园区综合能源服务利益方运营关系和经营战略

作为综合能源服务领域当前最具落地条件的领域,园区综合能源服务已受到工业、学术界越来越多的关注。园区综合能源服务相关利益方之间存在复杂的业务和利益耦合,亟须通过研究梳理利益方运营关系,指导园区综合能源服务的健康有序发展。通过分析园区综合能源服务的能量流、信息流与资金流,得出利益方运营关系。基于此,以电网企业为例,提出了开展园区综合能源服务发展的经营管理战略,即按照“以点带线、以点带面”的市场开拓思路,以示范项目为引领,拓展综合能源服务项目落地。     

浅谈工程项目管理的若干问题

随着我国社会经济的发展,人们对建筑的质量要求越来越高,建筑工程项目管理的作用也越来越大,其对保证建筑工程的实施和质量有着十分重要的意义。通过分析建筑项目管理工作的作用和具体内容,提出了改善和创新的方法和措施,以供相关单位借鉴和参考。     

市场机制下建筑节能相关利益主体博弈研究

充分发挥市场机制对节能产品的调控作用是市场经济的基本内容。通过对建筑节能市场发展中存在的相关问题研究,发现我国建筑节能市场的外部性和信息不对称性是产生问题的根源。全面分析建筑节能市场中政府、开发商、消费者以及其他服务组织等利益主体对市场培育的核心作用,通过构建政府与开发商、开发商与消费者之间的动态博弈模型,研究相关利益主体进一步完善建筑节能市场应采取的对策。     

面向不同利益相关者的IT投资决策模型

为了响应不同利益相关者在IT投资决策过程中的不同需求,把备选项目看作一个组合,综合IT项目的战略对应和财务收益为目标,权衡其成本、收益和风险,构建基于模糊多目标规划的IT投资决策模型,其中模糊数用来刻画不确定的项目信息。通过改变各临界值和求解过程中产生的参数,模型支持各种假设分析。最后用案例说明模型的用法和功能。     

我国节水灌溉利益相关者关系分析

节水灌溉是一项涉及国家、地方、部门、个人之间利益全面调整的综合系统工程,也是一个涉及政府、主管部门、水管单位、用水户等多个利益主体的复杂多重博弈过程。运用马克思主义历史唯物观,分析了我国节水灌溉过程中机构、团体或个人之间的利益关系,从多元动态博弈的视角对节水灌溉利益相关者的博弈行为与博弈结果进行分析,论证了只有充分考虑各利益相关者的利益诉求,引导、激励和规范节水灌溉行为,用水户实施节水灌溉行为,政府、主管部门、水管单位和用水户才能同时获得最大收益,达到不同利益者共赢多赢的目的。     

Decoupling climate-policy objectives and mechanisms to reduce fragmentation

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of climate-change mitigation policy within the building sector is examined in terms of how fragmentation can limit the extent of mitigation actions that can be achieved in a timely manner. The policy and regulatory context for the building industry is examined in relation to the policy context for solutions and recommendations that will work for all parties. Based on this analysis, two substantive recommendations are made for improved policy design. Firstly, a decoupling of policy objectives and policy mechanisms is needed so that the policy-taking stakeholders (in design, development and construction) can reduce energy use in buildings more effectively. Secondly, policy-taking stakeholders need an explicit and diverse system in order to advocate for policy objectives. The major aspect of this work is the development of a new conceptual framework that ties together these recommendations into a continuous process of policy-making and policy-taking. This framework demonstrates an idealized system that operates simultaneously top down and bottom up, and the development of policy objectives is influenced by stakeholders of all kinds to further the goals of an energy-efficient, low-carbon built environment.     

Emotional Illness and the Working Environment

Some of the difficulties associated with the measurement of alterations in mental health resulting from the working environment are discussed. Causes of stress are described which stem from the individual and his relationships, and from the organization of which he is a part. The need for a re-evaluation of the industrial physician's role and for future collaborative studies of occupational mental health is suggested.     

绿色建筑开发中多方利益主体行为分析

在绿色建筑开发中，所涉及的多方利益主体会综合考虑各方面的因素，做出各自的行为选择。在分析绿色建筑项目的利益主体范围和层次的基础上，研究绿色建筑涉及的多方利益主体的主要行为，并指出了各主体应完善的行为重点。     

Public–private partnership projects in Greece: risk ranking and preferred risk allocation

Project participants, through experience, have an initial perception and predisposition towards risk and the types of risks they are willing and able to undertake. This is equally true for parties interested in public–private partnership (PPP) projects. These initial positions have been registered for the major Greek PPP market stakeholders potentially involved in a PPP arrangement through a survey covering all candidate construction companies, interested financing institutes and a number of public sector entities to be involved in PPPs. Findings revealed that stakeholders were, for the majority of risks identified, in agreement as to preferred risk allocation. Risk allocation preferences for construction companies were compared with similar findings for the UK, a mature PPP market, indicating a possible learning/maturing process based on the particular country background. Conclusions add to other surveys carried out on the subject and should enable public sector clients to establish a more efficient framework for risk allocation, thus reducing negotiations prior to contract award and minimizing the risk of poor risk distribution.     

Sizing up ‘the box’ in order to fit in

Participants in design processes make an effort to come up with solutions that will be deemed acceptable, while accomplishing to ‘think out of the box’. Thinking ‘outside the box’ is often announced as a challenge to and for design teams. ‘The box’ is a metaphor often used in creative processes, and in organisational practices, as a term for rules and regulations, everyday routines and tacit knowledge of ‘how things usually are’ and ‘what we know about the world’. Such a challenge is meant to encourage participants to approach a situation with an open mind, challenge the most basic assumptions and be willing to do things differently. Basically, something different is being called for. Studies have shown that it is striking, how much the participants orient to actually ‘fit’ the box, even when asked to develop it. This paper shows how participants in design processes are ‘sizing up the box’, while participating in meetings or workshops in order to develop a design. They identify key stakeholders of the designated design project; they share their own expectations of these key stakeholders' possible perceptions, discuss the success criteria and negotiate the values that are to govern the design team in the development process.