首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《个人信息保护法(草案)》的立法评析与完善思考
引用本文:黄道丽,胡文华.《个人信息保护法(草案)》的立法评析与完善思考[J].信息安全与通信保密,2021(2):1-9.
作者姓名:黄道丽  胡文华
作者单位:公安部第三研究所
基金项目:2020基本科研业务费专项资金项目(C20251);2019年度公安理论及软科学研究计划(2019LLYJGASS048)。
摘    要:《个人信息保护法(草案)》吸收了近年来个人信息保护的国际经验以及国内《网络安全法》《民法典》等立法、标准和实践经验,既与国际接轨,又不乏中国特色.现有草案存在部分场景坚持"同意为王"的治理模式、缺乏对个人信息处理者"合法利益"的保障、未区分"去标识化"个人信息与一般个人信息处理规则等问题.在体系定位方面,正在制定中的个...

关 键 词:个人信息保护法  制度定位  体系定位  罚款标准  敏感个人信息  自动化决策

Legislative Analysis and Improvement of Personal Information Protection Law(Draft)
HUANG Daoli,HU Wenhua.Legislative Analysis and Improvement of Personal Information Protection Law(Draft)[J].China Information Security,2021(2):1-9.
Authors:HUANG Daoli  HU Wenhua
Affiliation:(The Third Research Institute of The Ministry of Public Security,Shanghai 201204,China)
Abstract:The personal information protection law(Draft)has absorbed the international experience in recent years,as well as domestic legislation experience,such as cybersecurity law and civil code and standards practical experience.It is not only in line with international standards,but also has Chinese characteristics.There are some problems in the current draft,such as adhering to the"consent is king"governance model in some scenarios,lack of protection for the"legitimate interests"of personal information processors,and failure to distinguish"de identification"personal information from general personal information processing rules.In terms of system positioning,the coordination between the personal information protection law and the basic laws is very important.In the aspect of revision and improvement of the draft,it is suggested to clarify the division of powers and responsibilities of the regulatory authorities and avoid multi-supervision;refine the fine standard to avoid excessive discretion of law enforcement bodies;the definition of sensitive personal information should be included in the dynamic evaluation factors;and the objective criteria should be adopted in the determination of significant impact of automated decision-making.
Keywords:Personal Information Protection Law  rule orientation  system orientation  penalty standard  personal sensitive information  automated decision making
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号