排序方式: 共有6条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
本文通过解读CIAM会议中柯布西耶与其ASCORAL团体提出的"CIAM格网"系统,以及其他CIAM成员(Team10成员)发展的部分格网,进一步理解CIAM时期提出的一种重要的城市与建筑设计的分析工具和思维方式,希望对当今城市及建筑设计的分析有所启示。 相似文献
2.
城市是文化物品;技术官僚制度下的城市设计体系(Urbanism),是一个来自19世纪欧洲的产物,尽管它已被中国广泛采用,却和中国的文化环境没有多大关联。中国有自己的城市设计传统,其中一种可以在中国南方的城市中找到,它为城市活动找到一种体量化的表达。文章认为,在这些地区可以找到更多适合中国的城市设计方法。 相似文献
3.
本文通过细读梁思成在1930年与张锐合作的天津规划,以及梁在1930-1949年间的一系列规划写作,仔细梳理他的规划思想的来源和运用。 相似文献
4.
5.
Kosuke Matsubara 《Planning Perspectives》2016,31(3):391-423
Gyoji Banshoya (1930–1998) was a Japanese urban planner whose life-work was urban planning in the Middle East and North Africa. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of his work, which still remains unknown. His early masterpiece, the ‘Square House’, shows how he was influenced by Kiyoshi Seike to apply historic spatial composition to realize width and convertibility in low-cost housing. Following this, Banshoya studied under the supervision of Gerald Hanning and George Candilis at Ateliers de Bâtisseurs in Paris, and went to Algiers to engage in the study of ‘evolutionary habitat’. As a United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) expert, he began working with Michel Ecochard in 1962 in Beirut, Damascus, and Aleppo. They were responsible for the elaboration of master plans for these three cities, and that of Damascus still remains as a legally active master plan today. Coupled with the Syrian political struggle since the 1980s, there has been some reaction against their modernist policies. However, the case is made for a detailed examination of Banshoya's work, and re-evaluation of its legacy for the urban planning history of the Middle East and North Africa. 相似文献
6.
Konstanze Sylva Domhardt 《Planning Perspectives》2013,28(2):173-197
Over a period of three decades, from 1928 to 1959, the Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne (CIAM) formed an unconventional working team and a complex laboratory of progressive ideas for designing the city. During the founding years of the organization and the transatlantic emigration of many of its major figures during the second half of the 1930s, a profound engagement with the most important trends in the European and North American debates on planning had become the critical foundation for their common task. The organization's consequent basic convictions and demands summed up the most effective maxims of the discipline since the turn of the century. Officially, CIAM tried to distinguish itself from traditional urban planning and instead advocated modern urban planning as the antithesis to everything that existed previously. Seen from a historical perspective, however, numerous points of connection – in particular to the garden city movement – become very clear. The various members of CIAM were deeply influenced ideologically by Ebenezer Howard's visions for urbanism. Personal contact to representatives of the garden city movement, active involvement in its institutions, and broad implementation of Howard's ideas in the context of European and North American planning led CIAM from the analysis of the functions of the existing city to a comprehensive design of the modern city. 相似文献
1