首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A study on the formation of a measurement scale for the environmental quality of Taiwan’s long-term care institutions by the Delphi method
Authors:Yen Ping Hsieh  Yen Wen Hsieh  Chia Ching Lin  Chien Wen Yeh  Sing Chiao Chang
Affiliation:1. Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
2. Department of Applied Japanese Language, Kainan University, No.1 Kainan Road, Luzhu Shiang, Taoyuan, 33857, Taiwan
3. Asia University, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
Abstract:This study used a two-round modified Delphi technique with a questionnaire survey in order to reach a consensus for the questionnaire; the survey was conducted from September to December 2009. The six indicators for the environmental quality of long-term care institutions in Taiwan are (1) indoor environmental quality, (2) safety equipment for the prevention and management of disasters occurring in residents?? daily lives, (3) provision for assistive devices for residents?? daily use, (4) provision for privacy and individualized space, (5) provision for comfortable and decorated indoor environments, and (6) provision for social interaction space. The scale included 34 items with an acceptable number of panel members and acceptable construct validity. Panel members all highly approved of Indicators 1, 2, and 6. Although they approved of Indicator 3, they suggested that caregivers at institutions should replace the functions of living assistive devices. They approved of Indicator 5; however, they questioned the method for providing comfortable and decorated environments. They approved of Indicator 4; however, they suggested that private space need not be provided in the living room of the institution. In terms of long-term care institution environments in Taiwan, Indicators 1, 2, and 6 were important for protecting residents?? physical and psychological well-being and improving their social interactions. Indicator 3, although important, could be directly replaced by caregivers. Indicator 5 required more implementation methods, while Indicator 4, the living room of the institution, was considered unnecessary.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号