Defect features and mechanical properties of friction stir lap welded dissimilar AA2024–AA7075 aluminum alloy sheets

5 mm-Thick dissimilar AA2024-T3 and AA7075-T6 aluminum alloy sheets were friction stir lap welded in two joint combinations, i.e., (top) 2024/7075 (bottom) and 7075/2024. The influences of process conditions (welding speed and joint combination) on defects (hook and voids) features and mechanical properties of joints were investigated in detail. It was found that the hook deflects largely upwards into the stir zone (SZ) at lower welding speeds (50, 150 mm/min) in both combinations. The process conditions significantly affect the hook geometry which in return affects the lap shear strength. In all 2024/7075 joints, voids appear and the joints fracture from the tip of hook on AS along the SZ/TMAZ (thermomechanically affected zone) interface in lap shear test (tensile fracture mode). In 7075/2024 joints, the hook on RS horizontally extends a large distance into the bottom stir zone at higher welding speeds (225, 300 mm/min). The joints fracture in three modes: shear fracture along the lap interfaces, tensile fracture and the mix fracture of both. In both joint combinations, the lap shear strength generally increases with the increase of welding speed. 7075/2024 Joints show higher failure load than 2024/7075 joints at lower welding speeds while the opposite result appears at higher welding speeds.     

Single-sided laser beam welding of a dissimilar AA2024–AA7050 T-joint

In the aircraft industry double-sided laser beam welding of skin–stringer joints is an approved method for producing defect-free welds. But due to limited accessibility – as for the welding of skin–clip joints – the applicability of this method is limited. Therefore single-sided laser beam welding of T-joints becomes necessary. This also implies a reduction of the manufacturing effort. However, the main obstacle for the use of single-sided welding of T-joints is the occurrence of weld defects. An additional complexity represents the combination of dissimilar and hard-to-weld aluminium alloys – like Al–Cu and Al–Zn alloys. These alloys offer a high strength-to-density ratio, but are also associated with distinct weldability problems especially for fusion welding techniques like laser beam welding. The present study demonstrates how to overcome the weldability problems during single-sided laser beam welding of a dissimilar T-joint made of AA2024 and AA7050. For this purpose a high-power fibre laser with a large beam diameter is used. Important welding parameters are identified and adjusted for achieving defect-free welds. The obtained joints are compared to double-sided welded joints made of typical aircraft aluminium alloys. In this regard single-sided welded joints showed the expected differing weld seam appearance, but comparable mechanical properties.     

Influence of welding parameters on lap joint between Al and Ti alloys using low power fiber laser

Fiber laser beam welding has always been a user‐friendly and flexible method to join dissimilar materials despite differences in thermal coefficient. Many industrial applications such as automotive has replaced the conventional joining methods towards this because of the flexibility and reduction in time consumption. In the present study, dissimilar titanium alloy; Ti6Al4 V and aluminum alloy; AA2024‐0 were laser welded through a lap joint technique using a low power Yb‐fiber laser without any additional filler. The influence of welding speed on weld morphology was investigated using optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The cross‐section of the joints revealed that the fusion zone (FZ) and heat affected zones (HAZ) are wider when welding speed decreases with lower laser power. This result shows that the low power fiber laser has sufficient energy to melt the base materials, forming a liquid bridge to facilitate the smooth flow of molten metal between the top and bottom layer. Therefore, at lower welding speeds with constant low laser power, it was shown that there are possibilities of laser welding between two non‐ferrous metals.     

Fatigue Strength Assessment of Laser Beam Welded Joints Made of AA7075 and Magnetic Pulse Welded Joints Made of AA7075 and 3D-Printed AlSi10Mg

The use of 7000 aluminum alloys has an important role in future lightweight structures in the field of mobility due to the low density and high strength. However, these alloys can only be fusion welded to a limited extent because welding defects can rarely be prevented. For this reason, investigations are carried out to identify the most suitable welding parameters for two processes: laser beam and magnetic pulse welding. Herein, laser beam welding is successfully used to manufacture a roll-formed and longitudinally welded pipe made of AA7075 and joined by magnetic pulse welding with a 3D-printed lug-tube made of AlSi10Mg. The fatigue strength of these pipe joints and of laser beam welded butt joint specimens is determined using load-controlled fatigue tests. For the characterization of the specimens, cross sections are prepared and examined metallographically, which reflect the local weld seam geometry in the joining area. A fatigue assessment is made using linear-elastic approaches. The reference radius concept is applied to map the influence of geometric notches on the fatigue strength, assuming linear-elastic stress–strain behavior. It is shown that the recommended notch stress fatigue class FAT 178 (von Mises stress) can be applied for a safe and reliable fatigue assessment.     

Relationship between base metal properties and friction stir welding process parameters

Friction stir welding (FSW) is a solid state welding process for joining aluminum alloys and has been employed in aerospace, rail, automotive and marine industries for joining aluminium, magnesium, zinc and copper alloys. In FSW, the base metal properties such as yield strength, ductility and hardness control the plastic flow of the material under the action of rotating non-consumable tool. The FSW process parameters such as tool rotational speed, welding speed, axial force, etc. play a major role in deciding the weld quality. In this investigation, an attempt has been made to establish relationship between the base material properties and FSW process parameters. FSW joints have been made using five different grades of aluminium alloys (AA1050, AA6061, AA2024, AA7039 and AA7075) using different combinations of process parameters. Macrostructural analysis has been done to check the weld quality (defective or defect free). Empirical relationships have been established between base metal properties and tool rotational speed and welding speed, respectively. The developed empirical relationships can be effectively used to predict the FSW process parameters to fabricate defect free welds.     

Establishing relationships between mechanical properties of aluminium alloys and optimised friction stir welding process parameters

Friction stir welding (FSW) is a solid state welding process for joining aluminium alloys and is employed in aerospace, rail, automotive and marine industries. In FSW, the base metal properties such as yield strength, hardness and ductility control the plastic flow of the material under the action of a rotating non-consumable tool. The FSW process parameters such as, the tool rotational speed, the welding speed and the axial force play a major role in deciding the weld quality. In this investigation, FSW joints were made using six different grades of aluminium alloys (AA1100, AA2219, AA2024, AA6061, AA7039, and AA7075) using different levels of process parameters. Macrostructural analysis was carried out to identify the feasible working range of process parameters. The optimal welding conditions to attain maximum strength for each alloy were identified using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Empirical relationships were established between the base metal mechanical properties of aluminium alloys and optimised FSW process parameters. These relationships can be effectively used to predict the optimised FSW process parameters from the known base metal properties (yield strength, elongation and hardness).     

Comparative evaluation of tungsten inert gas and laser beam welding of AA5083-H321

In this study, the bead-on-plate welds were made on AA5083-H321 alloy plates using both tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding and laser beam (LB) welding processes to study the enhancement of mechanical properties such as weld yield strength and hardness. The low heat input of laser beam welding effectively reduced the size of the fusion zone and heat affected zone compared to tungsten inert gas welding process. High speed LB welding and fast heating and cooling of LB welding process hinders grain growth compared to TIG welding process. The effect of vapourization of volatile alloying elements is also considered. It seems that magnesium evaporation is relatively less in LB welding compared to TIG welding. Tensile testing of the welded joints revealed that LB welding results in superior mechanical properties. It is concluded that LB welding process is more suitable to join AA5083-H321.     

Investigating the influence of tool shape during FSW of aluminum alloy via CFD analysis

This paper describes the application of the CFD code, Comsol Multiphysics, to modeling the 3-D metal flow in friction stir welding of AA 2024-T3 aluminum alloy in order to investigate the influence of tool shape over the metal flow. Heat transfer and non-Newtonian flow equations were solved simultaneously. The results from the benchmark experiments found in the literature were used for validation purposes. Scrolled shoulders and threaded pins were given as kinematic boundary conditions. This made the computational problem an easy one. A welding engineer can predict the metal flow around the tool with different scrolls and threads under any welding conditions without making expensive experiments. Investigation of the velocity field before actual welding can save a lot of engineering hours.     

Tensile behavior of dissimilar friction stir welded joints of aluminium alloys

The heat treatable aluminium alloy AA2024 is used extensively in the aircraft industry because of its high strength to weight ratio and good ductility. The non-heat treatable aluminium alloy AA5083 possesses medium strength and high ductility and used typically in structural applications, marine, and automotive industries. When compared to fusion welding processes, friction stir welding (FSW) process is an emerging solid state joining process which is best suitable for joining these alloys. The friction stir welding parameters such as tool pin profile, tool rotational speed, welding speed, and tool axial force influence the mechanical properties of the FS welded joints significantly. Dissimilar FS welded joints are fabricated using five different tool pin profiles. Central composite design with four parameters, five levels, and 31 runs is used to conduct the experiments and response surface method (RSM) is employed to develop the model. Mathematical regression models are developed to predict the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and tensile elongation (TE) of the dissimilar friction stir welded joints of aluminium alloys 2024-T6 and 5083-H321, and they are validated. The effects of the above process parameters and tool pin profile on tensile strength and tensile elongation of dissimilar friction stir welded joints are analysed in detail. Joints fabricated using Tapered Hexagon tool pin profile have the highest tensile strength and tensile elongation, whereas the Straight Cylinder tool pin profile have the lowest tensile strength and tensile elongation. The results are useful to have a better understanding of the effects of process parameters, to fabricate the joints with desired tensile properties, and to automate the FS welding process.     

硬铝合金半球形零件的渐进成形工艺研究

目的 研究冲压胀形工艺与渐进成形工艺成形半球形零件的区别。方法 使用两种热处理状态的硬铝合金,AA2024-O和AA2024-T4,分别用冲压胀形工艺和渐进成形工艺成形半球形零件。结果 相比较渐进成形零件而言,使用冲压胀形工艺得出的半球形零件的壁厚相对均匀,变形程度可以达到更大;在相同的试验条件下,AA2024-O的成形性能远高于AA2024-T4的成形性能;在本实验所研究的参数范围内,下压量越小,成形高度越大,对AA2024-O进给速率越快,成形高度越大;而对AA2024-T4进给速率越慢,成形高度越大;对于胀形零件,材料在胀形过程中处于双向拉伸应变状态,而渐进成形零件在成形过程中处于平面应变状态;胀形零件的最大应变和最大减薄处是半球的中心,而渐进成形零件的最大应变和最大减薄处是半球的边缘。结论 胀形零件的危险截面在半球的中心,渐进成形零件的危险截面在半球的边缘。