Contact Interaction of Turbine Blade Interlock Elements Under Creep

Strength of Materials - The effect of the creep of materials of a structure on the nature of the contact interaction between its elements during long-term operation is investigated. The problem of...     

Dynamic voltage scaling based energy-minimized partial task offloading in fog networks

Wireless Networks - With the dynamic voltage scaling (DVS) technology, the terminal node (TN) can dynamically adjust its computational speed, thus providing a new way to save energy during task...     

Novel pearl millet couscous process for West African markets using a low-cost single-screw extruder

Traditional West African pearl millet couscous products are popular; however, their preparation is laborious, time-consuming and energy-demanding, involving agglomeration, steaming, drying and sieving steps. In this study, a process was developed to produce millet couscous using a high pressure, high temperature and low-cost single-screw extruder. The innovation was to directly process the cooked low-moisture extrudate to a couscous product by drying and milling to the appropriate particle size (ranging between 1 and 2 mm). Throughput for the traditional process as prepared for commercial sale is 50 kg per day, but with the same amount of labour, the extrusion process yields ~350 kg per day. A consumer sensory study held in Niamey (Niger) showed that the extruded millet couscous was comparable to traditional couscous, though this was dependent on selection of the proper millet variety. This novel extrusion process could stimulate small- to medium-scale manufacturing of couscous and couscous-type products in West Africa.     

Graph-Theoretic Method on Topology Identification of Stochastic Multi-weighted Complex Networks with Time-Varying Delayed Coupling Based on Adaptive Synchronization

Neural Processing Letters - This paper is concerned with topology identification of stochastic multi-weighted complex networks based on adaptive synchronization. Different from previous work,...     

Adaptive Group Teaching Based Clustering and Data Aggregation with Routing in Wireless Sensor Network

Wireless Personal Communications - Nowadays, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is enhancing for different applications. Simultaneously, energy consumption for processing the tasks in most of the...     

Rapid anti-solvent vapor-assisted synthesis of CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 microcrystals with high brightness and stability of green light emission

Journal of Materials Science - The CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 perovskite composite material has received wide attention due to its good stability and photoelectric properties, and it is promising to appear...     

ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications,citations and different metrics and why?

ResearchGate has emerged as a popular professional network for scientists and researchers in a very short span. Similar to Google Scholar, the ResearchGate indexing uses an automatic crawling algorithm that extracts bibliographic data, citations, and other information about scholarly articles from various sources. However, it has been observed that the two platforms often show different publication and citation data for the same institutions, journals, and authors. While several previous studies analysed different aspects of ResearchGate and Google Scholar, the quantum of differences in publications, citations, and metrics between the two and the probable reasons for the same are not explored much. This article, therefore, attempts to bridge this research gap by analysing and measuring the differences in publications, citations, and different metrics of the two platforms for a large data set of highly cited authors. The results indicate that there are significantly high differences in publications and citations for the same authors captured by the two platforms, with Google Scholar having higher counts for a vast majority of the cases. The different metrics computed by the two platforms also differ in their values, showing different degrees of correlation. The coverage policy, indexing errors, author attribution mechanism, and strategy to deal with predatory publishing are found to be the main probable reasons for the differences in the two platforms.