首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

有机物污染场地浅层异位固化稳定化试验研究
引用本文:夏威夷,魏明俐,杜延军,于博伟,宋德君.有机物污染场地浅层异位固化稳定化试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2016,38(3):510-517.
作者姓名:夏威夷  魏明俐  杜延军  于博伟  宋德君
作者单位:1. 东南大学交通学院岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210096;2. 江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室,江苏 南京 210096;3. 江苏圣泰环境科技股份有限公司,江苏 南京 210007
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41330641); 国家自然科学基金项目(51278100,41472258); 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2012022); 国家高技术研究发展计划("863"计划)项目(2013AA06A206)
摘    要:以某化工企业有机物污染浅层土为对象,应用4种固化药剂进行固化稳定化修复对比研究。通过现场异位固化稳定化结合室内无侧限抗压强度、毒性浸出等试验,讨论了固化剂组份、龄期对其物理力学性质和浸出特性影响,并对比分析了其固化稳定化效果及机理。结果表明:随着养护时间增长,修复土p H值、毒性浸出溶液的有机物浓度降低,其中pH值由0 d的12.76~13.11降至28 d时的12.11~12.69,而有机物浸出浓度14d降幅在65%~100%间;干密度及无侧限抗压强度qu则稳步提高,其中干密度28 d增幅达14.4%~23.2%,而强度最大增加到122 k Pa。固化剂3和4修复污染土干密度较大,28 d密度超过1.37 g/cm~3,密实作用明显;添加固化剂会立即显著增大污染土pH值,其中固化剂4(电石渣+凹凸棒土)各龄期pH值明显大于其他剂型;各固化剂对不同有机污染物的稳定效果有所差别,但均能有效固化稳定化苯胺、2-氯酚、萘、苯、甲苯、邻-二甲苯;就污染物总体固化稳定化效果而言,含活性炭组分的固化剂1效果最为突出,其总稳定率接近100%;含水泥组分的固化剂2,3对土体的增强作用较好,其28 d强度可达109 k Pa以上。相较其他药剂,固化剂4在成本、能耗及污染物排放方面表现最优,且能较好满足场地修复对有机物稳定率及强度的要求,综合效果最佳,为优选的最佳剂型。

关 键 词:有机物污染  粉土质砂土  固化稳定化  毒性浸出  强度  
收稿时间:2014-12-21

Experimental study on ex-situ S/S for shallow soil of organically contaminated site
XIA Wei-yi,WEI Ming-li,DU Yan-jun,YU Bo-wei,SONG De-jun.Experimental study on ex-situ S/S for shallow soil of organically contaminated site[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2016,38(3):510-517.
Authors:XIA Wei-yi  WEI Ming-li  DU Yan-jun  YU Bo-wei  SONG De-jun
Affiliation:1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering & Environmental Safety (Southeast University), Nanjing 210096, China;3. Jiangsu Sentay Environmental Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210007, China
Abstract:4 kinds of binders are utilized to remedy the organically contaminated soil. The effects of curing age and binder type on physico-mechanical and environmental safety properties of the stabilized soils as well as the remediation efficiencies and mechanisms are studied by analyzing the results of ex-situ S/S and laboratory tests, such as unconfined compression strength tests and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure. The results show that with the increasing age, pH of soil and organic concentrations of leachate decrease while the dry densities and qu increase steadily. The dry densities of soil remedied by binders No. 3 and No. 4 are higher than those by other binders and over 1.38 g/cm3 after 28 days. The pH values of soil greatly increase with the addition of binders and are the highest for binder No. 4 (calcium carbide residue + attapulgite). 4 kinds of binders have different remediation effects on organic contaminants owing to different organic types, and they all have high removal efficiencies for aniline, 2-chlorophenol, naphthalene, benzene, methylbenzene and o-Xylene. In point of the overall effectiveness, activated carbon-based binder No. 1 is the best because its total removal efficiency approaches 93%. The qu of soils stabilized by cement-based binders No. 2 and No. 3 is higher than that of other binders and over 109 kPa after 28 days. Binder No. 4 is optimum for the re-use of organically contaminated soil because of its low cost, low energy consumption, low pollutant emission, high qu and total removal efficiency.
Keywords:organic contaminant  silty sand  solidification/stabilization  toxicity characteristic leaching procedure  strength  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩土工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩土工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号