都市圈发展阶段及其规划重点探讨

1　不同阶段的都市圈规划目标及重点当前的都市圈规划区别于传统的区域规划、城镇体系规划和概念性规划 ,应当说属于一种非标准层次的规划。都市圈规划的主要内容是从更大的空间范围协调行政区之间、城市之间和城乡之间的发展 ,协调城乡建设与人口分布、资源开发、环境整治和基     

新时期区域综合规划中的“协调”问题初探——基于京津冀都市圈区域综合规划的思考

适应国家对区域规划日益重视的趋势,总结我国“十一五”规划区域规划项目——京津冀都市圈区域规划的编制经验,实证研究与理论研究相结合,认为“协调”是区域规划工作的精髓。阐明了区域规划应在三个阶段,即前期研究阶段、研究成果完成阶段以及规划初稿阶段进行协调;协调的对象包括各专业规划、高层次区域（空间）规划和地方规划等,即上、下、横向三个层次的规划;协调内容包括战略性内容如规划目标、规划内容尤其是探索性内容、具体项目与对策措施等方面,即从宏观战略到具体方案等不同层次的内容。     

国家战略实施背景下跨界都市圈空间协同规划创新——以南京都市圈城乡规划协同工作为例

在“一带一路”、长江经济带、新型城镇化和江北新区等国家战略实施以及南京都市圈城市发展联盟成立的新背景下,南京都市圈八市联合推进了都市圈城乡规划协同工作.通过深入分析当前区域规划协调的难点与现状矛盾,借鉴国外都市圈发展经验,明确了规划协调的目标与思路.在工作方法上,重在适应市场,构建起自下而上的规划协同工作新机制.而且,既强调各城市的独立性,又强调相互的协同性,共同达成区域协调的规划约定,确立了行动指南,创新了都市圈规划行为约束机制.在技术方法上,区域空间层面重在建立都市圈规划编制体系,增强规划的指导性和实施性;专项规划层面重在适应市场经济条件,厘清有关区域整体发展格局的综合交通、生态保护等城市外部空间规划条件;地区实施层面重在关注跨界地区规划协调,明确分类管控及规划协调要点.以此对都市圈空间协同规划进行全新尝试,希望对今后国家空间规划体系的完善有所借鉴.     

省级都市圈高位协调机构的建立与实施机制

在借鉴西方国家都市圈机构建设有关经验的基础上,认为中国省级都市圈规划虽然具备了综合性空间规划的特点,但由于其规划实施涉及到与空间利用有关的多个部门以及多个设区以上的城市,具体规划落实中没有一个统一的实施主体来牵头,加上实施手段缺乏,导致规划实施成效不明显。针对实施主体不明确,提出需要建设自上而下与都市圈事权相对应以行政调控为主导的高位协调机构,并研究了高位协调机构的定位及其权限,以及都市圈协调机构建设的渐进式过程。针对都市圈建设中实施手段缺乏、环境协调难于落实等问题,提出建立并完善与都市圈体制机制创新相适应的高位协调机构运作的程序;最后,论文对构成都市圈的成员城市和部门协作的制度化合作方式进行了初步探讨。     

都市圈规划实施有效途径的思考——浅谈行动规划在哈尔滨都市圈规划中的应用

在对行动规划的内涵、特征及现实意义分析的基础上,以哈尔滨都市圈为例探讨了都市圈规划实施的有效途径。提出都市圈行动规划要从问题导向、目标导向和需求导向出发,确定行动规划的研究重点与编制内容,重点解决一体化建设中的壁垒问题,中心与外围关系问题,需统一行动的问题以及区域内土地利用需协调的问题。     

雏形期都市圈规划思路探讨--徐州都市圈规划介绍

都市圈规划目标因其本身发展问题的差异而具有阶段性，雏形期都市圈规划以培育都市圈为主要目标。本文系统总结了雏形期都市圈规划的思路和重点，并介绍了徐州都市圈规划的空间组织、产业发展、综合交通建设、基础设施和公共设施建设、生态建设和环境保护、政策环境等主要内容。     

日本首都圈规划构想及其启示

在考察日本三大都市圈的基础上,本文着重探讨和归纳了日本首都圈规划的目的、内容及实施追求等方面的重要特点,同时与江苏省都市圈规划相印证,提出在当前我国城市化高速发展时期,日本都市圈规划具有的借鉴意义.     

行政区划调整导向下济南都市圈区域协调发展策略

在优化行政区划设置和培育发展现代化都市圈的新时代,南京、济南、哈尔滨等城市被国家点名"省会作用不够"。这些省会城市的都市圈协调发展普遍面临行政区划掣肘问题,行政区划调整往往也成为各地规划建设都市圈以及推动都市圈实现一体化发展、提升竞争力水平的关键抓手。基于合肥、西安、成都、南京等典型省会都市圈发展与规划案例分析,文章理清了都市圈区域协调发展面临的行政区划困境表征,以及服务都市圈区域协调发展的行政区划调整主要模式、适应性规划策略及行政区划调整导向下都市圈区域协调发展机理,并结合济南都市圈规划建设与行政区划调整的发展历程、面临问题及优势条件分析,提出行政区划调整导向下的济南都市圈区域协调发展规划策略,包括强化核心、动能转换、区位再造、文化协同、生态共治,以期为西安(西咸)、兰州(兰白)等同类都市圈区域协调发展与规划提供参考。     

日本首都圈规划构想及其启示

在考察日本三大都市圈的基础上，本文着重探讨和归纳了日本首都圈规划的目的、内容及实施追求等方面的重要特点，同时与江苏省都市圈规划相印证，提出在当前我国城市化高速发展时期，日本都市圈规划具有的借鉴意义。     

量身定做 绘就“三圈”蓝图——江苏省全面完成三个都市圈规划

南京、徐州、苏锡常三个都市圈是《江苏省城镇体系规划》确定的“三圈五轴”城镇空间结构的重要内容。江苏省委、省政府对都市圈的规划建设十分重视。三个都市圈的规划编制由省建设厅具体负责,省各有关部门和有关城市共同参与。截止2002年底,苏锡常、南京、徐州三个都市圈的规划已经全面完成并经过江苏省人民政府批准进入实施阶段。其中苏锡常都市圈     

实施温州都市区规划 以都市化提升城市化

都市区将成为推进城市经济社会发展新的空间载体,温州较早就提出了都市区规划,都市区规划的实施又是当前转型期整合优化城乡空间形态的战略选择.温州都市区规划实施存在着城市区域的整体规模效应还未显现、产业发展不适应都市区功能发展的要求等问题,应从立体交通网络的规划建设,统筹区域基础设施建设,整合、强化与提升城市功能,以及制度创新等方面着手推进都市化进程.     

北抑南拓 东移西调——走向跨越式成长的广州

在认识和分析广州城市存在的问题和面临的机遇之后 ,提出处于高速发展阶段的广州应当从目前外溢式发展模式转变为跨越式发展模式 ,采取“北抑南拓东移西调”的空间策略 ,基于区域城市网络集中发展 ,在广州南部地区建设第二个“浦东” ,全面提升广州的区域职能和地位 ,发挥广州在国家和区域发展中的重要作用。还简要介绍了规划在珠三角都市圈结构模式、区域城市网络结构、城市空间结构、城市空间特色、重要交通设施等方面的构想 ,并论证了跨越式发展的必要性与可能性     

The New Regionalism: Key Characteristics of an Emerging Movement

This article analyzes the emergence of a “new regionalism” and situates this movement within the historical evolution of regional planning. Key characteristics include (1) a focus on specific territories and spatial planning; (2) a response to the particular problems of the postmodern metropolitan region; (3) a holistic perspective that integrates planning specialties as well as environmental, equity, and economic goals; (4) a renewed emphasis on physical planning, urban design, and sense of place; and (5) a more activist or normative stance on the part of planners. The implementation of new regionalist concepts is likely to come about not through top-down regional government, but through incremental development of social capital, institutions, ad hoc partnerships, and frameworks of incentives and mandates between existing levels of government.     

基于"点-轴"理论的西安大都市圈空间结构演变研究

“点-轴”理论在区域规划尤其是大都市圈空间结构演变中具有十分重要的理论价值和现实指导意义。本文通过介绍分析“点-轴”理论,探讨了它在都市圈空间结构中的作用机制。然后以西安大都市圈为例,分析了其空间结构的特征及其演变过程。     

从未实现的多中心城市区域:巴黎聚集区、巴黎盆地和法国的空间规划战略

本文揭示了在巴黎大都市区中,国家和区域层面的两种多中心空间规划政策是如何在无意中阻碍了这个多中心巨型城市区域的发展。国家层面的政策试图降低法国境内的经济不平衡,但却无法促进巴黎盆地这个完整空间系统的形成。另外,大巴黎地区的多中心规划限制了邻近新城的经济和城市发展。这导致了巴黎聚集区的加强,限制了尚未成形的巴黎多中心巨型城市区域周边功能性城市区域的进一步整合。     

长江三角洲地区多中心空间结构的经济分析和聚类

多中心的空间结构是当代区域发展的主要特征,也是区域研究的重要方面.长江三角洲地区,作为我国最大的经济核心区和城镇密集区,在全球化作用加深、产业集聚与扩散、交通体系建设与优化提升、城市化与工业化交互推进等多种因素综合影响下,形成了以上海市区与浦东新区为一级中心,以南京市区与杭州市区为二级中心,以无锡市区、宁波市区、苏州市区、绍兴市区、宝山区和闵行区为三级中心,以常州市区、扬州市区、常熟市、淳安县、舟山市区、镇江市区、江阴市、昆山市、嘉兴市区、靖江市和湖州市区为四级中心的空间结构.     

都市圈圈层界定方法

对都市空间界定的四要素(空间要素、时间要素、流量要素和引力要素)进行了具体量化分析。用经济势能及交通权数来确定都市圈的空间范围,以1 h作为时间要素来衡量距离,以公路旅客运输量作为流量要素来描述流量分布情况,以经济联系强度作为引力要素来确定中心城市的绝对影响区。通过对4个要素的综合,确定了都市圈圈域半径和圈层结构的界定方法,并以成都都市圈为例做了实证分析,得出了成都都市圈的圈域半径和圈层结构。     

The SEQ Regional Landscape Framework: Is Practice Ahead of Theory?

Current research into the peri-urbanisation associated with the rapid population growth of preferred Australian metropolitan regions has shown that their landscape values are put at risk and the region's quality of life (QoL) and the community's standards of liveability are consequently threatened. Whilst the concept of a landscape framework as an analytical, policy and management tool has general acceptance, there appears to be few if any working examples where this concept has been operationalised. To date, the conventional approaches utilised by regional planning agencies and local government have not been able to deliver the necessary tools to incorporate the essential landscape planning principles let alone planning processes to address the regional landscape values at risk in the peri-urban areas of rapidly growing regions. However, promising initiatives have emerged from allied planning fields such as landscape planning. Despite shortcomings in the theoretical development of this conceptual framework, a regional landscape framework has been incorporated into the recently released SEQ Regional Plan 2005-2026, a statutory planning instrument for the South East Queensland (SEQ) region, Australia's fastest growing metropolitan region. Whilst it is conceivable that in the SEQ case, practice may be ahead of theory, there is now an imperative to develop this framework in a manner that it can be utilised as a regional policy framework and as an integrating instrument to address the values of regional landscapes including the range of existing and emerging rural values of the critical urban-rural interface.     

Planning and the Challenges of the Metropolitan Landscape: Innovation in the Netherlands

The physical appearance of the Netherlands is rapidly changing. The land of prosperous towns and villages embedded in rich, flat and open agricultural land is turning into a metropolis. A distinctive quality of this metropolis is the mix of highly urbanized centres and open, green areas that come in different shapes and sizes. But how to design an appropriate planning system for this environment? Mixing “red” (urban) and “green” (rural) land uses, for instance, now becomes problematic as Dutch spatial planning has always focused primarily on the urban domain whereas planning of green areas has its origins in agricultural land consolidation policy. A genuinely integrated approach to the planning of built-up areas and green areas in the open spaces is a distant ideal in this setting. In addition, the regional administrative level, being so important for metropolitan spatial challenges, needs reinforcing. The authors make a plea for a reframing of the notion of spatial planning at the national and provincial geographical and administrative scale. It takes a new object for planning, design and analysis to do the trick. The traditional rural–urban opposition is traded for “metropolitan landscape”, a new image reflecting the integration of built-up and non-built-up distinctively urban and rural land uses. Planning for the metropolitan landscape requires a reassignment of duties and responsibilities among national, provincial and municipal governments and other stakeholders.     

Energy hierarchy and urban landscape system

The study of ecosystems suggests principles by which the flow of energy generates hierarchies in all systems. From viewpoint of ecological energetics, urban system lies on the highest level of ecosystem hierarchy. The main objective of this paper is to study the effect of energy flows on the hierarchies and spatial organization of urban zonation. This research uses Taipei metropolitan region as the area for the case study. “Emergy” is used as the principal conceptual tool for energy analysis; “transformity” is used to measure the hierarchies of land uses and urban landscape systems. Based on the calculation of the spatial distribution of energy flows, using GIS, the empower density and transformity increase from rural to urban center. In order to delineate zones of different energetics, the 1178 administrative districts of the Taipei metropolitan region are used as units for multivariate classification, in which 19 variables of energy flows are condensed into four factors. The factor scores of each districts are then used as input for cluster analysis and discriminate analysis. As a result, different energy structures, and subsequently, different types and amount of energy flows tend to associate with different intensities of urbanization. The Taipei metropolitan region is classified into six energetic zones: mixed-use urban core; high density urban residential district; service and manufacturing urban district; agricultural district, newly developed suburban district; and natural area. The calculation of transformity and emergy indices further establish the hierarchical order of these zones. The distribution of the six energetic zones, reveals the spatial energetic hierarchies of Taipei metropolitan region. The implication of energetic characteristics to planning practice is also discussed to conclude this research.