"The psychiatrist and tests of criminal responsibility": Reply to Eckhardt.

Replies to comments by W. Eckhardt (1964) that raise questions about R. Leifer's (1964) article on psychiatrists and tests of criminal responsibility. Leifer reiterates that psychiatric and psychological experts function as linguistic arbiters who attempt to extricate the courts from the enigma of ambiguous tests of criminal responsibility. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)