Transmission of vertical vibration through a seat: Effect of thickness of foam cushions at the seat pan and the backrest

The perception of vehicle ride comfort is influenced by the dynamic performance of full-depth foam used in many vehicle seats. The effects of the thickness of foam on the dynamic stiffness (i.e., stiffness and damping as a function of frequency) of foam cushions with three thicknesses (60, 80, and 100 mm), and the vibration transmitted through these cushions at the seat pan and the backrest were measured with 12 subjects (6 males and 6 females). With increasing thickness, the stiffness and the damping of the foam decreased. With increasing thickness of foam at the seat pan, the resonance frequencies around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the seat pan cushion and the backrest cushion decreased. For the conditions investigated, it is concluded that the thickness of foam at a vertical backrest has little effect on the vertical in-line or fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the foam at either the seat pan or the backrest. The frequencies of the primary resonances around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line transmissibility and the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of foam at the seat pan were highly correlated. Compared to sitting on a rigid seat pan with a foam backrest, sitting with foam at both the seat pan and the backrest reduced the resonance frequency in the vertical in-line transmissibility of the backrest foam and increased the associated transmissibility at resonance, while the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the backrest was little affected. Compared to sitting without a backrest, sitting with a rigid vertical backrest increased the resonance frequency of the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the seat pan cushion and increased the transmissibility at resonance.Relevance to industryThe transmissibility of a seat is determined by the dynamic properties of the occupant of the seat and the dynamic properties of the seat. This study shows how the thicknesses of foam at a seat pan and foam at a backrest affect the in-line and cross-axis transmissibilities of the foams at the seat pan and the backrest. The findings have application to the design of vehicle seats to minimise the transmission of vibration to the body.     

A parametric investigation on seat/occupant contact forces and their relationship with initially perceived discomfort using a configurable seat

The present work investigates the contact forces between sitters and seat as well as their correlations with perceived discomfort. Twelve different economy class aeroplane seat configurations were simulated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat by varying seat pan and backrest angles, as well as seat pan compressed surface. Eighteen males and 18 females, selected by their body mass index and stature, tested these configurations for two sitting postures. Perceived discomfort was significantly affected by seat parameters and posture and correlated both with normal force distribution on the seat-pan surface and with normal forces at the lumbar and head supports. Lower discomfort ratings were obtained for more evenly distributed normal forces on the seat pan. Shear force at the seat pan surface was at its lowest when sitters were allowed to self-select their seat-pan angle, supporting that a shear force should be reduced but not zeroed to improve seating comfort.

Practitioner Summary: The effects of seat-pan and backrest angle, anthropometric dimensions and sitting posture on contact forces and perceived discomfort were investigated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat. In addition to preferred seat profile parameters, the present work provides quantitative guidelines on contact force requirement for improving seating comfort.     

Vibration and comfort HI. Translational vibration of the feet and back

The effects on discomfort of the frequency and direction of the translational vibration of a footrest and flat firm backrest have been studied in two experiments. At frequencies in the range 2.5-63 Hz, the first experiment determined the levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration of the feet of seated subjects which caused them discomfort equivalent to that from 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical vibration of a firm flat seat. The levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration at the back of a seat which were equivalent to 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration were determined in the second experiment. The vibration of the feet or back occurred without simultaneous vibration at the seat.

Individual and group equivalent comfort contours are presented. It is concluded that the data provide a useful initial indication of the relative contribution of foot and back vibration to discomfort. Equivalent comfort contours for foot vibration were similar for all three directions of vibration. The contours for vibration of the back show a high sensitivity to fore-and-aft vibration. The results obtained from two additional studies show that vibration from a backrest and other variations in seating conditions can influence subject comfort.     

Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort

Static seat characteristics (seat stiffness) and dynamic seat characteristics (vibration magnitude) can both influence judgements of seat comfort. It is proposed that seat comfort can be predicted on the basis of Steven's psychophysical law: psi = kphi(n), where psi is a sensation magnitude, phi is the stimulus magnitude and k is a constant. The law is modified to: psi = a + bphis[n(s)] + cphiv[n(v)], where phis and phiv represent seat stiffness and vibration magnitude, n(s) and n(v) are exponents determined by the rate of increase in discomfort associated with the stiffness and vibration magnitude, and a, b and c are constants. The stiffness of foam loaded to 490 N may indicate static seat comfort, while the vibration dose value (VDV) on the seat surface may indicate vibration discomfort. Two experiments with 20 subjects investigated this approach. The first experiment with five magnitudes of vibration, three foams and a rigid wooden flat seat yielded 0.929 for the exponent, n(v), for VDV. In the second experiment subjects judged the overall seat discomfort while exposed six vibration magnitudes with the same four seating conditions. This experiment yielded 1.18 for the exponent, n(s), for seat stiffness. The overall prediction of seat discomfort was given by: psi = -50.3 + 2.68phis1.18 + 101phiv0.929. The prediction equation provided more accurate estimates of subject discomfort than models using either the VDV alone or the stiffness alone, especially when the vibration magnitude was low or the seats were similar. An interaction variable between the VDV and the stiffness slightly improved the prediction. The equivalence of the two stimuli was given by log10 (stiffness) = 0.787 log10 (VDV) + 1.34, or log10 (VDV) = 1.27 log10 (stiffness) - 1.70.     

Effect of lumbar support on seating comfort predicted by a whole human body-seat model

Automobile seat greatly affects the ride comfort of drivers in a prolonged driving. Not only the layout parameters of automobile seats, such as seat height, cushion inclination angle, backrest inclination angle, etc, but also the backrest surface related with lumbar support all affect the seating comfort. The human body-seat system includes the three-dimensional data of body based on anatomy and anthropometry, three-dimensional data of seat and adjustable assembly interaction between body and seat based on human body kinematics. Body height and driving posture are adjusted in POSER software, then the solid model of human skin, skeleton and muscle are created in ANSA software, and the integrated model of body-seat system is created in ABAQUS software. The adjustment of the lumbar support parameters is achieved by setting boundary condition of lumbar support region of seats. The finite element model of human body-seat system is validated by comparison to available literature results. At last the finite element model is applied to analyze the effect of lumbar support parameters of seats on the interaction between body and seat under the action of gravity. The pressure value and distribution, contact area, total force of backrest and intervertebral disc stress are obtained. The result shows that the optimal thickness of seat's lumbar support size for the seating comfort is 10 mm after comprehensive comparison and evaluation.Relevance to industry: This study investigated the effects of lumbar support on seating comfort, and can be used to protect the lumbar health. The modeling and simulation method can be applied for the optimization design of vehicle seats.     

Transmission characteristics of suspension seats in multi-axis vibration environments

The multi-axis vibration transmission characteristics of selected suspension seats were investigated in the laboratory. Subjects were exposed to a flat acceleration spectrum and two low frequency signals extracted from multi-axis acceleration data recorded at the floor of a passenger locomotive. Triaxial accelerations were measured at the floor of the vibration table and at the interfaces between the subject and mounted seat (seat pan and seat back). The transmission ratios between the overall seat pan and seat back accelerations and floor accelerations provided an effective tool for evaluating the effects of measurement site, vibration direction, and posture among the selected seating systems. The results showed that the system transfer matrix, estimated using a multiple-input/single-output model, would be less than ideal for predicting low frequency operational seat vibration when using suspension seats. The Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility (SEAT), estimated for the tested locomotive seats, was used to predict the weighted seat pan accelerations and Vibration Total Values for assessing a 1-h operational exposure in accordance with ISO 2631-1: 1997.

Relevance to industry

Multi-axis SEAT values can be estimated for seating systems tested in the laboratory using representative operational exposures. These values can be applied to monitored vehicle floor accelerations to target potentially harmful vibration in accordance with ISO 2631-1: 1997, assuming the operational exposures have similar frequency and magnitude characteristics. The transmission at the seat back should be considered when substantial low frequency multi-axis vibration is present.     

Reducing whole-body vibration and musculoskeletal injury with a new car seat design

A new car seat design, which allows the back part of the seat (BPS) to lower down while a protruded cushion supports the lumbar spine, was quantitatively tested to determine its effectiveness and potentials in reducing whole-body vibration (WBV) and musculoskeletal disorders in automobile drivers. Nine subjects were tested to drive with the seat in: 1) the conventional seating arrangement (Normal posture); and 2) the new seating design (without BPS (WO-BPS) posture). By reducing contact between the seat and the ischial tuberosities (ITs), the new seating design reduced both contact pressure and amplitude of vibrations transmitted through the body. Root-mean-squared values for acceleration along the z-axis at the lumbar spine and ITs significantly decreased 31.6% (p < 0.01) and 19.8% (p < 0.05), respectively, by using the WO-BPS posture. At the same time, vibration dose values significantly decreased along the z-axis of the lumbar spine and ITs by 43.0% (p < 0.05) and 34.5% (p < 0.01). This reduction in WBV allows more sustained driving than permitted by conventional seating devices, by several hours, before sustaining unacceptable WBV levels. Such seating devices, implemented in large trucks and other high-vibration vehicles, may reduce the risk of WBV-related musculoskeletal disorders among drivers.     

Reducing whole-body vibration and musculoskeletal injury with a new car seat design

A new car seat design, which allows the back part of the seat (BPS) to lower down while a protruded cushion supports the lumbar spine, was quantitatively tested to determine its effectiveness and potentials in reducing whole-body vibration (WBV) and musculoskeletal disorders in automobile drivers. Nine subjects were tested to drive with the seat in: 1) the conventional seating arrangement (Normal posture); and 2) the new seating design (without BPS (WO-BPS) posture). By reducing contact between the seat and the ischial tuberosities (ITs), the new seating design reduced both contact pressure and amplitude of vibrations transmitted through the body. Root-mean-squared values for acceleration along the z-axis at the lumbar spine and ITs significantly decreased 31.6% (p < 0.01) and 19.8% (p < 0.05), respectively, by using the WO-BPS posture. At the same time, vibration dose values significantly decreased along the z-axis of the lumbar spine and ITs by 43.0% (p < 0.05) and 34.5% (p < 0.01). This reduction in WBV allows more sustained driving than permitted by conventional seating devices, by several hours, before sustaining unacceptable WBV levels. Such seating devices, implemented in large trucks and other high-vibration vehicles, may reduce the risk of WBV-related musculoskeletal disorders among drivers.     

Car driving with and without a movable back support: Effect on transmission of vibration through the trunk and on its consequences for muscle activation and spinal shrinkage

The aim of this study was to test the effect of a movable backrest on vibration transmission through the trunk during driving and on the physiological consequences thereof. Eleven healthy male subjects drove for about 1 h on normal roads with a movable and with a fixed backrest while surface electromyography (EMG) was measured at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) and vertical accelerations were measured at the seat, backrest and at the spine at the levels of the second sacral vertebra (S2) and seventh cervical vertebra (C7). The movable backrest significantly reduced accelerations at C7 by up to 11.9% at the 5 Hz frequency band. The movable backrest also significantly reduced the coherence and transmission between S2 and C7 accelerations, but not the differential motion between these sensors. EMG at both sides of L5 was on average 28% lower when using the movable backrest. Spinal shrinkage was unaffected by backrest type. It is concluded that a movable backrest reduces the transmission of vibration through the trunk and that it reduces low back EMG. Car driving is associated with the risk of developing low back pain and this may be related to exposure to whole body vibration. This study found an effect of a simple ergonomics measure on the transmission of vibration through the trunk as well as on back muscle activation.     

Biomechanical model to predict loads on lumbar vertebra of a tractor operator

A biomechanical model is important for prediction of loads likely to arise in specific body parts under various conditions. The biomechanical model was developed to predict compressive and shear loads at L4/L5 (lumbar vertebra) of a tractor operator seating on seats with selected seat pan and backrest cushion materials. A computer program was written to solve the model for various inputs viz. stature and weight of the tractor operators, choice of operating conditions, and reaction forces from seat pan and backrest cushions. It was observed that maximum compressive and shear forces ranged 943–1367 N and 422–991 N, respectively at L4/L5 of tractor operators steering the tractor with leg and hand control actions and occasionally viewing the implement at back. The compressive forces were maximum (1202–1367 N) with coir based composite seat backrest cushion materials (thickness of 80 mm, density of 47.19 kg/m³) and were minimum (943–1108 N) with high density polyurethane foam (thickness of 44 mm, density of 19.09 kg/m³) for the seats.Relevance to industryThe biomechanical model of a tractor operator is important for theoretical understanding the problem of sitting and is also valuable in prediction of compressive and shear loads at L4/L5 of operator under various operating conditions. It will help in design of tractor seat for operator's comfort.     

Effects of aircraft seat pitch on interface pressure and passenger discomfort

Seat pitch, defined as the distance from a point on the back of one seat to the same point on the seat in front, is one of the most important factors influencing aircraft seating comfort. This study assessed the influence of different airline seat pitches on subjective ratings of discomfort and body-seat interface contact pressures. This was a laboratory within-subjects study using an aircraft interior mock up to vary seat pitch. Twelve participants completed 1 h of sitting in each of five different seat pitches (28inches, 30inches, 32inches, 34inches, and 36inches). Interface pressure mats measured seat and backrest pressure distribution, subjective rating scales were used to measure overall and local body region discomfort. The results showed that overall body and local body region discomfort ratings tend to be lower when the seat pitch increased from 28 inches to 36 inches (p < 0.05). For pressure variables, the upper back average contact area, upper/lower back average contact pressure, upper/lower back average peak contact pressure, right buttock average contact area, left/right thigh buttock average peak contact pressure, and left buttock average peak contact pressure were significantly affected by seat pitch(p < 0.05). Separate analyses support that seat pitch was more strongly correlated with backrest interface pressure than with seat pan pressure. In conclusion, seat pitch was found to be an important factor associated with body-seat contact pressure and discomfort ratings.     

Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort

Static seat characteristics (seat stiffness) and dynamic seat characteristics (vibration magnitude) can both influence judgements of seat comfort. It is proposed that seat comfort can be predicted on the basis of Steven's psychophysical law: ψ = k?n , where ψ is a sensation magnitude, ? is the stimulus magnitude and k is a constant. The law is modified to: ψ = a + b?ns s + c?nv v, where ? s ? v represent seat stiffness and vibration magnitude, n s and n v are exponents determined by the rate of increase in discomfort associated with the stiffness and vibration magnitude, and a, b and c are constants. The stiffness of foam loaded to 490 N may indicate static seat comfort, while the vibration dose value (VDV) on the seat surface may indicate vibration discomfort. Two experiments with 20 subjects investigated this approach. The first experiment with five magnitudes of vibration, three foams and a rigid wooden flat seat yielded 0.929 for the exponent, n v, for VDV. In the second experiment subjects judged the overall seat discomfort while exposed six vibration magnitudes with the same four seating conditions. This experiment yielded 1.18 for the exponent, n s, for seat stiffness. The overall prediction of seat discomfort was given by: ψ = -50.3+ 2.68 ? s 1.18+ 101 ? v 0.929. The prediction equation provided more accurate estimates of subject discomfort than models using either the VDV alone or the stiffness alone, especially when the vibration magnitude was low or the seats were similar. An interaction variable between the VDV and the stiffness slightly improved the prediction. The equivalence of the two stimuli was given by log10 (stiffness) = 0.787 log10 (VDV)+ 1.34, or log10 (VDV) = 1.27 log10 (stiffness)? 1.70.     

The effect of posture and vibration magnitude on the vertical vibration transmissibility of tractor suspension system

The efficiency of suspension seat can be influenced by several factors such as the input vibration, the dynamic characteristics of the seat and the dynamic characteristics of the human body. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of sitting postures and vibration magnitude on the vibration transmissibility of a suspension system of an agricultural tractor seat. Eleven (11) healthy male subjects participated in the study. All subjects were asked to sit on the suspension system. Four (4) different sitting postures were investigated – i) “relax”, ii) “slouch”, iii) “tense”, and iv) “with backrest support”. All subjects were exposed to random vertical vibration in the range of 1–20 Hz, at three vibration magnitudes - 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² r.m.s for 60 s. The results showed that there were three pronounced peaks in the seat transmissibility, with the primary resonance was found at 1.75–2.5 Hz for every sitting postures. The “backrest” condition had the highest transmissibility resonance (1.46), while the “slouch” posture had the highest Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility (SEAT) values (64.7%). Changes in vibration magnitude for “relax” posture from 0.5 to 2.0 m/s² r.m.s resulted in greater reduction in the primary resonance frequency of seat transmissibility. The SEAT values decreased with increased vibration magnitude. It can be suggested that variations in posture and vibration magnitude affected the vibration transmission through the suspension system, indicating the non-linear effect on the interaction between the human body and the suspension system.Relevance to industry: Investigating the posture adopted during agricultural activities, and the effects of various magnitudes of vibration on the suspension system's performance are beneficial to the industry. The findings regarding their influence on the human body may be used to optimize the suspension system's performance.     

Transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the head

A series of experiments has investigated the transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the heads of seated subjects. Head motion was measured in all six axes using a light-weight bite-bar while seated subjects were exposed to random motion at frequencies of up to 5 Hz at 1.0 rad.s ^?2 r.m.s. Subjects sat on a rigid flat seat in two body postures: ‘back-on’ (back in contact with backrest) and ‘back-off’ (no backrest contact). The influence of the position of the centre of rotation was also investigated.

Motion at the head occurred mostly in the lateral, roll and yaw axes during exposure to roll seat vibration and in the fore-and-aft, vertical and pitch axes during exposure to pitch seat vibration. A reduction in the magnitude of head motion occurred when the subjects sat in a 'back-off' posture compared with a 'back-on' posture. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the lateral axis during roll seat vibration affected vertical and pitch head motion: least head motion occurred when the centre of rotation was in line with the subject's mid-sagittal plane. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the vertical axis during roll seat vibration affected head motion in the mid-coronal plane: roll head motion decreased as the position of the centre of rotation was raised from below the seat surface to above the seat surface. Varying the centre of rotation (along the fore-and-aft and vertical axes) during pitch seat vibration altered head motion in the mid-sagittal plane. Head motion increased with increasing distance of the centre of rotation in front or behind the subject's ischial tuberosities and increased as the seat was raised from below the centre of rotation to above the centre of rotation.     

Biomechanical response of the musculoskeletal system to whole body vibration using a seated driver model

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the effects of backrest inclination and vibration frequency on muscle activity in a dynamic environment using a musculoskeletal model.MethodThe muscle activity modeling method was used to analyze a full body musculoskeletal system of a seated person with a public domain rigid body model in an adjustable car seat. This model was established using AnyBody Modeling System, based on the inverse dynamic approach. And the min/max criterion in dealing with the muscle redundancy problem. Ten healthy subjects were exposed to whole body vibration (WBV) with five frequencies (3, 4.5, 6, 7, and 8 Hz) in the vertical direction in a randomized order on three separate days. The displacement of the seat-pan and head was measured using a hybrid Polaris spectra system to obtain the seat-to-head (STH) transmissibility. Muscle oxygenation was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. The validity of the model was tested using STH transmissibility and muscle oxygenation.ResultsIncreased vibration frequency caused high muscle activities of the abdomen and the right leg with a backrest forward inclination angle. The muscle activities of the left leg decreased at a backrest backward inclination except at inclination angles of 15° and 30°. Muscle activity of the lumbar suddenly increased at a backrest inclination angle of 5° and vibration frequency of 5 Hz. Muscle activities were higher under vibration than that without vibration.ConclusionVibration frequency significantly affected the muscle activity of the lumbar area. Likewise, the inclination degree of the backrest significantly affected the muscle activities of the right leg and the abdomen. The combination of vibration and forward inclination of the backrest can be used to maximize the muscle activity of the leg, similar to the abdomen and lumbar muscles.Relevance to the industryThe musculoskeletal model established in the present study provides a method that can be used to investigate the biomechanical response of seated drivers to WBV. This model helps protect drivers from occupational injury.     

Sitting comfort in an aircraft seat with different seat inclination angles

Passengers' comfort experience during flights is important in choosing their flights. The focus of this study is passengers’ perceived comfort in different climbing angles during ascent. Twenty-six participants were invited to experience three inclination angles including 3°, 14° and 18° in a Boeing 737 cabin. The angle of 3° was used to simulate cruising stage and the other two were used to simulate different climbing angles. Participants experienced each setting for 20 min where the perceived comfort, their heart rate variability(HRV), and their body contact pressure values on the backrest and seat pan were recorded with questionnaires, HRV bands and pressure mats respectively. The results indicate a preference of 14° inclination angle resembling the cruising angle (3°) and having the slowest moving speed of the center of pressure (COP) on both the backrest and seat pan.     

Adaptation and sensitivity to postural change in sitting

We used 3 psychophysics methods to determine perceptible changes in seat height, seat pan angle, and backrest angle using an experimental chair. In the method of adjustment, the chosen chair settings were affected by the initial setting. For example, a high initial setting of the seat height led to a high selected setting and a low setting led to a low value. The difference between settings was referred to as not noticeable difference (NND). The method of limits was used to determine acceptable chair settings using verbal limits such as "too high" and "too low." Using the method of constant stimuli, just noticeable differences (JNDs) were determined for chair height (1.5 cm), seat pan angle (1.2 degrees) and backrest angle (1.7 degrees). The corresponding values for NNDs and verbal limits were about twice as large: chair height (2.5 cm), seat pan angle (4 degrees) and backrest angle (3 degrees). NNDs and verbal limits are unobtrusive measures that are considered more valid than JNDs, which exaggerate the need for adjustability. The results have practical implications for the design of office chairs.     

The vibration of inclined backrests: perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back in the z-axis of the body

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency of vibration influence the perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back (vertical vibration when sitting upright, horizontal vibration when recumbent). Subjects experienced backrest vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5 to 25 Hz at vibration magnitudes up to 24 dB above threshold. Absolute thresholds, equivalent comfort contours, and the principal locations for feeling vibration were determined with four backrest inclinations: 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90° (recumbent). With all backrest inclinations, acceleration thresholds and equivalent comfort contours were similar and increased with increasing frequency at 6 dB per octave (i.e. velocity constant). It is concluded that backrest inclination has little effect on the frequency dependence of thresholds and equivalent comfort contours for vibration applied along the back, and that the W _d frequency weighting in current standards is appropriate for evaluating z-axis vibration of the back at all backrest inclinations.

Statement of Relevance: To minimise the vibration discomfort of seated people, it is necessary to understand how discomfort varies with backrest inclination. It is concluded that the vibration on backrests can be measured using a pad between the backrest and the back, so that it reclines with the backrest, and the measured vibration evaluated without correcting for the backrest inclination.     

Equivalent comfort contours for vertical seat vibration: effect of vibration magnitude and backrest inclination

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency and magnitude of vertical seat vibration influence vibration discomfort. Subjects experienced vertical seat vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5-25 Hz at vibration magnitudes in the range 0.016-2.0 ms(-2) r.m.s. Equivalent comfort contours were determined with five backrest conditions: no backrest, and with a stationary backrest inclined at 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90°. Within all conditions, the frequency of greatest sensitivity to acceleration decreased with increasing vibration magnitude. Compared to an upright backrest, around the main resonance of the body, the vibration magnitudes required to cause similar discomfort were 100% greater with 60° and 90° backrest inclinations and 50% greater with a 30° backrest inclination. It is concluded that no single frequency weighting provides an accurate prediction of the discomfort caused by vertical seat vibration at all magnitudes and with all backrest conditions. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Vertical seat vibration is a main cause of vibration discomfort for drivers and passengers of road vehicles. A frequency weighting has been standardised for the evaluation of vertical seat vibration when sitting upright but it was not known whether this weighting is suitable for the reclined sitting postures often adopted during travel.     

The influence of seat backrest angle on human performance during whole-body vibration

This study investigated the effects of reclined backrest angles on cognitive and psycho-motor tasks during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration. Twenty participants were each exposed to three test stimuli of vertical vibration: 2-8 Hz; 8-14 Hz and 14-20 Hz, plus a stationary control condition whilst seated on a vibration platform at five backrest angles: 0° (recumbent, supine) to 90° (upright). The vibration magnitude was 2.0 ms(-2) root-mean-square. The participants were seated at one of the backrest angles and exposed to each of the three vibration stimuli while performing a tracking and choice reaction time tasks; then they completed the NASA-TLX workload scales. Apart from 22.5° seat backrest angle for the tracking task, backrest angle did not adversely affect the performance during vibration. However, participants required increased effort to maintain performance during vibration relative to the stationary condition. These results suggest that undertaking tasks in an environment with vibration could increase workload and risk earlier onset of fatigue. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Current vibration standards provide guidance for assessing exposures for seated, standing and recumbent positions, but not for semi-recumbent postures. This paper reports new experimental data systematically investigating the effect of backrest angle on human performance. It demonstrates how workload is elevated with whole-body vibration, without getting affected by backrest angle.