情感计算数学模型的研究初探

针对计算机如何进行情感计算，提出一种情感空间的概率模型并对其进行了计算机仿真。通过构造状态的概率转移矩阵，得到每个情感状态的概率分布，从而计算出情感的熵值。情感的熵值，表达出所构造的情感的细腻程度。通过计算机仿真，验证了情感模型是符合人类情感规律的——不确定性同时又具有统计规律。最后通过不同参数的仿真，说明此模型可以产生不同的情感活动，为情感机器人数学模型的建立与情感决策支持系统提供了一种新的方法。     

高校人力资源管理中心理契约的探讨

心理契约的本质是现代组织及其成员对无形的心理内容的一系列期望。近年来国外对其的研究，打破了传统的人力资源管理方式。把心理契约的概念引进高校人力资源管理，探讨高校教师的心理契约具有十分重要的现实意义，心理契约的构建贯穿于高校人力资源管理的各个环节。尤其要重视人员招聘方法，做好科学的职业生涯管理，营造良好的工作环境。     

包装设计与附加值

本文根据我国目前部分企业为了提升商品的附加值，而对产品进行过分包装的现状，从商品包装附加值产生的社会心理进行分析，结合实例得卅好的包装设计可以产生附加值，并深入探讨了实现包装设计附加值的因素和科学方法，进一步得出走消费者心理主导路线来实现包装附加值的观点。     

论大学生的就业心理

大学生的就业心理可以建构为就业心理倾向、就业心理素质、就业心态3个维度。并从这3个方面对当前大学生的就业心理特点进行了论述。最后,探讨了大学生应该如何进行就业心理准备和自我调试的问题。     

Josef Bro?ek: Friendship and History.

Presents reflections on the life and achievements of Josef Maria Bro?ek. The author notes that, in his way, Bro?ek turned psychology historiography into an international domain involving, in this construction, researchers from countries not only of Anglo Saxon languages but also those of Slavic and Latin languages, including Brazil. Quoting from Braque, he affirmed that "knowledge of the past enables the revelation of the present." However, he believed that "reality is not revealed if it is not sparkled by a poetic beam." The poetry of life illuminated Bro?ek and his actions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Correction to "Accredited Doctoral Programs" List (2003).

The list of "Accredited Doctoral Programs in Professional Psychology: 2003" (American Psychologist, 2003, Vol. 58, No. 12, pp. 1067-1080) contained an error. On page 1074, the University of Southern California is incorrectly identified (Footnote 7) as no longer admitting students to its doctoral program in clinical psychology. This is not the case. However, the University of Southern California is no longer admitting students to its doctoral program in counseling psychology (listed on page 1078), and the program is being phased out. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 2008-06168-001.) This is the official listing of accredited doctoral programs. It reflects all committee decisions through June 29, 2003. This list also is provided by electronic means (http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/doctoral.html), but that listing is for informational purposes only and should not be used for official credential review. The APA Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in the traditional substantive areas of clinical, counseling, school, or combined professional-scientific psychology representing two or more of those areas listed alphabetically below by their host institutions.. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sidney Orgel (1926-2003).

Presents an obituary for Sidney Orgel (1926-2003). Bud, as everyone knew him, received his bachelor's degree from New York University in 1948. He completed his master's (1950) and doctoral (1956) degrees in clinical psychology at the University of Connecticut. Bud joined the staff of the Syracuse Veterans Administration Hospital in 1956 and then in 1968 moved to the State University of New York Upstate Medical Center to develop a Division of Clinical Psychology. He remained at Upstate for the rest of his career and in 1993 was appointed professor emeritus. The high esteem in which he was held at Upstate is reflected in his selection as acting chair of the Department of Psychiatry, a position he held from 1981 to 1985 and a rare position for a psychologist. It was at Upstate that Bud's unique talents flourished. His first accomplishment was the development of one of the country's outstanding clinical psychology internships. The training and education of psychologists became a passion for him. Interns adored him, not only because he was an outstanding supervisor, but also because his trainees knew that his goal was providing them with the best possible experience and training. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The Scientific Attack on Brown v. Board of Education, 1954-1964.

Psychologists' work was cited in the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954). One criticism of the citation was that psychology could be used to overturn the Brown decision and return the country to segregation. A historical examination of such an attempt to overturn Brown in the early 1960s on the basis of new psychological knowledge shows that psychology was not persuasive in the face of the civil rights movement. The failure of segregationists to overturn Brown with psychological experts underscores how psychology is ineluctably bound to the larger society. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)