|
|||||
|
|
| 机载8设备实验室与现场使用可靠性差异分析和对策 | |
| 引用本文： | 田开让. 机载8设备实验室与现场使用可靠性差异分析和对策[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2001, 0(2): 25-29 |
| 作者姓名： | 田开让 |
| 作者单位： | 驻七六五厂军代室!陕西宝鸡721006 |
| 摘 要： | 空军的可靠性增长政策，使现役机载电子设备可靠性水平提高了一个数量级。然而，现场使用可靠性却远低于实验室的可靠性。原因是多方面的，列举了最为重要的6条，通过分析，提出了一些针对性的对策。 |
| 关 键 词： | 机载电子设备 可靠性差异 实验室 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-08-22 |
Analysis and Solution of the Reliability Difference Between Lab and Field Usage for Airborne Equipment |
|
| TIAN Kai-rang. Analysis and Solution of the Reliability Difference Between Lab and Field Usage for Airborne Equipment[J]. Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing, 2001, 0(2): 25-29 | |
| Authors: | TIAN Kai-rang |
| Affiliation: | TIAN Kai-rang |
| Abstract: | The reliability level of airborne electronic equipment in service was improved for an order of magnitude through the reliability growth strategy of the air force But the reliability of field usage was much lower than the lab reliability Six factors caused the phenomena were listed and the solution was suggested based on the analysis |
| Keywords: | airborne equipment reliability difference causes countermeasure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ | |