首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science
Authors:Dominique Valentin  Sylvie Chollet  Maud Lelièvre  Hervé Abdi
Affiliation:1. UMR CSGA 6265 CNRS, Inra, Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France;2. Institut Supérieur d’Agriculture, 59046 Lille Cedex, France;3. The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083‐0688, USA
Abstract:For food scientists and industrials, descriptive profiling is an essential tool that involves the evaluation of both the qualitative and quantitative sensory characteristics of a product by a panel. Recently, in response to industrial demands to develop faster and more cost‐effective methods of descriptive analysis, several methods have been offered as alternatives to conventional profiling. These methods can be classified in three families: (i) verbal‐based methods (flash profile and check‐all‐that‐apply), (ii) similarity‐based methods (free sorting task and projective mapping aka Napping®) and (iii) reference‐based methods (polarised sensory positioning and pivot profile). We successively present these three classes of methods in terms of origin, principles, statistical analysis, applications to food products, variations of the methods and the Pros and Cons.
Keywords:Check‐all‐that‐apply  consumer research  descriptive methods  flash profile  pivot profile  polarised sensory positioning  projective mapping  sensory characterisation  sensory evaluation  sorting task
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号