(Bi)simulations up-to characterise process semantics

We define (bi)simulations up-to a preorder and show how we can use them to provide a coinductive, (bi)simulation-like, characterisation of semantic (equivalences) preorders for processes. In particular, we can apply our results to all the semantics in the linear time-branching time spectrum that are defined by preorders coarser than the ready simulation preorder.The relation between bisimulations up-to and simulations up-to allows us to find some new relations between the equivalences that define the semantics and the corresponding preorders. In particular, we have shown that the simulation up-to an equivalence relation is a canonical preorder whose kernel is the given equivalence relation. Since all of these canonical preorders are defined in an homogeneous way, we can prove properties for them in a generic way. As an illustrative example of this technique, we generate an axiomatic characterisation of each of these canonical preorders, that is obtained simply by adding a single axiom to the axiomatization of the original equivalence relation. Thus we provide an alternative axiomatization for any axiomatizable preorder in the linear time-branching time spectrum, whose correctness and completeness can be proved once and for all.Although we first prove, by induction, our results for finite processes, then we see, by using continuity arguments, that they are also valid for infinite (finitary) processes.     

A comparison of Statecharts step semantics

The paper studies some variants of Statecharts step semantics in the framework of structural operational semantics. The chosen framework allows to study precongruence and congruence properties of behavioral preorders and equivalences and to compare, with respect to these properties, the different step semantics considered.     

On complete fuzzy preorders and their characterizations

In the context of crisp or classical relations, one may find several alternative characterizations of the concept of a total preorder. In this contribution, we first discuss the way of translating those characterizations to the framework of fuzzy relations. Those new properties depend on t-norms. We focus on two important families of t-norms, namely those that do not admit zero divisors and those that are rotation invariant. For these families, we study whether or not the properties shown for fuzzy relations lead to characterizations of complete fuzzy preorders. Special attention is paid to the minimum operator, which shows the best behaviour in preserving most of the characterizations known for crisp relations.     

Nested semantics over finite trees are equationally hard

This paper studies nested simulation and nested trace semantics over the language BCCSP, a basic formalism to express finite process behaviour. It is shown that none of these semantics affords finite (in)equational axiomatizations over BCCSP. In particular, for each of the nested semantics studied in this paper, the collection of sound, closed (in)equations over a singleton action set is not finitely based.     

Querying Weak Instances Under Extension Chase Semantics: A Complete Solution

The problem of computing windows using relational expressions has been solved only in certain cases in which the chase semantics and the extension chase semantics of the database coincide. However, the general problem of computing windows under either chase semantics or extension chase semantics, but without restrictions, remained an open problem. In this paper we present a complete solution of the general problem, under extension chase semantics. Our solution is complete in the sense that it does not require any assumption on the database scheme or on the database state. It follows that our approach subsumes previous approaches, and we exhibit cases in which our approach correctly computes the windows, while previous approaches fail to do so. Moreover, the efficiency of our approach lies in the fact that it uses only those relation schemes and only those functional dependencies that are necessary in the computation of windows. The main technique employed by our approach is a least fixpoint construction using the notion of cover (a cover being a set of relation schemes satisfying certain properties). The proposed technique can be implemented using relational algebra plus recursion.     

Robust safety of timed automata

Timed automata are governed by an idealized semantics that assumes a perfectly precise behavior of the clocks. The traditional semantics is not robust because the slightest perturbation in the timing of actions may lead to completely different behaviors of the automaton. Following several recent works, we consider a relaxation of this semantics, in which guards on transitions are widened by Δ>0 and clocks can drift by ε>0. The relaxed semantics encompasses the imprecisions that are inevitably present in an implementation of a timed automaton, due to the finite precision of digital clocks. We solve the safety verification problem for this robust semantics: given a timed automaton and a set of bad states, our algorithm decides if there exist positive values for the parameters Δ and ε such that the timed automaton never enters the bad states under the relaxed semantics.     

Semantics of Constructions（I）—The Traditional Approach

It is well known that impredicative type systems do not have set theoretical semantics.This paper takes a look at semantics of inductive types in impredicative type systems.A generalized inductive type is interpreted as an omega set generated by effectivizing a certain rule set .The result provedes a semantic justification of inductive types in the calculus of constructions.     

Abduction in logic programming: A new definition and an abductive procedure based on rewriting

A long outstanding problem for abduction in logic programming has been on how minimality might be defined. Without minimality, an abductive procedure is often required to generate exponentially many subsumed explanations for a given observation. In this paper, we propose a new definition of abduction in logic programming where the set of minimal explanations can be viewed as a succinct representation of the set of all explanations. We then propose an abductive procedure where the problem of generating explanations is formalized as rewriting with confluent and terminating rewrite systems. We show that these rewrite systems are sound and complete under the partial stable model semantics, and sound and complete under the answer set semantics when the underlying program is so-called odd-loop free. We discuss an application of abduction in logic programming to a problem in reasoning about actions and provide some experimental results.     

The equational theory of prebisimilarity over basic CCS with divergence

This paper studies the equational theory of prebisimilarity, a bisimulation-based preorder introduced by Hennessy and Milner in the early 1980s, over basic CCS with the divergent process Ω. It is well known that prebisimilarity affords a finite ground-complete axiomatization over this language; this study proves that this ground-complete axiomatization is also complete in the presence of an infinite set of actions. Moreover, in sharp contrast to this positive result, it is shown that prebisimilarity is not finitely based over basic CCS with the divergent process Ω when the set of actions is finite and nonempty.     

Structures for Abstract Rewriting

When rewriting is used to generate convergent and complete rewrite systems in order to answer the validity problem for some theories, all the rewriting theories rely on a same set of notions, properties, and methods. Rewriting techniques have been used mainly to answer the validity problem of equational theories, that is, to compute congruences. Recently, however, they have been extended in order to be applied to other algebraic structures such as preorders and orders. In this paper, we investigate an abstract form of rewriting, by following the paradigm of logical-system independency. To achieve this purpose, we provide a few simple conditions (or axioms) under which rewriting (and then the set of classical properties and methods) can be modeled, understood, studied, proven, and generalized. This enables us to extend rewriting techniques to other algebraic structures than congruences and preorders such as congruences closed under monotonicity and modus ponens. We introduce convergent rewrite systems that enable one to describe deduction procedures for their corresponding theory, and we propose a Knuth-Bendix–style completion procedure in this abstract framework.     

Process algebra with action dependencies

In this paper, we present a process algebra with a minimal form of semantics for actions given by dependencies. Action dependencies are interpreted in the Mazurkiewicz sense: independent actions should be able to commute, or (from a different perspective) should be unordered, whereas dependent actions are always ordered. In this approach, the process algebra operators are used to describe the conceptual behavioural structure of the system, and the action dependencies determine the minimal necessary orderings and thereby the additionally possible parallelism within this structure. In previous work on the semantics of specifications using Mazurkiewicz dependencies, the main interest has been on linear time. We present in this paper a branching time semantics, both operationally and denotationally. For this purpose, we introduce a process algebra that incorporates, besides some standard operators, also an operator for action refinement. For interpreting the operators in the presence of action dependencies, a new concept of partial termination has to be developed. We show consistency of the operational and denotational semantics; furthermore, we give a axiomatisation of bisimilarity, which is complete for finite terms. Some small examples demonstrate the flexibility of this process algebra in the design of distributed reactive systems. Received: 19 November 1998 / 18 July 2001     

有限样本条件下欠规范手语识别容错特征扩充

生活中似是而非的手语表达语义含糊,欠规范的手势动作易混淆,同时从有限样本中难以获得充足特征用于训练手语识别模型,模型容易过拟合进而导致识别准确率较低.针对此问题,提出一种在有限样本条件下扩充欠规范手语识别容错特征的表示学习方法.该方法基于手语表达时人体骨架的运动信息,面向手语的时空关联性构建自编码器,从手语语料库中少量...     

‘Closed Interval Process Algebra’ versus ‘Interval Process Algebra’

Summary. In this paper we extend the theory of processes with durational actions that has been proposed in [1,2] to describe and reason about the performance of systems. We associate basic actions with lower and upper time bounds, that specify their possible different durations. Depending on how the lower and upper time bounds are fixed, eager actions (those which happen as soon as they can), lazy actions (those which can wait arbitrarily long before firing) as well as patient actions (those which can be delayed for a while) can be modelled. Processes are equipped with a (soft) operational semantics which is consistent with the original one and is well-timed (observation traces are ordered with respect to time). The bisimulation-based equivalence defined on top of the new operational semantics, timed equivalence, turns out to be a congruence and, within the lazy fragment of the algebra, refines untimed equivalences. Decidability and automatic checking of timed equivalence are also stated by resorting to a finite alternative characterization which is amenable to an automatic treatment by using standard algorithms. The relationships with other timed calculi and equivalences proposed in the literature are also established. Received: 22 May 1998 / 8 November 2000     

A compact fixpoint semantics for term rewriting systems

This work is motivated by the fact that a “compact” semantics for term rewriting systems, which is essential for the development of effective semantics-based program manipulation tools (e.g. automatic program analyzers and debuggers), does not exist. The big-step rewriting semantics that is most commonly considered in functional programming is the set of values/normal forms that the program is able to compute for any input expression. Such a big-step semantics is unnecessarily oversized, as it contains many “semantically useless” elements that can be retrieved from a smaller set of terms. Therefore, in this article, we present a compressed, goal-independent collecting fixpoint semantics that contains the smallest set of terms that are sufficient to describe, by semantic closure, all possible rewritings. We prove soundness and completeness under ascertained conditions. The compactness of the semantics makes it suitable for applications. Actually, our semantics can be finite whereas the big-step semantics is generally not, and even when both semantics are infinite, the fixpoint computation of our semantics produces fewer elements at each step. To support this claim we report several experiments performed with a prototypical implementation.     

A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks

Dung’s argumentation framework consists of a set of arguments and an attack relation among them. Arguments are evaluated and acceptable sets of them, called extensions, are computed using a given semantics. Each extension represents a coherent position. In the literature, several proposals have extended this framework in order to take into account the strength of arguments. The basic idea is to ignore an attack if the attacked argument is stronger than (or preferred to) its attacker. Semantics are then applied using only the remaining attacks. In this paper, we show that those proposals behave correctly when the attack relation is symmetric. However, when it is asymmetric, conflicting extensions may be computed leading to unintended conclusions. We propose an approach that guarantees conflict-free extensions. This approach presents two novelties: the first one is that it takes into account preferences at the semantics level rather than the attack level. The idea is to extend existing semantics with preferences. In case preferences are not available or do not conflict with the attacks, the extensions of the new semantics coincide with those of the basic ones. The second novelty of our approach is that a semantics is defined as a dominance relation on the powerset of the set of arguments. The extensions (under a semantics) are the maximal elements of the dominance relation. Such an approach makes it possible not only to compute the extensions of a framework but also to compare its non-extensions. We start by proposing three dominance relations that generalize respectively stable, preferred and grounded semantics with preferences. Then, we focus on stable semantics and provide full characterizations of its dominance relations and those of its generalized versions. Complexity results are provided. Finally, we show that an instance of the proposed framework retrieves the preferred sub-theories which were proposed in the context of handling inconsistency in weighted knowledge bases.     

Compiling Esterel into Static Discrete-Event Code

Executing concurrent specifications on sequential hardware is important for both simulation of systems that are eventually implemented on concurrent hardware and for those most conveniently described as a set of concurrent processes. As with most forms of simulation, this is easy to do correctly but difficult to do efficiently. Solutions such as preemptive operating systems and discrete-event simulators present significant overhead.In this paper, we present a technique for compiling the concurrent language Esterel into very efficient C code. Our technique minimizes runtime overhead by making most scheduling decisions at compile time and using a very simple linked-list-based event queue at runtime.While these techniques work particularly well for Esterel with its high-level concurrent semantics, the same technique could also be applied to efficiently execute other concurrent specifications.     

HYPOTHETICAL REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS: FROM SITUATION CALCULUS TO EVENT CALCULUS

Hypothetical reasoning about actions is the activity of preevaluating the effect of performing actions in a changing domain; this reasoning underlies applications of knowledge representation, such as planning and explanation generation. Action effects are often specified in the language of situation calculus, introduced by McCarthy and Hayes in 1969. More recently, the event calculus has been defined to describe actual actions, i.e., those that have occurred in the past, and their effects on the domain. Altough the two formalisms share the basic ontology of atomic actions and fluents, situation calculus cannot represent actual actions while event calculus cannot represent hypotethical actions. In this article, the language and the axioms of event calculus are extended to allow representing and reasoning about hypothetical actions, performed either at the present time or in the past, altough counterfactuals are not supported. Both event calculus and its extension are defined as logic programs so that theories are readily adaptable for Prolog query interpretation. For a reasonably large class of theories and queries, Prolog interpretation is shown to be sound and complete w.r.t. the main semantics for logic programs.     

基于进程代数的UML序列图的形式语义

UML序列图用于建模实例间动态交互过程．但UML规范并没有给出其形式化的动态语义，这不利于对模型进行形式化验证和证明。本文把序列图中的事件动作及其执行序列映射为进程代数中的进程表达式，利用进程代数语义框架来构建UML序列图的形式语义。首先，建立了序列图到进程代数的语义映射规则；然后用Plotkin风格的结构化操作语义给出并证明务件组合算子演绎规则；最后，归纳定义了算子次序约束条件并证明了其可终止性。     

On graph reasoning

In this paper, we study the (positive) graph relational calculus. The basis for this calculus was introduced by Curtis and Lowe in 1996 and some variants, motivated by their applications to semantics of programs and foundations of mathematics, appear scattered in the literature. No proper treatment of these ideas as a logical system seems to have been presented. Here, we give a formal presentation of the system, with precise formulation of syntax, semantics, and derivation rules. We show that the set of rules is sound and complete for the valid inclusions, and prove a finite model result as well as decidability. We also prove that the graph relational language has the same expressive power as a first-order positive fragment (both languages define the same binary relations), so our calculus may be regarded as a notational variant of the positive existential first-order logic of binary relations. The graph calculus, however, has a playful aspect, with rules easy to grasp and use. This opens a wide range of applications which we illustrate by applying our calculus to the positive relational calculus (whose set of valid inclusions is not finitely axiomatizable), obtaining an algorithm for deciding the valid inclusions and equalities of the latter.     

Stepwise Development of Process-Algebraic Specifications in Decorated Trace Semantics

Process algebras are convenient formalisms to develop specifications stepwise. This can be done with the help of partially defined states in a specification. When refining the specification, new transitions are added to partially defined states. At every step, it is verified with the help of special preorders, refinement relations, that the step leads towards a desired goal. This approach has already been introduced in the case, where the verification is based on weak bisimulation equivalence. We show in this article that refinement relations can also be developed in decorated trace semantics. Moreover, the intuitive picture seems to be simpler in trace-based than in bisimulation-based semantics. The algorithms to compute the new refinement relations are exponential in the worst case, but behave quite well in practical cases.