首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

QP980板材边缘开裂的实验研究和数值模拟
引用本文:代恩凯,吕志亲,袁盼盼,刘国强,郭宁,刘哲,唐炳涛.QP980板材边缘开裂的实验研究和数值模拟[J].精密成形工程,2023,15(6):94-102.
作者姓名:代恩凯  吕志亲  袁盼盼  刘国强  郭宁  刘哲  唐炳涛
作者单位:齐鲁工业大学山东省科学院 机械工程学院,济南 250353;山东省机械设计研究院,济南 250031;金雷科技股份公司,济南 271105
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52275344);山东省自然科学基金重点项目(ZR2020KE021);泰山产业领军人才工程蓝色人才专项(TSLS20221101)
摘    要:目的 冲裁加工后的第3代先进高强钢QP980板材在成形中会因边缘开裂而显著影响汽车结构件安全性,针对这一问题,对QP980板材边缘开裂行为进行研究。方法 使用QP980板材通过钻孔和冲孔2种方法制备不同边缘状态的试样,并进行扩孔和中心孔拉伸试验。分析不同边缘状态试样的扩孔率和断裂应变演化规律。采用DF2015断裂模型对QP980板材的韧性断裂行为进行预测。结果 钻孔试样的扩孔率约为33%,冲孔试样的扩孔率约为24%。与钻孔试样的试验结果相比,DF2015断裂模型的模拟结果显示出了良好的预测性,但DF2015断裂模型无法准确预测冲孔试样的载荷–位移响应、扩孔率和断裂应变。结论 不同的预加工工艺导致QP980板材表现出不同的边缘开裂行为。中心孔拉伸试验结果与扩孔试验结果趋势一致,因此中心孔拉伸试验是研究边缘开裂的良好方法。钻孔预加工工艺可以保持板材的原始性能,而冲裁预加工工艺会导致板材边缘发生严重的预损伤。由于DF2015断裂模型未考虑预损伤,因此无法准确预测冲孔试样的边缘开裂行为。

关 键 词:边缘开裂  扩孔试验  中心孔拉伸试验  有限元  预损伤

Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Edge Fracture of QP980 Steel Sheet
DAI En-kai,LYU Zhi-qin,YUAN Pan-pan,LIU Guo-qiang,GUO Ning,LIU Zhe,TANG Bing-tao.Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Edge Fracture of QP980 Steel Sheet[J].Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering,2023,15(6):94-102.
Authors:DAI En-kai  LYU Zhi-qin  YUAN Pan-pan  LIU Guo-qiang  GUO Ning  LIU Zhe  TANG Bing-tao
Affiliation:School of Mechanical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan 250353, China;Shandong Institute of Mechanical Design and Research, Jinan 250031, China;Jinlei Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 271105, China
Abstract:The work aims to study the edge fracture of QP980 steel sheet to solve the problem that the edge fracture of QP980 AHSS sheet during stamping significantly affects the safety of automotive structural components after blanking process. Two types of specimens with different edge conditions (drilled and punched) were prepared and subject to hole expansion and center hole tensile tests. The evolution of hole expansion ratio (HER) and fracture strain of specimens with different edge conditions was analyzed. The DF2015 fracture model was used to characterize the ductile fracture behavior of QP980 steel sheets. The HER was approximately 33% in the drilled specimens and approximately 24% in the punched specimens. Compared with the test results of drilled specimens, the simulation results of DF2015 fracture model showed good predictability, but the DF2015 fracture model could not accurately predict the load-displacement response, HER, and fracture strain of the punched specimens. Different pre-processing techniques result in different edge fracture behaviors in QP980 steel sheets. The center hole tensile test results show the same trend as the hole expansion test results. The center hole tensile test is a good alternative for studying edge fracture. The drilled pre-processing technique can maintain the actual properties of the sheet, while the punching process introduces severe pre-damage to the sheet edge. The DF2015 fracture model does not consider the pre-damage during the punching process, and therefore can not accurately predict the edge fracture behavior of the punched specimens.
Keywords:edge fracture  hole expansion test  center hole tensile test  finite element  pre-damage
点击此处可从《精密成形工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《精密成形工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号