Linear interpolation in a fuzzy information space

An approach to solving a linear interpolation problem in a fuzzy information space is proposed. Two different schemes of interpolation are outlined: a heuristic one, based on the geometrical interpretation of operations, and an optimization one, based on the expansion principle. The results obtained allow performing fuzzy linear prediction. __________ Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 2, pp. 55–68, March–April 2006.     

多目标模糊优选理论在水资源系统中的应用

开放的水资源系统分析理论应是水资源学与系统科学等多种学科的结合 ,介绍一种新兴而实用的水资源系统分析技术———半结构性决策系统模糊优选理论的基本原理及其应用。     

Application of Fuzzy Control into a New Kind of Sea Water Still

ＡｐｐｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎｏｆＦｕｚｚｙＣｏｎｔｒｏｌｉｎｔｏａＮｅｗＫｉｎｄｏｆＳｅａＷａｔｅｒＳｔｉｌＱｕＷｅｉｄｏｎｇＹｕＪｉｎｄｉＺｈａｎｇＨｅｆｅｉＮｏｒｔｈｗｅｓｔｅｒｎＰｏｌｙｔｅｃｈｎｉｃａｌＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙＸｉ′ａｎ７１００７２，Ｐ...     

区域水资源模糊多目标规划模型及求解

针对区域水资源系统规划的多目标性和各目标的不精确性，建立了区域水资源系统模糊多目标线性规划模型。该模型改变了以往按确定性目标进行优化的思路，只需要给定目标值一个范围，就可以在规定的目标范围内进行优化求解。在求解过程中，建立了以各模糊目标隶属度值最大化为目标的模糊目标规划模型，采用目标隶属函数正负偏差量变量替换的方法，用线性目标规划的方法求解。经过实例验证，该模型求解比较简单，求解结果合理，与普通规划结果相比水资源模糊目标规划在规定目标的范围内取得了更好的优化结果。     

一种基于神经网络的模糊推理方法

对于Zadeh的模糊关系合成法则（简称CRI方法），选择一个适宜蕴涵关系矩阵是至关重要的。通常蕴涵关系矩阵的元素值是通过一个所构造的数学表达式计算的，或是由领域专家凭经验直接给出。然而，有时，特别是对于后一种情形，CRI法不能满足模糊推理最基本的一致性要求。文章构造了一个神经网络用于模糊推理，新方法不仅是CRI方法的推广，而且远比CRI方法易于满足推理的一致性要求。得益于神经网络的长处，新方法具有灵活性、可调性。文章给出了权值的具取值法。     

多级泵站老化的模糊评价模式

多级泵站是一个包括各级泵站及泵站内各种设施的复杂系统，系统内各个泵站的老化直接影响整个泵站系统的正常运行，采用单元化方法将多级泵站系统单元伦，引和泵站老化评价指标，建立了多级泵站老化的模糊评价模式，并对甘肃省景泰高扬程提水灌区多级泵站系统进行分析，提出了评价多级泵站老化程度的排序方法。     

土质滑坡相似材料试验设计理论及评价方法研究

通过对土质滑坡相似材料试验设计理论和试验结果评价体系的研究，比较了常用试验设计理论的优缺点。指出均匀设计在相似材料试验研究中的优越性，并提出一套与均匀设计配套的试验数据处理理论和试验结果评价体系，可供滑坡相似材料试验设计参考。     

战役战术导弹目标价值排序的模糊综合评判法

针对现代战争中战役战术导弹运用的特点，确定了战役战术导弹所打击目标价值的评判指标体系，并从分析目标价值的角度出发，用模糊综合评判法对战役战术导弹所打击目标进行价值分析，建立了打击先后顺序的评判模型．最后，用实例证明了，评判模型对战役战术导弹所打击目标进行价值排序的实用性和可行性。     

大空域机动巡航导弹的模糊PID控制器设计

针对大空域机动巡航导弹下降转平飞过程中出现的强非线性特点．在俯仰通道设计了模糊PID双模控制方案。以高度误差和该误差变化量为输入．以高度误差为阀限．在高度误差较大时采用响应迅速的模糊控制器．较小时采用稳态精度较高的PID控制器。最后通过仿真表明通过该方案所控制的弹道符合方案弹道．满足设计指标要求。     

Promise is Debt, Threat Another Matter: The Effect of Credibility on the Interpretation of Conditional Promises and Threats.

Evidence from reasoning tasks shows that promises and threats both tend to receive biconditional interpretations. They also both display high speaker control. On the face of it, the only difference seems to be the positive or negative signing of the consequent. In a promise, the speaker tries to persuade the hearer to do something by holding out the prospect of a particular reward; in a threat, the speaker tries to refrain the hearer from doing something by holding out the prospect of a particular punishment. This paper investigates the respects in which conditional promises and threats differ further by means of an inference task. The credibility of the consequent was manipulated in order to examine whether the acceptability ratings of inferences based on promises and on threats would be equally affected. The results of the inference task and an analysis of the reasons people give for their answers suggest that the credibility of promises is less affected by the use of excessive consequents than the credibility of threats. In other words, promise remains debt, whereas threat is another matter. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)