首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico
Authors:Carlos A. Garcí  a,Alfredo Fuentes,Anna Hennecke,Enrique Riegelhaupt,Fabio Manzini,Omar Masera
Affiliation:1. Posgrado en Ingeniería (Energía), Centro de Investigación en Energía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Privada Xochicalco S/N, Colonia Centro, Temixco, Morelos 62580, Mexico;2. Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro No. 8701 Colonia Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, 58190 Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico;3. IFEU Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Heidelberg GmbH, Wilckensstr. 3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;4. Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany;5. Red Mexicana de Bioenergía A.C. Av. San José del Cerrito, 400-51 Col. El Pueblito CP 58341 Morelia, Mich., Mexico;6. Centro de Investigación en Energía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Privada Xochicalco S/N, Colonia Centro, Temixco, Morelos 62580, Mexico;g Posgrado en Ingeniería (Energía), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxic, Av. Universidad No. 3000. 04510, Mexico D.F.
Abstract:
The purpose of this work was to estimate GHG emissions and energy balances for the future expansion of sugarcane ethanol fuel production in Mexico with one current and four possible future modalities. We used the life cycle methodology that is recommended by the European Renewable Energy Directive (RED), which distinguished the following five system phases: direct Land Use Change (LUC); crop production; biomass transport to industry; industrial processing; and ethanol transport to admixture plants. Key variables affecting total GHG emissions and fossil energy used in ethanol production were LUC emissions, crop fertilization rates, the proportion of sugarcane areas that are burned to facilitate harvest, fossil fuels used in the industrial phase, and the method for allocation of emissions to co-products. The lower emissions and higher energy ratios that were observed in the present Brazilian case were mainly due to the lesser amount of fertilizers applied, also were due to the shorter distance of sugarcane transport, and to the smaller proportion of sugarcane areas that were burned to facilitate manual harvest. The resulting modality with the lowest emissions of equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2e) was ethanol produced from direct juice and generating surplus electricity with 36.8 kgCO2e/GJethanol. This was achieved using bagasse as the only fuel source to satisfy industrial phase needs for electricity and steam. Mexican emissions were higher than those calculated for Brazil (27.5 kgCO2e/GJethanol) among all modalities. The Mexican modality with the highest ratio of renewable/fossil energy was also ethanol from sugarcane juice generating surplus electricity with 4.8 GJethanol/GJfossil.
Keywords:Sugarcane ethanol   GHG emissions   Energy balance   Life cycle assessment   Biofuel
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号