The relative positions of alanine residues in the hydrophobic core control the formation of two-stranded or four-stranded {alpha}-helical coiled-coils

The objective of this study was to investigate the positionaleffect of hydrophobic interactions in the -helical interfacein controlling the formation of two-stranded and four-strandedcoiled-coils. Two disulfide-bridged antiparallel coiled-coilswere designed which differ only in the position of a singleAla residue in the middle heptad: in peptide 2H the Ala residuesare in register (in the same rung), while in peptide 4H theyare not. Data from size-exclusion chromatography and sedimentationequilibrium experiments showed that under benign conditionspeptides 2H and 4H were two-stranded and four-stranded coiled-coilsrespectively. These results, in conjunction with molecular modelingstudies, suggest that when four Ala residues are in the sameplane of a potential four-stranded coiled-coil, the small sidechains of Ala would create a large cavity in the hydrophobicinterface of the potential four-stranded structure which isdestabilizing and favors the two-stranded, disulfide-bridgedcoiled-coil. In contrast, an alternating Leu-Ala hydrophobicpacking in the two planes distributes the potential cavity overa larger region, which may be partially filled by minor adjustmentsof the neighboring Leu side chains. As a result, there is stillsufficient hydrophobic contact to maintain the four-strandedstructure.     

Relationship of sidechain hydrophobicity and alpha-helical propensity on the stability of the single-stranded amphipathic alpha-helix

The aim of the present investigation is to determine the effect of alpha-helical propensity and sidechain hydrophobicity on the stability of amphipathic alpha-helices. Accordingly, a series of 18-residue amphipathic alpha-helical peptides has been synthesized as a model system where all 20 amino acid residues were substituted on the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic alpha-helix. In these experiments, all three parameters (sidechain hydrophobicity, alpha-helical propensity and helix stability) were measured on the same set of peptide analogues. For these peptide analogues that differ by only one amino acid residue, there was a 0.96 kcal/mole difference in alpha-helical propensity between the most (Ala) and the least (Gly) alpha-helical analogue, a 12.1-minute difference between the most (Phe) and the least (Asp) retentive analogue on the reversed-phase column, and a 32.3 degrees C difference in melting temperatures between the most (Leu) and the least (Asp) stable analogue. The results show that the hydrophobicity and alpha-helical propensity of an amino acid sidechain are not correlated with each other, but each contributes to the stability of the amphipathic alpha-helix. More importantly, the combined effects of alpha-helical propensity and sidechain hydrophobicity at a ratio of about 2:1 had optimal correlation with alpha-helix stability. These results suggest that both alpha-helical propensity and sidechain hydrophobicity should be taken into consideration in the design of alpha-helical proteins with the desired stability.