首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同蛋白质包埋壁材对益生菌在人体模拟胃液中的保护效果
引用本文:邹强,袁鹏,刘小鸣,赵建新,田丰伟,张灏,陈卫.不同蛋白质包埋壁材对益生菌在人体模拟胃液中的保护效果[J].食品工业科技,2012,33(13):60-63.
作者姓名:邹强  袁鹏  刘小鸣  赵建新  田丰伟  张灏  陈卫
作者单位:江南大学食品学院,食品科学与技术国家重点实验室,无锡江苏214122
基金项目:国家科技部863计划(2010AA10091,2011AA100902)
摘    要:为了提高益生菌在人体胃液中的存活率,本研究以大豆蛋白(SPI)、乳清蛋白(WPI)、酪蛋白(Casein)、明胶(Gelatin)为壁材,采用转谷氨酰胺酶交联的乳化凝胶方法,将Lactobacillus gasseri和Bifidobacterium bifidum包埋于蛋白质胶囊中,通过测定这两种益生菌在人体模拟胃液中的存活率,结果表明:相比于未经过包埋处理的细胞,包埋于蛋白质微胶囊中的细胞具有较高的存活率,并且还发现大豆蛋白微胶囊对菌的保护效果最好,明胶微胶囊最差。对于Lactobacillus gasseri,在加和未加胃蛋白酶的模拟胃液中,菌在这四种蛋白质微胶囊中的D值分别为:73.1、59.7、63.9、47.3min及246.6、240.5、220.0、90.2min。对于Bifidobacterium bifidum,在加和未加胃蛋白酶的模拟胃液中,菌在这四种蛋白质微胶囊中的D值分别为:31.7、24.2、22.7、18.7min和124.3、103.5、97.6、47.8min。除此之外,还比较了蛋白质的四种理化特性(乳化能力,凝胶强度,乳化稳定性、渗透性),其结果:乳化能力大小为SPI>Casein>WPI>Gelatin,凝胶强度大小为Gelatin>SPI>Casein>WPI,模拟胃液的渗透性大小为Gelatin>SPI=Casein>WPI,缓冲能力大小为Casein>WPI=SPI>Gelatin。通过上述结果可以推测蛋白质的缓冲能力与保护效果有很大的相关性,但缓冲能力并不是唯一决定因素,蛋白质其它的理化性质都有可能影响其保护效果。

关 键 词:益生菌  蛋白质微胶囊  包埋  模拟胃液

Protective effect of various protein as coating material on survival of probiotics in simulated gastric juice
ZOU Qiang,YUAN Peng,LIU Xiao-ming,ZHAO Jian-xin,TIAN Feng-wei,ZHANG Hao,CHEN Wei.Protective effect of various protein as coating material on survival of probiotics in simulated gastric juice[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2012,33(13):60-63.
Authors:ZOU Qiang  YUAN Peng  LIU Xiao-ming  ZHAO Jian-xin  TIAN Feng-wei  ZHANG Hao  CHEN Wei
Affiliation:*(National Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology,School of Food Science and Technology,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,China)
Abstract:The probiotics,Lactobacillus gasseri and Bifidobacterium bifidum were encapsulated into microcapsules with four types of protein-based coating material,such as soy protein isolation(SPI),whey protein isolation(WPI),sodium caseinate(Casein),gelatin(Gelatin) through transglutaminase-induced emusification/gelation method.The survivability of microencapsulated cells in the four protein-based microcapsules was conducted in simulated gastric juice(SGJ) with or without pepsin.SPI-based microcapsules provided the best protection for microencapsulated cells in all treatments.As for Lactobacillus gasseri,in SGJ with pepsin,the D-value of encapsulated cells in these four protein-based microcapsules were 73.1,59.7,63.9,47.3min,respectively;in SGJ without pepsin,the D-value of encapsulated cells were 246.6,240.5,220.0,90.2min,respectively.As for Bifidobacterium bifidum,in SGJ with or without pepsin,the the D-value of encapsulated cells in these four protein-based microcapsules were 31.7,24.2,22.7,18.7min and 124.3,103.5,97.6,47.8min,respectively.Additionally,some physical properties of these proteins for difference in protective effect on encapsulated cells in SGJ without pepsin were aslo investigated.The result showed that emulsion stability was SPI>Casein>WPI> Gelatin;gel strength was Gelatin>SPI>Casein>WPI;permeability to SGJ was Gelatin>SPI=Casein>WPI;buffer capacity was Casein>WPI=SPI>Gelatin.It could be deduced that buffer capacity had great influence on the protective effect in low pH condtion,other potential reasons for difference in the protective effect include difference in permeability of protein gels,emulsion stability and gel strength can also affect the protective effect.
Keywords:probiotics  protein-based microcapsules  microencapsulation  simulated gastric juice
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号