficiency of the run-time computation, which then reduces to relatively trivial processing within the extensional database. In addition, the output from this compilation process has the significant advantage of being immune to updates to the extensional database. Other forms of database pre-processing are also considered, and three transformations are presented mapping a database onto an equivalent positive database, non-disjunctive database, and set of conditional facts.     

Overview of disjunctive logic programming

The field of disjunctive programming started approximately in 1982 and has reached its first decade. The first result in the field was the development of the Generalized Closed World Assumption (GCWA). Major results have been made in this field since 1986. An overview is presented of the developments that have taken place, which include model theoretic, proof theoretic and fixpoint semantics for disjunctive, and extended normal disjunctive theories including alternative forms of negation.Dedicated to Chitta Baral, José Alberto Fernández, Jorge Lobo and Arcot Rajasekar.     

On computing minimal and perfect model membership

The computational complexity of a number of problems relating to minimal models of non-Horn deductive databases is considered. In particular, the problem of determining minimal model membership is shown to be NP-complete for non recursive propositional databases. The structure of minimal models is also examined using the notion of a cyclic tree, and methods of determining minimal model membership, minimality of models and compiling the GCWA are presented. The handling of negative premises is also considered using perfect model semantics, and methods for computing perfect model membership are presented.     

Top-Down Query Processing in First-Order Deductive Databases under the DWFS

A top-down query-processing method for first-order deductive databases under the disjunctive well-founded semantics (DWFS) is presented. The method is based on a characterization of the DWFS in terms of the Gelfond–Lifschitz transformation and employs a hyperresolution-like operator and quasi-cyclic trees to handle minimal model processing. The method is correct and complete and can be guaranteed to terminate given certain mild constraints on the format of database rules. The efficiency of the method is enhanced by the fact that large parts of the search tree are naturally grounded, even for first-order queries and databases. In the case of a grounded yes/no answer, the search tree becomes nongrounded only if processing enters the definite part of the database. For finite propositional databases the method runs in polynomial space. Efficiency may be enhanced by the application of partial compilation.     

Dynamic maintenance of the transitive closure in disjunctive graphs

We propose an approach with feasible space requirement to maintain the transitive closure of a class of hypergraphs called OR-graphs. OR-graphs are equivalent to disjunctive deductive databases where disjunctions are limited to one attribute in each OR-table. It has been shown that query processing in disjunctive deductive databases grows into CoNP with very simple examples, but few attempts have been made, as is done in this paper, to obtain classes of disjunctive databases and queries for which efficient algorithms exist. Polynomial time algorithms are presented to compute the transitive closure of OR-graphs and to handle dynamic insertions and deletions. With algorithms for insertions and deletions, we provide a simple but efficient technique to solve the failure set problem in reliability models, which is equivalent to finding the closure of an arbitrary non-empty set of simple nodes. We also show that a minimal extension to OR-graphs makes the computational complexity of the transitive closure CoNP-complete.Research supported in part by NSF under IRI-9210220 and IRI-9111988, Omron Corporation and Omron Management Center of America.     

COMPUTING PERFECT AND STABLE MODELS USING ORDERED MODEL TREES

Ordered model trees were introduced as a normal form for disjunctive deductive databases. They were also used to facilitate the computation of minimal models for disjunctive theories by exploiting the order imposed on the Herbrand base of the theory. In this work we show how the order on the Herbrand base can be used to compute perfect models of a disjunctive stratified finite theory. We are able to compute the stable models of a general finite theory by combining the order on the elements of the Herbrand base with previous results that had shown that the stable models of a theory T can be computed as the perfect models of a corresponding disjunctive theory ɛ T resulting from applying the so called evidential transformation to T. While other methods consider many models that are rejected at the end, the use of atom ordering allows us to guarantee that every model generated belongs to the class of models being computed. As for negation-free databases, the ordered tree serves as the canonical representation of the database.     

Negation as failure: Careful closure procedure

The aim of this paper is a modification of Minker's Generalized Closed World Assumption that would allow application of the “negation as failure rule” with respect to a set P of (not necessarily all) predicates of a database DB. A careful closure procedure is introduced which, when applied to a database DB, produces a new database DB*, that is used to answer queries about predicates from DB. It is shown that DB* is consistent iff DB is consistent. If P is the set of all predicates from DB and DB does not contain functional symbols, then DB* coincides with Minker's GCWA. The soundness and completeness of the careful closure procedure with respect to a minimal model style semantic is shown. As an inference engine associated with DB* we propose a query evaluation procedure QEP* which is a combination of a method of splitting an indefinite database DB into a disjunction of Horn databases and Clark's query evaluation procedure QEP. Soundness of QEP* with respect to DB* is shown for a broad class of databases.     

On Local StratifiabUity of Logic Programs and Databases

In this paper,we deal with the problem of verifying local stratifiability of logic programs anddatabases presented by Przymusinski.Necessary and sufficient conditions for the local stratifiability oflogic programs are presented and algorithms for performing the verification are developed.Finally,weprove that a database DB containing clauses with disjunctive consequents can be easily converted into alogic program P such that DB is locally stratified iff P is locally stratified.     

Disjunctive databases for representing repairs

This paper addresses the problem of representing the set of repairs of a possibly inconsistent database by means of a disjunctive database. Specifically, the class of denial constraints is considered. We show that, given a database and a set of denial constraints, there exists a (unique) disjunctive database, called canonical, which represents the repairs of the database w.r.t. the constraints and is contained in any other disjunctive database with the same set of minimal models. We propose an algorithm for computing the canonical disjunctive database. Finally, we study the size of the canonical disjunctive database in the presence of functional dependencies for both subset-based repairs and cardinality-based repairs.     

Processing negation and disjunction in logic programs through integrity constraints

Integrity constraints were initially defined to verify the correctness of the data that is stored in a database. They were used to restrict the modifications that can be applied to a database. However, there are many other applications in which integrity constraints can play an important role. For example, the semantic query optimization method developed by Chakravarthy, Grant, and Minker for definite deductive databases uses integrity constraints during query processing to prevent the exploration of search space that is bound to fail. In this paper, we generalize the semantic query optimization method to apply to negated atoms. The generalized method is referred to assemantic compilation. This exploration has led to two significant results. First, semantic compilation provides an alternative search space for negative query literals. The alternative search space can find answers in cases for which negation-as-finite-failure and constructive negation cannot. Second, we show how semantic compilation can be used to transform a disjunctive database with or without functions and denial constraints without negation into a new disjunctive database that complies with the integrity constraints.     

A Fixpoint Semantics for Stratified Databases

Przmusinski extended the notion of stratified logic programs,developed by Apt,Blair and Walker,and by van Gelder,to stratified databases that allow both negative premises and disjunctive consequents.However,he did not provide a fixpoint theory for such class of databases.On the other hand,although a fixpoint semantics has been developed by Minker and Rajasekar for non-Horn logic programs,it is tantamount to traditional minimal model semantics which is not sufficient to capture the intended meaning of negation in the premises of clauses in stratified databases.In this paper,a fixpoint approach to stratified databases is developed,which corresponds with the perfect model semantics.Moreover,algorithms are proposed for computing the set of perfect models of a stratified database.