首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

抗菌羽绒的短流程制备及其性能
引用本文:万颖萍,王宗乾,王英沣,杨海伟,吴开明,谢伟.抗菌羽绒的短流程制备及其性能[J].纺织学报,2023,44(1):149-155.
作者姓名:万颖萍  王宗乾  王英沣  杨海伟  吴开明  谢伟
作者单位:1.安徽工程大学 纺织服装学院, 安徽 芜湖 2410002.安徽古麒绒材股份有限公司, 安徽 芜湖 241008
基金项目:安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(202004a06020055);安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(2022a05020029);安徽省高校学科(专业)中青年拔尖人才学术资助项目(gxbjZD2020075);安徽省学术和技术带头人及后备人选学术科研活动资助项目(2020H218);芜湖市科技计划项目(2020yf14);安徽省博士后科研项目(2021A486);安徽高校研究生科学研究项目(YJS20210450)
摘    要:为降低抗菌羽绒制备中的原绒损耗,缩短工艺流程,将抗菌整理剂加入羽绒最后一道漂洗浴中,经振荡浸渍、离心脱水、烘干制得抗菌羽绒。借助扫描电镜、傅里叶红外光谱仪等对羽绒结构进行表征,通过平板菌落计数法测试羽绒的抗菌性能,同时分析此工艺对羽绒基础指标的影响。结果表明:采用短流程工艺制得的抗菌羽绒其形貌、蓬松度不受影响,抗菌剂填充并附着在绒丝纤维表面凹纹和菱节夹角处,对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌具有优异的抗菌性能,抑菌率达100.00%;经3次水洗,抗菌羽绒对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的抑菌率分别达到90.00%和66.18%,具有一定的耐水洗性能;短流程抗菌工艺降低了对原料绒的损伤,抗菌羽绒的清洁度、残脂率、耗氧量、气味并未发生明显变化。

关 键 词:羽绒  水洗  抗菌  短流程  抑菌率  蓬松度
收稿时间:2021-12-09

Short-process flow preparation and performance of antibacterial down
WAN Yingping,WANG Zongqian,WANG Yingfeng,YANG Haiwei,WU Kaiming,XIE Wei.Short-process flow preparation and performance of antibacterial down[J].Journal of Textile Research,2023,44(1):149-155.
Authors:WAN Yingping  WANG Zongqian  WANG Yingfeng  YANG Haiwei  WU Kaiming  XIE Wei
Affiliation:1. School of Textile and Garment, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China2. Anhui Guqi Down & Feather Textile Incorporated, Wuhu, Anhui 241008, China
Abstract:Objective Down has the characteristics of lightweight, high fluffiness and low thermal conductivity, resulting in excellent thermal insulation performance, and is widely used in cold-resistant textiles. However, it is eroded by exogenous contaminants, especially after absorbing sweat vapor emitted by the human body, causing the adhered bacteria to proliferate rapidly and develop odor which adversely affect the life quality and health. Research and treatment of down with antibacterial functions will greatly alleviate the bacterial breeding and associated problems of down products, and meet the market demand which is of great significance.Method In order to reduce the loss of down during down processing for antibacterial performance, antibacterial finishing agents were added in the final rinsing bath. After shocking, soaking, centrifuging and drying, the antibacterial down was obtained. The original and finished down were characterized with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy spectrometry (EDS), and Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FT-IR). The antibacterial properties of each sample were tested with the plate colony counting method, and the effect of quick antibacterial processing of down was evaluated simultaneously.Results In the experiment, the chemical structure of down before and after the antibacterial agent finishing were analyzed by FT-IR (Fig.2). The new characteristic absorption signal peak of the antibacterial down appeared at 1 468 and 1 086 cm-1, which was attributed the characteristic absorption of C-N+ groups in the molecular structure of the cationic quaternary ammonium salt antibacterial agent, indicating the antibacterial agent had been successfully attached to down after finishing. The micromorphologies of the down before and after antibacterial finishing were tested and characterized by SEM (Fig.1). The morphology and fluffiness of the antibacterial down were not affected by the quick processing, and the antibacterial agent was filled in and attached to the grooves and angles of the velvet fiber surface. The antibacterial performance test of down was carried out by the plate colony counting method (Fig.4). No strain appeared in the test surface dishes, and the bacteriostatic rate (BR) reached 100.00%, indicating that the antibacterial down had excellent antibacterial properties against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli). These results indicate sufficient amount of antibacterial agent were adhered to the down surface, showing a broad spectrum of antibacterial performance, which can efficiently sanitize gram-positive bacteria and negative bacteria (Tab.1). After 3 cycles of washing, the BR values of finished down against S. aureus and E. coli remained at 90.00% and 66.18% (Fig.5), respectively, suggesting high water resistance. The basic performance indicators before and after down antibacterial finishing were compared and analyzed, and the impact of the quick antibacterial processing on the fluffy quality of down was slight, and the cleanness, residual fat rate, oxygen consumption and odor of antibacterial down were not affected significantly (Fig.6, Tab.2).Conclusion The antibacterial finishing of down and the bath treatment of water washing have the advantage of quick process, and the new technology overcomes the shortcomings of dryness and fluffy, which hinders the applications in infiltration and functional finishing. The finishing process is quick, convenient and easy to operate, reducing the loss of raw lint during the preparation of antibacterial down. The antibacterial agent used in this research is an environmentally friendly functional finishing agent, and the down fiber after the antibacterial agent finishing has excellent antibacterial properties, which does not affect the quality of the down.
Keywords:down  washing  antibacterial  short-process flow processing  inhibition rate  fluffiness  
点击此处可从《纺织学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《纺织学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号