Aspects of decision support in water management--example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) II--improvement of management strategies |
| |
Authors: | Simon Ute Brüggemann Rainer Pudenz Stefan |
| |
Affiliation: | Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, D-12587 Berlin, Germany. simon@igb-berlin.de |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Methods related to partial order theory such as the Hasse diagram technique (HDT) are increasingly used in the field of multi-criteria decision support. The HDT has the advantage of being a transparent evaluation tool, supported by several data analysis tools such as the concept of antagonistic indicators. However, the evaluation usually does not lead to a clear decision, because more than one possible solution is offered. In the example presented here, three of the nine water management strategies (scenarios) evaluated by HDT were identified as winners. However, these strategies were not comparable with each other because of the conflicting evaluation of at least two different indicators. Such antagonisms describe the advantage and disadvantage of each scenario. Based on this background information, a new innovative approach is demonstrated, enabling the stakeholders to design new, modified management strategies, with reduced negative effects. After improvement of the three potential solutions, one clear winner scenario could be identified. |
| |
Keywords: | Water management Evaluation Multicriteria decision aid Decision support systems Ecology Improvement of management strategies Hasse diagram technique |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|