Affiliation: | Entomology Branch, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia |
Abstract: | ![]() The activity of fresh deposits of methoprene, fenoxycarb and diflubenzuron against F1 progeny of Rhyzopertha dominica on maize and paddy was compared with that on wheat, at two equilibrium relative humidities. There were differences between slopes of log concentration-probit (lc-p) lines for different compounds, and for the same compound on different grains. Judging by values of the IC99.9, i.e. the concentration which inhibited progeny production by 99.9%, the order of activity against F1 progeny on different grains was: methoprene, wheat and paddy > maize; fenoxycarb, wheat > paddy > maize; diflubenzuron, wheat and maize > paddy. Equilibrium relative humidity (e.r.h.) had no consistent effect on activity—at 90% e.r.h., the IC50 of fenoxycarb on wheat was reduced and the IC50 of diflubenzuron on maize was increased compared with 70% e.r.h., and other treatments were unaffected.The efficacy of these compounds on maize and paddy against F1 and F2 progeny was evaluated during 48 weeks storage at 30°C, 70% r.h. The resolved S isomer of methoprene was also included. Slopes of lc-p lines were greater against the F2 than against the F1, particularly using diflubenzuron on paddy, with corresponding smaller values of the IC99.9. Equally effective concentrations did not decline systematically over 48 weeks. Minimum effective application rates were judged as the concentrations that prevented living F2 progeny in at least 2 of 3 replicates. Estimates for 48 weeks protection on maize were: methoprene, 2 mg kg−1; S-methoprene, 1 mg kg−1; fenoxycarb, 10 mg kg−1; and diflubenzuron, 5 mg kg−1. Corresponding estimates on paddy were 0.15 mg kg−1, 0.05 mg kg−1, 5 mg kg−1, and 5 mg kg−1. |