首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

水下重锤夯击能及夯击效果试验研究
引用本文:刘苏乐,石崇,梁邦炎.水下重锤夯击能及夯击效果试验研究[J].河北工程大学学报,2016,33(3):57-62,66.
作者姓名:刘苏乐  石崇  梁邦炎
作者单位:河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210098;河海大学 岩土工程科 学研究所, 江苏 南京 210098;河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210098;河海大学 岩土工程科 学研究所, 江苏 南京 210098;中交第四航务工程局有限公司, 广东 广州 510000
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2015CB057903);国家自然科学基金青年项目(51309089);江苏省基础研究计划(自然科学基金)(BK20130846)
摘    要:重锤夯实是水下抛石基床密实工艺中的重要方法。根据流体动力学,本文建立夯锤在水中运动的计算模型,然后通过室内缩比尺试验,得到了夯锤水下绕流阻力系数经验取值;最后探讨了不同夯锤几何、不同落距对夯实效果的影响。结果表明:圆台型夯锤与圆柱形夯锤相比,由于有倒角,在水中的绕流阻力系数可以小至1.0;同一夯击能作用下不同锤型对抛石基床的夯实效果相差在5%之内;同一夯锤不同落距作用下,落距越大,抛石基床沉降量越大,夯击应力越大,但抛石基床沉降率存在一个极限值。

关 键 词:夯锤  绕流阻力系数  水下抛石基床  有效夯击能
收稿时间:2016/5/12 0:00:00

Water hammer tamping energy and the experimental study on compaction effect
Authors:LIU Sule  SHI Chong and LIANG Bangyan
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China;Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China;Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China;Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China;CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd3, Guangzhou 510000, China
Abstract:Heavy tamping method is a kind of important method of rubble bed tamping in the construction, the heavy hammer tamping energy is an important indicator of impact compaction hammer effect, the hammer tamping energy can be influenced by hammer type, flow resistence, drop distance and other effects. Therefore, on the basis of fluid dynamics. First of all, establish the calculation model of the hammer in water movement, analyse the hammer flow resistance in the process of hammer in water movement, and then through the indoor shrinkage scale test, analyse the water movement law of the cylindrical and cone hammer,obtain the experiential tamping hammer water flow coefficient value. Finally, analyse of the different geometric rammer, different distance to the effect of compaction effect. The results show that a cone type tamping hammer and cylindrical rammer compared. Because of the chamfer of a cone type hammmer, flow resistence coefficient is smaller in water and the value is about 1.0. under the action of the same tamping energy, different types of hammer has difference in 5% on the rubble mound foundation compaction effect.with a hammer in different falling distance, the greater the falling distance is,the greater the amount of settlement of riprap foundation bed is, the bigger the compaction stress is. but rubble mound foundation settlement has a limit value. The research results can provide reference for the selection of hammer shape under the process of compaction.
Keywords:rammer  flow resistance coefficient  underwater rubble bed  effective hammering energy
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《河北工程大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《河北工程大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号