首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同酒帽管理方式对干红葡萄酒理化指标和感官质量的影响
引用本文:丁康仪,魏夕卜,司雨璇,王佳敏,宋育阳,秦义,刘延琳,姜娇.不同酒帽管理方式对干红葡萄酒理化指标和感官质量的影响[J].中国酿造,2021,40(9):159.
作者姓名:丁康仪  魏夕卜  司雨璇  王佳敏  宋育阳  秦义  刘延琳  姜娇
作者单位:(1.西北农林科技大学 葡萄酒学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;2.陕西省葡萄与葡萄酒工程技术研究中心,陕西 杨凌 712100;3.西北农林科技大学 合阳葡萄试验示范站,陕西 合阳 715300)
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFD1002500);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2021JQ-136);西北农林科技大学博士科研启动费(Z1090219008);西北农林科技大学试验示范站(基地)科技成果推广项目(TGZX2019-27);国家级大学生创新项目(S202010712035) 作者简介:丁康仪(2000-),女,本科生,研究方向为酿酒微生物。
摘    要:以赤霞珠、梅洛为原料制备干红葡萄酒,探究带皮发酵期间压帽法和浸入法两种不同的酒帽管理方式对葡萄酒发酵和其基础理化指标、感官质量的影响。结果表明,采用压帽法、浸入法的组别发酵速率存在差异,发酵终产物总酚含量分别为641.17~836.17 g/L、722.00~883.67 g/L,总花色苷含量分别为130.98~210.70 g/L、172.72~259.45 g/L,b*值(黄化程度)分别为27.52~35.78、35.23~36.77。对于梅洛葡萄酒,浸入法在发酵中后期对提升酒中总酚、总花色苷含量方面发挥重要作用,但这一优势在赤霞珠葡萄浸渍过程中并不明显。感官评价结果表明,浸入法可显著提升赤霞珠葡萄酒口感复杂度和梅洛葡萄酒余味持久度。

关 键 词:干红葡萄酒  酒帽管理  花色苷  CIELab颜色参数  

Effect of different cap management methods on the physicochemical indexes and sensory quality of dry red wine
DING Kangyi,WEI Xibu,SI Yuxuan,WANG Jiamin,SONG Yuyang,QIN Yi,LIU Yanlin,JIANG Jiao.Effect of different cap management methods on the physicochemical indexes and sensory quality of dry red wine[J].China Brewing,2021,40(9):159.
Authors:DING Kangyi  WEI Xibu  SI Yuxuan  WANG Jiamin  SONG Yuyang  QIN Yi  LIU Yanlin  JIANG Jiao
Affiliation:(1.College of Enology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 2.Shaanxi Grape and Wine Engineering Technology Research Center, Yangling 712100, China; 3.Heyang Grape Experimental Demonstration Station, Northwest A&F University, Heyang 715300, China)
Abstract:Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot were used to prepared of dry red wine, the effects of different cap management methods including punch down method and submerged method on wines during fermentation with peel and its basic physical and chemical indexes and sensory quality were explored. The results showed that there were differences in the fermentation rate between punch down method and submerged method. The total phenol content of the wine was 641.17- 836.17 g/L and 722.00-883.67 g/L, respectively, the total anthocyanin content was 130.98-210.70 g/L and 172.72-259.45 g/L, respectively, and the b* value (yellowness) was 27.52-35.78 and 35.23-36.77, respectively. For Merlot wines, the submerged method was advantageous in enhancing the total phenol and total anthocyanin content of the wine in the middle and late stages of fermentation, but the advantage was not evident during the impregnation of Cabernet Sauvignon. The sensory evaluation showed that the submerged method could significantly enhance the taste complexity of Cabernet Sauvignon wines and aftertaste persistence of Merlot wines.
Keywords:dry red wine  cap management  anthocyanin  CIELab colour parameter  
点击此处可从《中国酿造》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国酿造》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号