Haemophilus influenzae type b-specific antibody in infants after maternal immunization

OBJECTIVE: To study the kinetics of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-specific antibody in infants born to mothers immunized with an Hib polysaccharide or one of two Hib conjugate vaccines. STUDY DESIGN: Serum antibody to the polyribosylribitol (PRP) moiety of Hib was measured by radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at birth and at 2 and 6 months of age in infants born to women immunized with Hib polysaccharide or conjugate vaccine (PRP-D and HbOC). A subset of infants > or = 6 months of age was immunized with Hib conjugate vaccine after licensure of this vaccine for infants. A comparison group of 18 infants born to unimmunized women received the same Hib conjugate vaccine on a similar schedule. RESULTS: Total PRP antibody concentrations were 1.50, 14.4 and 20.4 microg/ml in 2-month-old infants born to mothers immunized with polysaccharide, PRP-D and HbOC vaccines, respectively, and 2.54, 1.35 and 2.46 microg/ml in 6-month-old infants. Infants born to mothers immunized with polysaccharide vaccine had significantly less PRP antibody at 2 months of age but similar antibody concentrations at 6 months of age. Persistence or increases in total PRP antibody during 6 months were noted in 21 of 47 (44.6%) study infants. A subset of study and comparison infants was immunized with a mean of 2.6 doses of Hib vaccines between 6 months and 2 years of age, and all infants had total PRP antibody concentrations > or = 0.15 microg/ml. CONCLUSION: Conjugate Hib vaccines administered during the last trimester of pregnancy resulted in significantly higher PRP antibody titers in infants at birth and 2 months of age than did polysaccharide vaccine. A subset of infants born to immunized mothers was subsequently immunized with Hib conjugate vaccine and had antibody concentrations similar to those in infants born to nonimmunized women.     

The elusive nature of intrinsic efficacy

In the discipline of pharmacology, drugs (ligands) are used as tools to elucidate the processes of biological systems. Because of this, pharmacologists strive to delineate all characteristics of drugs. Decades of research have resulted in the proposal that ligands possess two properties that are intrinsic to the ligand and are invariant of the system in which their effects are investigated. These properties are affinity (the capacity of a drug to bind to a receptor) and intrinsic efficacy (the capacity of a drug to activate or inactivate a receptor). Although affinity is a relatively easy parameter to measure with a variety of techniques, ways of quantifying intrinsic efficacy have remained elusive ever since its inception. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that intrinsic efficacy might not be a single, ligand-dependent parameter but that agonists might have multiple intrinsic efficacies. William Clarke and Richard Bond discuss several reasons why the claim that intrinsic efficacy is a ligand-dependent parameter should be questioned, and the possible impact of these findings.     

Secondary myelodysplasia and acute leukemia in breast cancer patients after autologous bone marrow transplant

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of myelodysplasia (MDS) and/or acute leukemia (AL) in breast cancer patients after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with a single conditioning regimen and autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT), and analyze the cytogenetic abnormalities that arise after HDC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 864 breast cancer patients who underwent ABMT at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, from 1985 through 1996 who received the same preparative regimen of cyclophosphamide 1,875 mg/m2 for 3 days, cisplatin 55 mg/m2 for 3 days, and BCNU 600 mg/m2 for 1 day (CPB). Pretransplant cytogenetics were analyzed in all patients and posttransplant cytogenetics were evaluated in four of five patients who developed MDS/AL. RESULTS: Five of 864 patients developed MDS/AL after HDC with CPB and ABMT. The crude cumulative incidence of MDS/AL was 0.58%. The Kaplan-Meier curve shows a 4-year probability of developing MDS/AL of 1.6%. Pretransplant cytogenetics performed on these five patients were all normal. Posttransplant cytogenetics were performed on four of five patients and they were abnormal in all four, although only one patient had the most common cytogenetic abnormality associated with secondary MDS/AL (chromosome 5 and/or 7 abnormality). CONCLUSION: Whereas MDS/AL is a potential complication of HDC with CPB and ABMT, the incidence in this series of patients with breast cancer was relatively low compared with that reported in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent ABMT. The cytogenetic abnormalities reported in this group of breast cancer patients were not typical of those seen in prior reports of secondary MDS/AL and appear to have occurred after HDC.