Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science |
| |
Authors: | Dominique Valentin Sylvie Chollet Maud Lelièvre Hervé Abdi |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. UMR CSGA 6265 CNRS, Inra, Université de Bourgogne, 21000 Dijon, France;2. Institut Supérieur d’Agriculture, 59046 Lille Cedex, France;3. The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083‐0688, USA |
| |
Abstract: | For food scientists and industrials, descriptive profiling is an essential tool that involves the evaluation of both the qualitative and quantitative sensory characteristics of a product by a panel. Recently, in response to industrial demands to develop faster and more cost‐effective methods of descriptive analysis, several methods have been offered as alternatives to conventional profiling. These methods can be classified in three families: (i) verbal‐based methods (flash profile and check‐all‐that‐apply), (ii) similarity‐based methods (free sorting task and projective mapping aka Napping®) and (iii) reference‐based methods (polarised sensory positioning and pivot profile). We successively present these three classes of methods in terms of origin, principles, statistical analysis, applications to food products, variations of the methods and the Pros and Cons. |
| |
Keywords: | Check‐all‐that‐apply consumer research descriptive methods flash profile pivot profile polarised sensory positioning projective mapping sensory characterisation sensory evaluation sorting task |
|
|