Beyond interpretation: Reply to Cummins' response |
| |
| Authors: | Michael Morris |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1) School of English and American Studies, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QN Brighton, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | In his response to my  Why There Are No Mental Representations , Robert Cummins accused me of having misinterpreted his views, and attempted to undermine a crucial premise of my argument, which claimed that one could only define a semantic type non-semantically by stipulating which tokens should receive a uniform interpretation. I respond to the charge and defend the premise. |
| |
| Keywords: | Mental representation formal condition determinate content intentionality interpretation cognition |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
