An analytical expression for the instantaneous efficiency of a flat plate solar water heater and the influence of absorber plate absorptance and emittance |
| |
Authors: | D.E. Roberts A. Forbes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, National Laser Centre, Building 46, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria 0001, Gauteng, South Africa;2. School of Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa;1. Institute of Chemistry, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel;2. The Unit for Nanoscopic Characterization, the Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel;1. School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China;2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China;1. Department of Physics, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand;2. Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand;3. Department of Computer Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | Standard test results to quantify the instantaneous efficiency, η, of a glazed flat plate solar water heater are normally expressed in terms of a reduced temperature parameter, x, and global insolation, G, as η = η0 ? a1x ? a2Gx2. We show that the Hottel–Whillier–Bliss relation for the efficiency can be expressed in the same form with each of the coefficients η0, a1, and a2 in terms of algebraic expressions of standard mechanical, fluid and thermal parameters of a single glazed, finned heater, including the absorber plate absorptance, α, and thermal emittance, ε. The advantage of the derived expression is that the effect on the efficiency of changes in various heater parameters can be readily evaluated. Furthermore, it is shown that for selectivity α/ε > 2, each coefficient η0, a1, and a2 can be expressed as η0 = η0C ? εη0R, etc., in order to separate out the role of absorber radiation from other losses. This allows one to easily compare selective solar absorbers with different α and ε and, for example, to suggest an optimum coating thickness for thickness sensitive selective solar absorbers. In particular it can be seen that care should be taken in reducing ε at the expense of also reducing α in order to increase the selectivity, α/ε, since this will often be detrimental to the efficiency. The analytical expressions for η0, a1, and a2 can be easily programmed on a spreadsheet and, for convenience, are summarised in an appendix. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|