BCLA CLEAR - Contact lens wettability,cleaning, disinfection and interactions with tears

Contact lens materials have undergone significant changes over the past 20 years, particularly with respect to the introduction of silicone hydrogel materials. Whilst this development addressed hypoxic issues, other important areas relating to contact lens success, notably comfort, require further research.Contact lens wettability remains a crucially important part of biocompatibility. Contact lenses can be made more wettable by incorporation of surfactants into blister packs, internal wetting agents, surface treatments or care solutions. However, there remains no clear association between contact lens wettability and comfort, making it challenging to determine the potential for these approaches to be of significant clinical benefit. Most contact lenses are used on a daily wear, reusable basis, which requires them to be disinfected when not worn. The ideal disinfecting solution would also improve comfort during wear. However, balancing these requirements with other factors, including biocompatibility, remains a challenge. Soft lens materials invariably take up and subsequently release certain components of disinfecting solutions onto the ocular surface. This may affect tear film stability and the normal ocular microbiome, and further research is needed in this area to determine whether this has any affect on comfort. Finally, contact lens materials sorb components of the tear film, and these interactions are complex and may change the biochemistry of the tear film, which in turn may affect their comfort.In conclusion, the interaction between lens materials, tear film and disinfection solution plays an important role in the biocompatibility of lenses. However, the exact role and whether this can be altered to improve biocompatibility and comfort during wear remains debatable. This report summarises the best available evidence to examine this complex relationship and the opportunities for practitioners to enhance in-eye comfort of contemporary lenses, along with providing suggestions for areas of study that may provide further information on this topic.     

BCLA CLEAR – Contact lens technologies of the future

Contact lenses in the future will likely have functions other than correction of refractive error. Lenses designed to control the development of myopia are already commercially available. Contact lenses as drug delivery devices and powered through advancements in nanotechnology will open up further opportunities for unique uses of contact lenses.This review examines the use, or potential use, of contact lenses aside from their role to correct refractive error. Contact lenses can be used to detect systemic and ocular surface diseases, treat and manage various ocular conditions and as devices that can correct presbyopia, control the development of myopia or be used for augmented vision. There is also discussion of new developments in contact lens packaging and storage cases.The use of contact lenses as devices to detect systemic disease has mostly focussed on detecting changes to glucose levels in tears for monitoring diabetic control. Glucose can be detected using changes in colour, fluorescence or generation of electric signals by embedded sensors such as boronic acid, concanavalin A or glucose oxidase. Contact lenses that have gained regulatory approval can measure changes in intraocular pressure to monitor glaucoma by measuring small changes in corneal shape. Challenges include integrating sensors into contact lenses and detecting the signals generated. Various techniques are used to optimise uptake and release of the drugs to the ocular surface to treat diseases such as dry eye, glaucoma, infection and allergy. Contact lenses that either mechanically or electronically change their shape are being investigated for the management of presbyopia. Contact lenses that slow the development of myopia are based upon incorporating concentric rings of plus power, peripheral optical zone(s) with add power or non-monotonic variations in power. Various forms of these lenses have shown a reduction in myopia in clinical trials and are available in various markets.     

Non-invasive objective and contemporary methods for measuring ocular surface inflammation in soft contact lens wearers – A review

Contact lens wear is one of the primary risk factors for the development of ocular surface inflammatory events. The purpose of this review is to examine and summarize existing knowledge on the mechanisms of contact lens related ocular surface inflammation and the evidence for the effectiveness of current objective methods to measure ocular surface inflammation. Contact lens wear is postulated to trigger an inflammatory response on the ocular surface due to mechanical, chemical, hypoxic stress, or by the introduction of microbes and their toxins. Apart from the traditional signs of inflammation, such as swelling, oedema, redness and heat, on the ocular surface, other methods to measure ocular surface inflammation in sub-clinical levels include tear inflammatory mediator concentrations, conjunctival cell morphology, and corneal epithelial dendritic cell density and morphology. Tear inflammatory mediator concentrations are up- or down-regulated during contact lens wear, with or without the presence of associated inflammatory events. There is higher conjunctival cell metaplasia observed with contact lens wear, but changes in goblet cell density are inconclusive. Dendritic cell density is seen to increase soon after initiating soft contact lens wear. The long term effects of contact lens wear on dendritic cell migration in the cornea and conjunctiva, including the lid wiper area, require further investigation. Currently patient factors, such as age, smoking, systemic diseases and genetic profile are being studied. A better understanding of these mechanisms may facilitate the development of new management options and strategies to minimize ocular surface inflammation related to contact lens wear.     

Randomized crossover trial of silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PurposeThe aim of the current study is to assess, using new technologies, the interaction of four monthly silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the ocular surface and the comfort over 15 days of use.MethodsProspective cross-over, randomized and double-masked study including four materials (lotrafilcon-B, samfilcon-A , comfilcon-A and filcom-V3). Clinical examination was performed in the following order: tear meniscus height, first break-up of the tear film, the average time of all tear film breakup incidents, bulbar redness, limbal redness (Keratograph 5M ,Oculus, Germany); central corneal thickness (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany), thermography values (FLIR A325; FLIR Systems Inc., USA), and slit-lamp evaluations, including ocular surface staining. Finally, subjective comfort was obtained from Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8.ResultsThe impact of contact lens wear on the ocular surface didn’t show statistically significant changes over time except for corneal and conjunctival staining grades on day 15 compared to day 1 for the comfilcon A group (P = .003 and P = .01, respectively). Contact lens stability and impact on the ocular surface during contact lens wear didn’t show statistically significant changes over time except in the case of the comfilcon A material with respect to the irritation item (P = .01).ConclusionsThese results suggest that the impact of monthly silicone hydrogel contact lens materials on the ocular surface after and during contact lens wear, contact lens stability over time, and subjective comfort did not reveal any significant changes over 15 days of use for any of the materials.     

Hydrogel contact lens-induced corneal warpage.

BACKGROUND: Although contact lens-induced corneal warpage is most frequently associated with PMMA lenses, approximately 27% of reported cases of corneal warpage have been attributed to hydrogel lens wear. The change in corneal contour may be the result of either mechanical deformation, chronic metabolic insult, or a combination of mechanical and metabolic challenges. Limited oxygen transmissibility through some hydrogel lenses may lead to chronic hypoxia and acidosis. These metabolic challenges can change corneal physiology sufficiently to cause clinically significant corneal warpage. CASE REPORTS: Three cases of hydrogel contact lens-induced corneal warpage are presented. In all three cases, cessation of lens wear led to restoration of the normal corneal contour and visual acuity. All patients were refit with more oxygen-permeable lenses, and have successfully resumed wearing contact lenses. CONCLUSION: Certain individuals who wear hydrogel contact lenses can experience corneal warpage. Clinical signs of corneal warpage include changes in refractive error, decreased visual acuity with spectacle correction, and changes in corneal topography. Serial topography is useful to monitor the cornea to resolution of the condition. Contact lenses with higher oxygen transmissibility will frequently alleviate the relative hypoxia that may be associated with corneal warpage.     

Influence of air quality on the selection tendency of contact lens wearers

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether air quality influences ocular comfort when wearing contact lenses and the selection tendency of myopic populations who wears contact lenses.MethodsQuestionnaires were distributed to one hundred and twenty corneal contact lens wearers to understand whether the respondents would reduce or stop the use of contact lenses according to air quality and to evaluate and compare their ocular status under different air quality conditions.ResultsForty-three point eight percent of the respondents were concerned about reduced oxygen permeability of contact lenses and increased contact lens-associated complications caused by the adsorption and accumulation of haze particles on the contact lens. Thirteen point four percent of the respondents stated that they would stop using contact lenses during moderate to severe air pollution and switch to glasses. Twenty-eight point six percent of respondents remarked that they would reduce the use of contact lenses depending on the situation during moderate to severe air pollution. However, this study did not find statistically significant differences in the ocular comfort while wearing contact lenses and in the eye scores of contact lens wearers under different air quality conditions.ConclusionAir quality has an impact on the selection tendency of some contact lens wearers. However, whether moderate or more severe air pollution causes ocular discomfort or contact lens-associated complications in contact lens wearers awaits further investigation.     

BCLA CLEAR - Contact lens complications

Contact lens-related complications are common, affecting around one third of wearers, although most are mild and easily managed. Contact lenses have well-defined anatomical and physiological effects on the ocular surface and can result in other consequences due to the presence of a biologically active material. A contact lens interacts with the tear film, ocular surface, skin, endogenous and environmental microorganisms, components of care solutions and other antigens which may result in disease specific to contact lens wear, such as metabolic or hypersensitivity disorders. Contact lens wear may also modify the epidemiology or pathophysiology of recognised conditions, such as papillary conjunctivitis or microbial keratitis. Wearers may also present with intercurrent disease, meaning concomitant or pre-existing conditions unrelated to contact lens wear, such as allergic eye disease or blepharitis, which may complicate the diagnosis and management of contact lens-related disease.Complications can be grouped into corneal infection (microbial keratitis), corneal inflammation (sterile keratitis), metabolic conditions (epithelial: microcysts, vacuoles, bullae, tight lens syndrome, epithelial oedema; stromal: superficial and deep neovascularisation, stromal oedema [striae/folds], endothelial: blebs, polymegethism/ pleomorphism), mechanical (corneal abrasion, corneal erosion, lens binding, warpage/refractive error changes; superior epithelial arcuate lesion, mucin balls, conjunctival epithelial flaps, ptosis, discomfort), toxic and allergic disorders (papillary conjunctivitis, solution-induced corneal staining, incomplete neutralisation of peroxide, Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency), tear resurfacing disorders/dry eye (contact lens-induced dry eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction, lid wiper epitheliopathy, lid parallel conjunctival folds, inferior closure stain, 3 and 9 o'clock stain, dellen, dimple veil) or contact lens discomfort. This report summarises the best available evidence for the classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, management and prevention of contact lens-related complications in addition to presenting strategies for optimising contact lens wear.     

Herpes Simplex epithelial keratitis associated with daily disposable contact lens wear

PurposeTo report a case of epithelial Herpes Simplex keratitis in a patient wearing daily disposable contact lenses.MethodCase report.ResultsA 30-year-old female contact lens wearer presented to the emergency clinic with a painful, red left eye associated with an acute reduction of vision over 48 h. On examination, confluent dendritic ulcers were present on the cornea. Neither pertinent ocular nor medical history was obtained to explain such a dramatic clinical presentation.ConclusionContact lens wear was the only risk factor identified, perhaps resulting in deviation of the immune response at the ocular surface, with consequent extensive dendritic ulceration.     

The impact of contact lens wear on ocular surface mucins using a novel clinical fluorescence imaging system

PurposeFluorescein-labelled wheat germ agglutinin (F-WGA) acts as a marker for ocular surface mucins. This clinical study sought to investigate whether the degree of F-WGA fluorescence observed at the ocular surface differed between symptomatic contact lens wearers, asymptomatic contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers, using a novel imaging system.MethodsTwenty-five participants (10 symptomatic contact lens wearers, 10 asymptomatic contact lens wearers and 5 non-contact lens wearers) attended a single study visit. Photographs of the cornea, bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva were captured following application of F-WGA solution.ResultsThe imaging system captured high-resolution images of F-WGA fluorescence at the ocular surface. The degree of fluorescence differed between the ocular surface regions (p < 0.001). A significant difference in fluorescence was observed between participant groups for the cornea (p = 0.01), with both the symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers showing lower fluorescence than the non-lens wearers. F-WGA associated fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region of the symptomatic lens wearers, compared to the asymptomatic group (p = 0.025).ConclusionThe use of F-WGA as a clinical marker for ocular surface mucins allows an improved understanding of their distribution across the ocular surface. Contact lens wear appears to negatively impact mucin density across the ocular surface, with the most marked effect on the cornea. F-WGA fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region for the symptomatic contact lens wearing group, indicating that mechanical interaction in this region may play a role in the aetiology of contact lens discomfort. Given the ability of F-WGA to disclose mucin distribution across the ocular surface it is likely to be a key clinical tool in furthering our understanding of (i) the aetiology of contact lens related discomfort, (ii) contact lens designs/materials to minimise interaction with the ocular surface and (iii) dry eye disease and other ocular surface diseases.     

Patient experience and physiological response to two commercially available daily disposable myopia control contact lenses

BackgroundA range of myopia management (MM) contact lenses are becoming available to practitioners. These lenses are designed to slow myopia progression and axial elongation. This study explored the initial experience of participants wearing daily disposable MM contact lenses to investigate established factors previously associated with successful lens wear.MethodsThis was a prospective, double-masked, crossover study. Twenty participants aged 18–30 years old were assigned to wear two daily disposable MM lenses in a randomised order. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and amplitude/lag of accommodation were assessed at baseline, post-insertion, and after 2 and 6 h of lens wear. Self-reported lens comfort and vision quality were recorded at the same timepoints, and at 10 h post-insertion. Pairwise comparisons were performed between the two lenses at each timepoint, as well as assessing changes throughout wear. The relationship of the measured parameters to overall lens satisfaction was also assessed.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two MM lenses at any timepoint for any of the participant-reported parameters, including overall satisfaction. A small difference in visual acuity was noted at 6 h post-insertion, although this is unlikely to be clinically significant. Comfort decreased throughout the day, most notably at 10 h post-insertion. A moderate positive correlation was observed between participant-reported visual quality and overall satisfaction. A similar pattern was seen for comfort and overall satisfaction. Self-reported vision quality and measured visual acuity were poorly correlated, highlighting the benefit of subjectively assessing the quality of vision with these lenses.ConclusionsThe participants demonstrated comparable measures across a range of measures between the two MM lenses. Notably, half of the participants demonstrated a clear lens preference, although the preferred lens varied between individuals. Candidates for MM may benefit from trialling more than one MM lens design, to maximise initial wearing satisfaction.     

Overnight orthokeratology

Overnight orthokeratology lenses are approved in countries all over the world for the temporary reduction in myopia, and recently, one lens design has received regulatory approval for myopia control in Europe. The modern orthokeratology lens has a substantial history from its origins of attempting to flatten the corneal curvature with a spherical rigid contact lens to sophisticated gas permeable lenses, designed to reshape the cornea. These lenses are predominantly prescribed for children to slow myopia progression and limit axial elongation of the eye. This article reviews the peer-reviewed literature on the efficacy of orthokeratology for myopia control, sustainability after treatment is discontinued, and the safety concerns of overnight contact lens wear. Future avenues of research are discussed.     

Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 2: corneal topographic changes and safety over 100 days.

AIMS: Modern orthokeratology (ortho-k), using reverse geometry lens designs, is being widely used for myopia reduction world-wide but there has been no well-controlled clinical trial of this procedure. This study reports on the associated corneal changes and short-term safety of an orthokeratology procedure using the OK-74 lens design (known as OK704 in the UK). METHODS: We carried out a 100-day, controlled, randomised clinical trial in which 14 subjects underwent ortho-k and a further 14 were fitted with alignment fit contact lenses. RESULTS: Central corneal flattening and peripheral corneal steepening occurred and myopia reduction was explained by the flattening of the central 2 mm of the cornea. The overall ocular health effects were similar in conventional and OK-74 lens wear. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal sphericalisation occurred. Daily wear of OK-74 lens and the conventionally-designed lens were equally safe over the 100-day period investigated. Further work is needed to evaluate the long term safety of ortho-k.     

Review of 20 years of soft contact lens wearer ocular physiology data

BackgroundSince the introduction of Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lenses 20 years ago, industry has continued to modify lens materials, designs, lens care products and manufacturing processes, striving to improve contact lens physiological performance, comfort, and convenience for wearers. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the ocular health of habitual soft contact lens wearers today is better than it was in previous decades.MethodsBaseline ocular physiology data for 3624 participants from a The Brien Holden Vision Institute clinical trials database were retrospectively reviewed. Records were grouped into 3 time periods; A: >2 decades ago (1997–1999), B: one decade ago (2009–2014) and C: recent years (since 2015). Physiology data for both neophytes and habitual contact lens wearers included; bulbar, limbal and upper palpebral conjunctival redness, corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival indentation from contact lenses.ResultsCorneal staining levels are similar between neophytes and contact lens wearers at time points A and C but worse for contact lens wearers at time point B. Limbal redness was greater in contact lens wearers than in neophytes at time point A but at time points B and C they are not different to the non-contact lens wearing population. In recent years, most ocular physiological variables in habitual contact lens wearers are similar to neophytes.ConclusionsWhile there have been changes over the past two decades in ocular physiological responses to contact lens wear, it appears that ocular health with current day contact lens wear is similar to no lens wear in most respects.     

Temporal considerations in contact lens discomfort

PurposeTo determine the relative contributions to perceived discomfort during contact lens wear of contact time with the lens and the time of day at which wear begins, using a wearing framework similar to that of regular users.MethodsTwenty-three participants reported ocular discomfort using a 1–100 visual analogue rating scale, when prompted by email, during one day without contact lenses and on three other days while wearing soft contact lenses for twelve hours. Contact lens wear began at a different time on each day. The effect of start time on the change in discomfort during the wearing period was evaluated.ResultsThe average (± 95 % CI) change in discomfort over 12 h without contact lenses was -0.3 ± 3.5. The corresponding values during contact lens wear were 23.5 ± 14.6 when starting wear before 8am, 16.8 ± 11.0 when starting between 8am & 10am and 22.7 ± 8.4 when starting after 10am. While the increased discomfort was significant irrespective of start time (p < 0.01), there were no statistically significant differences between start times (p = 0.98).ConclusionDiscomfort during contact lens wear is associated with the length of time lenses are on-eye but not with the time of day when lenses are placed on-eye. This relationship is variable in the population and does not, of itself, explain why contact lenses become uncomfortable during wear. Active monitoring of participant compliance should be a consideration in all studies involving time critical responses.     

Exploring non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule: Subjective assessments and patient related factors in children wearing single vision and myopia control contact lenses

PurposeTo determine factors associated with non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule involving single vision and myopia control contact lenses in children.MethodsData from 379 children enrolled in a prospective, double masked, randomized clinical trial, aged 8–13 years, cycloplegic spherical equivalent of -0.75 to -3.50D and wearing either: single vision silicone hydrogel (SiH) CL (control lens); two anti-myopia SiH CL that incorporated relative plus in the central and periphery in a stepped manner (test lens I and II); and two extended depth of focus hydrogel CL (test lens III and IV) was considered. A questionnaire was administered to the participants at every scheduled visit and gathered information on days of wear/week and subjective assessments of ocular comfort and visual quality on an analog scale of 1–10.Participants were categorized as “Adherent” when lens wear was ≥ 6 days/week or “Non-adherent” when lens wear ≤ 5 days/week. Categorized adherence data was summarized as a percentage across visits for each CL type. Differences between the two groups were analyzed using linear mixed model.ResultsFor the control lens, 79.6 % participants were adherent as compared to 63.7%–74.6% with test lenses (p=0.026). Non-adherence was greater in those that discontinued (p<0.001). Subjective ratings of visual quality for static and dynamic tasks were lower with non-adherent wearers and more variable between visits. Ocular comfort was also poorer in non-adherent wearers irrespective of lens material or lens design. Male gender, lower baseline myopia, lower high contrast visual acuity and esophoria were associated with a higher risk of non-adherence.ConclusionsThe study identified a wide range of factors associated with non-adherence to lens wear schedule. Paying specific attention to these factors when evaluating patients for CL wear and taking steps to ensure satisfaction in lens wear may promote longer term continuation of wear.     

The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature.

AIM: To determine the dynamic emitted temperature changes of the anterior eye during and immediately after wearing different materials and modalities of soft contact lenses. METHOD: A dynamic, non-contact infrared camera (Thermo-Tracer TH7102MX, NEC San-ei) was used to record the ocular surface temperature (OST) in 48 subjects (mean age 21.7 +/- 1.9 years) wearing: lotrafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily wear (LDW; n=8) or continuous wear (LCW; n=8) basis; balafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily wear (BDW; n=8) or continuous wear (BCW; n=8) basis; etafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily disposable regimen (EDW; n=8); and no lenses (controls; n=8). OST was measured continuously five times, for 8s after a blink, following a minimum of 2h wear and immediately following lens removal. Absolute temperature, changes in temperature post-blink and the dynamics of temperature changes were calculated. RESULTS: OST immediately following contact lens wear was significantly greater compared to non-lens wearers (37.1 +/- 1.7 degrees C versus 35.0 +/- 1.1 degrees C; p < 0.005), predominantly in the LCW group (38.6 +/- 1.0 degrees C; p < 0.0001). Lens surface temperature was highly correlated (r=0.97) to, but lower than OST (by -0.62 +/- 0.3 degrees C). There was no difference with modality of wear (DW 37.5 +/- 1.6 degrees C versus CW 37.8+/-1.9 degrees C; p=0.63), but significant differences were found between etafilcon A and silicone hydrogel lens materials (35.3 +/- 1.1 degrees C versus 37.5 +/- 1.5 degrees C; p < 0.0005). Ocular surface cooling following a blink was not significantly affected by contact lens wear with (p=0.07) or without (p=0.47) lenses in situ. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular surface temperature is greater with hydrogel and greater still with silicone hydrogel contact lenses in situ, regardless of modality of wear. The effect is likely to be due to the thermal transmission properties of a contact lens.     

Ocular complications of soft contact lens wearers in a tertiary eye care centre of Nepal

AimTo determine the prevalence and the major types of ocular complications related with soft contact lenses (CL) in a tertiary eye care centre of Nepal.MethodsMedical files of 4064 soft CL wearers who started wearing CL between January 2003 and December 2010 in BP Koirala Lions Centre for Ophthalmic Studies (BPKLCOS) Kathmandu, Nepal, were retrospectively reviewed. Records of patients who visited the hospital with complications were analyzed. Patients with ocular complications non-related with CL wear were excluded.ResultsComplications were found in 4.9% of the total soft CL wearers. Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) was the most common complication, comprising 36.9% of the total patients with complications. The other commonly found complications were superior punctuate keratitis (SPK) in 16.2%, conjunctivitis in 18.2%, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in 8.6%, contact lens induced peripheral ulcer (CLPU) in 4%, corneal vascularization in 3.5% and microbial keratitis in 3%. The average time of first occurrence of complications after starting of contact lens wear was 14.3 ± 11.4 months.ConclusionCLPC, conjunctivitis and SPK were the most common types of soft CL related complications found in Nepal. Vision threatening complications like microbial keratitis was also found in some patients. Patient education in CL hygiene, after care schedule and frequent follow up examinations may help to minimize CL related complications.     

Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: Conjunctiva and sclera

While scleral lenses have been fitted using diagnostic lenses or impression moulding techniques for over a century, recent advances in anterior segment imaging such as optical coherence tomography and corneo-scleral profilometry have significantly improved the current understanding of the anatomy of the anterior eye including the morphometry of the conjunctiva, sclera, and corneo-scleral junction, as well as the ocular surface shape and elevation. These technological advances in ocular imaging along with continual improvements and innovations in scleral lens design and manufacturing have led to a global increase in scleral lens prescribing. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the conjunctiva and sclera in the context of modern scleral lens practice, including anatomical variations in healthy and diseased eyes, the physiological impact of scleral lens wear, potential fitting challenges, and current approaches to lens modifications in order to minimise lens-induced complications and adverse ocular effects. Specific topics requiring further research are also discussed.     

Presbyopia and the aging eye: Existing refractive approaches and their potential impact on dry eye signs and symptoms

Every part of the human body is subject to aging, including the eye. An increased prevalence of dry eye disease with age is widely acknowledged. Aging threatens ocular surface homeostasis, altering the normal functioning of the lacrimal functional unit and potentially leading to signs and symptoms of dry eye. Additional age-related processes take place within the crystalline lens, leading to presbyopia and cataractogenesis. Correction strategies for presbyopia and cataracts may directly or indirectly challenge the ocular surface. Contact lenses disturb the normal structure of the tear film and can interact negatively with the ocular surface, further deteriorating an already unbalanced tear film in presbyopes, however, newer contact lens designs can overcome some of these issues. Moreover, cataract and corneal refractive surgeries sever corneal nerves and disrupt the corneal epithelium and ocular surface, which can influence surgical outcomes and aggravate dryness symptoms in older age groups. This review summarises the current understanding of how the invasive nature of contact lens wear and cataract and refractive surgery influence signs and symptoms of ocular dryness in an aging population.