| 电热膜与地热采暖方式的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 路晓东,于辉,邵明.电热膜与地热采暖方式的对比[J].节能,2007,26(6):37-39. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 路晓东 于辉 邵明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大连理工大学,建筑与艺术学院,辽宁,大连,116023 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 大连理工大学校科研和教改项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 低温辐射电热膜供暖与低温地板辐射供暖是分户计量的两种主要形式。本文对二者各选择一个典型居室在两方面进行对比:24h的竖向温度场、相对湿度实测研究对比;一个采暖期的经济运行的实际测算对比。结论表明,目前二者各有利弊,而长远看低温地板辐射供暖将更有优势。
|
| 关 键 词： | 分户计量 电热膜 地热 对比 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-7948（2007）06-0037-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-11-08 |
The contrast of two heating technique with the mark of family measures |
| |
| LU Xiao-dong,YU Hui,SHAO Ming.The contrast of two heating technique with the mark of family measures[J].Energy Conservation,2007,26(6):37-39. |
| |
| Authors: | LU Xiao-dong YU Hui SHAO Ming |
| |
| Abstract: | The low temperature radiation electro thermal film and low temperature floor radiation is two kinds of main technique.Two typical rooms were chosen by the article,and contrast in two aspects:the 24 hours measurement of vertical temperature and relative humidity;economy calculate in a heating period.The conclusion indicates each technique has its advantages and disadvantages,while low temperature floor radiation will have advantage in the future. |
| |
| Keywords: | the mark of family heating measures electro thermal film floor radiation contrast |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
