| Abstract: | ![]()
The main objective of the study was to develop systematic methods for improving CAL materials by comparing the five coursewares which were produced by independent authors and related to high school mathematics, science and engineering. Various kinds of evaluation were undertaken before, immediately before, during and immediately after CAL implementation; e.g. evaluators check on the drafts for courseware; evaluators check on the problems encountered in each frame while studying at the terminals; the readiness, pre- and post-tests; an anxiety scale; questionnaires for assessing any difficulties with learning in each chapter and each course; the course test; an image scale, an attitude scale and a line-connecting type of content analysis. Each courseware was evaluated and compared with others on the basis of the data analysis of tests and questionnaires as well as the learning history records, e.g., total learning duration, total number of passed frames, frequency of use of function keys, actual transitive path graph, actual average branch ratio, relative entropy in each frame and the index of educational effectiveness. A number of important evaluation items were selected by factor analysis. Finally an evaluation package instrument for improving CAL courseware were developed. |
