| Abstract: | Measurement of personal values in terms of money or utility can promote efficient public decisions about environmental and risk regulation, health care, and so forth. Current measures are subject to several biases. Quantitative judgments of value are often based on a concept of importance that ignores the quantity of the good being valued. They are sensitive to irrelevant factors, such as cost of the good (vs. its benefit) and whether it has been reduced by human action or nature. Some judgments are based on moral opinions about actions rather than on the value of consequences. Some of these problems seem solvable by methods that remove irrelevant information or force attention to relevant information. Other problems are less tractable. Their solution should be a high priority for research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
