首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

土党参多糖不同提取方法的比较研究
引用本文:吴兰芳,景永帅,张振东,杨娟.土党参多糖不同提取方法的比较研究[J].食品科学,2012,33(18):45-48.
作者姓名:吴兰芳  景永帅  张振东  杨娟
作者单位:贵州省、中国科学院天然产物化学重点实验室
基金项目:贵州省中药现代化科技产业研究开发专项(黔科合社字[2009]5017号)
摘    要:目的:比较3种提取方法对土党参原料多糖提取率的影响。方法:以土党参多糖提取率为考察指标,对热水浸提、超声波以及微波辅助3种提取方法进行均匀优化试验设计,对多糖提取率进行二次多项式逐步回归分析。结果:热水浸提法的优化条件为液料比25:1(mL/g)、温度70℃、提取时间60min,提取率28.05%;超声波提取法的优化条件为液料比50:1、功率210W、提取时间40min,提取率28.12%;微波法提取的优化条件为液料比15:1、功率900W、提取时间5min,提取率28.99%。结论:3种提取方法对多糖提取率影响差异不明显,但超声波和微波辅助提取较热水浸提具有省时的优点。

关 键 词:土党参  多糖  热水浸提  超声波  微波  均匀设计  
收稿时间:2011-07-07

A Comparative Study of Different Extraction Methods for Polysaccharides from Campanumoea javanica Roots
WU Lan-fang,JING Yong-shuai,ZHANG Zhen-dong,YANG Juan.A Comparative Study of Different Extraction Methods for Polysaccharides from Campanumoea javanica Roots[J].Food Science,2012,33(18):45-48.
Authors:WU Lan-fang  JING Yong-shuai  ZHANG Zhen-dong  YANG Juan
Affiliation:(The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guiyang 550002,China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare the extraction efficiencies of polysaccharides from Campanumoea javanica roots by different extraction methods. Methods: Three different extraction methods were optimized by uniform design combined with second-order polynomial regression analysis for enhanced extraction efficiency. Results: The optimal hot water extraction conditions were material-to-liquid ratio of 1:25 (g/mL), extraction temperature of 70 ℃ and extraction time of 60 min. Under these conditions, the maximum yield of polysaccharides was 28.05%. The optimal ultrasonic-assisted extraction conditions were material-to-liquid ratio of 1:50 (g/mL), ultrasonic power of 210 W and extraction time of 40 min. Under these conditions, the maximum yield of polysaccharides was 28.12%. The optimal microwave-assisted extraction conditions were material-to-liquid ratio of 1:15 (g/mL), microwave power of 900 W and extraction time of 5 min. Under these conditions, the maximum yield of polysaccharides was 28.99%. Conclusion: No significant difference was observed among three extraction methods. However, ultrasonic-assisted extraction and microwave-assisted extraction have a time-saving advantage over hot water extraction.
Keywords:Campanumoea javanica  polysaccharide  hot water extraction  ultrasound-assisted extraction  microwave-assisted extraction  uniform design  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《食品科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号