首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中欧规范关于基桩承载力确定方法的比较
引用本文:李元松,夏进,余顺新,邓涛.中欧规范关于基桩承载力确定方法的比较[J].武汉化工学院学报,2012(2):44-49.
作者姓名:李元松  夏进  余顺新  邓涛
作者单位:[1]武汉工程大学环境与城市建设学院,湖北武汉430074 [2]中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,湖北武汉430056
基金项目:国家自然科学基金助(51054005)
摘    要:介绍欧洲岩土工程设计规范的设计原理包括作用、效应、抗力与极限状态验算不等式,分析3种设计方法用于桩基设计分项系数的取值特点.以《建筑桩基技术规范》为例对比分析中欧岩土工程设计规范基桩承载力确定方法的异同点.3个实例表明欧洲规范确定基桩承载力与国内规范确定基桩承载力平均相差25%,国内规范更为保守.

关 键 词:中欧规范  岩土工程  基桩承载力  对比分析

Comparing methods of determining foundation pile bearing capacity in EN1997-1 with those in Chinese Geotechnical Design Code
LI Yuan-song,XIA Jin,YU Shun-xin,DENG Tao.Comparing methods of determining foundation pile bearing capacity in EN1997-1 with those in Chinese Geotechnical Design Code[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Chemical Technology,2012(2):44-49.
Authors:LI Yuan-song  XIA Jin  YU Shun-xin  DENG Tao
Affiliation:1.School of Environmental and Civil Engineering,Wuhan Institute of Technology,Wuhan 430074,China; 2.China Communication Construction Company Second Highway Consultants Co.Ltd,Wuhan 430056,China)
Abstract:The basic principle of the European geotechnical engineering design code,including the action,effect,resistance and limit state calculation inequality was introduced.The characteristics taking value of partial factors of three design approachs for pile foundation design were analyzed.Taking "Technical code for building pile foundations" as an example,the similarities and differences in determining pile bearing capacity of the China-Euro geotechnical design code were compared and analyzed.Study of three work examples illustrates the relative errors upto 25% among three kinds of design approaches of European standard and those of domestic design code.Domestic design code is more conservative.
Keywords:China-Eurocode  geotechnical  foundation pile bearing capacity  comparing analysis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号