Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods

A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is reported for five methods of hydrogen production, namely steam reforming of natural gas, coal gasification, water electrolysis via wind and solar electrolysis, and thermochemical water splitting with a Cu–Cl cycle. Carbon dioxide equivalent emissions and energy equivalents of each method are quantified and compared. A case study is presented for a hydrogen fueling station in Toronto, Canada, and nearby hydrogen resources close to the fueling station. In terms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle is found to be advantageous over the other methods, followed by wind and solar electrolysis. In terms of hydrogen production capacities, natural gas steam reforming, coal gasification and thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle methods are found to be advantageous over the renewable energy methods.     

The cost analysis of hydrogen life cycle in China

Currently, the increasing price of oil and the possibility of global energy crisis demand for substitutive energy to replace fossil energy. Many kinds of renewable energy have been considered, such as hydrogen, solar energy, and wind energy. Many countries including China have their own plan to support the research of hydrogen, because of its premier features. But, at present, the cost of hydrogen energy production, storage and transportation process is higher than that of fossil energy and its commercialization progress is slow. Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was used in this paper to evaluate the cost of hydrogen energy throughout the life cycle focused on the stratagem selection, to demonstrate the costs of every step and to discuss their relationship. Finally, the minimum cost program is as follows: natural gas steam reforming – high-pressure hydrogen bottles transported by car to hydrogen filling stations – hydrogen internal-combustion engines.     

Prospects of solar thermal hydrogen production processes

This article provides a critical discussion of prospects of solar thermal hydrogen production in terms of technological and economic potentials and their possible role for a future hydrogen supply. The study focuses on solar driven steam methane reforming, thermochemical cycles, high temperature water electrolysis and solar methane cracking. Development status and technological challenges of the processes and objectives of ongoing research are described. Estimated hydrogen production costs are shown in comparison to other options. A summary of current discussions and today's scenarios of future use of hydrogen as an energy carrier and a brief overview on the development status of end-use technologies characterise uncertainties whether hydrogen could emerge as important energy carrier until 2050. Another focus is on industrial hydrogen demand in areas with high direct solar radiation which may be the main driver for the further development of solar thermal hydrogen production processes in the coming decades.     

Prospects for solar only operation of the hybrid sulphur cycle for hydrogen production

The hybrid sulphur process is one of the most promising thermochemical water splitting cycles for large scale hydrogen production. While the process includes an electrolysis step, the use of sulphur dioxide in the electrolyser significantly reduces the electrical demand compared to conventional alkaline electrolysis. Solar operation of the cycle with zero emissions is possible if the electricity for the electrolyser and the high temperature thermal energy to complete the cycle are provided by solar technologies.This paper explores the possible use of photovoltaics (PV) to supply the electrical demand and examines a number of configurations. Production costs are determined for several scenarios and compared with base cases using conventional technologies. The hybrid sulphur cycle has promise in the medium term as a viable zero carbon production process if PV power is used to supply the electrolyser. However, the viability of this process is dependent on a market for hydrogen and a significant reduction in PV costs to around $1/W_p.     

Life cycle assessment of alternatives for hydrogen production from renewable and fossil sources

New processes under development for producing hydrogen have been assessed using a life cycle methodology and compared to conventional ones. The aim of this paper is to determine the main obstacles to be beaten or the critical aspects to be addressed to ensure the feasibility of these processes. Water photosplitting, solar two-step thermochemical cycles and automaintained methane decomposition with different lay-outs were studied. They have been compared to methane steam reforming with CCS and electrolysis with different electricity sources.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production by methane decomposition using carbonaceous catalysts

Methane decomposition to yield hydrogen and carbon (CH₄ ? 2H₂ + C) is one of the cleanest alternatives, free of CO₂ emissions, for producing hydrogen from fossil fuels. This reaction can be catalyzed by metals, although they suffer a fast deactivation process, or by carbonaceous materials, which present the advantage of producing the catalyst from the carbon obtained in the reaction. In this work, the environmental performance of methane decomposition catalyzed by carbonaceous catalysts has been evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment tools, comparing it to other decomposition processes and steam methane reforming coupled to carbon capture systems. The results obtained showed that the decomposition using the autogenerated carbonaceous as catalyst is the best option when reaction conversions higher than 65% are attained. These were confirmed by 2015 and 2030 forecastings. Moreover, its environmental performance is highly increased when the produced carbon is used in other commercial applications. Thus, for a methane conversion of 70%, the application of 50% of the produced carbon would lead to a virtually zero-emissions process.     

Solar hybrid photo-thermochemical sulfur-ammonia water-splitting cycle: Photocatalytic hydrogen production stage

One of the main limitations of existing solar thermochemical water-splitting cycles (WSC) are that they utilize only thermal component of the solar irradiation neglecting its photonic component. A new hybrid photo-thermochemical sulfur–ammonia (HySA) WSC developed at the Florida Solar Energy Center allows circumventing this shortcoming. In the HySA cycle, water splitting occurs by means of solar beam splitting which enables utilization of the quantum (UV–Vis) portion of the solar spectrum in the hydrogen production stage and the thermal (IR) portion in the oxygen production stage. Present work investigates the photocatalytic hydrogen production step using narrow band gap CdS and CdSZnS composite photocatalysts, and ammonium sulfite as an electron donor. The choice of the electron donor was determined by the considerations of its regenerability in the thermal stages of the HySA cycle. This article examines the impact of photocatalyst and cocatalyst loading, temperature, and light intensity on hydrogen production rates. Photocatalysts, cocatalysts and photoreaction products were analyzed by a number of materials characterization (XRD, SEM, TEM, EDS) and analytical (GC and IC) methods. The experimental data obtained provide guidance for the improved solar photoreactor design.     

Solar thermochemical ZnO/ZnSO4 water splitting cycle for hydrogen production

In this paper, solar reactor efficiency analysis of the solar thermochemical two-step zinc oxide–zinc sulfate (ZnO–ZnSO₄) water splitting cycle. In step-1, the ZnSO₄ is thermally decomposed into ZnO, SO₂, and O₂ using solar energy input. In step-2, the ZnO is re-oxidized into ZnSO₄ via water splitting reaction producing H₂. The ZnSO₄ is recycled back to the solar reactor and hence can be re-used in multiple cycles. The equilibrium compositions associated with the thermal reduction and water-splitting steps are identified by performing HSC simulations. The effect of Ar towards decreasing the required thermal reduction temperature is also explored. The total solar energy input and the re-radiation losses from the ZnO–ZnSO₄ water splitting cycle are estimated. Likewise, the amount of heat energy released by different coolers and water splitting reactor is also determined. Thermodynamic calculations indicate that the cycle (η_cycle) and solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency (η_{solar-to-fuel}) of the ZnO–ZnSO₄ water splitting cycle are equal to 40.6% and 48.9% (without heat recuperation). These efficiency values are higher than previously investigated thermochemical water splitting cycles and can be increased further by employing heat recuperation.     

Comparison of thermochemical,electrolytic, photoelectrolytic and photochemical solar-to-hydrogen production technologies

Hydrogen produced from solar energy is one of the most promising solar energy technologies that can significantly contribute to a sustainable energy supply in the future. This paper discusses the unique advantages of using solar energy over other forms of energy to produce hydrogen. Then it examines the latest research and development progress of various solar-to-hydrogen production technologies based on thermal, electrical, and photon energy. Comparisons are made to include water splitting methods, solar energy forms, energy efficiency, basic components needed by the processes, and engineering systems, among others. The definitions of overall solar-to-hydrogen production efficiencies and the categorization criteria for various methods are examined and discussed. The examined methods include thermochemical water splitting, water electrolysis, photoelectrochemical, and photochemical methods, among others. It is concluded that large production scales are more suitable for thermochemical cycles in order to minimize the energy losses caused by high temperature requirements or multiple chemical reactions and auxiliary processes. Water electrolysis powered by solar generated electricity is currently more mature than other technologies. The solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency is the main limitation in the improvement of the overall hydrogen production efficiency. By comparison, solar powered electrolysis, photoelectrochemical and photochemical technologies can be more advantageous for hydrogen fueling stations because fewer processes are needed, external power sources can be avoided, and extra hydrogen distribution systems can be avoided as well. The narrow wavelength ranges of photosensitive materials limit the efficiencies of solar photovoltaic panels, photoelectrodes, and photocatalysts, hence limit the solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies of solar based water electrolysis, photoelectrochemical and photochemical technologies. Extension of the working wavelength of the materials is an important future research direction to improve the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency.     

Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation

In this study, nuclear energy based hydrogen and ammonia production options ranging from thermochemical cycles to high-temperature electrolysis are comparatively evaluated by means of the life cycle assessment (LCA) tool. Ammonia is produced by extracting nitrogen from air and hydrogen from water and reacting them through nuclear energy. Since production of ammonia contributes about 1% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, new methods with reduced environmental impacts are under close investigation. The selected ammonia production systems are (i) three step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (ii) four step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (iii) five step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (iv) nuclear energy based electrolysis, and (v) nuclear high temperature electrolysis. The electrolysis units for hydrogen production and a Haber–Bosch process for ammonia synthesis are utilized for the electrolysis-based options while hydrogen is produced thermochemically by means of the process heat available from the nuclear power plants for thermochemical based hydrogen production systems. The LCA results for the selected ammonia production methods show that the nuclear electrolysis based ammonia production method yields lower global warming and climate change impacts while the thermochemical based options yield higher abiotic depletion and acidification values.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen supply chain with special attention on hydrogen refuelling stations

The controversial and highly emotional discussion about biofuels in recent years has shown that greenhouse gas² (GHG) emissions can only be evaluated in an acceptable way by carrying out a full life cycle assessment (LCA) taking the overall life cycle including all necessary pre-chains into consideration. Against this background, the goal of this paper is it to analyse the overall life cycle of a hydrogen production and provision. A state of the art hydrogen refuelling station in Hamburg/Germany opened in February 2012 is therefore taken into consideration. Here at least 50% hydrogen from renewable sources of energy is produced on-site by water electrolysis based on surplus electricity from wind (mainly offshore wind parks) and water. The remaining other 50% of hydrogen to be sold by this station mainly to hydrogen-fuelled buses is provided by trucks from a large-scale production plant where hydrogen is produced from methane or glycerol as a by-product of the biodiesel production. These two pathways are compared within the following explanations with hydrogen production from biomass and from coal. The results show that – with the goal of reducing GHG emissions on a life cycle perspective – hydrogen production based on a water electrolysis fed by electricity from the German electricity mix should be avoided. Steam methane reforming is more promising in terms of GHG reduction but it is still based on a finite fossil fuel. For a climatic sound provision of hydrogen as a fuel electricity from renewable sources of energy like wind or biomass should be used.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell and gasoline vehicles

A life cycle assessment of hydrogen and gasoline vehicles, including fuel production and utilization in vehicles powered by fuel cells and internal combustion engines, is conducted to evaluate and compare their efficiencies and environmental impacts. Fossil fuel and renewable technologies are investigated, and the assessment is divided into various stages.     

Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy

A life cycle assessment (LCA) of one proposed method of hydrogen production—the high temperature electrolysis of water vapor—is presented in this paper. High temperature electrolysis offers an advantage of higher energy efficiency over the conventional low-temperature alkaline electrolysis due to reduced cell potential and consequent electrical energy requirements. The primary energy source for the electrolysis will be advanced nuclear reactors operating at temperatures corresponding to those required for the high temperature electrolysis. The LCA examines the environmental impact of the combined advanced nuclear-high temperature electrolysis plant, focusing upon quantifying the emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The results are presented in terms of the global warming potential (GWP) and the acidification potential (AP) of the system. The GWP for the system is 2000 g carbon dioxide equivalent and the AP, 0.15 g equivalents of hydrogen ion equivalent per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The GWP and AP of this process are one-sixth and one-third, respectively, of those for the hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas, and are comparable to producing hydrogen from wind- or hydro-electricity powered conventional electrolysis.     

Solar hydrogen production by two-step thermochemical cycles: Evaluation of the activity of commercial ferrites

In this work, we report on the evaluation of the activity of commercially available ferrites with different compositions, NiFe₂O₄, Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄, ZnFe₂O₄, Cu_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄ and CuFe₂O₄, for hydrogen production by two-step thermochemical cycles, as a preliminary study for solar energy driven water splitting processes. The samples were acquired from Sigma–Aldrich, and are mainly composed of a spinel crystalline phase. The net hydrogen production after the first reduction–oxidation cycle decreases in the order NiFe₂O₄ > Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄ > ZnFe₂O₄ > Cu_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄ > CuFe₂O₄, and so does the H₂/O₂ molar ratio, which is regarded as an indicator of potential cyclability. Considering these results, the nickel ferrite has been selected for longer term studies of thermochemical cycles. The results of four cycles with this ferrite show that the H₂/O₂ molar ratio of every two steps increases with the number of cycles, being the total amount stoichiometric regarding the water splitting reaction. The possible use of this nickel ferrite as a standard material for the comparison of results is proposed.     

Water splitting for hydrogen production with ferrites

The water splitting reaction by a thermo-chemical cycle using ferrites was investigated for H₂ production. In the first step (activation step), ferrites were thermally reduced at 1200 °C to form an oxygen-deficient ferrite. In the second step (water splitting step), the activated ferrites were oxidized by water at 800 °C to produce hydrogen. Among the prepared ferrites, Ni-ferrite was found to be the most suitable for H₂ production. NiFe₂O₄ produced an average of 0.442 cm³/g cycle of H₂. The H₂ productivity of the Ni-ferrite was much higher than that of the other ferrites at the same temperature. XRD showed that the crystal structure of NiFe₂O₄ during the redox reaction was not changed during the repeated cycles, indicating that NiFe₂O₄ was an excellent material in terms of structural stability and durability.     

Experimental study of effect of anolyte concentration and electrical potential on electrolyzer performance in thermochemical hydrogen production using the Cu-Cl cycle

An important process in the copper-chlorine water splitting cycle for hydrogen production is electrolysis which occurs after a series of cycle steps that produce the constituents for the anolyte of the electrochemical cell. In this investigation, an anolyte mixture of HCl/CuCl/H₂O of varying concentrations is circulated through the electrolyzer to assist in optimizing its performance. It is observed that the concentration and temperature of the anolyte directly affect the process. The efficiency of the electrolyzer is adversely affected, after running a series of experiments, due to copper deposition on the membrane. An important implication of the results is that, to determine the optimal electrolyzer performance, one needs to vary the flow rate and the concentration of anolyte, for a given constant voltage source. In addition, this work demonstrates that aqueous CuCl₂ can be recovered from the waste solution exiting the electrolyzer and recycled to the hydrolysis reactor.     

Comparative study of the activity of nickel ferrites for solar hydrogen production by two-step thermochemical cycles

In this work, we compare the activity of unsupported and monoclinic zirconia – supported nickel ferrites, calcined at two different temperatures, for solar hydrogen production by two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycles at low thermal reduction temperature. Commercial nickel ferrite, both as-received and calcined in the laboratory, as well as laboratory made supported NiFe₂O₄, are employed for this purpose. The samples leading to higher hydrogen yields, averaged over three cycles, are those calcined at 700 °C in each group (supported and unsupported) of materials. The comparison of the two groups shows that higher chemical yields are obtained with the supported ferrites due to better utilisation of the active material. Therefore, the highest activity is obtained with ZrO₂-supported NiFe₂O₄ calcined at 700 °C.     

Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Evaluation of different Spanish feedstocks

Gasification of biomass can be used for obtaining hydrogen reducing the total greenhouse gases emissions due the fixation of CO₂ during photosynthetic processes. The kind of raw materials is an important variable since has a great influence on the energy balance and environmental impacts. Wastes from forestry are considered as the most appropriate raw materials since they do not compete for land. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental feasibility of four Spanish lignocellulosic wastes (vine and almond pruning and forest waste coming from pine and eucalyptus plantation) for the production of hydrogen through gasification. LCA methodology was applied using global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication and the gross energy necessary for the production of 1 Nm³ of hydrogen as impact categories. As expected, the use of biomass instead of natural gas leads to the reduction of CO₂ emissions. Regarding to the different feedstocks, biomass coming from forestry is more environmental-friendly since does not need cropping procedures. Finally, the distribution of environmental charges between pruning wastes and fruits (grape and almond) and the use of obtained by-products have a great influence, reducing the environmental impacts.     

A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a Cu-Cl cycle

In this paper, a comparative environmental study is reported of the Cu-Cl water-splitting cycle with various other hydrogen production methods: the sulphur-iodine (S-I) water-splitting cycle, high temperature water electrolysis, conventional steam reforming of natural gas and hydrogen production from renewable resources. The investigation uses life cycle assessment (LCA), which is an analytical tool to identify and quantify environmentally critical phases during the life cycle of a system or a product and/or to evaluate and decrease the overall environmental impact of the system or product. The LCA results for the hydrogen production processes indicate that the thermochemical cycles have lower environmental impacts while steam reforming of natural gas has the highest.