The relationship between centrality and land use patterns: Empirical evidence from five Chinese metropolises |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;2. School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;3. Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Guangzhou 510275, China;4. Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, Guangzhou 510275, China;1. Behavioural Epidemiology Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia;2. McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia;3. Spatial Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research & School of Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia;4. Murdoch Children''s Research Institute, Royal Children''s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;5. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children''s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia;6. School of Population Health, the University of Queensland, Australia;7. School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne University, Australia;8. Department of Medicine, Monash University, Australia;1. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, 1 Create Way, Singapore;2. Department of Land-Surveying and Geo-Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong;3. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Spatial Information Smart Sensing and Services, School of Architecture and Urban Planning & Research Institute for Smart Cities, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China;4. Senseable City Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;2. Research Institute for Smart Cities, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China;1. College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058 Zhejiang Province, PR China;2. Department of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 117566, Singapore;3. College of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China;4. Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The relationship between location and land use patterns is one of the classic theoretical issues in urban studies. Classic models based on the monocentricity hypothesis have limitations in the interpretation of modern urban structure. China has experienced institutional transformation in recent decades, and the interaction of national government policy, market forces and the natural environment has influenced urban planning in Chinese metropolises, resulting in urban structures with special characteristics. This paper examines the distribution of location and land use intensity, and tested the Alonso model by the relationship between them in five Chinese metropolises using Point of Interest data, space syntax methodology, the grid weighted statistical method and the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. Universal patterns about the scaling relation between intensity of land use types and the centrality of location are revealed. The elasticity of land use types to location, from high to low sensitivity, is commercial, residential then industrial land in most of the five metropolises studied. The sensitivity sequence of land use studied suggests that the hypothetical model based on the classical Alonso model can explain the spatial structure of modern metropolises in China to some extent, especially for the commercial land. But the order of sensitivity of residential land and industrial land to location does not conform to the model. The spatial heterogeneity in land use intensity and centrality were explored and the factors embedded were discussed. It can be found that the relation between centrality and land use intensity conforms to power law. In most of the metropolises studied, when the scaling relation between land use intensity and centrality is super linear, the sequence of the frequency value from high to low are commercial, residential and industrial land; when the scaling relation is sublinear, the sequence of the frequency value is industrial, residential and commercial land. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
